CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01176058Updated Oct 28, 2015Results posted

A Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Anidulafungin Vs. Fluconazole In The Treatment Of Patients With Candidemia And/Or Other Forms Of Invasive Candidiasis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Anidulafungin/Fluconazole in Candidemia, sponsored by Pfizer. Terminated at 7 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-28.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3 and Interventional

Why this study was terminated
See termination reason in detailed description.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the treatment of patients with candidemia and/or other forms of invasive candidiasis , Anidulafungin is at least as effective and safe as Fluconazole.

Read the detailed description

To support anidulafungin NDA in China Due to the challenges in subject recruitment resulting in protracted study course, Pfizer Inc. has decided to terminate trial A8851023 prematurely based on the recommendation by the senior management team on November 8, 2011. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety concerns. All investigators were verbally informed by the study team since November 8, 2011 to stop the subject recruitment as soon as possible. All 17 enrolled subjects have been followed up on safety issues and no safety concerns were present by the data of these subjects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Candidemia

Keywords

  • Phase 3b
  • Efficacy and Safety evaluation of Anidulafungin
  • ICC
03

In context

Candidiasis

265 studies on the registry are indexed under Candidiasis; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 99 across 186 interventional studies indexed under Candidiasis.

Browse Candidiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of candidemia or invasive candidiasis.
  • Presence of one or more of signs and symptoms of acute fungal infection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who received greater than 48 hours of systemic antifungal treatment for the Candida infection for which they will be enrolled.
  • Subjects with hypersensitivity to echinocandins or azole therapy or drug excipients.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    open label

    Drug: Anidulafungin/Fluconazole

Interventions

  • DrugAnidulafungin/Fluconazole

    Anidulafungin:IV,100 mg daily preceded by an initial 200 mg dose on Day 1, 14 - 42 days Fluconazole: IV/Oral, 400mg,QD,14 - 42 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)

    Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were not available \[N/A\] for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.

    Time frame: End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)

    Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were N/A for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.

    Time frame: End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOIT

    Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

    Time frame: End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT

    Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

    Time frame: End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-Up

    Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

    Time frame: Post treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOIT

    Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

    Time frame: End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT

    Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

    Time frame: End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-Up

    Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

    Time frame: Post treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)

  8. Number of Participants Who Died

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 52

07

Results

Posted Sep 21, 2015
Limitations and caveats
Due to small enrollment, the per-protocol population was not determined, and analysis was performed on the mITT population.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAnidulafunginFluconazole
Started98
Completed55
Not completed43
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Insufficient clinical response22
Withdrew: Insufficient mycological response01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)

Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were not available \[N/A\] for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.

Time frame:
End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success62.50 (29.0 to 96.0)71.43 (38.0 to 100.0)
Failure37.50 (4.0 to 71.0)28.57 (0.0 to 62.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)

Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were N/A for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.

Time frame:
End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success62.50 (29.0 to 96.0)42.86 (6.2 to 79.5)
Failure37.50 (4.0 to 71.0)57.14 (20.5 to 93.8)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOIT

Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

Time frame:
End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOIT
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success75.00 (45.0 to 100.0)71.43 (38.0 to 100.0)
Failure25.00 (0.0 to 55.0)28.57 (0.0 to 62.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT

Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

Time frame:
End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success75.00 (45.0 to 100.0)57.14 (20.5 to 93.8)
Failure25.00 (0.0 to 55.0)42.86 (6.2 to 79.5)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-Up

Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

Time frame:
Post treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-Up
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success75.00 (45.0 to 100.0)57.14 (20.5 to 93.8)
Failure25.00 (0.0 to 55.0)42.86 (6.2 to 79.5)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOIT

Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

Time frame:
End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOIT
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success75.00 (45.0 to 100.0)85.71 (59.8 to 100.0)
Failure25.00 (0.0 to 55.0)14.29 (0.0 to 40.2)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT

Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

Time frame:
End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success75.00 (45.0 to 100.0)57.14 (20.5 to 93.8)
Failure25.00 (0.0 to 55.0)42.86 (6.2 to 79.5)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-Up

Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

Time frame:
Post treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-Up
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Success62.50 (29.0 to 96.0)57.14 (20.5 to 93.8)
Failure37.50 (4.0 to 71.0)42.86 (6.2 to 79.5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died
Time frame:
Baseline to Day 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Died
participantsAnidulafunginFluconazole
Number of Participants Who Died10

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Anidulafungin—2/9 (22.2%)6/9 (66.7%)
Fluconazole—0/8 (0%)6/8 (75%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAnidulafunginFluconazole
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/90/8
Disease progressionGeneral disorders1/90/8
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventAnidulafunginFluconazole
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/92/8
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/92/8
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/92/8
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/91/8
White blood cell count increasedInvestigations2/90/8
HypoproteinaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/90/8
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/91/8
Chest discomfortGeneral disorders0/91/8
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/91/8
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/91/8

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)AnidulafunginFluconazoleTotal
Between 18 and 44 years145
Between 45 and 64 years426
More than 65 years426
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AnidulafunginFluconazoleTotal
Female134
Male8513
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia(participants)AnidulafunginFluconazoleTotal
Fever7714
Hypothermia000
Tachycardia325
White blood cell count decreased202
White blood cell count increased314
White blood cell morphology abnormal011
Respiratory rate increased213
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) decrease011
Mechanical ventilation112
Swelling123
Feeling hot448
Localized erythema101
Purulence123
Other213
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Nanfang Hospital
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China
  • Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command/Respiratory Department
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China
  • Changhai Hospital, Hemotology Department
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200433, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Zhejiang University/Department of Hematology
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
  • Sir run run shaw hospital, Affiliated with school of medicine, Zhejiang University
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, China
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital / Department of Infectious Disease
    Beijing, 100730, China
  • Institute of Antibiotics, Hua Shan Hospital, Fudan University
    Shanghai, 200040, China
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01176058
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2010
Start date
Dec 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2011
Completion
Nov 2011
Results posted
Sep 21, 2015
Last update
Oct 28, 2015

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion