ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01288287RA-PROACTIVEUpdated Sep 16, 2016Results posted

Long Term Effects of an Early Response to Certolizumab Pegol (CZP, Cimzia®) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients

An observational study in Arthritis,Rheumatoid, sponsored by UCB Pharma. Completed at 22 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-16.

Sponsored by UCB Pharma (part of UCB S.A.) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
149
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine if early clinical response at 12 weeks to Certolizumab Pegol (CZP, Cimzia ®) therapy in adult Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients is a predictor of better long term clinical response at 18 months compared with a lack of clinical response at 12 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Clinical response will be assessed by the percentage of patients achieving a reduction from Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] score of greater than 1.2 points, which is considered the minimum clinically important difference.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis,Rheumatoid

Keywords

  • Certolizumab pegol
  • Cimzia®
03

In context

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

2,962 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid; 396 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 149 is below the median of 176 across 854 observational studies indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid.

Browse Arthritis, Rheumatoid studies →

Lead sponsor

UCB Pharma is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient presenting with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and having prescribed certolizumab pegol (CZP, Cimzia®) at the clinic

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent is signed and dated
  • The patient is considered capable of and prepared to adhere to the study protocol procedures
  • The patient is prescribed CZP according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (UK and Eire) and National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) (UK only) guidelines for anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).
  • The patient is screen-negative for tuberculosis
  • The patient is 18 years of age or above

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has been exposed previously to biological disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARD) agents.
  • Patient has previously participated in this study or the patient has previously been assigned to treatment in a study of CZP or another biological agent used to treat RA.
  • Patient has participated in another study within the last 30 days
  • Patient has any medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the physician, can jeopardize or would compromise the patient's ability to adequately participate in the study
  • Patient has inadequate literacy to understand and complete the questionnaires.
  • Contraindications stated in the SmPC
  • Patient is pregnant or breast feeding
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
149 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Week 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) Responders

    Patients achieving a reduction from Baseline in a Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) \[DAS28(ESR)\] score of greater than 1.2 points at Week 12

  • Week 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) Non-Responders

    Patients who fail to achieve a reduction from Baseline in a Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) \[DAS28(ESR)\] score of greater than 1.2 points at Week 12

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score (DAS) Response at 78 Weeks Where DAS Response is Defined as a Reduction From Baseline in DAS 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score of Greater Than 1.2 Points

    DAS28(ESR) is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), ESR (mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). 28 joints are examined using: DAS28(ESR) = 0.56 \* √(TJC) + 0.28\* √(SJC) + 0.70\* ln(ESR) + 0.014\* PtGADA, with TJC=0 to 28, SJC=0 to 28, PtGADA=0 to 100 mm, ESR=0 to infinite mm/hour but ESR values of greater 250 mm/h are typically measurement errors. DAS28(ESR) ranges from 0 to around 10 with lower scores indicating less disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score at 78 Weeks

    DAS28(ESR) is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), ESR (mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). 28 joints are examined using: DAS28(ESR) = 0.56 \* √(TJC) + 0.28\* √(SJC) + 0.70\* ln(ESR) + 0.014\* PtGADA, with TJC=0 to 28, SJC=0 to 28, PtGADA=0 to 100 mm, ESR=0 to infinite mm/hour but ESR values of greater 250 mm/h are typically measurement errors. DAS28(ESR) ranges from 0 to around 10 with lower scores indicating less disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score (DAS)-Based European League Against Rheumatoid Arthritis (EULAR) Response at 78 Weeks Compared to Baseline

    Percentage of patients achieving good, moderate, or no EULAR clinical response, where good response is defined as DAS28(ESR) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from baseline by \> 1.2; moderate response is defined as achievement of one of the following: * DAS28(ESR) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2, * DAS28(ESR) \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and decrease from baseline \> 0.6, * DAS28(ESR) \> 5.1 and decrease from baseline \> 1.2 Patients without a good or moderate response are considered to be non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) Scores at 78 Weeks

    RADAI is a five-item questionnaire administered to patients. The final score range is 0-10, with higher scores denoting a worse disease state. A negative value in RADAI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to 78 weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks

  4. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at 78 Weeks

    HAQ-DI is a questionnaire which measures function and health-related quality of life. The final score range is 0-3, with higher scores denoting greater disability. A negative value in HAQ-DI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to 78 weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 27, 2016

Participant flow

This observational study started to enroll patients in July 2011 in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Patients
Started149
Safety set147
Full analysis set111
Completed103
Not completed46
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up8
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy13
Withdrew: Other reason13
Withdrew: Unknown reason1
Withdrew: Unknown status7

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score (DAS) Response at 78 Weeks Where DAS Response is Defined as a Reduction From Baseline in DAS 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score of Greater Than 1.2 Points

DAS28(ESR) is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), ESR (mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). 28 joints are examined using: DAS28(ESR) = 0.56 \* √(TJC) + 0.28\* √(SJC) + 0.70\* ln(ESR) + 0.014\* PtGADA, with TJC=0 to 28, SJC=0 to 28, PtGADA=0 to 100 mm, ESR=0 to infinite mm/hour but ESR values of greater 250 mm/h are typically measurement errors. DAS28(ESR) ranges from 0 to around 10 with lower scores indicating less disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Percentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score (DAS) Response at 78 Weeks Where DAS Response is Defined as a Reduction From Baseline in DAS 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score of Greater Than 1.2 Points
percentage of patientsWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) RespondersWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) Non-Responders
Percentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score (DAS) Response at 78 Weeks Where DAS Response is Defined as a Reduction From Baseline in DAS 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score of Greater Than 1.2 Points79.5 (64.7 to 90.2)50.0 (23.0 to 77.0)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score at 78 Weeks

DAS28(ESR) is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), ESR (mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). 28 joints are examined using: DAS28(ESR) = 0.56 \* √(TJC) + 0.28\* √(SJC) + 0.70\* ln(ESR) + 0.014\* PtGADA, with TJC=0 to 28, SJC=0 to 28, PtGADA=0 to 100 mm, ESR=0 to infinite mm/hour but ESR values of greater 250 mm/h are typically measurement errors. DAS28(ESR) ranges from 0 to around 10 with lower scores indicating less disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score at 78 Weeks
units on a scaleWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) RespondersWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) Non-Responders
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-joint Count (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) [DAS28(ESR)] Score at 78 Weeks-2.45 ± 1.454-1.63 ± 1.157
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score (DAS)-Based European League Against Rheumatoid Arthritis (EULAR) Response at 78 Weeks Compared to Baseline

Percentage of patients achieving good, moderate, or no EULAR clinical response, where good response is defined as DAS28(ESR) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from baseline by \> 1.2; moderate response is defined as achievement of one of the following: * DAS28(ESR) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2, * DAS28(ESR) \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and decrease from baseline \> 0.6, * DAS28(ESR) \> 5.1 and decrease from baseline \> 1.2 Patients without a good or moderate response are considered to be non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Percentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score (DAS)-Based European League Against Rheumatoid Arthritis (EULAR) Response at 78 Weeks Compared to Baseline
percentage of patientsWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) RespondersWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) Non-Responders
Good Response47.735.7
Moderate Response36.450.0
No Response15.914.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) Scores at 78 Weeks

RADAI is a five-item questionnaire administered to patients. The final score range is 0-10, with higher scores denoting a worse disease state. A negative value in RADAI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to 78 weeks.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) Scores at 78 Weeks
units on a scaleWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) RespondersWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) Non-Responders
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) Scores at 78 Weeks-2.64 ± 2.262-1.78 ± 3.048
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at 78 Weeks

HAQ-DI is a questionnaire which measures function and health-related quality of life. The final score range is 0-3, with higher scores denoting greater disability. A negative value in HAQ-DI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to 78 weeks.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), 78 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at 78 Weeks
units on a scaleWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) RespondersWeek 12 Disease Activity Score (DAS) Non-Responders
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at 78 Weeks-0.43 ± 0.506-0.34 ± 0.606

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment emergent adverse drug reactions (TEADRs) were collected up to 88 weeks. TEADRs are events with an onset date from the first dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) to 10 weeks after the last dose of CZP.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Safety Set (All Patients)—8/147 (5.4%)3/147 (2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSafety Set (All Patients)
Pulmonary TuberculosisInfections and infestations2/147
Abortion inducedSurgical and medical procedures2/147
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/147
Liver function test abnormalInvestigations1/147
Rheumatoid arthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/147
Bladder cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/147
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/147
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSafety Set (All Patients)
Exposure during pregnancyInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/147
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/147

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics refer to the Safety Set, consisting of all patients entered into the study who took at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Safety Set (All Patients)
Mean55.6 ± 11.85
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Safety Set (All Patients)
< 65 years111
>= 65 years36
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Safety Set (All Patients)
Female101
Male46
08

Study locations

22 sites
  • 2
    Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • 7
    Bridgend, Bridgend, United Kingdom
  • 25
    Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • 4
    Durham, County Durham, United Kingdom
  • 17
    Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom
  • 24
    Eastbourne, East Sussex, United Kingdom
  • 13
    Southend, Essex, United Kingdom
  • 11
    Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 12
    Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 6
    Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom
  • 20
    Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom
  • 15
    St Helens, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • 10
    Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
  • 22
    Ashford, Middlesex, United Kingdom
  • 14
    Abergavenny, Monmouthshire, United Kingdom
  • 5
    Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
  • 19
    Burton, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
  • 3
    Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • 18
    Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
  • 16
    Cannock, West Midlands, United Kingdom
  • 9
    Dudley, West Midlands, United Kingdom
  • 1
    York, Yorkshire, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumar N, Naz S, Quinn M, Ryan J, Kumke T, Sheeran T. Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Certolizumab Pegol: Results from PROACTIVE, a Non-Interventional Study in the UK and Ireland. Adv Ther. 2018 Sep;35(9):1426-1437. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0758-1. Epub 2018 Aug 3. PubMed 30076523 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2011, a primary completion of Oct 2014 and a completion of Dec 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2016, 1 year 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 25, 2011
First posted
Feb 2, 2011
Start
Jul 2011
Primary completionActual
Oct 2014
CompletionActual
Dec 2014
Results first posted
Jun 27, 2016
Last update
Sep 16, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01288287
Lead sponsor
UCB Pharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 2, 2011
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Jun 27, 2016
Last update
Sep 16, 2016

Study contacts

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
study director · +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion