CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01288378Updated Dec 11, 2023

Empirical Versus Preemptive Antifungal Therapy

A Phase 3 interventional study of caspofungin acetate in Fungal Infection, Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, sponsored by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC. Completed at 16 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-11.

Sponsored by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
556
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Caspofungin acetate may be effective in treating fungal infections in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who are receiving treatment for their cancer. It is not yet known whether caspofungin acetate is more effective when treatment starts after development of a fever or after the infection is shown in laboratory test, chest x-ray, or CT scan.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying the best time to start caspofungin acetate therapy in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome that is newly diagnosed or in first relapse.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To compare empirical approach (i.e., fever driven) versus preemptive approach (i.e., diagnostic driven), for starting antifungal therapy with caspofungin acetate, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who are starting chemotherapy (for attaining remission induction) or myeloablation (to prepare for an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) for newly diagnosed disease or disease in first relapse.

Secondary

  • To evaluate clinical validity and utility of a standardized Aspergillus PCR assay.
  • To evaluate clinical validity and utility of beta-D-glucan.
  • To determine the occurrence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the predictive value of SNPs for identifying patients at higher risk of developing invasive fungal infection.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to institution, prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (yes vs no), and type of air flow (laminar air flow vs high-efficiency particulate air). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm A (Empirical approach): Patients start caspofungin acetate treatment when one of the following criteria are met:

    • Presence of unexplained persistent fever refractory to 4 full days of broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy with any of the following regimens either alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside or a glycopeptide:

      • Ceftazidime
      • Cefepime
      • Piperacillin/tazobactam
      • Imipenem-cilastatin
      • Meropenem
    • New fever occurring > 2 days after resolution of a first fever while continuing broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy as defined above for which no obvious cause has been documented and fungal infection cannot be excluded Patients receive caspofungin acetate IV once daily. Treatment continues until neutrophil recovers.
  • Arm B (Preemptive approach): Patients start caspofungin acetate treatment when at least one of the following criteria* are met:

    • Single plasma or serum galactomannan ELISA with index > 0.5
    • New pulmonary infiltrate on chest x-ray and IFD cannot be readily excluded
    • New dense well-circumscribed lesions with or without a halo sign, on a CT scan, consistent with IFD
    • Aspergillus sp. recovered by culture from sputum Patients receive caspofungin acetate IV once daily. Treatment continues until neutrophil recovers.

NOTE: *These criteria are not sufficient to warrant preemptive caspofungin acetate therapy: skin lesions evocative of IFD, sinusitis or orbititis, hepatosplenic abscesses (hypodensities on CT scan), or unexplained persistent fever for more than 7 days or recurrent fever whatever its duration.

All patients undergo blood sample collection periodically for the detection of galactomannan and beta-D-glucan and for the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Some patients undergo blood sample collection for the detection of Aspergillus via PCR. An economic evaluation is performed for cost-effectiveness analysis.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fungal Infection
  • Leukemia
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

  • fungal infection
  • de novo myelodysplastic syndromes
  • previously treated myelodysplastic syndromes
  • secondary myelodysplastic syndromes
  • recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia
  • untreated adult acute myeloid leukemia
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with del(5q)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22)
  • secondary acute myeloid leukemia
03

In context

Mycoses

539 studies on the registry are indexed under Mycoses; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 556 is above the median of 46 across 358 interventional studies indexed under Mycoses.

Browse Mycoses studies →

Lead sponsor

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC is the lead sponsor of 342 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

    • Newly diagnosed disease or disease in first relapse after hematological remission lasting for a minimum of 6 months AND meets one of the following criteria:

      • Starting remission-induction chemotherapy within 3 days prior to study randomization
      • Starting myeloablative conditioning regimen to prepare for a first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation within 3 days prior to study randomization
  • Planning a hospital admission for the duration of the neutropenic phase (ANC \< 0.5 x 10\^9 /L)
  • Planning to receive oral or intravenous fluconazole for Candida prophylaxis at a dose of 400 mg/day

    • Fluconazole is discontinued during caspofungin acetate administration
  • No previous or current history of proven or probable invasive fungal disease (IFD)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients muse use effective contraception during and for at least 3 months after completion of study therapy
  • No current clinical diagnosis of pneumonia
  • No serious, uncontrolled, concomitant disease or comorbidity that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise adherence to the study protocol
  • No history of allergy or any adverse reaction to echinocandin drugs (i.e., caspofungin acetate, micafungin, or anidulafungin)
  • No hypersensitivity to caspofungin active substance or to any of the excipients
  • No inadequately treated infection
  • No documented HIV infection
  • No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
  • No history of liver cirrhosis or severe hepatic insufficiency (i.e., Child Pugh Class C, D, or E)

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No concurrent participation on another clinical trial using an investigational drug for infectious diseases
  • No other concurrent systemic antifungal therapy (oral or intravenous)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
556 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Empirical

    Empirical approach (fever driven) for starting antifungal therapy

    Drug: caspofungin acetate

  • Experimental
    Pre-emptive

    Pre-emptive approach (diagnostic driven) for starting antifungal therapy

    Drug: caspofungin acetate

Interventions

  • Drugcaspofungin acetate

    intravenous route, at a 70 mg loading dose on day 1 of antifungal therapy, followed by 50 mg once a day thereafter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival at 42 days after randomization

    Time frame: 6 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival at 84 days after randomization

    Time frame: 12 weeks after randomization

  2. Development of proven or probable invasive fungal disease (IFD) during the 42 and 84 days following randomization

    Time frame: during 84 days after randomization

  3. Proper management according to allocated treatment arm (i.e., appropriate administration of caspofungin acetate in compliance to protocol, and compliance to the treatment strategy) during the 42 and 84 days after randomization

    Time frame: during 84 days after randomization

  4. Survival-free of fungal infection during the 42 and 84 days following randomization

    Time frame: during 84 days after randomization

  5. Safety (adverse event [AE] and serious adverse event [SAE]) as assessed by CTCAE criteria v4.0

    Time frame: during 84 days after randomization

  6. Number of days under caspofungin treatment or under another antifungal treatment administered after caspofungin (evaluation will be done at day 42 and day 84 after randomization)

    Time frame: at day 42 and day 84 after randomization

  7. Costs related to the strategy for initiating and monitoring antifungal treatment during the 42 and 84 days following randomization

    Time frame: during 84 days after randomization

07

Study locations

16 sites
  • A.Z. St. Jan
    Brugge, Belgium
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
    Brussels, Belgium
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires Bordet-Erasme - Institut Jules Bordet
    Brussels, Belgium
  • U.Z. Gasthuisberg
    Leuven, Belgium
  • C.H.U. Sart-Tilman
    Liège, Belgium
  • Masaryk University
    Brno, Czechia
  • CHU de Caen - Hopital Cote de Nacre
    Caen, France
  • C.H.U. Henri Mondor AP-HP
    Créteil, France
  • CHRU de Lille - Hopital Hurie
    Lille, France
  • CHU de Limoges - Hopital Dupuytren
    Limoges, France
  • Hopital Universitaire Hautepierre
    Strasbourg, France
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
    Villejuif, France
  • Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
    Freiburg, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg - Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II
    Wuerzburg, Germany
  • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • National Cancer Institute
    Bratislava, Slovakia
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01288378
Lead sponsor
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 2, 2011
Start date
Mar 2012
Primary completion
Apr 4, 2019
Completion
Apr 4, 2019
Last update
Dec 11, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion