CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01187498MOTIVEUpdated May 20, 2014Results posted

Behavioral Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Men

A Phase 3 interventional study of Behavioral training and Oxybutynin chloride, extended-release in Overactive Bladder, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-20.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
143
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The primary purpose of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral treatment compared to standard drug therapy for symptoms of OAB in male veterans.

Read the detailed description

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a very common and bothersome condition manifested by urgency, frequent urination, urge urinary incontinence, and nocturia. Drug therapy with oxybutynin or tolterodine is the most common approach to treatment of OAB in VA Medical Center clinics and is the standard of care nationally. Although it improves symptoms of OAB for many patients, drug therapy often has side effects, which cause a significant number of patients to discontinue therapy. Further, many symptoms are not completely controlled, even while patients are on the medication. Therefore, there is a need to improve interventions for this common problem. Although behavioral treatment is a well-established treatment for urge urinary incontinence and frequency in women, there are no controlled trials of behavioral treatment for symptoms of OAB in men. The primary purpose of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral treatment for symptoms of OAB in male veterans.

The study is a two-site (Birmingham and Atlanta) randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of behavioral training compared to a standard (drug) treatment control condition. Subjects are 143 men with OAB as manifested by urgency and frequent urination (>8 voids per day), with or without incontinence, and without significant bladder outlet obstruction. Following a run-in period in which all patients are treated with an alpha blocker to empirically treat any undetected obstruction, they are stratified on severity and presence of urge incontinence and randomized to 8 weeks of behavioral treatment or drug therapy. The behavioral treatment is a comprehensive, behavioral training program, which includes pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation, self monitoring with bladder diaries, and teaching urge suppression and other skills to inhibit detrusor contraction, thus reducing urgency, frequency, incontinence, and nocturia. Patients in the control group receive standard therapy consisting of individually titrated, extended-release oxybutynin, a well-established pharmacologic agent with a state of the art drug delivery system that has the lowest rates of side effects. Bladder diaries completed by subjects prior to randomization and following the last treatment session are used to calculate changes in frequency of urination, as well as other symptoms of overactive bladder, including reports of urgency, incontinence, and nocturia. Secondary outcome measures include patient global ratings of satisfaction and improvement, impact of incontinence, and the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index.

The second purpose of the study is to examine combined behavioral and drug therapy. Following post-treatment assessment, patients who do not achieve satisfactory outcomes with either behavioral or drug therapy alone are crossed over into a second phase, in which they receive combined treatment to improve outcome as much as possible.

This study will yield important information related to alternative treatment of OAB in male veterans. Though many clinicians use drug therapy routinely in the treatment of OAB, most do not offer behavioral treatments such as pelvic floor muscle training for this problem. Thus, this study has potential to alter standards of care for OAB in men.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder

Keywords

  • Overactive bladder
  • Behavioral treatment
  • Drug therapy
  • Lower urinary tract symptoms
  • Urinary incontinence
  • Clinical trial
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

855 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 143 is above the median of 72 across 652 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male
  • Community-dwelling
  • Veteran
  • Self-reported urgency
  • Self-reported frequent urination
  • Mean of > 8 voids per 24-hour day on bladder diary
  • Able to come to clinic

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urologic surgery in the past 6 months
  • Nonambulatory (unless has independent transfer skills)
  • Flow rate \< 5mL at baseline and \< 10mL/sec after run-in (on simple uroflowmetry)
  • Post-void residual urine volume > 250mL at baseline and > 150mL after run-in (on bladder ultrasound)
  • Continual leakage
  • Urinary tract infection (growth of > 100,000 colonies per ml of a urinary pathogen on urine culture). May be reconsidered after treatment and negative culture.
  • Fecal impaction
  • Poorly controlled diabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin >9 within last 3 months)
  • Hematuria on microscopic examination in the absence of infection
  • Any unstable medical condition (particularly: decompensated congestive heart failure, malignant arrhythmias, unstable angina)

    -- Impaired mental status (\< 24 on Folstein's Mini-Mental State Exam)

  • Narrow angle glaucoma
  • Gastric retention (by medical history)
  • Hypersensitivity to tamsulosin or oxybutynin
  • Current use of anticholinergic agents for detrusor instability. May be reconsidered after 2-week wash-out.
  • If on diuretic, dose has not been stable for at least three months
  • Sleep apnea, unless surgically corrected
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
143 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Behavioral Training

    Behavioral training using delayed voiding, urge suppression techniques, and pelvic floor muscle training

    Behavioral: Behavioral training

  • Active comparator
    Drug Therapy

    Oxybutynin chloride, extended-release, individually-titrated, 5-30 mg

    Drug: Oxybutynin chloride, extended-release

Interventions

  • BehavioralBehavioral training

    Comprehensive behavioral training program using delayed voiding, urge suppression techniques, pelvic floor muscle training, and monitoring with bladder diaries. Treatment is implemented by a nurse practitioner in 4 clinic visits over 8 weeks.

    Also known as: Behavioral treatment

  • DrugOxybutynin chloride, extended-release

    Individually titrated, extended-release oxybutynin chloride, initiated at 10 mg, fluid management handout, and monitoring with bladder diaries. Treatment is implemented by a nurse practitioner in 4 clinic visits over 8 weeks.

    Also known as: Antimuscarinic medication

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 24-hour Voiding Frequency

    Mean voiding frequency per 24 hours derived from 7-day bladder dairy

    Time frame: post-treatment (week 8)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Nocturia Frequency

    Change in frequency of nocturia episodes based on 7-day bladder diary

    Time frame: baseline to post-treatment (week 8)

  2. Change in Urgency Severity

    Indevus Urgency Severity Scale incorporated into the 7-day bladder diary. Scores for urgency severity ranged from 0 to 3: 0: None-no urgency 1. Mild-awareness of urgency, but is easily tolerated. 2. Moderate-enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens usual activity 3. Severe-extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activities or tasks.

    Time frame: baseline to post-treatment (week 8)

  3. Percent Change in Frequency of Urge Incontinence

    Percent change in frequency of urge incontinence episodes based on 7-day bladder diary. Percent change was calculated as (\[frequency at baseline\] - \[frequency at 8 weeks\]) / (frequency at baseline).

    Time frame: baseline to post-treatment (week 8)

  4. Change on American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index

    Change in score on American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index (baseline to week 8). The index measures lower urinary tract symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline to post-treatment (week 8)

  5. Patient Global Perception of Improvement (GPI)

    Patient global perception of improvement ("much better" to "much worse")

    Time frame: post-treatment (week 8)

  6. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient global rating of satisfaction with progress in treatment ("completely satisfied" to "very dissatisfied")

    Time frame: post-treatment (week 8)

  7. Patient Global Rating of Activity Restriction

    Patient global rating of activity restriction ("not at all" to "all the time")

    Time frame: post-treatment (week 8)

  8. Patient Report of Symptom Distress

    Patient report of how disturbed they were by symptoms ("not at all" to "extremely")

    Time frame: post-treatment (week 8)

  9. Patient Global Rating of Bothersomeness of Side Effects

    Patient global rating of how bothersome their side effects were ("no side effects" to "extremely bothersome")

    Time frame: post-treatment (week 8)

  10. Patient Desire for Alternate Treatment

    Patient response to "Do you wish to receive another form of treatment?" (yes)

    Time frame: post-treatment (week 8)

07

Results

Posted May 20, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Results can only be generalized to men without evidence of obstruction as determined by uroflowmetry, post-void residual urine (PVR) volume, and a trial of an alpha-blocker.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited through mailed surveys about bladder symptoms and through clinics at two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers(2005-2009).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Started7370
Completed6460
Not completed910

Outcome measures

Primary24-hour Voiding Frequency

Mean voiding frequency per 24 hours derived from 7-day bladder dairy

Time frame:
post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · voids per 24-hour day
24-hour Voiding Frequency
voids per 24-hour dayBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
24-hour Voiding Frequency9.1 ± 2.59.5 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Regression, Linear · p = .001 · Difference of the means: .4The estimated parameter of dispersion is the standard error of the regression coefficient which measured the adjusted difference of the group means.
SecondaryChange in Nocturia Frequency

Change in frequency of nocturia episodes based on 7-day bladder diary

Time frame:
baseline to post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · nocturia episodes per night
Change in Nocturia Frequency
nocturia episodes per nightBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Change in Nocturia Frequency-0.70 ± .72-.32 ± 1.28
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Regression, Linear · p = .05 · Difference of the means: -.38The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the group means.
SecondaryChange in Urgency Severity

Indevus Urgency Severity Scale incorporated into the 7-day bladder diary. Scores for urgency severity ranged from 0 to 3: 0: None-no urgency 1. Mild-awareness of urgency, but is easily tolerated. 2. Moderate-enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens usual activity 3. Severe-extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activities or tasks.

Time frame:
baseline to post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on scale
Change in Urgency Severity
Score on scaleBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Change in Urgency Severity.04 ± .58-.15 ± .42
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = .05 · Difference of group means: 0.19The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the group means.
SecondaryPercent Change in Frequency of Urge Incontinence

Percent change in frequency of urge incontinence episodes based on 7-day bladder diary. Percent change was calculated as (\[frequency at baseline\] - \[frequency at 8 weeks\]) / (frequency at baseline).

Time frame:
baseline to post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change in episodes per week
Percent Change in Frequency of Urge Incontinence
Percent change in episodes per weekBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Percent Change in Frequency of Urge Incontinence87.2 ± .2575.6 ± .36
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = .33 · Difference in group means: -.14The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the group means.
SecondaryChange on American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index

Change in score on American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index (baseline to week 8). The index measures lower urinary tract symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline to post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on the scale
Change on American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index
Scores on the scaleBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Change on American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index3.4 ± 4.63.2 ± 5.6
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = .84 · Median difference (net): 0.20The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the group means.
SecondaryPatient Global Perception of Improvement (GPI)

Patient global perception of improvement ("much better" to "much worse")

Time frame:
post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Perception of Improvement (GPI)
participantsBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Much better2318
Better3034
About the same107
Worse01
Much worse00
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .69 · Difference in weighted group means: -.0563The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the weighted group means.
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction

Patient global rating of satisfaction with progress in treatment ("completely satisfied" to "very dissatisfied")

Time frame:
post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Satisfaction
participantsBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Completely satisfied3625
Somewhat satisfied2533
Somewhat dissatisfied22
Very Dissatisfied00
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .16 · Difference between group weighted means: -.1563The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the weighted group means.
SecondaryPatient Global Rating of Activity Restriction

Patient global rating of activity restriction ("not at all" to "all the time")

Time frame:
post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Rating of Activity Restriction
participantsBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Not at all2931
Slightly1915
Some of the time1113
All the time41
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .56 · Difference in weighted group means: 0.1079The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the weighted group means.
SecondaryPatient Report of Symptom Distress

Patient report of how disturbed they were by symptoms ("not at all" to "extremely")

Time frame:
post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Report of Symptom Distress
participantsBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Not at all1917
Slightly3035
Somewhat147
All the time01
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .65 · Difference in weighted group means: 0.0540The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the weighted group means.
SecondaryPatient Global Rating of Bothersomeness of Side Effects

Patient global rating of how bothersome their side effects were ("no side effects" to "extremely bothersome")

Time frame:
post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Rating of Bothersomeness of Side Effects
participantsBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
No side effects2311
Not at all bothersome1613
A Little1619
Somewhat713
Extremely14
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .01
SecondaryPatient Desire for Alternate Treatment

Patient response to "Do you wish to receive another form of treatment?" (yes)

Time frame:
post-treatment (week 8)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Desire for Alternate Treatment
participantsBehavioral TrainingDrug Therapy
Patient Desire for Alternate Treatment1830
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Training vs Drug Therapy · Chi-squared · p = .02 · Difference in group proportions: -.21The estimated parameter of dispersion represents the standard error for the difference of the group proportions.

Adverse events

Collected over 8-week treatment period. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Behavioral Training—0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)
Drug Therapy—0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Behavioral TrainingDrug TherapyTotal
Mean63.7 ± 10.364.8 ± 9.664.2 ± 9.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Behavioral TrainingDrug TherapyTotal
Female000
Male7370143
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Behavioral TrainingDrug TherapyTotal
United States7370143
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Birmingham VA Medical Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur
    Decatur, Georgia 30033, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Burgio KL, Goode PS, Johnson TM, Hammontree L, Ouslander JG, Markland AD, Colli J, Vaughan CP, Redden DT. Behavioral versus drug treatment for overactive bladder in men: the Male Overactive Bladder Treatment in Veterans (MOTIVE) Trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Dec;59(12):2209-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03724.x. Epub 2011 Nov 7. PubMed 22092152 ↗
  • Johnson TM 2nd, Markland AD, Goode PS, Vaughan CP, Colli JL, Ouslander JG, Redden DT, McGwin G, Burgio KL. Efficacy of adding behavioural treatment or antimuscarinic drug therapy to alpha-blocker therapy in men with nocturia. BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):100-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11736.x. Epub 2013 Feb 28. PubMed 23448285 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01187498
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2010
Start date
Jan 2005
Primary completion
Oct 2009
Completion
Oct 2009
Results posted
May 20, 2014
Last update
May 20, 2014

Study contacts

Kathryn L. Burgio, PhD MA BA
principal investigator · Birmingham, Alabama VA Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion