ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01211678BATTER-UPUpdated Jun 9, 2014

Biomarkers of Anti-TNF-α Therapy Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis to Define Unresponsive Patients

An observational study in Arthritis, Rheumatoid, sponsored by Biogen. Completed at 30 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-09.

Sponsored by Biogen · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
301
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study was to validate the ability of an 8-gene biomarker set to differentiate between participants who met or did not meet European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28 Good Response criteria after treatment with anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) therapy for 14 weeks in approximately 200 anti-TNF-naïve participants. The secondary objectives of this study was (i) to compare the behavior of the 8-gene marker set in participants who were anti-TNF naïve versus those who began their second anti-TNF treatment , (ii) to develop, maintain, and utilize a biorepository of serum, plasma, RNA, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples for additional experiments and analyses and (iii) to discover novel genetic (DNA) predictors of response to anti-TNF therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid
03

In context

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

2,962 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid; 396 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 301 is above the median of 176 across 854 observational studies indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid.

Browse Arthritis, Rheumatoid studies →

Lead sponsor

Biogen is the lead sponsor of 511 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Of its 100 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (49%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants who meet American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and who, in the opinion of their treating rheumatologist, are not adequately treated with existing therapy and should begin treatment with either an anti TNF agent for the first time or with a different anti-TNF agent.

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

To be eligible to participate in this study, candidates must meet the following eligibility criteria at the time of enrollment:

  • Are willing and able to provide informed consent..
  • Meet the ACR criteria for RA as determined by a rheumatologist who is board certified in Rheumatology or a member of the ACR.
  • Have 4 or more tender and 4 or more swollen joints out of 28 joints as assessed by their treating rheumatologist or a trained joint assessor.
  • Subjects are not taking any of the following treatments and/or have washed out for the minimum duration as defined below. If subjects are currently taking these treatments, must have been on a stable dosing regimen for the minimum duration as defined below:

    • Oral DMARDs (MTX, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, cyclosporine, azathioprine): on drug for at least 3 months and washed out or stable for at least 6 weeks prior to baseline sample collection.
    • Oral corticosteroids: washed out or stable AND ≤10 mg/day of prednisone equivalent for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline sample collection.
    • Intraarticular or parenteral corticosteroids: Washed out or stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline sample collection.
    • NSAIDs: Washed out or stable for at least 2 weeks prior to baseline sample collection.
  • Are about to start treatment with an anti-TNF agent approved for the treatment of RA for the first time OR Have not, in the opinion of the treating rheumatologist, achieved or maintained an adequate response to treatment with their first anti-TNF agent (any anti-TNF agent approved for the treatment of RA), and have been prescribed a different anti TNF agent. Subjects who switch for any reason other than lack of efficacy will be excluded.

Key Exclusion Criteria

Candidates will be excluded from study entry if any of the following exclusion criteria exist at the time of enrollment:

  • Any medical condition that would preclude safe use of an anti-TNF agent for at least 14 weeks.
  • Previous participation in the present study as a subject in the anti-TNF-naïve group.
  • Prior exposure to 2 or more anti-TNF agents.
  • Prior exposure to Orencia (abatacept, or CTLA4-Ig) and/or Rituxan (anti CD20), or other biologic therapy for RA or other diseases.

Note: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
301 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Validation of the ability of an 8-gene biomarker set to differentiate between participants who meet or do not meet EULAR DAS-28 Good response criteria after treatment with anti-TNF therapy

    Time frame: 14 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the behavior of the 8-gene marker set in participants who are anti-TNF naïve versus those who begin their second anti-TNF treatment

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  2. Development, maintenance, and utilization of a biorepository of serum, plasma, RNA, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples for additional experiments and analyses.

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  3. Discovery of novel genetic (DNA) predictors of response to anti-TNF therapy.

    Time frame: 14 weeks

07

Study locations

30 sites
  • Research Site
    Murrieta, California, United States
  • Research Site
    Longmont, Colorado, United States
  • Research Site
    Lewes, Delaware, United States
  • Research Site
    Dunedin, Florida, United States
  • Research Site
    Ocala, Florida, United States
  • Research Site
    Orange Park, Florida, United States
  • Research Site
    Morton Grove, Illinois, United States
  • Research Site
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Research Site
    Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States
  • Research Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
  • Research Site
    Reno, Nevada, United States
  • Research Site
    Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, United States
  • Research Site
    Summit, New Jersey, United States
  • Research Site
    Floral Park, New York, United States
  • Research Site
    Orchard Park, New York, United States
  • Research Site
    Smithtown, New York, United States
  • Research Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • Research Site
    Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
  • Research Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • Research Site
    Mayfield Village, Ohio, United States
  • Research Site
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
  • Research Site
    Edmund, Oklahoma, United States
  • Research Site
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Research Site
    Mrytle Beach, South Carolina, United States
  • Research Site
    Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Research Site
    San Anotnio, Texas, United States
  • Research Site
    Burke, Virginia, United States
  • Research Site
    Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Research Site
    Spokane, Washington, United States
  • Research Site
    Franklin, Wisconsin, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2010, a primary completion of Jul 2013 and a completion of Jul 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 28, 2010
First posted
Sep 29, 2010
Start
Jun 2010
Primary completionActual
Jul 2013
CompletionActual
Jul 2013
Last update
Jun 9, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01211678
Lead sponsor
Biogen
Collaborators
Crescendo Bioscience
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 29, 2010
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2013
Completion
Jul 2013
Last update
Jun 9, 2014

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Biogen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion