A Phase 4 interventional study of Dalteparin and Dalteparin in Superficial Thrombophlebitis, sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Completed at 1 site in Slovenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-04.
Sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of the study is to establish whether treatment of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) with low-molecular-weight heparin in preventive or therapeutic doses prevents disease progression and thromboembolic events (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), whether efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin differs with regard to the dosage used (prevention, treatment), and to recognize groups of patients in which treatment with heparin is most efficient, as well as to determine factors that influence the efficacy of SVT treatment with heparin.
Until recently thrombophlebitis was regarded as a benign and self-limiting disease. Recent studies have shown that various complications, especially vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism, often accompany SVT. An observational study (Prospective Observational Superficial Thrombophlebitis - POST) showed that three months after onset of the disease thromboembolic events occurred in 10% of patients: pulmonary embolism in 0.4%, disease progression in 3.1% and disease recurrence in 1.9% of patients. Therefore, SVT is now frequently regarded as a part of the thromboembolic syndrome. On the basis of the evidence referred to above anticoagulants, especially heparin, are used more and more often for treatment of SVT instead of anti-inflammatory drugs and non-steroidal antirheumatics. Several studies performed so far have examined the efficacy of standard and low-molecular-weight heparin in various doses, but no final conclusion on the efficacy of treatment of SVT with heparin has been established yet.
A study by Marchiori and colleagues showed that 8-12-day treatment of SVT with preventive and therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin significantly reduces progression and relapse of the disease, but not its thromboembolic complications. Another study demonstrated that low-molecular-weight heparin in combination with elastic compression was not significantly more effective than compression alone. Comparison of preventive and therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin given to patients over the period of one month after disease onset showed no differences in the efficacy in prevention of disease progression and thromboembolic complications. The standard (unfractionated) heparin was also shown to be effective in preventing disease progression, however, but not in preventing thromboembolic complications. It is also not clear how long the treatment with heparin should last. So far only one study compared the efficacy of treatment with various doses of low-molecular-weight heparin from one month to three months' duration; it demonstrated that 1-month treatment with lower doses of heparin was as effective as 3-month treatment with therapeutic doses of heparin. A recent study (CALISTO) compared the efficacy of preventive doses of fondaparinux (2.5 mg) with placebo in more than 3,000 patients with SVT and concluded that anticoagulant treatment of SVT probably does not significantly influence prevention of thromboembolic complications (Abstract presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology).
Results of recent studies show that heparin (standard or low-molecular-weight heparin) in various doses prevents SVT progression, but no final agreement has emerged as to whether they prevent the occurrence of thromboembolic complications. Interpretation of the results is difficult because of the heterogeneity of the patients included in certain studies and especially because of unavailability of subgroup analyses, which would help to establish whether treatment with heparin is more effective in certain groups of patients with SVT than in those with presenting forms of the disease. Latest (2008) guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolic events adopted by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend treatment with at least preventive or median doses of low-molecular-weight heparin or standard heparin for the duration of not less than 4 weeks. This recommendation was based on a very low evidence level (level 2B).
In this study, we aim to investigate whether the extensiveness of thrombophlebitis and the proximal distance of the end of a blood clot from saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal junction influence the efficacy of SVT treatment with heparin. The investigators shall also monitor the expression of systemic inflammatory parameters that might be related to the efficacy of the treatment and progression of the disease.
15 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombophlebitis; 2 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 68 is below the median of 104 across 11 interventional studies indexed under Thrombophlebitis.
Browse Thrombophlebitis studies →University Medical Centre Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 296 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Drug: Dalteparin
Drug: Dalteparin
dalteparin 5000 I.U./24 h s.c. for 6 weeks
Also known as: Fragmin
dalteparin 15000 I.U./24 h s.c. for 6 weeks
Also known as: Fragmin
To assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin - dalteparin in patients with ST
To compare the efficacy of therapeutic vs. preventive doses of dalteparin in prevention of thromboembolic complications and disease progression in patients with acute thrombophlebitis of lower extremities
Time frame: 3 months
Combined end-point: occurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism or ultrasonographic blood clot progression or relapse of ST
Time frame: 3 months
Clinically relevant bleeding occurring
(i.e., major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding)
Time frame: during treatment
To investigate the safety of ST treatment with preventive doses of dalteparin compared with therapeutic doses, death, bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
Time frame: 3 months
To ascertain whether the extent or progression of ST is related to systemic inflammatory parameters
Time frame: 12 months
To study a possible correlation between effectiveness of treatment of ST with preventive and therapeutic doses of dalteparin and severity of systemic inflammatory parameters.
Time frame: 12 months
To determine whether the extension of anticoagulant treatment with the study drug for additional six weeks is more effective and safer
Time frame: 3 months
Ran from Dec 2010 to primary completion in Dec 2012, 24 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Dalteparin
University Medical Centre Ljubljana →