CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01200914Updated May 12, 2016

Covered Stents to Treat Hemodialysis Access Stenoses in the Cephalic Arch and Central Veins

An interventional study of GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface and PTA alone without use of the GORE VIABAHN in Renal Failure, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Terminated at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-12.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
poor recruitment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Balloon angioplasty is used to open up a narrowing that forms in hemodialysis fistula. Two areas of particular problems are the terminal portion of the cephalic vein near the shoulder and the central veins in the chest. Although angioplasty is standard of care the treated narrowed segments of vein mostly renarrow within 3 months requiring retreatment to keep your dialysis access functional. Recently there has been introduction of a new technology called a covered stent graft. Initial studies suggest that placing this device across the area of narrowing leads to dialysis access staying open longer and needing less angioplasty treatments.

This study is designed to compare angioplasty (standard of care) versus using a covered stent graft. The investigators will then look at the dialysis records and future fistulograms to see if there is decreased flow through the fistula at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial procedure.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, prospective, unblinded study with 1:1 randomization. Both groups will undergo PTA of stenotic lesion and patients will be randomized such that 50% will receive a covered stent in addition to the PTA. Patients will be followed at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. Follow-up will be conducted with either angiographic and/or transonic measurements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis
  • Fistula
  • Angiograph
  • Angiogram
03

In context

Renal Insufficiency

1,995 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency; 173 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 43 across 1,504 interventional studies indexed under Renal Insufficiency.

Browse Renal Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Hemodialysis patient with a mature forearm or upper arm access that was created > 2 months before enrollment in study.
  • The patient is ≥ 18 years of age.
  • The patient has a reasonable expectation of remaining on hemodialysis for 12 months.
  • The patient or his/her legal guardian understands the study and is willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements.
  • The patient or his/her legal guardian is willing to provide informed consent.
  • The patient has lesions that meet the angiographic inclusion / exclusion criteria and induce clinical, hemodynamic or functional abnormality.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a known or suspected systemic infection.
  • The patient has a known or suspected infection of the hemodialysis access and / or bacteremia.
  • The patient is currently taking maintenance immunosuppressant medication such as rapamycin, mycophenolate or mycophenolic acid, prednisone (>10 mg per day), cyclosporine, tacrolimus, or cyclophosphamide.
  • The patient has known bleeding disorder (e.g., hemophilia or von Willebrand's disease).
  • The patient has known sensitivity to heparin.
  • The patient is scheduled for a live donor kidney transplant.
  • The patient is enrolled in another investigational study or another access maintenance trial
  • The patient has comorbid conditions that may limit their ability to comply with the follow-up requirements.
  • Life expectancy is ≤ 24 months.
  • The patient has an untreatable allergy to radiographic contrast material.
  • The patient is pregnant.
  • In the opinion of the operating physician, the patient's hemodialysis access circuit is unsuitable for endovascular treatment.
  • The patient's access is planned to be abandoned within 1 year.
  • The patient has indwelling catheters (dialysis, pacemakers, ports).
  • The patient has a central vein stent that would lead to jailing of the internal jugular vein.
  • The patient experiences angioplasty-induced venous rupture.
  • The patient has a flow limiting dissection after angioplasty.
  • The patient's hemodialysis access is thrombosed.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    'PTA without use of the GORE VIABAHN'

    Subjects randomized to 'PTA alone without use of the GORE VIABAHN' will receive the standard of care treatment which is Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty without the use of the 'GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface'

    Procedure: PTA alone without use of the GORE VIABAHN

  • Experimental
    PTA with covered stent

    Subjects randomized to PTA with covered stent will receive Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty followed by the delivery of a 'GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface' .

    Device: GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface

Interventions

  • DeviceGORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface

    The 'GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface' will be deployed at the brachiocephalic stenosis.

    Also known as: Covered stent

  • ProcedurePTA alone without use of the GORE VIABAHN

    Subject will receive standard of care PTA alone at the brachiocephalic stenosis without deployment of the'GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface'

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Target lesion primary patency at 3, 6, and 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Target lesion secondary patency at 3, 6, and 12 months, access circuit primary and secondary patency at 3, 6, and 12 months, anatomic, clinical, and procedural success. Adverse events through 1 month

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universtiy Health Network
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N2, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gray RJ, Sacks D, Martin LG, Trerotola SO; Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee. Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Pt 2):S433-42. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000094618.61428.58. No abstract available. PubMed 14514859 ↗
  • Sidawy AN, Gray R, Besarab A, Henry M, Ascher E, Silva M Jr, Miller A, Scher L, Trerotola S, Gregory RT, Rutherford RB, Kent KC. Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;35(3):603-10. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.122025. PubMed 11877717 ↗
  • Chang CJ, Ko PJ, Hsu LA, Ko YS, Ko YL, Chen CF, Huang CC, Hsu TS, Lee YS, Pang JH. Highly increased cell proliferation activity in the restenotic hemodialysis vascular access after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: implication in prevention of restenosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Jan;43(1):74-84. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.09.015. PubMed 14712430 ↗
  • Patel RI, Peck SH, Cooper SG, Epstein DM, Sofocleous CT, Schur I, Falk A. Patency of Wallstents placed across the venous anastomosis of hemodialysis grafts after percutaneous recanalization. Radiology. 1998 Nov;209(2):365-70. doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807560. PubMed 9807560 ↗
  • Rajan DK, Clark TW. Patency of Wallstents placed at the venous anastomosis of dialysis grafts for salvage of angioplasty-induced rupture. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003 May-Jun;26(3):242-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-003-2706-x. PubMed 14562971 ↗
  • Haage P, Vorwerk D, Piroth W, Schuermann K, Guenther RW. Treatment of hemodialysis-related central venous stenosis or occlusion: results of primary Wallstent placement and follow-up in 50 patients. Radiology. 1999 Jul;212(1):175-80. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl21175. PubMed 10405739 ↗
  • Vogel PM, Parise C. SMART stent for salvage of hemodialysis access grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Oct;15(10):1051-60. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000129915.48500.DC. PubMed 15466790 ↗
  • Rajan DK, Saluja JS. Use of nitinol stents following recanalization of central venous occlusions in hemodialysis patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;30(4):662-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9083-9. PubMed 17533532 ↗
  • Chan MR, Bedi S, Sanchez RJ, Young HN, Becker YT, Kellerman PS, Yevzlin AS. Stent placement versus angioplasty improves patency of arteriovenous grafts and blood flow of arteriovenous fistulae. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 May;3(3):699-705. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04831107. Epub 2008 Feb 6. PubMed 18256373 ↗
  • Pan HB, Liang HL, Lin YH, Chung HM, Wu TH, Chen CY, Fang HC, Chen CK, Lai PH, Yang CF. Metallic stent placement for treating peripheral outflow lesions in native arteriovenous fistula hemodialysis patients after insufficient balloon dilatation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Feb;184(2):403-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840403. PubMed 15671353 ↗
  • Shemesh D, Goldin I, Zaghal I, Berlowitz D, Raveh D, Olsha O. Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1524-31, 1531.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.071. Epub 2008 Oct 1. PubMed 18829240 ↗
  • Naoum JJ, Irwin C, Hunter GC. The use of covered nitinol stents to salvage dialysis grafts after multiple failures. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006 Aug-Sep;40(4):275-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574406291803. PubMed 16959720 ↗
  • Gupta M, Rajan DK, Tan KT, Sniderman KW, Simons ME. Use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol stents for the salvage of dysfunctional autogenous hemodialysis fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.016. Epub 2008 Apr 28. PubMed 18503914 ↗
  • Clark TW, Rajan DK. Treating intractable venous stenosis: present and future therapy. Semin Dial. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):4-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139x.2004.17103.x. PubMed 14717801 ↗
  • Yuan JG, Ohki T, Marin ML, Quintos RT, Krohn DL, Beitler JJ, Veith FJ. The effect of nonporous PTFE-covered stents on intimal hyperplasia following balloon arterial injury in minipigs. J Endovasc Surg. 1998 Nov;5(4):349-58. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1998)0052.0.CO;2. PubMed 9867326 ↗
  • Fontaine AB, Dos Passos S, Spigos D, Cearlock J, Urbaneja A. Use of polyetherurethane to improve the biocompatibility of vascular stents. J Endovasc Surg. 1995 Aug;2(3):255-65. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1995)0022.0.CO;2. PubMed 9234140 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01200914
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Responsible party
Dheeraj Rajan (Head and Associate Professor, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, University Health Network, Toronto) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2010
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Last update
May 12, 2016

Study contacts

Dheeraj Rajan, M.D.
principal investigator · Physician

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion