CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01293084Updated Sep 22, 2015Results posted

Hypertonic Saline and Mucociliary Clearance in Children

A Phase 2 interventional study of 0.12% saline and 7% saline in Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-22.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Previously, the investigators and others have shown that mucociliary clearance (MCC) is defective in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and it is now thought that alterations in airway mucus rheology figure prominently in the impairment. Mucociliary clearance works by trapping toxic particles, bacteria and viruses in the lung mucus and then quickly removing the mucus out of the lungs. Defects in MCC typically lead to the accumulation of mucus in the airways, and this in turn is associated with acute infections, chronic bacterial colonization and chronic inflammation. One treatment strategy that is gaining acceptance as an important therapy for improving MCC in adults with CF is the inhalation of the osmotic stimulus, hypertonic saline (HS). A number of studies have shown that acute inhalation of HS (7% saline) significantly improves MCC in adults with CF and results from a recent study indicate that two weeks of inhaling HS leads to a significant increase in MCC that is sustained for 8 hours post inhalation and is associated with significant improvements in FEV1, FVC and FEF25-75 values. Since MCC in patients with CF appears to be impaired by adulthood, any drug that disrupts or slows the impairment in childhood could prove enormously beneficial in the long-term prognosis of the disease. Nevertheless, no studies have been conducted to determine if HS treatment improves MCC in children with CF. This is most problematic for physicians who care for children with CF who have normal FEV1 and FVC values, since it is unclear if they should treat these children with HS or not. This research study is designed to begin to answer this question. The investigators hypothesize that acute inhalation of hypertonic saline (7%) will improve MCC in CF children with normal pulmonary function. Our hypothesis will be tested in a one-year clinical trial that will be randomized and placebo-controlled. Twelve children with CF who are 7-12 years old and have normal FEV1 and FVC values will participate. Our goal will be to compare MCC in these children on two study visits after acute inhalations of placebo (0.12% saline) or hypertonic saline (HS) (7% saline) aerosol. The investigators predict that MCC values after acute inhalation of 7% HS aerosol will be statistically significantly greater than after placebo inhalation.

Read the detailed description

Several studies report that mucociliary clearance (MCC) is impaired in adults with CF. Because MCC is an important airway defense mechanism, drugs that slow impairment of MCC in children could prove beneficial in the long-term prognosis of the disease. A few studies have shown that inhalation of hypertonic saline (HS) significantly improves MCC in adults with CF and improvement is associated with increases in pulmonary function and decreases in pulmonary exacerbations. Nevertheless, no studies have examined if HS improves MCC in CF children. This is problematic for physicians who care for CF children with normal pulmonary function, since it is unclear if they should treat with HS or not. This study was designed to begin to answer this question. Twelve children with CF (7-12 yrs; 5 males) and normal pulmonary function (FEV1 and FVC > 90% of predicted values) participated in a screening visit and two study visits. On the screening visit, children underwent an induced sputum test. On the two study visits, they inhaled 0.12% saline (placebo), or HS, in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Following inhalation of placebo or HS, patients inhaled the radioisotope 99mtechnetium and underwent sequential imaging of their lungs with a gamma camera for 90 min and approximately 24 hrs later. Mucociliary clearance was quantified at 60 min (MCC60), 90 min (MCC90) and 24 hrs (MCC24hrs) after inhalation of the radioisotope. Between the 60 min and 90 min measurements, children coughed 30 times.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

  • mucociliary clearance
  • children
  • cystic fibrosis
  • hypertonic saline
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 36 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females
  • Age 7-12 years old
  • Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis by sweat chloride > 60 meq/L, or presence of two CFTR mutations known to cause CF
  • Routinely treated with the short-acting bronchodilator albuterol
  • FEV1 > 90% of predicted values

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • FEV1 \< 90% of predicted values
  • Routine use of hypertonic saline, mannitol, or amiloride
  • Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA)
  • Sputum colonization with Burkholderia cepacia or multiple antibiotic resistant organisms
  • Evidence of a pulmonary exacerbation within past two weeks
  • Treated with intravenous or oral antibiotics in the past two weeks for a pulmonary exacerbation
  • Presence of an acute respiratory illness characterized by:

    • Coughing above baseline values
    • Wheezing
    • Respiratory distress
    • Hemoptysis
  • Cannot perform the inhalation maneuvers that are required for drug inhalation or radioaerosol administration
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    7% saline

    5 mL of 7% saline was inhaled once over a 20 minute period.

    Drug: 7% saline

  • Placebo comparator
    0.12% saline

    5mL 0.12% saline inhaled once during 20 minutes

    Drug: 0.12% saline

Interventions

  • Drug0.12% saline

    5mL of 0.12% saline inhaled once over 20 minutes

  • Drug7% saline

    5mL 7% saline inhaled once over 20 minutes

    Also known as: hypertonic saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Mucociliary Clearance at 60 Minutes

    Time frame: 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Mucociliary Clearance at 90 Minutes

    Time frame: 90 minutes

07

Results

Posted Sep 22, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneChildren With CF
Started17
Completed12
Not completed5
Withdrew: Physician decision3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Mucociliary Clearance at 60 Minutes
Time frame:
60 minutes
Reported as:
Median · percentage mucociliary clearance
Percent Mucociliary Clearance at 60 Minutes
percentage mucociliary clearance7% Saline0.12% Saline
Percent Mucociliary Clearance at 60 Minutes18.6 (12.3 to 27.4)15.4 (12.4 to 24.5)
Statistical analysis
  • 7% Saline vs 0.12% Saline · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.62 · Median difference (final values): 2.2
SecondaryPercent Mucociliary Clearance at 90 Minutes
Time frame:
90 minutes
Reported as:
Median · percentage mucociliary clearance
Percent Mucociliary Clearance at 90 Minutes
percentage mucociliary clearance7% Saline0.12% Saline
Percent Mucociliary Clearance at 90 Minutes27.4 (16.25 to 30.95)19.3 (17.3 to 27.8)
Statistical analysis
  • 7% Saline vs 0.12% Saline · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.32 · Median difference (final values): 2.3

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
7% Saline—0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
0.12% Saline—0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Children With CF
Median10.5 (8.9 to 12.4)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Children With CF
Female7
Male5
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Children With CF
United States12
FVC (% predicted)
FVC (% predicted)(percent predicted)Children With CF
Median107 (101.5 to 116.0)
FEV1 (% predicted)
FEV1 (% predicted)(percent predicted)Children With CF
Median108 (102.5 to 117.5)
Genotype
Genotype(participants)Children With CF
F508del homozygous9
F508heterozygous2
Other1
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Laube BL, Sharpless G, Carson KA, Kelly A, Mogayzel PJ Jr. Acute inhalation of hypertonic saline does not improve mucociliary clearance in all children with cystic fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med. 2011 Sep 6;11:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-45. PubMed 21896198 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01293084
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
Responsible party
Beth L. Laube (Professor, Johns Hopkins University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2011
Start date
Jul 2007
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jun 2009
Results posted
Sep 22, 2015
Last update
Sep 22, 2015

Study contacts

Beth L Laube, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion