CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01191736Updated Mar 7, 2011Results posted

Ultra-Brief Versus Brief Hands Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice

An interventional study of No training, assessed within 60 mins and Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins in Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Valleywise Health. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-03-07.

Sponsored by Valleywise Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
336
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bystander CPR improves survival from Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. This study examines the efficacy of ultra-brief video training for Hands-Only CPR. Subjects were randomized to one of four training conditions, then assessed for CPR skills retention.

Read the detailed description

Bystander CPR improves survival from Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. This study is the first of its kind to examine the efficacy of ultra-brief video training for Hands-Only CPR without the use of a manikin. The results will inform future efforts to mass train citizens in CPR. Subjects were randomized to one of four training conditions, then assessed for CPR skills retention. The four groups were 1) no training; 2) ultra-brief training video (90 seconds); 3) short training video (5 minutes) with no practice; and 4) short training video with hands-on practice. The subjects were then evaluated for CPR skills retention. One half of the subjects were evaluated on the training day, and the other half were evaluated two months later.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • hands only
  • CPR
  • resuscitation
  • cardiac arrest
  • Education of general public regarding resuscitation methods
03

In context

Heart Arrest

966 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 336 is above the median of 100 across 557 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Valleywise Health is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Members of a local area church

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years old
  • formal CPR training or certification within last 2 years
  • Lacks fluency in English
  • Works as a health care provider
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
336 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    No training, assessed within 60 mins

    Subjects receive no training

    Behavioral: No training, assessed within 60 mins

  • Experimental
    Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins

    Subjects receive an ultra-brief (90-second) video on hands-only CPR

    Behavioral: Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins

  • Experimental
    Brief video; assessed in 60 mins

    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video on hands-only CPR

    Behavioral: Brief video; assessed in 60 mins

  • Experimental
    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins

    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video with hands-on manikin practice

    Behavioral: Brief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins

  • Experimental
    Ultra-brief video; assessed at 2 months

    Behavioral: Ultra-brief video; assessed at 2 months

  • Experimental
    Brief video; assessed 2 months later

    Behavioral: Brief video; assessed 2 months later

  • Experimental
    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later

    Behavioral: Brief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later

Interventions

  • BehavioralNo training, assessed within 60 mins

    Subjects receive no training in resuscitation

    Also known as: C-Group

  • BehavioralUltra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins

    Subjects receive an ultra-brief (90-second) video on hands-only CPR

    Also known as: UBV-Group

  • BehavioralBrief video; assessed in 60 mins

    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video on hands-only CPR

    Also known as: BV-Group

  • BehavioralBrief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins

    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video with hands-on manikin practice

    Also known as: BVP-Group

  • BehavioralUltra-brief video; assessed at 2 months

    Subjects see ultra-brief video (90-seconds), are assessed two months later

    Also known as: UBV-Group

  • BehavioralBrief video; assessed 2 months later

    Subjects see brief video (5 minutes), are then assessed two months later

    Also known as: BV-Group

  • BehavioralBrief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later

    Subjects see brief (5-minute) video, receive hands-on training, and are assessed two months later

    Also known as: BVP-Group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Compression Depth (mm)

    Assessment of resuscitation skills using a Laerdal Resusci Annie recording manikin and Laerdal PC Skill Reporting software

    Time frame: 60 minutes after intervention or two months after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters

    The proportion of the subjects who assessed the responsiveness of the victim (manikin) as judged by expert raters

    Time frame: 60 minutes after intervention and two months after intervention

07

Results

Posted Oct 7, 2010

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNo Training, Assessed Within 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 MonthsBrief Video; Assessed 2 Months LaterBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months Later
Started51474946485045
Completed51474946485045
Not completed0000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryMedian Compression Depth (mm)

Assessment of resuscitation skills using a Laerdal Resusci Annie recording manikin and Laerdal PC Skill Reporting software

Time frame:
60 minutes after intervention or two months after intervention
Reported as:
Median · millimeters
Median Compression Depth (mm)
millimetersNo Training, Assessed Within 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 MonthsBrief Video; Assessed 2 Months LaterBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months Later
Median Compression Depth (mm)30 (14 to 41)41 (32 to 51)42 (34 to 51)48 (39 to 55)43 (30 to 49)43 (32 to 55)46 (32 to 55)
Statistical analysis
  • No Training, Assessed Within 60 Mins vs Ultra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 Mins vs Brief Video; Assessed in 60 Mins vs Brief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 Mins vs Ultra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 Months vs Brief Video; Assessed 2 Months Later vs Brief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months Later · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .05Null hypothesis: the medians for all seven arms are equal.
SecondaryThe Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters

The proportion of the subjects who assessed the responsiveness of the victim (manikin) as judged by expert raters

Time frame:
60 minutes after intervention and two months after intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Proportion of Participants
The Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters
Proportion of ParticipantsNo Training, Assessed Within 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 MonthsBrief Video; Assessed 2 Months LaterBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months Later
The Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters.854 (.754 to .954).182 (.068 to .296).8 (.683 to .917).978 (.936 to 1.000).542 (.401 to .683).780 (.665 to .895).822 (.711 to .934)
Statistical analysis
  • No Training, Assessed Within 60 Mins vs Ultra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 Mins vs Brief Video; Assessed in 60 Mins vs Brief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 Mins vs Ultra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 Months vs Brief Video; Assessed 2 Months Later vs Brief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months Later · Chi-squared · p = .05Null hypothesis: the proportions within the seven arms are equal.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
No Training, Assessed Within 60 Mins———
Ultra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 Mins———
Brief Video; Assessed in 60 Mins———
Brief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 Mins———
Ultra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 Months———
Brief Video; Assessed 2 Months Later———
Brief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months Later———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)No Training, Assessed Within 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 MonthsBrief Video; Assessed 2 Months LaterBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months LaterTotal
<=18 years11030207
Between 18 and 65 years48324139434442289
>=65 years2148454340
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)No Training, Assessed Within 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 MonthsBrief Video; Assessed 2 Months LaterBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months LaterTotal
Mean44.8 ± 11.851.7 ± 15.250.5 ± 13.341.7 ± 14.248.1 ± 14.545.3 ± 13.847.4 ± 11.947.1 ± 13.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)No Training, Assessed Within 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 MonthsBrief Video; Assessed 2 Months LaterBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months LaterTotal
Female28282229222725181
Male23192717262320155
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)No Training, Assessed Within 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video; Assessed in 60 MinsBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd in 60 MinsUltra-brief Video; Assessed at 2 MonthsBrief Video; Assessed 2 Months LaterBrief Video + hands-on; Ass'd 2 Months LaterTotal
United States51474946485045336
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Spaite DW, Potts J, Denninghoff K, Chikani V, Brazil PR, Ramsey B, Abella BS. The effectiveness of ultrabrief and brief educational videos for training lay responders in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: implications for the future of citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):220-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959353. Epub 2011 Mar 8. PubMed 21386066 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01191736
Lead sponsor
Valleywise Health
Collaborators
American Heart Association, University of Arizona
First posted
Aug 31, 2010
Start date
Sep 2009
Primary completion
Nov 2009
Completion
Nov 2009
Results posted
Oct 7, 2010
Last update
Mar 7, 2011

Study contacts

Bentley J Bobrow, MD
principal investigator · Valleywise Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion