ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01194973Updated May 30, 2017Results posted

An Open-label, Multi-center Clinical Trial of Eculizumab in Adult Patients With Atypical Hemolytic-uremic Syndrome

A Phase 2 interventional study of Eculizumab in Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome, sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 23 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-30.

Sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (part of AstraZeneca) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 10 studies testing eculizumab in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, 1 of them phase 3. eculizumab · Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.

Enrollment
3rd of 10
44 · median 19
Started
2010
with 1 other
Phase 2
8 of 10
none open now
Registered
5th of 10
by date
Lead sponsor
7 of 10
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Among the 10 studies testing eculizumab in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, this one is the 3rd largest by enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2010, is one of 8 in phase 2, and was the 5th registered.

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

45 studies on the registry are indexed under Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome; 14 are open to participants now.

Browse Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 10 studies testing eculizumab in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome is open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

About eculizumab

eculizumab: first FDA approval 2007 (SOLIRIS), first EMA approval 2007. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 12 Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome studies recruiting now, 10 (83%) set no upper age limit and none (0%) stop at 75 or younger; 6 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 10 studies testing eculizumab in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The record Primary purpose is to assess the efficacy of eculizumab in adult patients with Atypical Hemolytic- Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) to control Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) as characterized by thrombocytopenia, hemolysis and renal impairment.

03

Conditions studied

  • Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome

Keywords

  • Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient must be willing and able to give written .
  2. Patient's age > 18 years.
  3. Patients exhibit thrombocytopenia, hemolysis and elevated Serum Creatinine.
  4. Patients with diagnosis of aHUS with or without an identified complement regulatory protein genetic abnormality or anti-complement factor antibody and for whom etiologies of hemolytic uremic syndrome have been ruled out as confirmed in the exclusion criteria
  5. Female patients of must be practicing an effective, reliable and medically approved regimen during the entire duration of the study, including the follow-up period. At the time of the last follow-up visit, patients must agree to continue to use adequate contraception methods for up to 5 months following discontinuation of eculizumab treatment.
  6. Able and willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion:

  1. Chronic dialysis.
  2. Prior eculizumab use or to eculizumab, to murine proteins or to one of the .
  3. Known familial a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS-13) deficiency (ADAMTS-13 \<5%).
  4. Typical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome (HUS) (known Shiga toxin +).
  5. History of within 5 years of screening.
  6. Known (HIV) infection.
  7. Identified drug exposure-related hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS).
  8. Infection-related HUS.
  9. HUS related to bone marrow transplant (BMT).
  10. HUS related to vitamin B12 deficiency.
  11. Known Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or antiphospholipid antibody positivity or syndrome.
  12. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sepsis defined as positive blood cultures within 7 days of the screening visit and not treated with antibiotics to which the organism is sensitive.
  13. Presence or suspicion of active and untreated systemic bacterial infection that, in the opinion of the Investigator confounds an accurate diagnosis of aHUS or impedes the ability to manage the aHUS disease.
  14. Pregnancy or lactation.
  15. Unresolved systemic meningococcal disease.
  16. Any medical or psychological condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could increase the patient's risk by participating in the study or confound the outcome of the study.
  17. Patients receiving chronic intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) within 8 weeks or chronic Rituximab therapy within 12 weeks of screening visit.
  18. Patients receiving other therapies such as , mechanist target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine or tacrolimus) are excluded unless: [1] part of an established post-transplant anti-rejection regime, or [2] patient has confirmed anti-Complement Factor Antibodies requiring immunosuppressive therapy, or [3] steroids are being used for a condition other than aHUS (example asthma).
  19. Participation in any other drug trial or device trial, or procedures beginning 4 weeks prior to screening and throughout the entire trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Eculizumab

    Drug: Eculizumab

Interventions

  • All patients received open-label eculizumab administered intravenously on the following dose schedule: Induction dose - 900 mg per week for four weeks and a dose of 1200 mg one week later; Maintenance dose - 1200 mg every two weeks. Patients who received plasma exchange or infusion during the eculizumab treatment period received a supplemental dose of 600 mg within one hour before plasma infusion or within one hour after the completion of each plasma exchange.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response

    Proportion of Patients with Complete TMA response was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and preservation of renal function (defined as \< 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline) which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

    Time frame: Through 26 weeks

  2. Percentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response

    Proportion of Patients with Modified Complete TMA response through 26 weeks of treatment was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and improvement in renal function (defined as ≥ 25% reduction from the baseline value in serum creatinine, which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

    Time frame: Through 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response

    Proportion of Patients with Complete Hematologic response through end of study was determined and defined by normalization of platelet count and LDH sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

    Time frame: Through 26 weeks

  2. Percentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization

    Proportion of Patients with Platelet Count Normalization through 26 weeks of treatment was determined and defined as the platelet count observed to be ≥ 150 x 109/L on at least two consecutive measurements which span a period of at least four weeks

    Time frame: Through 26 weeks

  3. Percentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement

    Proportion of Patients with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement was determined and defined as an increase in eGFR by ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 from baseline, sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

    Time frame: Through 26 weeks

  4. Platelet Count Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks

    Time frame: Through 26 weeks

  5. Percentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response

    Proportion of Patients with Complete TMA response through end of study was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and preservation of renal function (defined as \< 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline) which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

    Time frame: Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks

  6. Percentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response

    Proportion of Patients with Modified Complete TMA response through end of study was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and improvement in renal function (defined as ≥ 25% reduction from the baseline value in serum creatinine, which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

    Time frame: Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks

  7. Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response

    Proportion of Patients with Complete Hematologic response through end of study of treatment was determined and defined by normalization of platelet count and LDH sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

    Time frame: Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks

  8. Percentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization

    Proportion of Patients with Platelet Count Normalization through end of study of treatment was determined and defined as the platelet count observed to be ≥ 150 x 109/L on at least two consecutive measurements which span a period of at least four weeks

    Time frame: Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks

  9. Percentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement

    Proportion of Patients with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement was determined and defined as an increase in eGFR by ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 from baseline sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart

    Time frame: Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks

  10. Platelet Count Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks

    Time frame: Through 52 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 24, 2015

Participant flow

A total of 44 patients diagnosed with aHUS signed the informed consent and of these, 41 patients were treated. Three patients were excluded from the study due to failed screening procedure and did not receive eculizumab.

Screening Period
Participant flow — Screening Period
MilestoneEculizumab
Started44
Completed41
Not completed3
Withdrew: Screen failure3
26 Week Treatment Period
Participant flow — 26 Week Treatment Period
MilestoneEculizumab
Started41
Completed38
Not completed3
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1
Withdrew: Pregnancy1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response

Proportion of Patients with Complete TMA response was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and preservation of renal function (defined as \< 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline) which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

Time frame:
Through 26 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response73.2 (57.1 to 85.8)
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response

Proportion of Patients with Modified Complete TMA response through 26 weeks of treatment was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and improvement in renal function (defined as ≥ 25% reduction from the baseline value in serum creatinine, which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

Time frame:
Through 26 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response56.1 (39.7 to 71.5)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response

Proportion of Patients with Complete Hematologic response through end of study was determined and defined by normalization of platelet count and LDH sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

Time frame:
Through 26 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response87.8 (73.8 to 95.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization

Proportion of Patients with Platelet Count Normalization through 26 weeks of treatment was determined and defined as the platelet count observed to be ≥ 150 x 109/L on at least two consecutive measurements which span a period of at least four weeks

Time frame:
Through 26 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization97.6 (87.1 to 99.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement

Proportion of Patients with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement was determined and defined as an increase in eGFR by ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 from baseline, sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

Time frame:
Through 26 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement53.7 (37.4 to 69.3)
SecondaryPlatelet Count Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks
Time frame:
Through 26 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · 10^9 cells/L
Platelet Count Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks
10^9 cells/LEculizumab
Platelet Count Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks117.68 (92.77 to 142.59)
Statistical analysis
  • Eculizumab · ANOVA · p = <0.0001 · Ls mean change from baseline: 117.68 · 95% CI 92.77 to 142.59
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response

Proportion of Patients with Complete TMA response through end of study was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and preservation of renal function (defined as \< 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline) which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

Time frame:
Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Complete TMA Response80.5 (65.1 to 91.2)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response

Proportion of Patients with Modified Complete TMA response through end of study was determined and defined by normalization of hematological parameters (platelet count and LDH) and improvement in renal function (defined as ≥ 25% reduction from the baseline value in serum creatinine, which were sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

Time frame:
Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Modified Complete TMA Response63.4 (46.9 to 77.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response

Proportion of Patients with Complete Hematologic response through end of study of treatment was determined and defined by normalization of platelet count and LDH sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart.

Time frame:
Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response97.6 (87.1 to 99.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization

Proportion of Patients with Platelet Count Normalization through end of study of treatment was determined and defined as the platelet count observed to be ≥ 150 x 109/L on at least two consecutive measurements which span a period of at least four weeks

Time frame:
Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Platelet Count Normalization100.0 (91.4 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement

Proportion of Patients with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement was determined and defined as an increase in eGFR by ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 from baseline sustained for at least two consecutive measurements obtained at least four weeks apart

Time frame:
Through End of Study, Median Exposure 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement
Percentage of ParticipantsEculizumab
Percentage of Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Improvement61.0 (44.5 to 75.8)
SecondaryPlatelet Count Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks
Time frame:
Through 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · 10^9 cells/L
Platelet Count Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks
10^9 cells/LEculizumab
Platelet Count Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks102.49 (68.15 to 136.82)
Statistical analysis
  • Eculizumab · ANOVA · p = <0.0001 · Ls mean change from baseline: 102.49 · 95% CI 68.15 to 136.82

Adverse events

Collected over Through end of study; exposure to eculizumab in this study extended for a median duration of 11.9 months and ranged from 2.9 months to 28.8 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Eculizumab—19/41 (46.3%)41/41 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 35
Most frequent serious events
EventEculizumab
Device related sepsisInfections and infestations2/41
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations2/41
ConvulsionNervous system disorders2/41
Renal failure acuteRenal and urinary disorders2/41
Renal failure chronicRenal and urinary disorders2/41
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders2/41
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/41
Pulmonary oedemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/41
Haemolytic uraemic syndromeBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/41
Thrombotic microangiopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/41
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 227
Most frequent other events
EventEculizumab
HEADACHENervous system disorders15/41
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders13/41
OEDEMA PERIPHERALGeneral disorders9/41
NASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestations8/41
ARTHRALGIAMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/41
ANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders7/41
PYREXIAGeneral disorders7/41
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations7/41
COUGHRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/41
HYPOTENSIONVascular disorders7/41

Baseline characteristics

The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all patients who received any amount of eculizumab, and were considered evaluable for safety and efficacy analyses. For both the efficacy and safety analyses, all 41 patients who were treated with study drug were included in the ITT population.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Eculizumab
Mean40.3 ± 15.33
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Eculizumab
Female28
Male13
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Eculizumab
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White38
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

23 sites
  • Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, United States
  • Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Liège, 4020, Belgium
  • Caen, 14033, France
  • Lille, 59037, France
  • Nantes, 44093, France
  • Nice, 6000, France
  • Paris, 75743, France
  • Paris, 75970, France
  • Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Tours, 37044, France
  • Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Bergamo, 24127, Italy
  • Firenze, 50134, Italy
  • Barcelona, 14004, Spain
  • Cordoba, 14004, Spain
  • Exeter, United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom
  • Newcastle, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pugh D, O'Sullivan ED, Duthie FA, Masson P, Kavanagh D. Interventions for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 23;3(3):CD012862. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012862.pub2. PubMed 33783815 ↗
  • Cofiell R, Kukreja A, Bedard K, Yan Y, Mickle AP, Ogawa M, Bedrosian CL, Faas SJ. Eculizumab reduces complement activation, inflammation, endothelial damage, thrombosis, and renal injury markers in aHUS. Blood. 2015 May 21;125(21):3253-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-600411. Epub 2015 Apr 1. PubMed 25833956 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2010, a primary completion of Oct 2013 and a completion of Feb 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2015, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2010
First posted
Sep 3, 2010
Start
Jul 2010
Primary completionActual
Oct 2013
CompletionActual
Feb 2014
Results first posted
Apr 24, 2015
Last update
May 30, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01194973
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 3, 2010
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Feb 2014
Results posted
Apr 24, 2015
Last update
May 30, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Eculizumab

Start the discussion