ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT01267955Updated Aug 13, 2026Results posted

Vismodegib in Treating Patients With Advanced Chondrosarcomas

A Phase 2 interventional study of Laboratory Biomarker Analysis and Pharmacogenomic Study in Clear Cell Chondrosarcoma, Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma and Locally Advanced Chondrosarcoma, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Active, not recruiting at 6 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase II trial studies how well vismodegib works in treating patients with chondrosarcomas that have spread to other places in the body and usually cannot be cured or controlled with treatment. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vismodegib, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the antitumor activity of GDC-0449 (vismodegib) in terms of 6-month clinical benefit rate (complete response, partial response, and stable disease, as per the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] criteria 2009).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Best overall response (as per the revised RECIST criteria 2009). II. 1- and 2-year progression-free survival. III. 1- and 2-year overall survival. IV. GDC-0449 safety. V. Pharmacogenomics analysis of predictive markers of treatment outcome.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive vismodegib orally (PO) on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up every 3 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Clear Cell Chondrosarcoma
  • Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma
  • Locally Advanced Chondrosarcoma
  • Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma
  • Metastatic Chondrosarcoma
  • Primary Central Chondrosarcoma
  • Unresectable Primary Central Chondrosarcoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Chondrosarcoma

99 studies on the registry are indexed under Chondrosarcoma; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 52 across 72 interventional studies indexed under Chondrosarcoma.

Browse Chondrosarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,556 studies on the registry; 336 are open to participants now.

Of its 411 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 373 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must have confirmed diagnosis of chondrosarcoma (conventional, mesenchymal, dedifferentiated or clear cell subtypes)
  • Patients must have (outside any previously irradiated field) defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as >= 10 mm with spiral computed tomography (CT) scan
  • No more than three for advanced disease (including no more than 450 mg/m\^2 doxorubicin); at least three weeks since last chemotherapy (six weeks in case of nitrosoureas and mitomycin C), immunotherapy or any other pharmacological treatment and/or radiotherapy
  • of greater than 3 months
  • (ECOG) performance status =\< 2 ( >= 60%)
  • Leukocytes >= 3,000/mcL
  • >= 1,500/mcL
  • >= 100,000/mcL
  • Total within normal institutional limits
  • (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) =\< 2.5 X institutional
  • Creatinine within normal institutional limits OR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal
  • or unresectable locally advanced disease
  • Documented disease progression (as per ) before study entry
  • Women of and men must use two forms of (i.e., barrier contraception and one other method of contraception) at least 4 weeks prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for at least 24 months post-treatment for female patients and for 2 months for male patients; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately
  • Women of childbearing potential are required to have a negative serum pregnancy test (with a sensitivity of at least 25 mIU/mL) within 7 days prior to initiation of GDC-0449 (serum or urine); a pregnancy test (serum or urine) will be administered every 4 weeks while on study within the 24-hour period prior to the administration of GDC-0449; a positive urine test must be confirmed by a serum pregnancy test; prior to dispensing GDC-0449, the investigator must confirm and document the patient's use of two contraceptive methods, dates of negative pregnancy test, and confirm the patient's understanding of the teratogenic potential of GDC-0449

    • Women of childbearing potential are defined as follows:

      • Patients with regular menses
      • Patients with amenorrhea, irregular cycles, or using a contraceptive method that precludes withdrawal bleeding
      • Women who have had a tubal ligation
    • Women are considered not to be of childbearing potential for the following reasons:

      • The patient has undergone hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy
      • The patient is defined by amenorrhea for at least 1 year in a woman > 50 years old
      • The patient has permanent premature ovarian failure confirmed by specialist gynecologist
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written document
  • In accordance with French Regulatory Authorities: Patients with French Social Security in compliance with the French law relating to biomedical research (Huriet Law 88-1138 and related decrees)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 3 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 3 weeks earlier
  • Patients may not be receiving any other agents
  • Patients with known should be excluded from this clinical trial
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to GDC-0449 or other agents used in the study
  • Patients with malabsorption syndrome or other condition that would interfere with intestinal absorption; patients must be able to swallow capsules
  • Patients with history of liver disease, including viral or other hepatitis, or cirrhosis are ineligible
  • Patients with uncontrolled hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, or hypokalemia defined as less than the lower limit of normal for the institution, despite adequate electrolyte supplementation, are excluded from this study
  • Tumor tissue sample not available for pathological review and/or correlative studies
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study; breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with GDC-0449; these potential risks may also apply to other agents used in this study
  • (HIV)-positive patients on combination antiretroviral therapy are ineligible
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(22)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment (vismodegib)

    Patients receive vismodegib PO on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis · Other: Pharmacogenomic Study · Drug: Vismodegib

Interventions

  • OtherLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

    Correlative studies

  • OtherPharmacogenomic Study

    Correlative studies

    Also known as: PHARMACOGENOMIC

  • Given PO

    Also known as: Erivedge, GDC 0449, GDC-0449, GDC0449, Hedgehog Antagonist GDC-0449

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Centralized Imaging Review as Per RECIST 1.1

    CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete or partial responses (CR, PR) or stable disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Analysis of response was performed based on radiological centralized review. A 2-stage optimal Simon's design with 37 participants (first stage: 17 participants) was used. If 3 or less non-progressions (CR + PR + SD) at 6 months were observed during stage 1 (out of 17 participants), the trial would stopped early. Otherwise, 20 additional patients would be accrued for stage 2. If 11 or more non-progressions (out of 37 participants) were observed at the end of recruitment, further investigation of this therapy would be warranted.

    Time frame: At 6 months after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival

    Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median survival rates will be reported with a 95% confidence interval. Median follow-up will be calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 3 years

  2. Overall Survival Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria 2009

    Overall survival will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median survival rates will be reported with a 95% confidence interval. Median follow-up will be calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Time from start of treatment to the time of death, assessed up to 3 years

  3. Duration of Response

    Will be described in responding subjects using descriptive statistics (median, extreme values, etc.).

    Time frame: From the time measurement criteria are met for complete response or partial response (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented, assessed up to 3 years

  4. Mutational Status of Patched 1 and Smoothened

    The 6-months clinical benefit rate will be correlated with the mutational status of patched and smoothened in order to identify predictive factors of clinical benefit from vismodegib.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Expression Pattern of Hedgehog Signaling Molecules by Using Quantitative Reverse Transcription-polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunohistochemistry

    The 6-months clinical benefit rate will be correlated with the expression score of hedgehog signaling molecules in order to identify predictive factors of clinical benefit from vismodegib.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Nov 15, 2019

Participant flow

Stage 1 (6 Months)
Participant flow — Stage 1 (6 Months)
MilestoneTreatment (Vismodegib)
Started20
Completed17
Not completed3
Withdrew: Death3
Stage 2 (6 Months)
Participant flow — Stage 2 (6 Months)
MilestoneTreatment (Vismodegib)
Started45
Completed39
Not completed6
Withdrew: Death5
Withdrew: Protocol violation1

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Centralized Imaging Review as Per RECIST 1.1

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete or partial responses (CR, PR) or stable disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Analysis of response was performed based on radiological centralized review. A 2-stage optimal Simon's design with 37 participants (first stage: 17 participants) was used. If 3 or less non-progressions (CR + PR + SD) at 6 months were observed during stage 1 (out of 17 participants), the trial would stopped early. Otherwise, 20 additional patients would be accrued for stage 2. If 11 or more non-progressions (out of 37 participants) were observed at the end of recruitment, further investigation of this therapy would be warranted.

Time frame:
At 6 months after inclusion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Centralized Imaging Review as Per RECIST 1.1
percentage of participantsTreatment (Vismodegib)
First stage23.5 (6.8 to 49.9)
Second stage (Overall)25.6 (13.0 to 42.1)
SecondaryProgression-free Survival

Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median survival rates will be reported with a 95% confidence interval. Median follow-up will be calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
Time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 3 years

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryOverall Survival Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria 2009

Overall survival will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median survival rates will be reported with a 95% confidence interval. Median follow-up will be calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
Time from start of treatment to the time of death, assessed up to 3 years

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryDuration of Response

Will be described in responding subjects using descriptive statistics (median, extreme values, etc.).

Time frame:
From the time measurement criteria are met for complete response or partial response (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented, assessed up to 3 years

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryMutational Status of Patched 1 and Smoothened

The 6-months clinical benefit rate will be correlated with the mutational status of patched and smoothened in order to identify predictive factors of clinical benefit from vismodegib.

Time frame:
Baseline

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryExpression Pattern of Hedgehog Signaling Molecules by Using Quantitative Reverse Transcription-polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunohistochemistry

The 6-months clinical benefit rate will be correlated with the expression score of hedgehog signaling molecules in order to identify predictive factors of clinical benefit from vismodegib.

Time frame:
Baseline

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 14 months of treatment. At the time of primary analysis, 8 were still on treatment and 37 patients discontinued treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment (Vismodegib)23/45 (51.1%)22/45 (48.9%)45/45 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment (Vismodegib)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) - Other, specifyNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)5/45
SepsisInfections and infestations3/45
Adult respiratory distress syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/45
ANEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders2/45
General disorders and administration site conditions - Other, specifyGeneral disorders2/45
Tumor painNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)2/45
Surgical and medical procedures - Other, specifySurgical and medical procedures2/45
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders2/45
ABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disorders1/45
CONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disorders1/45
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 54
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment (Vismodegib)
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders29/45
FatigueGeneral disorders24/45
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders23/45
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders18/45
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders17/45
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders13/45
Weight lossInvestigations12/45
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders12/45
ANEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders9/45
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders9/45

Baseline characteristics

All patients enrolled

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment (Vismodegib)
Median58.0 (27.0 to 85.0)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment (Vismodegib)
Female14
Male31
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment (Vismodegib)
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Asian—
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander—
Black or African American—
White—
More than one race—
Unknown or Not Reported—
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Treatment (Vismodegib)
France45
ECOG Performance status
ECOG Performance status(Participants)Treatment (Vismodegib)
020
120
25
Weight
Weight(kilogram)Treatment (Vismodegib)
Median76.5 (51.0 to 102.0)
Height
Height(millimetres)Treatment (Vismodegib)
Median173.0 (148.0 to 200.0)
Histological subtype
Histological subtype(Participants)Treatment (Vismodegib)
Conventional chondrosarcoma39
Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma5
Clear cell chondrosarcoma1
Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma0

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

6 sites
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Italiano A, Le Cesne A, Bellera C, Piperno-Neumann S, Duffaud F, Penel N, Cassier P, Domont J, Takebe N, Kind M, Coindre JM, Blay JY, Bui B. GDC-0449 in patients with advanced chondrosarcomas: a French Sarcoma Group/US and French National Cancer Institute Single-Arm Phase II Collaborative Study. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov;24(11):2922-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt391. PubMed 24170610 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01267955
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 29, 2010
Start date
Dec 21, 2010
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018
Completion
Jul 21, 2027 (estimated)
Results posted
Nov 15, 2019
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Antoine Italiano
principal investigator · Institut Bergonie Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: HhAntag691

Start the discussion