An interventional study of Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced in Lumbar Puncture, sponsored by Seattle Children's Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-02-17.
Sponsored by Seattle Children's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Objective: To evaluate pediatric emergency department provider lumbar puncture success with and without the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced, a new pressure transducer, in order to determine: the proportion of lumbar punctures where a) any cerebrospinal fluid is obtained on the first attempt, b) any cerebrospinal fluid is obtained on any attempt, and c) sufficient cerebrospinal fluid is obtained for standard tests (culture, chemistries, cell count); the time to provider success in obtaining a) a drop of fluid from the needle, and b) opening pressure measurement; the proportion of successful lumbar punctures that contain blood; and provider satisfaction.
Background: Lumbar punctures are necessary to diagnose meningitis, neurological diseases and some cancers. They are common pediatric emergency department procedures that frequently require repeated attempts or are only partially successful, with sufficient blood to limit interpretation. Measuring cerebrospinal fluid pressure during lumbar punctures is recommended but rarely done, due to limitations of current technology. Liquid column manometry is cumbersome, time-consuming and frequently impractical. Existing pressure transduction probes that connect via tubing to external monitors are not designed or recommended for lumbar punctures. The pressure is displayed on a monitor that is difficult to view during the LP procedure and they equilibrate too slowly to keep pace of pressure changes during LPs. The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced is a new, inexpensive, disposable, medical device, specifically designed for use during LPs, that has the potential to increase lumbar punctures success and decrease blood contamination. It attaches to the spinal needle and displays both a numeric pressure value and a pressure waveform, allowing physicians to more readily identify the cerebrospinal fluid space and measure cerebrospinal fluid pressure. The device is small, easy to use, and readily incorporated into standard practice.
The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced uniquely provides immediate feedback about pressure that may allow physicians to more quickly and confidently identify the CSF space, and instantly determine cerebrospinal fluid pressure when the space is reached. The investigators believe the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced will increase lumbar punctures success and decrease the proportion containing blood. It has the potential to become the standard of care and be used in every lumbar puncture procedure. This study is expected to demonstrate the clinical utility of the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced to the medical community. Increased awareness of the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced and a positive demonstration of the viability of the technology will help attract either the investment capital or the strategic partnership necessary to fully develop the market.
Objective: To evaluate pediatric emergency department (ED) provider lumbar puncture success with and without the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced, a new pressure transducer, in order to determine: the proportion of lumbar punctures (LPs) where a) any cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is obtained on the first attempt, b) any CSF is obtained on any attempt, and c) sufficient CSF is obtained for standard tests (culture, chemistries, cell count); the time to provider success in obtaining a) a drop of fluid from the needle, and b) opening pressure measurement; the proportion of successful lumbar punctures that contain blood; and provider satisfaction.
Background: Lumbar punctures are necessary to diagnose meningitis, neurological diseases and some cancers. They are common pediatric emergency department procedures that frequently require repeated attempts or are only partially successful, with sufficient blood to limit interpretation. Measuring cerebrospinal fluid pressure during a lumbar puncture is recommended but rarely done, due to limitations of current technology. Liquid column manometry is cumbersome, time-consuming and frequently impractical. Existing pressure transduction probes that connect via tubing to external monitors are not designed or recommended for LPs. The pressure is displayed on a monitor that is difficult to view during the lumbar puncture procedure and they equilibrate too slowly to keep pace of pressure changes during lumbar puncture. The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced is a new, inexpensive, disposable, medical device, specifically designed for use during lumbar punctures, that has the potential to increase lumbar puncture success and decrease blood contamination. It attaches to the spinal needle and displays both a numeric pressure value and a pressure waveform, allowing physicians to more readily identify the cerebrospinal fluid space and measure cerebrospinal fluid pressure. The device is small, easy to use, and readily incorporated into standard practice.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial will test adding the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced vs. standard care in 60 children 0-16 years old who are receiving a lumbar puncture in the Seattle Children's Hospital Emergency Department. We will test the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced against standard care in 60 children receiving lumbar puncture, comparing success, pressures obtaining, time to success, complications (e.g. >200 red blood cells/mm3) and provider satisfaction. Results will be compared with chi-squared tests, regressions, Kaplan-Meier and logrank tests. We expect improved success, decreased time to success and complications and high provider satisfaction.
Impact: Currently, one third of lumbar punctures require multiple attempts, 7-20% contain blood that limits interpretation, and 6% are unsuccessful. This results in unnecessary hospitalizations, increased hospital days, increased antibiotic use and increased numbers of repeat procedures. The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced uniquely provides immediate feedback about pressure that will allow physicians to more quickly and confidently identify the cerebrospinal fluid space, and instantly determine cerebrospinal fluid pressure when the space is reached. We believe the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced will increase lumbar puncture success and decrease the proportion containing blood. It has the potential to become the standard of care and be used in every lumbar puncture procedure. This study is expected to demonstrate the clinical utility of the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced to the medical community.
5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.
Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →Seattle Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 210 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The participants randomly assigned to this arm will receive a lumbar puncture using standard procedures and equipment
The participants randomly assigned to this group will receive a lumbar puncture with the use of the Compass device.
Device: Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced
Participants randomly assigned to this group will receive a lumbar puncture using the Compass device.
Also known as: compass
Lumbar puncture success
Time to lumbar puncture success. In pediatric patients receiving emergency department care, we aim to evaluate pediatric ED provider LP success with and without the Compass, in order to determine the proportion of LPs where any CSF is obtained on any attempt
Time frame: 1 minute to 2 hours
Obtaining CSF fluid
In pediatric patients receiving emergency department care, we aim to evaluate pediatric ED provider LP success with and without the Compass, in order to determine the proportion of LPs where any CSF is obtained on any attempt
Time frame: 1 minute to 2 hours
Obtain sufficient CSF fluid
In pediatric patients receiving emergency department care, we aim to evaluate pediatric ED provider LP success with and without the Compass, in order to determine the proportion of LPs where sufficient CSF is obtained for standard tests (culture, chemistries and cell count) on any attempt
Time frame: 1 minute to 2 hours
Successful traumatic LPs (contaminated with blood)
In pediatric patients receiving emergency department care, we aim to evaluate pediatric ED provider LP success with and without the Compass, in order to determine the proportion of successful LPs that are traumatic (contaminated with blood)
Time frame: 1 minute to 2 hours
Time to fluid
In pediatric patients receiving emergency department care, we aim to evaluate pediatric ED provider LP success with and without the Compass, in order to determine the time to provider success in obtaining a drop of fluid from the needle
Time frame: 1 minute to 2 hours
Time to LP opening pressure
In pediatric patients receiving emergency department care, we aim to evaluate pediatric ED provider LP success with and without the Compass, in order to determine the time to provider success in obtaining opening pressure measurement
Time frame: 1 minute to 2 hours
Provider satisfaction
In pediatric patients receiving emergency department care, we aim to evaluate pediatric ED provider LP success with and without the Compass, in order to determine provider satisfaction with the procedure +/- device.
Time frame: 1 minute to 2 hours
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seattle Children's Hospital