An interventional study of ASR METHOD in TIBIA PSEUDOARTHROSES, sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-11-24.
Sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
In this study the investigators are presenting the advantages as well as the disadvantages of ACUTE SHORTENING AND RELENGTHENINIG VS SEGMENT TRANSPORT methods.
41 studies on the registry are indexed under Pseudarthrosis; 7 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 22 is close to the median of 22 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Pseudarthrosis.
Browse Pseudarthrosis studies →Bezmialem Vakif University is the lead sponsor of 354 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:TIBIA PSEUDOARTHROSES -
Exclusion Criteria:BONE LOSS GREATER THAN 10 CM
-
Other: ASR METHOD
TREATMENT PERIOD AND COMPLICATION RATE
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.