CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01292525Updated Mar 23, 2016

Protocol Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Weaning

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tacrolimus and Placebo in Function of Renal Transplant, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-23.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Difficulties of recruitment
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the benefit of the withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) on renal function in patients one year after the end of the weaning period. The secondary objectives will focus on assessing the risks and consequences of withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®).

02

Conditions studied

  • Function of Renal Transplant

Keywords

  • Withdrawal of Tacrolimus and renal graft
  • renal allograft
  • stable renal function
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 825 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Pre-inclusion criteria :

  • Male or female aged between 18 and 80 years (inclusive),
  • Having received a deceased donor transplant or living with ABO compatibility,
  • First renal allograft for at least 4 years and under 10 years,
  • Presenting a stable renal function : serum creatinine with a variation of ± 25% of the average of the year before inclusion,
  • Treated with tacrolimus (Prograf®) in combination with MPA (Cellcept® and Myfortic®) + / - steroids (between 5 and 10 mg per day),
  • Patient has given informed consent,
  • Patient insured,
  • Patient (of childbearing age) with effective contraception.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), defined by the dosage of cystatin C ≥ 40 ml/min/1, 73m²,
  • Proteinuria ≤ 0,5 g / day,
  • Patient with serum levels of Tacrolimus between 5 to 10 ng / ml on average during the last 6 months (inclusive). It is accepted that 25% of the assays performed during the last 6 months, serum levels of tacrolimus are outside the limits mentioned above (5-10 ng / ml). They must nevertheless be between 3.5 to 12.5 ng / ml (inclusive).
  • Patient with serum levels of MPA (Cellcept® and Myfortic®) higher ≥ 30 mg / ml,
  • No anti-HLA antibodies at the time of inclusion, verified using highly sensitive techniques (Luminex HD),
  • Lack of histological evidence of cellular or humoral acute or chronic or subclinical rejection on renal graft according to the latest classification of Banff 2009.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under age 18 or over 80 years,
  • Transplanted from less than 4 years and over 10 years,
  • Patients re-transplanted,
  • Transplantation of several organs,
  • Patient not treated with tacrolimus as maintenance therapy,
  • Serum levels of Tacrolimus patient \<5 or >10 ng / ml,
  • Serum levels of MPA of the patient \<30 mg / ml,
  • Patients treated with other immunosuppressive drugs that Tacrolimus (Prograf®), MPA (Cellcept® and Myfortic®) and steroids,
  • Patient not having a stable graft function at baseline (change in serum creatinine > 25% of the average of the year before inclusion in the study), with a GFR defined by the dosage of cystatin C \<40 ml/min/1, 73m² at the time of inclusion,- Patients with proteinuria > 0.5 g at study entry,
  • Patient with HLA antibodies at study entry,
  • Patient non-compliant,
  • Presence of histological evidence of cellular or humoral acute or chronic or subclinical rejection on renal graft according to the latest classification of Banff 2009,
  • History of lymphoproliferative disorders,
  • Diagnosis of a malignancy within 5 years before enrollment,
  • Significantly abnormal hematologic data of a clinical standpoint, as determined by the investigator for hematocrit, hemoglobin, white blood cell count or platelets,
  • Data significantly abnormal blood biochemistry of a clinical standpoint, as determined by the investigator,
  • Abuse of significant drug or alcohol at the time of inclusion, determined by the investigator,
  • Patient positive for antibodies to hepatitis C or hepatitis B surface antigen of hepatitis B (HBsAg) or HIV infection,
  • Participation in a clinical study within 3 months,
  • Pregnancy, Breastfeeding.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Tacrolimus

    Drug: Tacrolimus

  • Experimental
    Withdrawal of Tacrolimus

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugTacrolimus

    A control group continued conventional therapy, Tacrolimus (Prograf®) ("control" group) and will be followed in parallel group "withdrawal" that will stop treatment with Tacrolimus (Prograf®).

  • DrugPlacebo

    Patients randomized to the "withdrawal"group will begin the protocol with their usual dose of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) (initial dose). The initial dose of tacrolimus (Prograf®) will be reduced by one third at visit 3 (day 0) and again a third visit 5 (J60). The complete withdrawal Tacrolimus (Prograf®) begins to visit 7 (J120). The withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) will be obtained in four months. Monitoring of all patients lasted 17 months in total from the screening visit, which corresponds to 12 months after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) for patients in the "withdrawal" group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Renal function

    The primary endpoint will be the improvement of renal function one year after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) assessed by measuring the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated by the dosage of cystatin C according to the equation Bricon. The DFG will be compared between times J-30 and J480 (1 year after the withdrawal).

    Time frame: one year after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus

Secondary outcomes

  1. Renal function

    Improvement of renal function by measuring serum creatinine, using the original MDRD equation,

    Time frame: one year after complete withdrawal

  2. Acute rejection

    Rate of histologically proven acute rejection by biopsy according to Banff classification 2009,

    Time frame: one year after complete withdrawal

  3. Chronic rejection

    Rate of chronic rejection histologically proven by biopsy according to Banff classification 2009,

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  4. Steroid-resistant rejection

    Rates of steroid-resistant rejection

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  5. Graft survival

    Rate of return to dialysis (graft survival)

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  6. Cancer and infections

    Incidence of cancer and infections

    Time frame: one year after complete withdrawal

  7. Patients survival

    Survival rate of patients

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  8. Anti-HLA antibodies

    Appearance of anti-HLA donor specific and non-donor specific antibodies measured by the technique Luminex

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  9. Histological lesions of rejection

    The appearance of histological lesions of cellular or humoral acute or chronic or subclinical rejection on the biopsy protocol

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  10. Histological lesions of fibrosis

    Onset or worsening of histological lesions of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on biopsy inflammatory

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  11. Hypertension, hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia

    Incidence of hypertension, hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

  12. Quality of life

    Determination of the benefits of withdrawal of Tacrolimus on the quality of life of patients, defined by the scale of quality of life validated SF-36 used at the beginning (J-15) and at the end of the weaning period (J120) at 6 months (J300) and one year after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus (J480)

    Time frame: One year after complete withdrawal

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nantes University Hospital
    Nantes, 44093, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01292525
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
First posted
Feb 9, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
May 2015
Last update
Mar 23, 2016

Study contacts

Magali GIRAL, Profesor
principal investigator · Nantes University Hospital
Jean-Paul SOULILLOU, Profesor
study chair · Nantes University Hospital
Christophe LEGENDRE, Profesor
study chair · Hôpital Necker - AP-HP
Emmanuel MORELON, Profesor
study chair · CHU de Lyon
Georges MOURAD, Profesor
study chair · CHU de Montpellier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion