CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01165554Updated Dec 4, 2013Results posted

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Brain Amyloid Compared to Post-Mortem Levels

A Phase 3 interventional study of [18F] Flutemetamol in Brain Fibrillarab Levels, sponsored by GE Healthcare. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-04.

Sponsored by GE Healthcare · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
203
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
55 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine the level of association between quantitative regional estimates of brain uptake of [18F]flutemetamol and quantitative immunohistochemical regional estimates of brain levels of amyloid estimated from post-mortem analysis of corresponding brain tissue samples.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Fibrillarab Levels

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Amyloid
  • PET-Positron Emission Tomography
  • SUVR-Standard uptake value ratios
03

In context

Amyloidosis

491 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyloidosis; 135 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 203 is above the median of 40 across 304 interventional studies indexed under Amyloidosis.

Browse Amyloidosis studies →

Lead sponsor

GE Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 168 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject has a short life expectancy (approximately 1 year or less) as estimated by the Investigator.
  • The subject is 70 years of age or older if cognitively normal, or 55 years of age or older if terminal because of dementia.
  • The subject's general health is adequate to undergo the study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has a contraindication for PET.
  • The subject has a known or suspected hypersensitivity/allergy to [18F]flutemetamol or to any of the excipients.
  • The subject is unable to tolerate or cooperate with study procedures.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
203 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    [18F] Flutemetamol

    Drug: [18F] Flutemetamol

Interventions

  • Drug[18F] Flutemetamol

    Flutemetamol (18F) Injection, 111 to 370 MBq (3 to 10 mCi), single intravenous injection.

    Also known as: AH110690

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Sensitivity of Blinded Visual Interpretations of [18F]Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images Without Anatomic Brain Images for Detecting Brain Fibrillar Amyloid β.

    A calculation used to assess Sensitivity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined abnormal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of abnormal participants). Blinded visual interpretations of \[18F\]flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images without anatomic brain images for detecting brain fibrillar amyloid β.

    Time frame: Post flutemetamol administration.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, Without Anatomic Brain Images.

    A calculation used to assess Specificity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined normal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of normal participants). Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, without anatomic brain images.

    Time frame: Post Flutemetamol administrations

  2. Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Abnormal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.

    Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as abnormal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.

    Time frame: Post flutemetamol administration.

  3. Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.

    Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.

    Time frame: Post flutemetamol administration.

07

Results

Posted Dec 4, 2013

Participant flow

Study started on May, 2010 and ended on November 2011.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFlutemetamol Injection
Started203
Completed180
Not completed23
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject23

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Sensitivity of Blinded Visual Interpretations of [18F]Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images Without Anatomic Brain Images for Detecting Brain Fibrillar Amyloid β.

A calculation used to assess Sensitivity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined abnormal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of abnormal participants). Blinded visual interpretations of \[18F\]flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images without anatomic brain images for detecting brain fibrillar amyloid β.

Time frame:
Post flutemetamol administration.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Sensitivity by Reader
The Sensitivity of Blinded Visual Interpretations of [18F]Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images Without Anatomic Brain Images for Detecting Brain Fibrillar Amyloid β.
Percentage of Sensitivity by ReaderSensitivity Percentage of Abnormal Visual Reads
Reader 1- Abnormal81
Reader 2 - Abnormal88
Reader 3 - Abnormal93
Reader 4 - Abnormal93
Reader 5 - Abnormal88
SecondaryBlinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, Without Anatomic Brain Images.

A calculation used to assess Specificity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined normal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of normal participants). Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, without anatomic brain images.

Time frame:
Post Flutemetamol administrations
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Specificity by Reader
Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, Without Anatomic Brain Images.
Percentage of Specificity by ReaderSpecificity Percentage of Normal Visual Reads
Reader 1 - Normal88
Reader 2 - Normal92
Reader 3 - Normal44
Reader 4 - Normal80
Reader 5 - Normal92
SecondaryBlinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Abnormal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.

Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as abnormal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.

Time frame:
Post flutemetamol administration.
Reported as:
Number · Percent of Sensitivity-Abnormal Reads
Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Abnormal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.
Percent of Sensitivity-Abnormal ReadsSensitivity-Abnormal Visual Reads
Reader 191 (78 to 97)
Reader 295 (84 to 99)
Reader 398 (88 to 100)
Reader 491 (78 to 97)
Reader 591 (77 to 97)
SecondaryBlinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.

Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.

Time frame:
Post flutemetamol administration.
Reported as:
Number · Percent of Specificity-Normal Reads
Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.
Percent of Specificity-Normal ReadsSpecificity-Normal Visual Reads
Reader 192 (74 to 99)
Reader 288 (69 to 98)
Reader 356 (35 to 76)
Reader 488 (69 to 98)
Reader 592 (74 to 99)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Flutemetamol Injection—4/180 (2.2%)0/180 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventFlutemetamol Injection
Prostate CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/180
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/180
Senile DementiaPsychiatric disorders1/180
Change in Mental StatusPsychiatric disorders1/180

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Flutemetamol Injection
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years15
>=65 years165
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Flutemetamol Injection
Mean79.9 ± 9.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Flutemetamol Injection
Female103
Male77
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Flutemetamol Injection
United States168
United Kingdom12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • GE Healthcare
    Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Thal DR, Ronisz A, Tousseyn T, Rijal Upadhaya A, Balakrishnan K, Vandenberghe R, Vandenbulcke M, von Arnim CAF, Otto M, Beach TG, Lilja J, Heurling K, Chakrabarty A, Ismail A, Buckley C, Smith APL, Kumar S, Farrar G, Walter J. Different aspects of Alzheimer's disease-related amyloid beta-peptide pathology and their relationship to amyloid positron emission tomography imaging and dementia. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019 Nov 14;7(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0837-9. Erratum In: Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020 Aug 3;8(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01005-5. PubMed 31727169 ↗
  • Thal DR, Beach TG, Zanette M, Lilja J, Heurling K, Chakrabarty A, Ismail A, Farrar G, Buckley C, Smith APL. Estimation of amyloid distribution by [18F]flutemetamol PET predicts the neuropathological phase of amyloid beta-protein deposition. Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Oct;136(4):557-567. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1897-9. Epub 2018 Aug 19. PubMed 30123935 ↗
  • Ikonomovic MD, Buckley CJ, Heurling K, Sherwin P, Jones PA, Zanette M, Mathis CA, Klunk WE, Chakrabarty A, Ironside J, Ismail A, Smith C, Thal DR, Beach TG, Farrar G, Smith AP. Post-mortem histopathology underlying beta-amyloid PET imaging following flutemetamol F 18 injection. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Dec 12;4(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0399-z. PubMed 27955679 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 4, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01165554
Lead sponsor
GE Healthcare
Collaborators
i3 Statprobe, Covance
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 20, 2010
Start date
May 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2011
Completion
Nov 2011
Results posted
Dec 4, 2013
Last update
Dec 4, 2013

Study contacts

Paul Sherwin, MD, PhD
study director · GE Healthcare

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion