ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01245998REVETRUpdated May 4, 2018

Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Superficial Vein Thrombosis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dalteparin and Dalteparin in Superficial Thrombophlebitis, sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Completed at 1 site in Slovenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-04.

Sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to establish whether treatment of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) with low-molecular-weight heparin in preventive or therapeutic doses prevents disease progression and thromboembolic events (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), whether efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin differs with regard to the dosage used (prevention, treatment), and to recognize groups of patients in which treatment with heparin is most efficient, as well as to determine factors that influence the efficacy of SVT treatment with heparin.

Read the detailed description

Until recently thrombophlebitis was regarded as a benign and self-limiting disease. Recent studies have shown that various complications, especially vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism, often accompany SVT. An observational study (Prospective Observational Superficial Thrombophlebitis - POST) showed that three months after onset of the disease thromboembolic events occurred in 10% of patients: pulmonary embolism in 0.4%, disease progression in 3.1% and disease recurrence in 1.9% of patients. Therefore, SVT is now frequently regarded as a part of the thromboembolic syndrome. On the basis of the evidence referred to above anticoagulants, especially heparin, are used more and more often for treatment of SVT instead of anti-inflammatory drugs and non-steroidal antirheumatics. Several studies performed so far have examined the efficacy of standard and low-molecular-weight heparin in various doses, but no final conclusion on the efficacy of treatment of SVT with heparin has been established yet.

A study by Marchiori and colleagues showed that 8-12-day treatment of SVT with preventive and therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin significantly reduces progression and relapse of the disease, but not its thromboembolic complications. Another study demonstrated that low-molecular-weight heparin in combination with elastic compression was not significantly more effective than compression alone. Comparison of preventive and therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin given to patients over the period of one month after disease onset showed no differences in the efficacy in prevention of disease progression and thromboembolic complications. The standard (unfractionated) heparin was also shown to be effective in preventing disease progression, however, but not in preventing thromboembolic complications. It is also not clear how long the treatment with heparin should last. So far only one study compared the efficacy of treatment with various doses of low-molecular-weight heparin from one month to three months' duration; it demonstrated that 1-month treatment with lower doses of heparin was as effective as 3-month treatment with therapeutic doses of heparin. A recent study (CALISTO) compared the efficacy of preventive doses of fondaparinux (2.5 mg) with placebo in more than 3,000 patients with SVT and concluded that anticoagulant treatment of SVT probably does not significantly influence prevention of thromboembolic complications (Abstract presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology).

Results of recent studies show that heparin (standard or low-molecular-weight heparin) in various doses prevents SVT progression, but no final agreement has emerged as to whether they prevent the occurrence of thromboembolic complications. Interpretation of the results is difficult because of the heterogeneity of the patients included in certain studies and especially because of unavailability of subgroup analyses, which would help to establish whether treatment with heparin is more effective in certain groups of patients with SVT than in those with presenting forms of the disease. Latest (2008) guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolic events adopted by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend treatment with at least preventive or median doses of low-molecular-weight heparin or standard heparin for the duration of not less than 4 weeks. This recommendation was based on a very low evidence level (level 2B).

In this study, we aim to investigate whether the extensiveness of thrombophlebitis and the proximal distance of the end of a blood clot from saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal junction influence the efficacy of SVT treatment with heparin. The investigators shall also monitor the expression of systemic inflammatory parameters that might be related to the efficacy of the treatment and progression of the disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Superficial Thrombophlebitis

Keywords

  • Thrombophlebitis
  • Venous thrombosis
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Anticoagulants
  • Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin
03

In context

Thrombophlebitis

15 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombophlebitis; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 68 is below the median of 104 across 11 interventional studies indexed under Thrombophlebitis.

Browse Thrombophlebitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 296 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • written to participate in the study
  • symptomatic thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein measuring at least 10 cm or the small saphenous vein measuring at least 10 cm or a collateral of the great saphenous vein measuring at least 10 cm (within 7 days from the onset of the disease)
  • age 18 to 85 years
  • body weight 65 to 85 kg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to objectively confirm the diagnosis
  • excessive or insufficient body weight (more than 85 kg or less than 60 kg)
  • history of previous thromboembolic complications (including previous thrombophlebitis, vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism)
  • for anticoagulant treatment
  • active bleeding or high risk for bleeding contraindicating treatment with (LMWH)
  • diseases requiring anticoagulant treatment
  • proximal or distal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (either symptomatic or incidentally found asymptomatic)
  • thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein at a distance of less than 5 cm from the saphenofemoral junction or thrombophlebitis of small saphenous vein at a distance of less than 3 cm from the saphenopopliteal junction
  • thrombophlebitis that might arise as a consequence of a previous intravenous access (infusion thrombophlebitis), sclerotherapy or surgical treatment of chronic vein insufficiency
  • pregnancy, known malignant disease or chemotherapy
  • immobility
  • advanced stage of kidney failure (GF \< 30 mL/min/1.72 m2)
  • significant liver disease (e.g., acute hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis) or (ALT) >\= 2 times the (ULN), or total (TBL) x 1.5 times the ULN
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    dalteparin 5000 I.U./24 h s.c.

    Drug: Dalteparin

  • Active comparator
    dalteparin 15000 I.U./24 h s.c.

    Drug: Dalteparin

Interventions

  • dalteparin 5000 I.U./24 h s.c. for 6 weeks

    Also known as: Fragmin

  • dalteparin 15000 I.U./24 h s.c. for 6 weeks

    Also known as: Fragmin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin - dalteparin in patients with ST

    To compare the efficacy of therapeutic vs. preventive doses of dalteparin in prevention of thromboembolic complications and disease progression in patients with acute thrombophlebitis of lower extremities

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Combined end-point: occurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism or ultrasonographic blood clot progression or relapse of ST

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Clinically relevant bleeding occurring

    (i.e., major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding)

    Time frame: during treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. To investigate the safety of ST treatment with preventive doses of dalteparin compared with therapeutic doses, death, bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. To ascertain whether the extent or progression of ST is related to systemic inflammatory parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. To study a possible correlation between effectiveness of treatment of ST with preventive and therapeutic doses of dalteparin and severity of systemic inflammatory parameters.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. To determine whether the extension of anticoagulant treatment with the study drug for additional six weeks is more effective and safer

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Spirkoska A, Jezovnik MK, Poredos P. Time course and the recanalization rate of superficial vein thrombosis treated with low-molecular-weight heparin. Angiology. 2015 Apr;66(4):381-6. doi: 10.1177/0003319714533183. Epub 2014 May 7. PubMed 24807875 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2010 to primary completion in Dec 2012, 24 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 22, 2010
First posted
Nov 23, 2010
StartActual
Dec 1, 2010
Primary completionActual
Dec 3, 2012
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2014
Last update
May 4, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01245998
Responsible party
Pavel POREDOS (professor tenure track, board certified in internal medicine, cardiology and vascular disease, head of the research department, University Medical Centre Ljubljana) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 23, 2010
Start date
Dec 1, 2010
Primary completion
Dec 3, 2012
Completion
Jan 1, 2014
Last update
May 4, 2018

Study contacts

Pavel Poredos, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Vascular Disease

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dalteparin

Start the discussion