CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01207414i-FANSUpdated Mar 15, 2013Results posted

Switching to Iloperidone From Other Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia

A Phase 4 interventional study of iloperidone in Schizophrenia, sponsored by Novartis. Completed at 59 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-03-15.

Sponsored by Novartis · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
501
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluate the clinical outcome of two switching strategies to iloperidone treatment in adult subjects with schizophrenia who require a change in their current antipsychotic treatment of risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole due to suboptimal efficacy and/or safety/tolerability reasons.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • iloperidone
  • switch
  • gradual switch
  • immediate switch
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 501 is above the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis is the lead sponsor of 703 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females, 18 to 64 years of age, inclusive
  • DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Patients currently on an optimal in-label dose of one of the following permitted antipsychotic treatments for at least 30 days: risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole
  • Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) of 4 or 5 or
  • Not tolerating one of the permitted treatments and exhibits one of the allowable side-effects

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other current Axis I disorder other than schizophrenia which is the focus of treatment;
  • Acutely psychotic or patient's symptom severity requires hospitalization
  • Patient with significant cardiovascular illness (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia)

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
501 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    iloperidone gradual switch

    Participants taking risperidone, olanzapine or aripiprazole gradually decreased the dose they were taking: 50% of original dose on Day 1, 25% of original dose after the first week and the total discontinuation of the drug after the second week. On Day 1 participants began taking iloperidone orally twice a day (bid) in the morning and in the evening beginning at a dose of 1 mg and increasing to 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg, and 12 mg bid on consecutive days over a 7-day period to achieve a total dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: iloperidone

  • Experimental
    iloperidone immediate switch

    Participants taking risperidone, olanzapine or aripiprazole discontinued the drug immediately. On Day 1 participants began taking iloperidone orally twice a day (bid) in the morning and in the evening beginning at a dose of 1 mg and increasing to 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg, and 12 mg bid on consecutive days over a 7-day period to achieve a total dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: iloperidone

Interventions

  • Drugiloperidone

    Iloperidone tablets supplied at doses of 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg and 12 mg to achieve a target dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks.

    Also known as: Fanapt™

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) at Week 12

    The I-CGI-C at Week 12 was the overall impression of medically qualified raters using three separate Clinical Global Impression of Change scales: efficacy (E-CGI-C); safety and tolerability (ST-CGI-S); and overall severity (I-CGI-S) combined for a total score. The I-CGI-C scale ranged from 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating improvement (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved), higher scores indicating worsening (5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, 7=very much worse), and a score of 4 indicating no change.

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) at Week 12

    The TSQM consisted of 14 questions about the patient's satisfaction with the drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness \[3 questions scored as 1(extremely dissatisfied) to 7(extremely satisfied)\], Side Effects \[question 4 scored as 0(no) or 1(yes);question 5 scored as 1(extremely bothersome) to 5(not at all bothersome);questions 6 - 8 scored as 1(a great deal) to 5(not at all)\], Convenience \[questions 9 and 10 scored as 1(extremely difficult) to 7 (extremely easy);question 11 scored as 1(extremely inconvenient) to 5 (extremely convenient)\] and Global Satisfaction \[question 12 scored as 1(not at all confident) to 7(extremely confident);question 13 scored as 1(not at all certain) to 5(extremely certain);question 14 scored as 1(extremely dissatisfied) to 5(extremely satisfied)\]. The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm used to create a score of 0 to 100. Higher scores for each domain indicate a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events or Death

    Adverse event are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptoms, sign (including an abnormal lab finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or if present at baseline appear to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization , cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgments of the investigators represent significant hazards. Additional information about adverse events can be found in the Adverse Event section.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Change From Baseline in the Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) at Week 12

    Medically qualified raters use the E-CGI-S scale at Baseline and Week 12 to assess the effectiveness of treatment by examining changes in positive symptoms \[hallucinations (false perceptions), delusions (false beliefs), paranoia (unfounded distrust), conceptual disorganization (loosening of associations), or hostility\], negative symptoms \[apathy (lack of interest), avolition (lack of motivation), alogia (poverty of speech), and anhedonia (absence of pleasure)\] and cognitive symptoms \[concentration difficulties, difficulties with executive function (integrative reasoning), and illogical thinking\] in the previous 7 days on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=normal, 2=borderline mentally ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill or 7=among the most extremely ill). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in the Safety and Tolerability Clinical Global Impression of Severity (ST-CGI-S) at Week 12

    Medically qualified raters used the ST-CGI-S at Baseline and Week 12 to evaluate safety and tolerability in the previous 7 days on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=Normal-no symptoms, 2=borderline severity, 3=mild impairment, 4=moderate, 5=marked, 6=severe, 7=among the most severe.) A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Severity (I-CGI-S) at Week 12

    I-CGI-S incorporated the overall, combined impression of illness severity based upon the E-CGI-S and ST-CGI-S. Medically qualified raters evaluated the patient's illness in the previous 7 days at Baseline and Week 12 on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=normal not at all ill, 2=borderline mental illness or impairment, 3=mildly ill or impaired, 4=moderately ill or impaired, 5=marked ill or impaired, 6= severely ill or impaired or 7=among the most extremely ill patients. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

07

Results

Posted Mar 15, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
Started241260
Safety population: received study drug240260
Completed168178
Not completed7382
Withdrew: Adverse event2539
Withdrew: Abnormal test procedure results01
Withdrew: Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect54
Withdrew: Patient withdrew consent1411
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1517
Withdrew: Administrative problems11
Withdrew: Protocol deviation129
Withdrew: Randomized in error10

Outcome measures

PrimaryIntegrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) at Week 12

The I-CGI-C at Week 12 was the overall impression of medically qualified raters using three separate Clinical Global Impression of Change scales: efficacy (E-CGI-C); safety and tolerability (ST-CGI-S); and overall severity (I-CGI-S) combined for a total score. The I-CGI-C scale ranged from 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating improvement (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved), higher scores indicating worsening (5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, 7=very much worse), and a score of 4 indicating no change.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) at Week 12
Score on a scaleIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) at Week 122.826 ± 1.12442.824 ± 1.3300
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) at Week 12

The TSQM consisted of 14 questions about the patient's satisfaction with the drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness \[3 questions scored as 1(extremely dissatisfied) to 7(extremely satisfied)\], Side Effects \[question 4 scored as 0(no) or 1(yes);question 5 scored as 1(extremely bothersome) to 5(not at all bothersome);questions 6 - 8 scored as 1(a great deal) to 5(not at all)\], Convenience \[questions 9 and 10 scored as 1(extremely difficult) to 7 (extremely easy);question 11 scored as 1(extremely inconvenient) to 5 (extremely convenient)\] and Global Satisfaction \[question 12 scored as 1(not at all confident) to 7(extremely confident);question 13 scored as 1(not at all certain) to 5(extremely certain);question 14 scored as 1(extremely dissatisfied) to 5(extremely satisfied)\]. The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm used to create a score of 0 to 100. Higher scores for each domain indicate a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) at Week 12
Score on a scaleIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
Change from baseline 3 cohorts combined14.1 ± 29.5612.7 ± 27.89
Change from baseline risperidone cohort (n=75,85)14.4 ± 27.016.6 ± 29.65
Change from baseline olanzapine cohort (n=70,67)13.3 ± 28.179.9 ± 28.60
Change from baseline aripiprazole cohort (n=69,81)14.8 ± 33.7211.0 ± 25.12
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events or Death

Adverse event are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptoms, sign (including an abnormal lab finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or if present at baseline appear to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization , cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgments of the investigators represent significant hazards. Additional information about adverse events can be found in the Adverse Event section.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events or Death
ParticipantsIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
Serious Adverse Events87
Adverse Events196207
Death00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) at Week 12

Medically qualified raters use the E-CGI-S scale at Baseline and Week 12 to assess the effectiveness of treatment by examining changes in positive symptoms \[hallucinations (false perceptions), delusions (false beliefs), paranoia (unfounded distrust), conceptual disorganization (loosening of associations), or hostility\], negative symptoms \[apathy (lack of interest), avolition (lack of motivation), alogia (poverty of speech), and anhedonia (absence of pleasure)\] and cognitive symptoms \[concentration difficulties, difficulties with executive function (integrative reasoning), and illogical thinking\] in the previous 7 days on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=normal, 2=borderline mentally ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill or 7=among the most extremely ill). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) at Week 12
Score on a scaleIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
Change from baseline 3 cohorts combined-0.8 ± 0.89-0.8 ± 0.89
Change from baseline risperidone cohort (n=81,92)-0.9 ± 0.82-0.9 ± 0.85
Change from baseline olanzapine cohort (n=77,74)-0.8 ± 0.96-0.6 ± 0.88
Change from baseline aripiprazole cohort (n=77,90)-0.8 ± 0.89-0.9 ± 0.92
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Safety and Tolerability Clinical Global Impression of Severity (ST-CGI-S) at Week 12

Medically qualified raters used the ST-CGI-S at Baseline and Week 12 to evaluate safety and tolerability in the previous 7 days on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=Normal-no symptoms, 2=borderline severity, 3=mild impairment, 4=moderate, 5=marked, 6=severe, 7=among the most severe.) A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Safety and Tolerability Clinical Global Impression of Severity (ST-CGI-S) at Week 12
Score on a scaleIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
Change from baseline 3 cohorts combined-0.9 ± 1.29-0.8 ± 1.45
Change from baseline risperidone cohort (n=81,92)-1.1 ± 1.27-0.9 ± 1.49
Change from baseline olanzapine cohort (n=77,74)-0.9 ± 1.20-0.9 ± 1.36
Change from baseline aripiprazole cohort (n=77,90)-0.8 ± 1.39-0.4 ± 1.45
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Severity (I-CGI-S) at Week 12

I-CGI-S incorporated the overall, combined impression of illness severity based upon the E-CGI-S and ST-CGI-S. Medically qualified raters evaluated the patient's illness in the previous 7 days at Baseline and Week 12 on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=normal not at all ill, 2=borderline mental illness or impairment, 3=mildly ill or impaired, 4=moderately ill or impaired, 5=marked ill or impaired, 6= severely ill or impaired or 7=among the most extremely ill patients. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Severity (I-CGI-S) at Week 12
Score on a scaleIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
Change from baseline 3 cohorts combined-0.9 ± 0.95-0.9 ± 0.97
Change from baseline risperidone cohort (n=81,92)-0.9 ± 0.85-1.0 ± 0.89
Change from baseline olanzapine cohort (n=77,74)-0.8 ± 0.96-0.7 ± 0.98
Change from baseline aripiprazole cohort (n=77,80)-1.0 ± 1.04-0.9 ± 1.04

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Iloperidone Gradual Switch—8/240 (3.3%)148/240 (61.7%)
Iloperidone Immediate Switch—7/260 (2.7%)155/260 (59.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
SchizophreniaPsychiatric disorders1/2402/260
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/2400/260
Concomitant disease progressionGeneral disorders1/2400/260
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/2400/260
OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2400/260
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/2400/260
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/2401/260
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/2400/260
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/2400/260
Social stay hospitalisationSocial circumstances1/2400/260
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventIloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate Switch
DizzinessNervous system disorders42/24058/260
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders43/24054/260
SomnolenceNervous system disorders34/24025/260
Weight increasedInvestigations29/24020/260
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders20/24025/260
SedationNervous system disorders22/24022/260
FatigueGeneral disorders21/24020/260
HeadacheNervous system disorders17/24019/260
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders11/24018/260
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders13/24017/260

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Iloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate SwitchTotal
Mean42.3 ± 10.9844.2 ± 10.9243.3 ± 10.98
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Iloperidone Gradual SwitchIloperidone Immediate SwitchTotal
Female7095165
Male170165335
08

Study locations

59 sites
  • Birmingham Psychiatry Pharmaceutical Studies, Inc.
    Birmingham, Alabama 35226, United States
  • Comprehensive Neuroscience
    Cerritos, California 90703, United States
  • ATP Clinical Research Center, Inc.
    Costa Mesa, California 92626, United States
  • Collaborative Neuroscience Network
    Garden Grove, California 92845, United States
  • Apostle Clinical Trials, Inc.
    Long Beach, California 90813, United States
  • Pacific Health Systems
    National City, California 91950, United States
  • Pacific Research Partners
    Oakland, California 94612, United States
  • Excell Research, Inc.
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • University of California, Irvine
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • CNRI San Diego
    San Diego, California 92102, United States
  • Affiliated Research Institute
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Neuropsychiatric Research Center of Orange County
    Santa Ana, California 92701, United States
  • Viking Clinical Research
    Temecula, California 92591, United States
  • Collaborative Neuroscience
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • The Hospital of Central Connecticut
    New Britain, Connecticut 06052, United States
  • Comprenhensive Neuroscience
    Washington, District of Columbia 20016, United States
  • Amit K. Vijapura MD & Associates
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Scientific Clinical Research
    North Miami, Florida 33161, United States
  • Atlanta Center for Medical Research
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Comprehensive Neuroscience
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Northwest Behavioral Research Center
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Carman Research
    Smyrna, Georgia 30080, United States
  • Institute for Behavioral Medicine
    Smyrna, Georgia 30080, United States
  • Alexian Brothers Center for Mental Health
    Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center, Treatment Research Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • AMR - Baber Research, Inc.
    Naperville, Illinois 60563, United States
  • Midwest Center for Neurobehavioral Medicine
    Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, United States
  • Louisiana Clinical Research
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71115, United States
  • Neurobehavioral Medicine Group, Clinical Trials Division
    Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302, United States
  • Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine
    Rochester Hills, Michigan 48307, United States
  • Precise Research Centers
    Flowood, Mississippi 39232, United States
  • St. Charles Psychiatric Associates - Midwest Research Group
    Saint Charles, Missouri 63301, United States
  • Center for Emotional Fitness
    Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002, United States
  • CRI World Wide Clinical Research Company
    Willingboro, New Jersey 08046, United States
  • Albuquerque Neuroscience
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109, United States
  • Neurobehavioral Research
    Cedarhurst, New York 11516, United States
  • Comprehensive Neuroscience
    Fresh Meadows, New York 11366, United States
  • Division of Psychiatry Research - Zucker Hills Hospital
    Glen Oaks, New York 11004, United States
  • Finger Lakes Clinical Research
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • Behavioral Medical Research
    Staten Island, New York 10305, United States
  • Richmond Behavioral Associates
    Staten Island, New York 10312, United States
  • North Coast Clinical Trials
    Beachwood, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Neurobehavioral Clinical Research
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • IPS Research Company
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103, United States
  • SP Research, PLLC
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Belmont Center for Comprehensive Treatment
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19131, United States
  • CRI Worldwide, LLC - Kirkbride Division
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19139, United States
  • Carolina Clinical Trials
    Charleston, South Carolina 29407, United States
  • Community Clinical Research, Inc.
    Austin, Texas 78754, United States
  • KRK Medical Research
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • FutureSearch Trials
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • InSite Clinical Research
    Desoto, Texas 75115, United States
  • Bayou City Research Limited
    Houston, Texas 77007, United States
  • Claghorn-Lesem Research Clinic, Inc
    Houston, Texas 77008, United States
  • Mary Ann Knesevich, MD, PA
    Irving, Texas 75062, United States
  • InSite Clinical Research
    Plano, Texas 75074, United States
  • Frontier Institute
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01207414
Lead sponsor
Novartis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2010
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Jan 2012
Completion
Jan 2012
Results posted
Mar 15, 2013
Last update
Mar 15, 2013

Study contacts

Marla Hochfeld, MD, MD
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion