CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01216761Updated Jan 11, 2017Results posted

A Cluster-randomized Cross-over Trial Evaluating the Comparative Effectiveness of Three Skin Antiseptic Interventions

An interventional study of Iodine tincture and Chlorhexidine gluconate in Bacteremia, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-11.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,879
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Contaminated blood cultures result in unnecessary antibiotic use, increased length of stay, and additional laboratory tests, all of which increase healthcare costs. While the optimal skin antisepsis agent for reducing blood culture contamination is not known, the cost of various agents differs substantially.

Objective: To determine the relative rates of blood culture contamination for 3 skin antisepsis interventions - 10% povidone iodine aqueous solution (PI), 2% iodine tincture (IT) and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (CHG) - when used by dedicated phlebotomy teams to obtain peripheral blood cultures in adult non-ICU medical and surgical patients.

Read the detailed description

A group-randomized crossover trial was conducted to test the null hypothesis of no difference in blood culture contamination rates among 3 antiseptic skin preparations. The sequence of 3 different antiseptic treatments was randomly assigned to 3 separate hospital floors, therefore in this trial cross-over occurred at the hospital floor level (not the individual patient level).

Also, it is possible for subjects to have multiple blood culture sets obtained during the study. Thus, the number of blood culture sets will not equal the number of unique subjects in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacteremia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bacteremia
  • Blood culture
  • Contamination
  • Antiseptic agents
03

In context

Bacteremia

322 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3,879 is above the median of 149 across 171 interventional studies indexed under Bacteremia.

Browse Bacteremia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient on general medical, surgical, and cardiology floors
  • Receipt of a peripheral blood draw for blood culture collection
  • Blood draw performed by phlebotomy team

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
3,879 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    CHG then PI then IT

    Skin antisepsis prior to any peripheral blood culture collection on Floor A was performed with CHG for 3 months, followed by PI for 3 months, followed by IT for 3 months. Each 3 month intervention period was separated by a one month wash out period where data regarding blood culture contamination was not collected. 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol packaged in a single 1.5 ml Frepp applicators (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- CHG 10% povidone iodine aqueous solution packaged in a single 0.67 Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- PI Iodine tincture (2% iodine and 2% sodium iodide diluted in 50% ethanol) packaged in a single 0.67 mL Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- IT

    Drug: Iodine tincture · Drug: Chlorhexidine gluconate · Drug: Povidone iodine

  • Active comparator
    IT then CHG then PI

    Skin antisepsis prior to any peripheral blood culture collection on Floor B was performed with iodine tincture for 3 months, followed by Chlorhexidine gluconate for 3 months, followed by povidone iodine for 3 months. Each 3 month intervention period was separated by a one month wash out period where data regarding blood culture contamination was not collected. Iodine tincture (2% iodine and 2% sodium iodide diluted in 50% ethanol) packaged in a single 0.67 mL Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- IT 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol packaged in a single 1.5 ml Frepp applicators (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- CHG 10% povidone iodine aqueous solution packaged in a single 0.67 Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- PI

    Drug: Iodine tincture · Drug: Chlorhexidine gluconate · Drug: Povidone iodine

  • Active comparator
    PI then IT then CHG

    Skin antisepsis prior to any peripheral blood culture collection on Floor C was performed with povidone iodine for 3 months, followed by iodine tincture for 3 months, followed by chlorhexidine gluconate for 3 months. Each 3 3 month intervention period was separated by a one month wash out period where data regarding blood culture contamination was not collected. 10% povidone iodine aqueous solution packaged in a single 0.67 Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- PI Iodine tincture (2% iodine and 2% sodium iodide diluted in 50% ethanol) packaged in a single 0.67 mL Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- IT 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol packaged in a single 1.5 ml Frepp applicators (Enturia, Leewood KS) -- CHG

    Drug: Iodine tincture · Drug: Chlorhexidine gluconate · Drug: Povidone iodine

Interventions

  • DrugIodine tincture

    Iodine tincture (2% iodine and 2% sodium iodide diluted in 50% ethanol) packaged in a single 0.67 mL Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS)

  • DrugChlorhexidine gluconate

    2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol packaged in a single 1.5 ml Frepp applicators (Enturia, Leewood KS)

  • DrugPovidone iodine

    10% povidone iodine aqueous solution packaged in a single 0.67 Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Culture Contamination

    A culture set was considered contaminated if it yielded growth of typical skin contaminants including aerobic gram positive rods, Lactobacillus sp, Propionibacterium acnes, Micrococcus sp, Bacillus sp (not B. anthracis or B. cereus), coag negative Staphylococcus, Neisseria sp (not N. meningitides or N. gonorrhoeae), or gamma-hemolytic streptococci (not Enterococcus sp) from only 1 of 2 or more blood culture sets obtained from different sites.

    Time frame: 5 days

07

Results

Posted Nov 1, 2012
Limitations and caveats
It is possible for subjects to have multiple blood culture sets obtained during the study.Thus, the # of blood culture sets will not equal the # of subjects. Also, cross-over assignment occurred at the hospital floor level - not the subject level.

Participant flow

Please note: it is possible for a single patient to have multiple blood culture sets obtained throughout the study. Therefore, number of blood culture sets will differ from the number of unique patients. Also, cross-over assignment occurred at the hospital floor level - not the individual subject level.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCHG Then PI Then ITIT Then CHG Then PIPI Then IT Then CHG
Started142114101379
Completed142114101379
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryBlood Culture Contamination

A culture set was considered contaminated if it yielded growth of typical skin contaminants including aerobic gram positive rods, Lactobacillus sp, Propionibacterium acnes, Micrococcus sp, Bacillus sp (not B. anthracis or B. cereus), coag negative Staphylococcus, Neisseria sp (not N. meningitides or N. gonorrhoeae), or gamma-hemolytic streptococci (not Enterococcus sp) from only 1 of 2 or more blood culture sets obtained from different sites.

Time frame:
5 days
Reported as:
Number · blood culture sets
Blood Culture Contamination
blood culture setsChlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG_Iodine Tincture (IT)Povidone Iodine (PI)
Blood Culture Contamination413225

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CHG Then PI Then IT—0/1,421 (0%)0/1,421 (0%)
IT Then CHG Then PI—0/1,410 (0%)0/1,410 (0%)
PI Then IT Then CHG—0/1,379 (0%)0/1,379 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Total Population
Mean56.8 ± 17.9
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)Total Population
Male0
Female0
Unknown3879
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Washer LL, Chenoweth C, Kim HW, Rogers MA, Malani AN, Riddell J 4th, Kuhn L, Noeyack B Jr, Neusius H, Newton DW, Saint S, Flanders SA. Blood culture contamination: a randomized trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of 3 skin antiseptic interventions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;34(1):15-21. doi: 10.1086/668777. Epub 2012 Nov 26. PubMed 23221187 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01216761
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation
Responsible party
Laraine Washer (Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 7, 2010
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Sep 2009
Completion
Nov 2009
Results posted
Nov 1, 2012
Last update
Jan 11, 2017

Study contacts

Laraine L. Washer, MD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion