A Phase 2 interventional study of Gabapentin; and Placebo in Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-06.
Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Utilizing a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, the proposed work will evaluate the ability of an adjuvant anticonvulsant analgesic to diminish or reverse the opioid-induced hyperalgesia complicating the pain states suffered by Methadone-Maintained (MM) patients. Specifically, in a sample of MM patients, gabapentin, which has proven efficacy in treating neuropathic pain will be evaluated for its ability to ameliorate or diminish the opioid-induced hyperalgesia in these patients as reflected by changes on pain threshold and tolerance to both cold-pressor and electrical pain, at peak and through methadone blood levels. The results of this work will not only provide pharmacologic insight into the mechanisms underlying poor pain tolerance in this at-risk population, but also direction for the medical management of pain complicated by opioid-induced hyperalgesia.
152 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperalgesia; 13 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 42 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Hyperalgesia.
Browse Hyperalgesia studies →University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.
Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Potential participants must:
Exclusion Criteria:
Potential participants must not:
Drug: Gabapentin;
Drug: Placebo
Gabapentin titrated to daily dose of 2400mg PO over 1 week with established dose taken daily for 5 weeks.
Placebo titrated over 1 week with established dose taken daily for 5 weeks.
Change in Pain Threshold Time From Baseline to Week 5
Change in pain threshold time from baseline (pre-gabapentin) to week 5 (post gabapentin)measured during cold pressor task administered at peak methadone blood levels. Pain threshold time is the amount of time that passes before pain is detected after administration of the cold pressor.
Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks
| Milestone | Gabapentin | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 10 | 16 |
| Completed | 10 | 16 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Change in pain threshold time from baseline (pre-gabapentin) to week 5 (post gabapentin)measured during cold pressor task administered at peak methadone blood levels. Pain threshold time is the amount of time that passes before pain is detected after administration of the cold pressor.
| seconds | Gabapentin | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Threshold Time From Baseline to Week 5 | 2.95 ± 2.41 | -3.49 ± 2.85 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabapentin | — | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
| Placebo | — | 0/16 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Gabapentin | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 10 | 16 | 26 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age Continuous(years) | Gabapentin | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 45.5 ± 4.46 | 49.5 ± 4.96 | 47.9 ± 5.05 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Gabapentin | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| Male | 5 | 9 | 14 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Gabapentin | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 16 | 26 |
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of California, Los Angeles