CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01265615Updated Jun 9, 2015Results posted

Paricalcitol Versus Calcitriol for the Management of Renocardiac Syndrome in Renal Transplant Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Paricalcitol and Calcitriol in Cardiorenal Syndrome and Chronic Allograft Nephropathy, sponsored by Ural State Medical University. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to male participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-09.

Sponsored by Ural State Medical University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
109
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

We hypothesize that paricalcitol and calcitriol in dose-dependent manner are effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). We assume that paricalcitol can have some advantages if compare with calcitriol or cholecalciferol due to absence of calcemic and phosphatemic complications alongside with great beneficial potential.

Read the detailed description

Paricalcitol and calcitriol are identically effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). Vitamin D can reduce progression of CAD. Activation of VDR in proximal part of nephron leads to rapid non-genomic beneficial effects with urgent multilevel protection of the most functionally important portion of kidney. Rising expression of VDR in distal portions of nephron stimulates slows genomic effects with some local repair responses.

Hormone D may stimulate recruitment and activity of the different origin stem-progenitor cells (SPCs) with beneficial effects on different stages of regeneration by force of para- and autocrine activity. SPCs are revealing mostly in interstitium and among fibroblast-like cells. Vitamin D did not confirm efficacy as a tool for management of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in human however it needs more research experimental evidences due to multifactorial influence on SPCs in human being including immunosuppressive and bone-marrow-related effects of cyclosporine in kidney transplant (Tx) patients. Paricalcitol and calcitriol can slow down migration and infiltration of MSC into interstitium and vessel wall. The side population of mature and SPCs (first of all, with bone-marrow and mesenchymal phenotype) is the most metabolically and functionally active portion of cells with high sensitivity to vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation that responsible for repair of tissue.

The most optimal scheme of treatment with vitamin D in patients with CAD and CRS is an administration of paricalcitol with dose 2-4 μg daily and supplemental intake of vitamin D including special diet, multivitamins, and others with optimal dose until 1800 international units (IU) but excluding insolation as a factor of skin carcinoma. High-dose medicinal intake of calcitriol (until 6 mcg and higher) showed relatively high efficacy but rather excessive level of complications mediated with mineral metabolism.

Paricalcitol and calcitriol may significantly improve contractility of myocardium and reduce cardiovascular risk, heart failure (HF) and hypertension with some beneficial effects on cardiorenal axis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiorenal Syndrome
  • Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

Keywords

  • chronic allograft nephropathy
  • stem-progenitor cells
  • cardiorenal syndrome
  • calcitriol
  • paricalcitol
  • cholecalciferol
  • cardiac repair
  • renal repair
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 109 is above the median of 70 across 2,640 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Ural State Medical University is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 40-75
  • Male
  • History of chronic kidney disease and cardiorenal syndrome
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Acute illness
  • Life-threat competitive illness
  • Mental disorders
  • Endocrinologic diseases (including diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, and other thyroid disorders)
  • Need for dialyses
  • Hypercalcemia
  • Concomitant use of hormone or cytokine medication
  • Participation to any drug-investigation during the previous 60 days as checked with VIP check
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
109 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Paricalcitol treatment

    6-8 μg daily per os (orally) without special diet

    Drug: Paricalcitol

  • Active comparator
    Calcitriol treatment

    2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D

    Drug: Calcitriol

  • Active comparator
    Cholecalciferol

    alendronate sodium/ cholecalciferol capsules with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day

    Drug: Cholecalciferol

  • Other
    Supplemental

    intake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day

    Dietary Supplement: Supplemental

Interventions

  • DrugParicalcitol

    paricalcitol group (6-8 μg daily per os - orally - without special diet)

    Also known as: Zemplar

  • DrugCalcitriol

    calcitriol group (2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D)

    Also known as: Rocaltrol

  • DrugCholecalciferol

    cholecalciferol group (intake of cholecalciferol with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day)

    Also known as: Fosamax

  • Dietary supplementSupplemental

    intake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day

    Also known as: Diet, sun, multivitamin drugs, food

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree

    Beyond 180 days, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) was characterized by mean Banff degree (revised 2005/2007 criteria) with the data of renal biopsy material. Renal tissue was recovered during routined biopsy. We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades: Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (\>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)

    Time frame: day 180 after Tx (transplantation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heart Failure (HF)

    NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class verified with veloergometry probe and by NYHA clinical classification NYHA Class Symptoms I No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. II Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. III Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m). Comfortable only at rest. IV Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.

    Time frame: on day 180 after Tx (transplantation)

  2. GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)

    Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated form of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation: eGFR = exp (5.228 - 1.154 × ln (serum creatinine) - 0.203 × ln (age). Concerning of GFR with Tc99m DTPA renography was used for the complex analysis of renal function. Camera based GFR estimated from Tc99m DTPA renography was named Gates GFR.

    Time frame: on day 180

  3. CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree

    CAD degree measured by Banff score after routine renal biopsy (revised 2005/2007 criteria). We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades: Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (\>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)

    Time frame: on day 90

  4. Serum Creatinine

    After an overnight fast, plasma concentrations of hemoglobin, creatinine, cholesterol, glucose, total calcium, and phosphate were measured using an autoanalyzer as described by Adorini L. (2005)

    Time frame: on day 180 after Tx

  5. Number of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells

    Renal cells and solid tissue were obtained from the normal portion of cortex obtained from surgically removed kidneys or by standart biopsy on day 180. Cytofluorimetric analysis and immunofluorescence were performed as described by Oliver J.A. (2004). Sorting and analysis of different cells was done on a FACS (fluorescent activated cell sorting) and by flow cytometry. Cells were analyzed with EPICS systems (Beckman Coulter). Quantification of mRNA expression was achieved using Assays-on-Demand gene expression kits and the ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystem).

    Time frame: on day 180

  6. VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium

    VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.

    Time frame: on day 180

  7. VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney

    VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.

    Time frame: on day 180

  8. Systolic Blood Pressure

    SBP measured by routine method

    Time frame: on day 180

  9. Coronary Calcium Score

    Bone mineral density assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the whole body, lumbar spine and hip was performed using Hologic scanners (QDR 1000W or QDR 2000). The total Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) was measured as the sum of calcified plaque scores of all the coronary arteries. The amount of calcium present in the coronary arteries is scored according to the Agatson scale, as follows: 0 - no identifiable disease; 1 to 99 - mild disease; 100 to 399 - moderate disease; 400 or higher - severe disease.

    Time frame: on day 180

07

Results

Posted Jun 21, 2011

Participant flow

A total of 120 patients (Russian and dutch caucasian, kidney recipients with vitamin D deficiency defined as 25(OH)D \< 30 ng/mL) were assigned on the basis of Ural Institute of Cardiology. Nine of the 120 patients were subsequently excluded due to protocol violation. All the patients had given their written informed consents.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
Started30303030
Completed28282627
Not completed2243
Withdrew: Protocol violation2243

Outcome measures

PrimaryCAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree

Beyond 180 days, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) was characterized by mean Banff degree (revised 2005/2007 criteria) with the data of renal biopsy material. Renal tissue was recovered during routined biopsy. We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades: Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (\>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)

Time frame:
day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Banff scale
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Scores on a Banff scaleParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree1.24 ± 0.141.22 ± 0.421.43 ± 0.221.68 ± 0.36
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryHeart Failure (HF)

NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class verified with veloergometry probe and by NYHA clinical classification NYHA Class Symptoms I No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. II Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. III Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m). Comfortable only at rest. IV Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.

Time frame:
on day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
Reported as:
Mean · NYHA functional class of HF
Heart Failure (HF)
NYHA functional class of HFParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
Heart Failure (HF)1.8 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.31.9 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.2
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryGFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated form of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation: eGFR = exp (5.228 - 1.154 × ln (serum creatinine) - 0.203 × ln (age). Concerning of GFR with Tc99m DTPA renography was used for the complex analysis of renal function. Camera based GFR estimated from Tc99m DTPA renography was named Gates GFR.

Time frame:
on day 180
Reported as:
Mean · ml/min/1.73 m^2
GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)
ml/min/1.73 m^2Paricalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)84 ± 1181 ± 976 ± 1054 ± 9
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryCAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree

CAD degree measured by Banff score after routine renal biopsy (revised 2005/2007 criteria). We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades: Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (\>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)

Time frame:
on day 90
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Banff scale
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Scores on a Banff scaleParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree1.24 ± 0.141.22 ± 0.421.43 ± 0.221.68 ± 0.36
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondarySerum Creatinine

After an overnight fast, plasma concentrations of hemoglobin, creatinine, cholesterol, glucose, total calcium, and phosphate were measured using an autoanalyzer as described by Adorini L. (2005)

Time frame:
on day 180 after Tx
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Serum Creatinine
mg/dLParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
Serum Creatinine2.5 ± 0.92.5 ± 0.72.8 ± 0.74.1 ± 1.1
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryNumber of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells

Renal cells and solid tissue were obtained from the normal portion of cortex obtained from surgically removed kidneys or by standart biopsy on day 180. Cytofluorimetric analysis and immunofluorescence were performed as described by Oliver J.A. (2004). Sorting and analysis of different cells was done on a FACS (fluorescent activated cell sorting) and by flow cytometry. Cells were analyzed with EPICS systems (Beckman Coulter). Quantification of mRNA expression was achieved using Assays-on-Demand gene expression kits and the ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystem).

Time frame:
on day 180
Reported as:
Mean · per cent of SP cells
Number of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells
per cent of SP cellsParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
Number of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells7.6 ± 0.96.5 ± 15.7 ± 0.84.2 ± 0.7
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryVDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium

VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.

Time frame:
on day 180
Reported as:
Mean · fmol VDR/ mg protein
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium
fmol VDR/ mg proteinParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium801 ± 112715 ± 96654 ± 88389 ± 77
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryVDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney

VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.

Time frame:
on day 180
Reported as:
Mean · fmol VDR/ mg protein
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney
fmol VDR/ mg proteinParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney584 ± 103599 ± 102478 ± 79333 ± 62
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondarySystolic Blood Pressure

SBP measured by routine method

Time frame:
on day 180
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Systolic Blood Pressure
mmHgParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
Systolic Blood Pressure143 ± 22141 ± 9147 ± 13165 ± 19
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryCoronary Calcium Score

Bone mineral density assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the whole body, lumbar spine and hip was performed using Hologic scanners (QDR 1000W or QDR 2000). The total Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) was measured as the sum of calcified plaque scores of all the coronary arteries. The amount of calcium present in the coronary arteries is scored according to the Agatson scale, as follows: 0 - no identifiable disease; 1 to 99 - mild disease; 100 to 399 - moderate disease; 400 or higher - severe disease.

Time frame:
on day 180
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Coronary Calcium Score
units on a scaleParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
Coronary Calcium Score530 ± 423611 ± 502524 ± 122990 ± 120
Statistical analysis
  • Paricalcitol Treatment vs Calcitriol Treatment vs Cholecalciferol vs Supplemental · ANOVA · p = <0.05

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Paricalcitol Treatment—9/30 (30%)10/30 (33.3%)
Calcitriol Treatment—21/30 (70%)15/30 (50%)
Cholecalciferol—6/30 (20%)9/30 (30%)
Supplemental—8/30 (26.7%)9/30 (30%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
HypophospatemiaEndocrine disorders7/3016/305/301/30
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/301/300/305/30
HypercalcemiaEndocrine disorders2/304/300/300/30
StrokeNervous system disorders0/300/301/302/30
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 45
Most frequent other events
EventParicalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplemental
FatigueGeneral disorders5/307/303/304/30
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders4/305/304/307/30
Increased hypertensionCardiac disorders4/303/305/306/30
PainGeneral disorders4/304/305/304/30
EdemaMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/304/305/303/30
Chest PainGeneral disorders1/302/304/303/30
AnorexiaPsychiatric disorders0/304/300/300/30
Taste perversionsGastrointestinal disorders3/304/302/302/30
DizzinessNervous system disorders3/303/302/304/30
VertigoNervous system disorders3/302/304/303/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Paricalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplementalTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years28282627109
>=65 years224311
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Paricalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplementalTotal
Mean56 ± 459 ± 458 ± 557 ± 458 ± 9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Paricalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplementalTotal
Female00000
Male30303030120
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Paricalcitol TreatmentCalcitriol TreatmentCholecalciferolSupplementalTotal
Russian Federation30303030120
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • De Haar Research Foundation
    Rotterdam, South Holland 3071PR, Netherlands
  • Ural Institute of Cardiology
    Yekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kharlamov AN, Perrish AN, Gabiskii IaL, Ronne Kh, Ivanova EIu. [Vitamin D in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome in patients with chronic nephropathy]. Kardiologiia. 2012;52(3):33-44. Russian. PubMed 22839442 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01265615
Lead sponsor
Ural State Medical University
Collaborators
Ural Institute of Cardiology, De Haar Research Foundation
Responsible party
Alexander Kharlamov (Lecturer at the Ural Medical University, Ural State Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 23, 2010
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Results posted
Jun 21, 2011
Last update
Jun 9, 2015

Study contacts

Alexander Kharlamov, M.D.
principal investigator · Ural Institute of Cardiology
Alexander Perrish, M.D.
principal investigator · Ural State Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion