CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01294592CONDUCTUpdated Aug 20, 2018Results posted

Comparative Efficacy of Dutasteride Plus Tamulosin With Lifestyle Advice Versus Watchful Waiting Plus Lifestyle Advice in the Management of Treatment naïve Men With Moderately Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Enlargement

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin and tamsulosin in Prostatic Hyperplasia, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 80 sites in 8 countries. Open to male participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-20.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
742
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Study FDC114615 is a two year, multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial to assess the efficacy of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin when compared to the standard practice of watchful waiting, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin in treatment naive men with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).

Once consented, each subject will undergo screening procedures to ensure the prostate volume and post void residual are within eligible range. If all entry criteria are met, subjects will be randomised (1:1) to receive Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice or watchful waiting, with lifestyle advice, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin. Escalation will be initiated when no improvement from baseline is scored using the International Prostate Symptom Score (version 2) (IPSS) questionnaire.

After randomisation, the subjects return to site at one month, then every 13 weeks until two years of treatment is complete or they are withdrawn. Key assessments, such as Adverse Events (AE's) and concomitant medication monitoring and completion of the quality of life questionnaires are performed at each visit and the data recorded.

Read the detailed description

This will be a European, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group study. The aim of the study is to investigate whether Dutasteride plus Tamulson treatment with lifestyle advice is more effective than watchful waiting treatment plus lifestyle advice plus step-up therapy with tamsulosin for improvement of symptoms and Acte Urinary Retention (AUR) and BPH-related prostatic surgery, in older men (≥50 yrs), with moderate symptoms of BPH (IPSS 8-19), enlarged prostates (≥30cc) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≥1.5ng/mL.

Data from all participating centres will be pooled prior to analysis. Investigative centres will be pooled a priori into clusters based on geographic location; these clusters may be used in analyses to adjust for site effects. Clusters will be defined once all investigative centres have been identified and randomisation has been completed.

Subjects will be screened for inclusion into the study and eligible subjects will be randomised by investigative centre. Subjects will be allocated to one of two treatment groups, according to a pre-determined randomisation schedule (in a 1:1 ratio):

  • Dutasteride plus tamsulosin once daily plus lifestyle advice.
  • Watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice. Escalation to tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily at any visit from Week 4 if any IPSS measurement shows no improvement or worsening from baseline. At any study visit, if the IPSS is the same or greater than the baseline value for that subject, tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily will be initiated. If tamsulosin is initiated, it will be continued for the remainder of the study unless the subject elects to withdraw from the study. Initiation of tamsulosin will be recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF.) Subjects will self-administer study medication once daily for up to 104 weeks, (up to 100 weeks for those on tamsulosin). Subjects will return to the clinic at 4 weeks post-randomisation and then at 13-week intervals post-randomisation during the 2-year treatment period (i.e. at 4, 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91 and 104 weeks) for the assessments listed as in Appendix 1 Time and Events Schedule.

Approximately 760, treatment naive men with symptomatic BPH will be randomised into the study in order to achieve at least 592 evaluable subjects. 380 into the Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice arm and 380 into the watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice arm.

Treatment naïve is defined as a man that has recently been diagnoses with BPH whom has received no prescribed therapeutic treatment. For example, medicines such as 5 α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) or invasive procedures such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) prescribed to directly treat the BPH symptoms are considered therapeutic treatments. As per the entry criteria, phytotherapy is allowed unless it was performed less than two weeks prior to the screening visit.

The anticipated recruitment period will be approximately 6 months. The study will be conducted in approximately 8 countries within Europe.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostatic Hyperplasia
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

783 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 174 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 742 is above the median of 97 across 593 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • Males aged ≥50 years.
  • A confirmed clinical diagnosis of BPH.
  • International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) 8-19 at Visit 1 (screening).
  • Prostate volume ≥30 cc (by transrectal ultrasonography; TRUS).
  • Total serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥1.5 ng/mL at Visit 1 (screening).
  • Willing and able to give signed written informed consent and comply with study procedures.
  • Fluent and literate in local language with the ability to read, comprehend and record information on the IPSS and BII questionnaires.
  • Able to swallow and retain oral medication.
  • Willing and able to participate in the study for the full 2 years.
  • Men with a female partner of childbearing potential must either agree to use effective contraception or have had a prior vasectomy. Contraception must be used from 2 weeks prior to administration of the first dose of study treatment until at least 5 half-lives for the drug plus 3 months to allow clearance of any altered sperm after the last dose of study treatment.
  • French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category.

Note: If total serum PSA is >4 ng/mL and unless PSA value has been stable for at least the past 2 years, the investigator should make every appropriate effort to exclude the possibility of prostate cancer, e.g. further Digital rectal examination (DRE), review TRUS taken within previous month, consider 8-12 core prostate biopsy in accordance with routine clinical practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:
  • Total serum PSA >10.0 ng/mL at Visit 1 (screening).
  • History or evidence of prostate cancer (e.g. positive biopsy or ultrasound within the previous 6 months, suspicious DRE and/or rising PSA).

Excluded medication and therapies Current or any prior use of the following prohibited medications

  • a 5α-reductase inhibitor (finasteride or dutasteride),
  • anti-cholinergics (e.g. oxybutynin, propantheline)
  • an alpha-adrenoreceptor blocker (i.e. indoramin, prazosin, terazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin and doxazosin) for BPH or Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
  • any drugs with anti-androgenic properties (e.g. spironolactone, flutamide, bicalutamide, cimetidine, ketoconazole, progestational agents) within the previous 6 months.
  • any drugs noted for gynaecomastia effects, or could affect prostate volume, within 6 months of the Visit 1
  • any investigational or marketed study drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, (whichever is longer), preceding the first dose of study treatment.

Current use of:

  • any alpha-adrenoreceptor blocker (i.e. indoramin, prazosin, terazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin and doxazosin)
  • anabolic steroids.
  • drugs known or thought to have an interaction with tamsulosin, e.g. cimetidine and warfarin.
  • Use of phytotherapy for BPH within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening) and/or predicted to need phytotherapy during the study.

Have a known (immediate or delayed) hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to the study medication or excipients that, in the opinion of the Investigator or GlaxoSmithKline contraindicates their participation.

Recent Medical Procedures

  • Previous prostatic surgery (including TURP, balloon dilatation, thermotherapy and stent replacement) or other invasive or minimally invasive procedures to treat BPH.
  • History of flexible/rigid cystoscopy or other instrumentation of the urethra within 7 days prior to Visit 1 (screening). Catheterisation (\<10F) is acceptable with no time restriction.

Medical history

  • History of AUR within 3 months prior to Visit 1 (screening).
  • Post-void residual volume >250 mL (suprapubic ultrasound) at Visit 1 (screening)..
  • Any causes other than BPH, which may in the judgement of the investigator, result in urinary symptoms or changes in flow rate (e.g. neurogenic bladder, bladder neck contracture, urethral stricture, bladder malignancy, acute or chronic prostatitis, or acute or chronic urinary tract infections).
  • History of 'first dose' hypotensive episode on initiation of alpha-1-adrenoreceptor antagonist therapy for hypertension.
  • History of postural hypotension, dizziness, vertigo or any other signs and symptoms of orthostasis, which in the opinion of the investigator could be exacerbated by tamsulosin and result in putting the subject at risk of injury.
  • History of breast cancer or clinical breast examination finding of unclear origin or suggestive of malignancy.
  • History of hepatic impairment or abnormal liver function tests at Visit 1 (screening). (defined as Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alkaline phosphatase >2 times the Upper limit of normal (ULN) , or total bilirubin >1.5 times the ULN, (unless associated with predominantly indirect bilirubin elevation or Gilbert's syndrome).
  • History of renal insufficiency, or serum creatinine >1.5 times the upper limit of normal at Visit 1 (screening)..
  • Prior history of malignancies (other than basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) within the past 5 years. Subjects who have had no evidence of the malignancy for ≥5 years are eligible.
  • History of any illness (including psychiatric) that in the opinion of the investigator might confound the results of the study or poses additional risk to the subject.
  • Any unstable, serious co-existing medical condition(s) including, but not limited to, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, unstable angina, cardiac arrhythmias, clinically evident congestive heart failure, or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to Screening visit; uncontrolled diabetes or peptic ulcer disease which is uncontrolled by medical management.
  • History or current evidence of drug or alcohol abuse within the previous 12 months.
  • Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric disorder or other conditions that could interfere with subject's safety, obtaining informed consent or compliance to the study procedures, in the opinion of the Investigator or GSK Medical Monitor.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
742 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Dutasteride plus tamsulosin

    Dutasteride plus tamsulosin arm + lifestyle advice

    Drug: Dutasteride plus tamsulosin

  • Experimental
    Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin

    Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin

    Drug: tamsulosin

Interventions

  • DrugDutasteride plus tamsulosin

    Take 1 capsule daily

  • Drugtamsulosin

    Take 1 capsule daily when escalation criteria met

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach

    The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "delighted" and 6 indicates "terrible." The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from Baseline in IPSS total score was calculated as the Month 24 value minus the Baseline value. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

    Symptom improvement was assessed using IPSS categorical changes from Baseline. Change from Baseline categories were summarized by treatment group using five improvement levels: \>=1 point through \>=5 points. IPSS percent change from Baseline was summarized using seven improvement levels: \>0 percent, \>=10 percent, \>=20 percent, \>=25 percent, \>=30 percent, \>=40 percent, and \>=50 percent. Change in IPSS from Baseline was analysed using the LOCF method and is summarized for the following categories: \>=2 points, \>=3 points, and percent change \>=25. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35).

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

  2. Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

    The BII is a 4-item questionnaire covering physical discomfort, worry, bother, and impact on usual activities, with a minimum score of 0 (best) and a maximum score (worst) of 13 points. Individual missing questionnaire responses were imputed, as applicable. Change from Baseline in the BII score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

  3. Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

    Each participant was asked the following question "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?". This response was rated from 0 ("delighted") to 6 ("terrible"). Change from Baseline in the BHS score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

  4. Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH

    The number of participants with the first occurrence of clinical progression (CP) of BPH occurring on or after the randomization date are summarized by treatment and year. Time is based on the date of the first-occurring CP event, and is relative to the randomization date. CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom deterioration by IPSS \>=3 points from Baseline (Visit 2); acute urinary retention related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single \>=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value \>=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). For components that required multiple episodes, the first of the multiple episodes was utilized in terms of timing.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  5. Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH

    CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom progression (symptom deterioration by IPSS \>=3 points from Baseline \[Visit 2\]); acute urinary retention (AUR) related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single \>=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value \>=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). The number of participants with CP of BPH, the number of participants with the indicated first-occurring component of CP of BPH, the number of participants with two simultaneously first-occurring components ("Tied for first component"), and the number of participants with multiple first-occurring components were summarized by treatment group.

    Time frame: Up to Month 24

  6. Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries

    BPH-related surgery was summarized for events occurring on or after the date of randomization. The number of participants who had any BPH-related surgery, the indicated type of surgery, and multiple surgeries was summarized by treatment. Type of surgery data (cystoscopy, transurethral resection of the prostate \[TURP\], and prostatectomy) are presented in terms of the first-occurring BPH-related surgery after randomization. It was possible for a single participant to have multiple surgeries.

    Time frame: Up to Month 24

  7. Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

    The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 1 was: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment and its effect on your urinary problems?" There were seven possible responses, including: "very satisfied," "satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied." Response categories were created by grouping together "very satisfied," "satisfied," and "somewhat satisfied" responses into the category of "Any Satisfaction (AS)," and separately grouping "neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied" responses into the category of "Neutral or Any Dissatisfaction (N/AD)." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

  8. Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

    The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 2 was: "Would you ask your doctor for the treatment you received in this study?" There were three possible responses, including: "Yes," "No," and "Not sure." Response categories included "Yes" and "No or Not Sure," created by grouping together "No" and "Not sure." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

  9. Exposure to Study Drug

    Study drug exposure (days) = treatment stop date - treatment start date + 1. Participants in the Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes subgroup could have been escalated to study drug at any time during the study. Therefore, it is possible that participants were exposed to tamsulosin for a shorter length of time than participants in the dutasteride plus tamsulosin group.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  10. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization

    A post-randomization adverse event is defined as an event with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations. Refer to the general non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of non-serious AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold of \>=5%) and SAEs.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

07

Results

Posted Jun 16, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Started369373
Completed292300
Not completed7773
Withdrew: Adverse event2813
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy75
Withdrew: Protocol violation17
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up79
Withdrew: Physician decision611
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2828

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach

The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "delighted" and 6 indicates "terrible." The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from Baseline in IPSS total score was calculated as the Month 24 value minus the Baseline value. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.

Time frame:
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach
Scores on a scaleDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Month 1, n=358, 367-3.2 ± 0.21-0.9 ± 0.20
Month 3, n=359, 368-4.5 ± 0.22-2.4 ± 0.22
Month 6, n=359, 368-4.6 ± 0.23-3.2 ± 0.22
Month 9, n=359, 368-5.1 ± 0.22-3.6 ± 0.22
Month 12, n=359, 368-5.2 ± 0.23-3.6 ± 0.23
Month 15, n=359, 368-5.2 ± 0.25-3.6 ± 0.24
Month 18, n=359, 368-5.1 ± 0.25-3.3 ± 0.25
Month 21, n=359, 368-5.5 ± 0.25-3.6 ± 0.24
Month 24, n=359, 368-5.4 ± 0.25-3.6 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 1) · Adjusted mean difference: -2.2 · 95% CI -2.8 to -1.7Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 3) · Adjusted mean difference: -2.1 · 95% CI -2.7 to -1.5Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 6) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.5 · 95% CI -2.1 to -0.9Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 9) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.6 · 95% CI -2.2 to -1.0Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 12) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.6 · 95% CI -2.2 to -1.0Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 15) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.6 · 95% CI -2.3 to -1.0Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 18) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.7 · 95% CI -2.4 to -1.0Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 21) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.9 · 95% CI -2.5 to -1.2Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
  • Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin vs Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (Month 24) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.8 · 95% CI -2.5 to -1.2Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

Symptom improvement was assessed using IPSS categorical changes from Baseline. Change from Baseline categories were summarized by treatment group using five improvement levels: \>=1 point through \>=5 points. IPSS percent change from Baseline was summarized using seven improvement levels: \>0 percent, \>=10 percent, \>=20 percent, \>=25 percent, \>=30 percent, \>=40 percent, and \>=50 percent. Change in IPSS from Baseline was analysed using the LOCF method and is summarized for the following categories: \>=2 points, \>=3 points, and percent change \>=25. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35).

Time frame:
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
ParticipantsDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Month 1, >=2 points, n=358, 367225149
Month 1, >=3 points, n=358, 36718290
Month 1, >=25 percent, n=358, 36716176
Month 3, >=2 points, n=359, 368277221
Month 3, >=3 points, n=359, 368233172
Month 3, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368218150
Month 6, >=2 points, n=359, 368277250
Month 6, >=3 points, n=359, 368245208
Month 6, >=25 percent, n=359, 368229189
Month 9, >=2 points, n=359, 368286276
Month 9, >=3 points, n=359, 368257222
Month 9, >=25 percent, n=359, 368247207
Month 12, >=2 points, n=359, 368291273
Month 12, >=3 points, n=359, 368261229
Month 12, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368249214
Month 15, >=2 points, n=359, 368289275
Month 15, >=3 points, n=359, 368259243
Month 15, >=25 percent, n=359, 368245231
Month 18, >=2 points, n=359, 368288268
Month 18, >=3 points, n=359, 368262229
Month 18, >=25 percent, 359, 368245212
Month 21, >=2 points, n=359, 368292274
Month 21, >=3 points, n=359, 368267237
Month 21, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368253224
Month 24, >=2 points, n=359, 368295279
Month 24, >=3points, n=359, 368277234
Month 24, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368261221
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

The BII is a 4-item questionnaire covering physical discomfort, worry, bother, and impact on usual activities, with a minimum score of 0 (best) and a maximum score (worst) of 13 points. Individual missing questionnaire responses were imputed, as applicable. Change from Baseline in the BII score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Scores on a scaleDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Month 1, n=357, 366-1.3 ± 0.11-0.4 ± 0.11
Month 3, n=359, 368-1.8 ± 0.11-1.0 ± 0.11
Month 6, n=359, 368-1.9 ± 0.11-1.3 ± 0.11
Month 9, n=359, 368-2.1 ± 0.11-1.5 ± 0.11
Month 12, n=359, 368-2.1 ± 0.12-1.5 ± 0.12
Month 15, n=359, 368-2.2 ± 0.12-1.5 ± 0.12
Month 18, n=359, 368-2.2 ± 0.12-1.4 ± 0.12
Month 21, n=359, 368-2.4 ± 0.12-1.6 ± 0.12
Month 24, n=359, 368-2.4 ± 0.12-1.6 ± 0.12
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

Each participant was asked the following question "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?". This response was rated from 0 ("delighted") to 6 ("terrible"). Change from Baseline in the BHS score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Scores on a scaleDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Month 1, n=358, 367-0.8 ± 0.06-0.3 ± 0.05
Month 3, n=359, 368-1.1 ± 0.06-0.7 ± 0.06
Month 6, n=359, 368-1.2 ± 0.06-0.9 ± 0.06
Month 9, n=359, 368-1.3 ± 0.06-1.0 ± 0.06
Month 12, n=359, 368-1.3 ± 0.06-1.1 ± 0.06
Month 15, n=359, 368-1.4 ± 0.06-1.1 ± 0.06
Month 18, n=359, 368-1.4 ± 0.06-1.1 ± 0.06
Month 21, n=359, 368-1.5 ± 0.06-1.1 ± 0.06
Month 24, n=359, 368-1.5 ± 0.06-1.1 ± 0.06
SecondaryNumber of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH

The number of participants with the first occurrence of clinical progression (CP) of BPH occurring on or after the randomization date are summarized by treatment and year. Time is based on the date of the first-occurring CP event, and is relative to the randomization date. CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom deterioration by IPSS \>=3 points from Baseline (Visit 2); acute urinary retention related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single \>=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value \>=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). For components that required multiple episodes, the first of the multiple episodes was utilized in terms of timing.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Number · Events
Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
EventsDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Year 1, n=369, 3734894
Year 2, n=276, 2511714
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH

CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom progression (symptom deterioration by IPSS \>=3 points from Baseline \[Visit 2\]); acute urinary retention (AUR) related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single \>=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value \>=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). The number of participants with CP of BPH, the number of participants with the indicated first-occurring component of CP of BPH, the number of participants with two simultaneously first-occurring components ("Tied for first component"), and the number of participants with multiple first-occurring components were summarized by treatment group.

Time frame:
Up to Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
ParticipantsDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Participants with CP of BPH, n=369, 37365108
BPH symptom progression, n=65, 1085997
BPH-related AUR, n=65, 10824
BPH-related incontinence, n=65, 10843
Recurrent BPH-related UTI, n=65, 10804
BPH-related renal insufficiency, n=65, 10800
Tied for first component, n=65, 10800
Multiple components (2 components), n=65, 10849
Multiple components (3 components), n=65, 10801
Multiple components (>=4 components), n=65, 10801
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries

BPH-related surgery was summarized for events occurring on or after the date of randomization. The number of participants who had any BPH-related surgery, the indicated type of surgery, and multiple surgeries was summarized by treatment. Type of surgery data (cystoscopy, transurethral resection of the prostate \[TURP\], and prostatectomy) are presented in terms of the first-occurring BPH-related surgery after randomization. It was possible for a single participant to have multiple surgeries.

Time frame:
Up to Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries
ParticipantsDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Participants with any BPH-related surgery63
Participants with cystoscopy51
Participants with TURP21
Participants with prostatectomy01
Participants with 2 surgeries10
Participants with >=3 surgeries00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 1 was: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment and its effect on your urinary problems?" There were seven possible responses, including: "very satisfied," "satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied." Response categories were created by grouping together "very satisfied," "satisfied," and "somewhat satisfied" responses into the category of "Any Satisfaction (AS)," and separately grouping "neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied" responses into the category of "Neutral or Any Dissatisfaction (N/AD)." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.

Time frame:
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
ParticipantsDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Baseline, Any Satisfaction, n=315, 328119122
Baseline, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=315, 328196206
Month 1, Any Satisfaction, n=358, 349272209
Month 1, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=358, 34986140
Month 3, Any Satisfaction, n= 359, 359300265
Month 3, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 3595994
Month 6, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 361301285
Month 6, Neutral /Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 3615876
Month 9, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 361304293
Month 9, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n= 359, 3615568
Month 12, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 363311305
Month 12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 3634858
Month 15, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364311299
Month 15, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 3644865
Month 18, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364305298
Month 18, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 3645466
Month 21, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364310300
Month 21, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 3644964
Month 24, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364312312
Month 24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 3644752
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 2 was: "Would you ask your doctor for the treatment you received in this study?" There were three possible responses, including: "Yes," "No," and "Not sure." Response categories included "Yes" and "No or Not Sure," created by grouping together "No" and "Not sure." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.

Time frame:
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
ParticipantsDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Baseline, Yes, n=315, 328109103
Baseline, No or Not Sure, n=315, 328206225
Month 1, Yes, n=358, 347224166
Month 1, No or Not Sure, n=358, 347134181
Month 3, Yes, n=359, 357232207
Month 3, No or Not Sure, n=359, 357127150
Month 6, Yes, n=359, 360232227
Month 6, No or Not Sure, n=359, 360127133
Month 9, Yes, n=359, 361238231
Month 9, No or Not Sure, n=359, 361121130
Month 12, Yes, n=359, 363240229
Month 12, No or Not Sure, n=359, 363119134
Month 15, Yes, n=359, 364246239
Month 15, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364113125
Month 18, Yes, n=359, 364235236
Month 18, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364124128
Month 21, Yes, n=359, 364249234
Month 21, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364110130
Month 24, Yes, n=359, 364243236
Month 24, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364116128
SecondaryExposure to Study Drug

Study drug exposure (days) = treatment stop date - treatment start date + 1. Participants in the Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes subgroup could have been escalated to study drug at any time during the study. Therefore, it is possible that participants were exposed to tamsulosin for a shorter length of time than participants in the dutasteride plus tamsulosin group.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Mean · days
Exposure to Study Drug
daysDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting Escalated=Yes
Exposure to Study Drug639.8 ± 215.49566.3 ± 195.13
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization

A post-randomization adverse event is defined as an event with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations. Refer to the general non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of non-serious AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold of \>=5%) and SAEs.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization
ParticipantsDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and NoWatchful Waiting Escalated=Yes
Any AE19011995
Any SAE382519

Adverse events

Collected over Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) starting post-randomization (including events with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date) were collected (up to 2 years).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin—38/369 (10.3%)43/369 (11.7%)
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No—25/373 (6.7%)13/373 (3.5%)
Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes—19/229 (8.3%)12/229 (5.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 78
Most frequent serious events
EventDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and NoWatchful Waiting Escalated=Yes
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders4/3692/3732/229
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/3692/3732/229
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/3692/3732/229
CellulitisInfections and infestations2/3690/3730/229
Inguinal herniaGastrointestinal disorders2/3691/3730/229
PresyncopeNervous system disorders2/3690/3730/229
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations0/3692/3731/229
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/3692/3731/229
ProstatitisReproductive system and breast disorders1/3692/3731/229
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders1/3691/3731/229
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and NoWatchful Waiting Escalated=Yes
Erectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disorders31/3694/3733/229
Retrograde ejaculationReproductive system and breast disorders19/36910/37310/229

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Dutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and NoTotal
Mean66.3 ± 7.7866.2 ± 7.3466.2 ± 7.56
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Dutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and NoTotal
Female000
Male369373742
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Dutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and NoTotal
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage357363720
White - Arabic/North African Heritage426
African American/African Heritage022
Mixed Race011
Missing8513
08

Study locations

80 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Aigrefeuille Sur Maine, 44140, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Angers, 49000, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Angers, 49933, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Corsept, 44560, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    La Montagne, 44620, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    La Rochelle, 17000, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Laval, 53000, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Le Temple De Bretagne, 44360, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Murs Erigne, 49610, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Nantes, 44300, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Nieul sur Mer, 17137, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sautron, 44880, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Thouars, 79100, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tierce, 49125, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Vihiers, 49310, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Aichach, Bayern 86551, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Nuernberg, Bayern 90441, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hagenow, Brandenburg 19230, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oranienburg, Brandenburg 16515, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Strausberg, Brandenburg 15344, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Marburg, Hessen 35039, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Buchholz, Niedersachsen 21244, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 45130, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hettstedt, Sachsen-Anhalt 06333, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04109, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein 24143, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10249, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Eisleben, 06295, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Argos, 21200, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Athens, 10552, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Athens, 115 22, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Athens, 11527, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Athens, 151 26, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Larisa, 41110, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Patra, 265 04, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rhodes, 85100, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Thessaloniki, 546 42, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Thessaloniki, 564 29, Greece
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Vasto (CH), Abruzzo 66054, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Avellino, Campania 83100, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Napoli, Campania 80131, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Roma, Lazio 00161, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Milano, Lombardia 20132, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Fermo Della Battaglia (CO), Lombardia 22020, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Torino, Piemonte 10126, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Foggia, Puglia 71100, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cagliari, Sardegna 09134, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pisa, Toscana 56124, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Den Haag, 2582 LJ, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Doetinchem, 7009 BL, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Maarssen, 3607 KN, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sneek, 8601 ZK, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Voerendaal, 6367 ED, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Wildervank, 9648 BE, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Winterswijk, 7101 BN, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Arad, 310175, Romania
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bucharest, Romania
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alava, 01004, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 8907, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cordoba, 14004, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Coslada, 28822, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fuenlabrada (Madrid), 28942, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Galdakano, 48960, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Getafe, 28905, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Malaga, 29010, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Marbella, 29600, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mendaro, Guipuzcoa, 20850, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Murcia, 30008, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pamplona, 31008, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Sebastián, 20014, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Valencia, 46010, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Valladolid, 47012, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire HP8 4QG, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sandbach, Cheshire CW11 1EQ, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bath, BA1 3NG, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bristol, BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Broadway, Fleetwood, FY7 8GU, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chadderton, Oldham, OL9 0LH, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01294592
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2011
Start date
Dec 22, 2010
Primary completion
Oct 17, 2013
Completion
Oct 17, 2013
Results posted
Jun 16, 2014
Last update
Aug 20, 2018

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion