CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01284959Updated Oct 23, 2012Results posted

Different Safety Profile of Risperidone and Paliperidone Extended-release

A Phase 4 interventional study of risperidone and paliperidone ER in Schizophrenia, sponsored by Chonbuk National University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 38 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-23.

Sponsored by Chonbuk National University Hospital · Phase 4 and Interventional

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 38 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this study was to assess subjective experiences related to secondary negative symptoms and cognitive performance in healthy volunteers in response to multiple doses of paliperidone ER and risperidone in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adverse events caused by these drugs were also evaluated.

Read the detailed description

A new oral antipsychotic drug, paliperidone extended-release (ER), has recently been developed and might represent an innovative approach in the treatment of schizophrenia. Paliperidone is 9-hydroxyrisperidone, the chief active metabolite of risperidone. Although paliperidone possesses a pharmacological profile very similar to that of its parent compound, it has many different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics compared with risperidone (Pani and Marchese, 2009). First, paliperidone ER utilizes an osmotic controlled-release oral delivery system (OROS), resulting in a more stable serum concentration and reduced likelihood of causing unexpected over- or under-dosages due to CYP2D6 genetic variability. Second, paliperidone does not undergo significant hepatic metabolism, and the drug is predominantly excreted by the kidney as an unchanged drug; whereas risperidone is extensively metabolized by the CYP2D6 hepatic enzyme. Third, the off-rate for dissociation from human cloned D2 receptors in tissue culture cells is faster for paliperidone (60 s) compared with risperidone (27 min) (Seeman, 2005). Due to its looser binding to D2 receptors, paliperidone should be associated with a reduced risk of extrapyramidal side effects compared with its parent drug. Fourth, ex vivo studies have indicated that paliperidone injections induce relatively smaller H1 occupancy levels in the brains of animals when compared with similar dosages of risperidone (Schotte, et al. 1995 and 1996). This may contribute to a reduced sedative effect and less weight gain secondary to paliperidone when compared with risperidone. Finally, paliperidone has no relevant affinity toward muscarinic receptors, resulting in the absence of anticholinergic side effects; this is another important benefit compared with risperidone (Schotte, et al. 1996). Therefore, paliperidone would be the drug of choice in young psychotic patients for whom preservation or improvement of cognitive function is critical. All of these properties might be associated with improved efficacy and better tolerability of paliperidone ER compared with risperidone. In support of this view, recent studies (Canuso, et al. 2008 and 2010) demonstrated that switching from risperidone to paliperidone ER resulted in improvements in medication satisfaction, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Kay, et al. 1987) score, and abbreviated Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale (Chouinard and Margolese, 2005) score. However, to date, no clinical trials have investigated the relative superiority of paliperidone ER over risperidone in terms of effects on cognitive function. Recently, interest in the negative subjective experiences secondary to antipsychotic medications has been renewed, as these experiences are key factors in adherence and clinical outcomes (Awad, 1993; van Putten and May, 1978). Artaloytia et al. (2006) reported that risperidone induced negative symptoms in healthy volunteers, which might be termed secondary negative symptoms. Therefore, we hypothesized that paliperidone ER has a better safety profile in terms of subjective experiences and cognitive function compared with risperidone. Research on the effects of antipsychotic drugs on subjective experiences and cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia may be hampered by numerous confounding factors, such as pathological features of the illness, patient motivation, or concomitant medications. Investigating the effects of antipsychotic drugs in healthy subjects provides a method for controlling these variables. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess subjective experiences related to secondary negative symptoms and cognitive performance in healthy volunteers in response to multiple doses of paliperidone ER and risperidone in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adverse events caused by these drugs were also evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cognitive function
  • subjective experiences
  • neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome
  • paliperidone extended-release
  • risperidone
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Chonbuk National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 38 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-38 years and meet no DSM-IV diagnostic criteria as assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, research version

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Anyone who:

  • Participated in other clinical trials within 30 days from the start of this clinical trial or is currently participating in one
  • Has progressive disease or in unstable medical condition unfit for the trial
  • Has been diagnosed in psychiatric terms in the past, depends on psychotropic substance, or has overdosed or depended on the substance or alcohol (except for coffee or tobacco) within 1 month from the trial start
  • Is suicidal or highly probable of suicides; OR
  • Has test results considered clinically meaningful
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    risperidone

    Drug: risperidone 3mg, PO two times Groups: risperidone

    Drug: risperidone

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    drug: lactose, PO 3 times group: placebo

    Drug: placebo

  • Experimental
    paliperidone ER

    drug : Paliperidone ER 6mg PO, two times group: paliperidone ER

    Drug: paliperidone ER

Interventions

  • Drugrisperidone

    risperidone 3mg, PO, 3 times

    Also known as: Rispedal

  • Drugpaliperidone ER

    paliperidone ER 6mg, PO,3 times

    Also known as: Invega

  • Drugplacebo

    lactose PO, 3times

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating Scales

    SANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) In NIDSS, the average of number 1 to 5 is blunted affect, the average of number 16 to 20 is avolition, the average of number 6 to 15 is cognition, the average of all score is total. Minimum of NIDSS(avolition, blunted affect, cognition, total) is -3, maximum is +3.(subscale score and total) '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 0, Maximum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.

    Time frame: baseline and 2hr after third medication

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales

    DIEPSS(Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale), VAS(Visual analog scale);mental sedation (alert-drowsy, muzzy-clear headed, mentally slow-quick witted, attentive-dreamy), physical sedation (strong-feeble, well coordinated-clumsy, lethargic-energetic, incompetent-proficient), tranquilization (calm-excited, contented-discontented, troubled-tranquil, tense-relaxed), and other types of feelings (happy-sad, antagonistic-amicable, interested-bored, withdrawn-gregarious) Minimum of VAS(Mental sedation score,Physical sedation score,Total score) is 0, Maximum is 10. VAS-total score is average of all subscale scores. Minimum of DIEPSS is 0, Maximum is 4. The higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.

    Time frame: baseline and 2hr after third medication

  2. Assessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales

    DIEPSS(Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale), VAS(Visual analog scale);mental sedation (alert-drowsy, muzzy-clear headed, mentally slow-quick witted, attentive-dreamy), physical sedation (strong-feeble, well coordinated-clumsy, lethargic-energetic, incompetent-proficient), tranquilization (calm-excited, contented-discontented, troubled-tranquil, tense-relaxed), and other types of feelings (happy-sad, antagonistic-amicable, interested-bored, withdrawn-gregarious) Minimum of VAS is 0, Maximum is 10 Minimum of DIEPSS is 0, Maximum is 4 The higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

    Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

  3. Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-1

    CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included a word fluency test. All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Word-fluency test is 0 and no maximum value, the higher number is better outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

    Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

  4. Symptoms Assessment by Objective Rating Scales

    SANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) Minimum of NIDSS is -3, maximum of NIDSS is +3. '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SNAS-Global score is 0, Maximum of SNAS-Global score is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

    Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

  5. Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-2

    CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included the Stroop test, Trail-Making Test B (TMT B). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications Minimum of Stroop test is 0, no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Trail making test B is 0 and no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

    Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

  6. Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-3

    CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Trials to complete first category trials is 0, Maximum is 128 and minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after th

    Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

07

Results

Posted Oct 23, 2012
Limitations and caveats
The sample size was small, which presents higher risk of a type II error. The time of assessment after administering placebo or risperidone was noon to 2 PM, which may have contributed to the increased reports of sedation

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
Started111211
Completed101210
Not completed101
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
Withdrew: Adverse event001

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating Scales

SANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) In NIDSS, the average of number 1 to 5 is blunted affect, the average of number 16 to 20 is avolition, the average of number 6 to 15 is cognition, the average of all score is total. Minimum of NIDSS(avolition, blunted affect, cognition, total) is -3, maximum is +3.(subscale score and total) '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 0, Maximum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.

Time frame:
baseline and 2hr after third medication
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Assessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating Scales
units on a scaleRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
NIDSS-Avolition-1.30 ± 1.22-0.28 ± 0.64-0.66 ± 0.53
NIDSS-Blunted Affect-0.70 ± 0.740.02 ± 0.35-0.24 ± 0.64
NIDSS-Cognition-0.54 ± 0.530.02 ± 0.26-0.38 ± 0.39
NIDSS-Total-0.77 ± 0.70-0.06 ± 0.35-0.42 ± 0.38
SANS-Global score for alogia0.67 ± 0.500 ± 00 ± 0
SANS-Global score for blunted affect0.67 ± 0.500 ± 00.10 ± 0.32
SecondaryAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales

DIEPSS(Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale), VAS(Visual analog scale);mental sedation (alert-drowsy, muzzy-clear headed, mentally slow-quick witted, attentive-dreamy), physical sedation (strong-feeble, well coordinated-clumsy, lethargic-energetic, incompetent-proficient), tranquilization (calm-excited, contented-discontented, troubled-tranquil, tense-relaxed), and other types of feelings (happy-sad, antagonistic-amicable, interested-bored, withdrawn-gregarious) Minimum of VAS(Mental sedation score,Physical sedation score,Total score) is 0, Maximum is 10. VAS-total score is average of all subscale scores. Minimum of DIEPSS is 0, Maximum is 4. The higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.

Time frame:
baseline and 2hr after third medication
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Assessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales
units on a scaleRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
VAS-Total score5.41 ± 1.823.35 ± 1.694.11 ± 1.63
VAS-Mental sedation score6.05 ± 2.143.85 ± 1.824.78 ± 1.56
VAS-Physical sedation score5.78 ± 1.793.23 ± 1.664.08 ± 1.94
DIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0.60 ± 0.520.08 ± 0.290.20 ± 0.42
SecondaryAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales

DIEPSS(Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale), VAS(Visual analog scale);mental sedation (alert-drowsy, muzzy-clear headed, mentally slow-quick witted, attentive-dreamy), physical sedation (strong-feeble, well coordinated-clumsy, lethargic-energetic, incompetent-proficient), tranquilization (calm-excited, contented-discontented, troubled-tranquil, tense-relaxed), and other types of feelings (happy-sad, antagonistic-amicable, interested-bored, withdrawn-gregarious) Minimum of VAS is 0, Maximum is 10 Minimum of DIEPSS is 0, Maximum is 4 The higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame:
baseline and 50hr after third medication
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Assessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales
units on a scaleRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
VAS-Total score6.15 ± 1.273.74 ± 1.803.42 ± 1.75
VAS-Mental sedation score6.53 ± 1.374.21 ± 1.873.60 ± 1.83
VAS-Physical sedation score6.25 ± 1.503.69 ± 1.903.35 ± 1.85
DIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0.25 ± 0.460 ± 00.10 ± 0.32
SecondaryAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1

CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included a word fluency test. All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Word-fluency test is 0 and no maximum value, the higher number is better outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame:
baseline and 50hr after third medication
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-1
scores on a scaleRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
Word-fluency test-Animal22.22 ± 9.4625.42 ± 4.1223.50 ± 6.22
Word-fluency test-Stationery22.56 ± 7.5826.00 ± 5.2423.60 ± 4.70
Word-fluency test-"ㄱ"17.44 ± 7.6819.75 ± 4.5417.10 ± 5.13
Word-fluency test-"ㅅ"17.44 ± 5.8518.25 ± 4.8516.40 ± 2.17
Word-fluency test-"ㅇ"16.11 ± 4.1117.17 ± 4.7316.70 ± 4.27
SecondarySymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating Scales

SANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) Minimum of NIDSS is -3, maximum of NIDSS is +3. '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SNAS-Global score is 0, Maximum of SNAS-Global score is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame:
baseline and 50hr after third medication
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Symptoms Assessment by Objective Rating Scales
units on a scaleRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
NIDSS-Avolition-0.85 ± 0.70-0.37 ± 0.720.14 ± 0.78
NIDSS-Blunted Affect-0.70 ± 0.64-0.27 ± 0.340.04 ± 0.67
NIDSS-Cognition-0.66 ± 0.57-0.26 ± 0.390.28 ± 0.61
NIDSS-Total-0.72 ± 0.59-0.29 ± 0.410.19 ± 0.63
SANS-Global score for alogia0.13 ± 0.350 ± 00 ± 0
SANS-Global score for blunted affect0.25 ± 0.460 ± 00 ± 0
SecondaryAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2

CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included the Stroop test, Trail-Making Test B (TMT B). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications Minimum of Stroop test is 0, no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Trail making test B is 0 and no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame:
baseline and 50hr after third medication
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-2
millisecondsRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
Stroop test-Color15.40 ± 4.5113.09 ± 1.6712.68 ± 1.70
Stroop test-Word-color21.84 ± 4.5317.53 ± 2.9718.31 ± 3.29
Stroop test-Interference score6.43 ± 1.774.44 ± 2.015.63 ± 2.71
Trail making test B29.78 ± 10.2428.42 ± 7.4531.10 ± 8.66
SecondaryAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3

CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Trials to complete first category trials is 0, Maximum is 128 and minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after th

Time frame:
baseline and 50hr after third medication
Reported as:
Mean · trials
Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-3
trialsRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed6.00 ± 0.006.00 ± 0.006.00 ± 0.00
Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response14.11 ± 6.0313.08 ± 8.1110.10 ± 2.96
Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error10.00 ± 3.509.67 ± 6.116.50 ± 1.18
WCST-Trials to complete first category trials14.00 ± 7.9811.75 ± 2.0112.10 ± 2.42

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Risperidone—2/11 (18.2%)5/11 (45.5%)
Placebo—0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
Paliperidone ER—0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
Abdominal discomfort(vomiting)Gastrointestinal disorders1/110/120/11
sedationNervous system disorders1/110/120/11
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ER
sedationGastrointestinal disorders5/112/120/11
abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders2/111/120/11
dizzinessNervous system disorders2/110/120/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)RisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ERTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years11121134
>=65 years0000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)RisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ERTotal
Mean28.40 ± 2.5928.08 ± 2.2330.60 ± 3.2728.97 ± 2.85
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)RisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ERTotal
Female75517
Male47617
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)RisperidonePlaceboPaliperidone ERTotal
Korea, Republic of11121134
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Chonbuk national university hospital
    Chonju, Korea, Republic of
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 23, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01284959
Lead sponsor
Chonbuk National University Hospital
Collaborators
AstraZeneca, Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea, Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sanofi-Synthelabo
Responsible party
Young Chul Chung (Professor of Psychiatry, Chonbuk National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2011
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Results posted
Oct 23, 2012
Last update
Oct 23, 2012

Study contacts

Young-chul Chung, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Chonbuk National University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion