CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01220557PRIMASUpdated Aug 17, 2021Results posted

Evaluation of a Treatment and Education Programme for Type 1 Diabetic Patients (PRIMAS)

An interventional study of PRIMAS and DTTP in Type 1 Diabetes, sponsored by Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-17.

Sponsored by Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a randomized prospective trial with 6-month follow up. A non-inferiority hypothesis is tested. A new developed treatment and education programme for type 1 diabetic patients (PRIMAS) will be tested compared to an established treatment and education programme (German DTTP). Primary outcome variable is glycemic control at 6-month follow up. Secondary outcome variables are: diabetes knowledge, diabetes related distress, depressive symptoms, diabetes self-efficacy, self-care behavior, attitudes towards diabetes and insulin treatment, hypoglycemia awareness.

Read the detailed description

Both programmes consists of 12 lessons with a length of 90 minutes. Eligible type 1 diabetic patients in a diabetologist practice are pooled and randomised either to the new developed PRIMAS programme or to an established education programme for type 1 diabetic patients (DTTP - Treatment and education programme for intensified insulin treatment) as an active comparator.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

  • Diabetes mellitus, education, self management
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 40 across 2,649 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

type 1 diabetes, diabetes duration > 4 weeks, age 18 - 75 years, BMI 20 - 40 kg/m², A1c 7 - 13 %, ability to understand, speak and write German language, written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

current treatment of psychological or psychiatric disorder, dementia or severe cognitive impairment, severe organic disease (e.g. terminal renal disease, cancer with poor prognosis), preventing a regular participation in the training course, pregnancy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PRIMAS group

    PRIMAS is a newly developed treatment and education programme for type 1 diabetic patients. It consists of 12 lessons (duration 90 minutes each), slides for diabetes educators and patient material

    Behavioral: PRIMAS

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    The German DTTP (Diabetes Teaching and Treatment Programme) - The German ZI Program - is an established treatment and education programme for intensified insulin treatment consisting of 12 lessons (90 minutes duration each). Flipchart for diabetes educators and patient material.

    Behavioral: DTTP

Interventions

  • BehavioralPRIMAS

    PRIMAS is a newly developed treatment and education programme for type 1 diabetic patients. It consists of 12 lessons (duration 90 minutes each), slides for diabetes educators and patient material

  • BehavioralDTTP

    The German DTTP (Diabetes Teaching and Treatment Programme) - The German ZI Program - is an established treatment and education programme for intensified insulin treatment consisting of 12 lessons (90 minutes duration each). Flipchart for diabetes educators and patient material.

    Also known as: The German Diabetes Teaching and Treatment Programme, ZI Treatment and Education Program for intensified insulin theapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Glycemic Control Measured by A1c

    Difference between baseline A1c and A1c at 6 month follow up. Equivalent effect on glycemic control measured by A1c (non-inferiority). In case of-non-inferiority test of superiority.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diabetes Knowledge

    To assess knowledge among insulin-treated diabetes patients, participants completed a new developed 11-item diabetes knowledge score. Each item had to be answered by selecting the correct answer from multiple choices. The numbers of correct answers are summed up; thus, the range of the diabetes knowledge score is between 0 and 11.

    Time frame: 6 month

  2. Hypoglycaemia Awareness Score

    The hypoglycemia awareness questionnaire provides a score indicating the severity of hypoglycaemia unawareness. This scale ranges from 0 (maximum hypoglycaemia awareness) to 7 (minimum hypoglycaemia awareness), where a score of 4 suggests reduced hypoglycaemia awareness.

    Time frame: 6 month

  3. Diabetes Empowerment Score (DES)

    Empowerment was measured by a German version of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale, a measure of diabetes-related psychosocial self-efficacy.

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

  4. Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA)

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure is a self-report measure of diabetes self-management assessing several aspects of the diabetes regimen.

    Time frame: 6 month

  5. Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)

    Diabetes related distress was assessed by a German version of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). The DDS is a 17-item self-report scale for the assessment of emotional burdens in diabetes treatment in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

  6. CES-D Score

    Depressive symptoms were assessed using the German version of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), an instrument for measuring number and severity of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

  7. Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale

    A German version of the Diabetes Self-efficacy Scale was used to assess diabetes specific self-efficacy.

    Time frame: 6 Month Follow up

  8. Treatment Satisfaction / Problem Areas in Dealing With Diabetes

    Satisfaction with current diabetes treatment was assessed by a diabetes satisfaction questionnaire developed by Kulzer et al. This questionnaire uncovers problems in dealing with diabetes, also. A high score indicates dissatisfaction with insulin therapy.

    Time frame: 6 Month Follow up

  9. Evaluation of the Diabetes Education Course

    Patients satisfaction with the diabetes education programs was assessed using a self-constructed 12-item scale on specific questions regarding contents and performance of the training. Response mode was a scale ranging from 4 (apply very strong) to 0 (apply not at all). Additionally, patients were asked to give an overall grade for their course ranging from 1 (very good) to 6 (unsatisfactory).

    Time frame: 6 month Follow up

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2014

Participant flow

The participants were recruited in 23 outpatient study centres, which were located all over Germany. A study centre was defined as a medical practice run by a diabetologist and a diabetes educator or diabetes nurse.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePRIMAS GroupControl Group
Started8179
Completed7574
Not completed65
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up53
Withdrew: Attended less than 6 lessons12

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in Glycemic Control Measured by A1c

Difference between baseline A1c and A1c at 6 month follow up. Equivalent effect on glycemic control measured by A1c (non-inferiority). In case of-non-inferiority test of superiority.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Changes in A1c in percentage points
Changes in Glycemic Control Measured by A1c
Changes in A1c in percentage pointsPRIMAS GroupControl Group
Changes in Glycemic Control Measured by A1c-0.4 ± 1.00.0 ± 0.6
SecondaryDiabetes Knowledge

To assess knowledge among insulin-treated diabetes patients, participants completed a new developed 11-item diabetes knowledge score. Each item had to be answered by selecting the correct answer from multiple choices. The numbers of correct answers are summed up; thus, the range of the diabetes knowledge score is between 0 and 11.

Time frame:
6 month

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryHypoglycaemia Awareness Score

The hypoglycemia awareness questionnaire provides a score indicating the severity of hypoglycaemia unawareness. This scale ranges from 0 (maximum hypoglycaemia awareness) to 7 (minimum hypoglycaemia awareness), where a score of 4 suggests reduced hypoglycaemia awareness.

Time frame:
6 month

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryDiabetes Empowerment Score (DES)

Empowerment was measured by a German version of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale, a measure of diabetes-related psychosocial self-efficacy.

Time frame:
6 month follow up

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondarySummary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA)

The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure is a self-report measure of diabetes self-management assessing several aspects of the diabetes regimen.

Time frame:
6 month

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryDiabetes Distress Scale (DDS)

Diabetes related distress was assessed by a German version of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). The DDS is a 17-item self-report scale for the assessment of emotional burdens in diabetes treatment in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Time frame:
6 month follow up

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCES-D Score

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the German version of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), an instrument for measuring number and severity of depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
6 month follow up

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryDiabetes Self-Efficacy Scale

A German version of the Diabetes Self-efficacy Scale was used to assess diabetes specific self-efficacy.

Time frame:
6 Month Follow up

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryTreatment Satisfaction / Problem Areas in Dealing With Diabetes

Satisfaction with current diabetes treatment was assessed by a diabetes satisfaction questionnaire developed by Kulzer et al. This questionnaire uncovers problems in dealing with diabetes, also. A high score indicates dissatisfaction with insulin therapy.

Time frame:
6 Month Follow up

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryEvaluation of the Diabetes Education Course

Patients satisfaction with the diabetes education programs was assessed using a self-constructed 12-item scale on specific questions regarding contents and performance of the training. Response mode was a scale ranging from 4 (apply very strong) to 0 (apply not at all). Additionally, patients were asked to give an overall grade for their course ranging from 1 (very good) to 6 (unsatisfactory).

Time frame:
6 month Follow up

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PRIMAS Group—0/81 (0%)0/81 (0%)
Control Group—0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PRIMAS GroupControl GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7477151
>=65 years729
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PRIMAS GroupControl GroupTotal
Mean45.9 ± 13.845.1 ± 13.445.5 ± 13.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PRIMAS GroupControl GroupTotal
Female313970
Male504090
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PRIMAS GroupControl GroupTotal
Germany8179160
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Ehrmann D, Bergis-Jurgan N, Haak T. The effect of a diabetes education programme (PRIMAS) for people with type 1 diabetes: results of a randomized trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;102(3):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 9. PubMed 24210673 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01220557
Lead sponsor
Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim
Responsible party
Norbert Hermanns (PhD, Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 14, 2010
Start date
Sep 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Completion
Mar 2012
Results posted
Aug 26, 2014
Last update
Aug 17, 2021

Study contacts

Norbert Hermanns, PhD
principal investigator · Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim (FIDAM GmbH)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion