A Phase 3 interventional study of [18F] Flutemetamol in Brain Fibrillarab Levels, sponsored by GE Healthcare. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-04.
Sponsored by GE Healthcare · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic
To determine the level of association between quantitative regional estimates of brain uptake of [18F]flutemetamol and quantitative immunohistochemical regional estimates of brain levels of amyloid estimated from post-mortem analysis of corresponding brain tissue samples.
491 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyloidosis; 135 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 203 is above the median of 40 across 304 interventional studies indexed under Amyloidosis.
Browse Amyloidosis studies →GE Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 168 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (89%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: [18F] Flutemetamol
Flutemetamol (18F) Injection, 111 to 370 MBq (3 to 10 mCi), single intravenous injection.
Also known as: AH110690
The Sensitivity of Blinded Visual Interpretations of [18F]Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images Without Anatomic Brain Images for Detecting Brain Fibrillar Amyloid β.
A calculation used to assess Sensitivity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined abnormal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of abnormal participants). Blinded visual interpretations of \[18F\]flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images without anatomic brain images for detecting brain fibrillar amyloid β.
Time frame: Post flutemetamol administration.
Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, Without Anatomic Brain Images.
A calculation used to assess Specificity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined normal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of normal participants). Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, without anatomic brain images.
Time frame: Post Flutemetamol administrations
Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Abnormal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.
Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as abnormal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.
Time frame: Post flutemetamol administration.
Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.
Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.
Time frame: Post flutemetamol administration.
Study started on May, 2010 and ended on November 2011.
| Milestone | Flutemetamol Injection |
|---|---|
| Started | 203 |
| Completed | 180 |
| Not completed | 23 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 23 |
A calculation used to assess Sensitivity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined abnormal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of abnormal participants). Blinded visual interpretations of \[18F\]flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images without anatomic brain images for detecting brain fibrillar amyloid β.
| Percentage of Sensitivity by Reader | Sensitivity Percentage of Abnormal Visual Reads |
|---|---|
| Reader 1- Abnormal | 81 |
| Reader 2 - Abnormal | 88 |
| Reader 3 - Abnormal | 93 |
| Reader 4 - Abnormal | 93 |
| Reader 5 - Abnormal | 88 |
A calculation used to assess Specificity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined normal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of normal participants). Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, without anatomic brain images.
| Percentage of Specificity by Reader | Specificity Percentage of Normal Visual Reads |
|---|---|
| Reader 1 - Normal | 88 |
| Reader 2 - Normal | 92 |
| Reader 3 - Normal | 44 |
| Reader 4 - Normal | 80 |
| Reader 5 - Normal | 92 |
Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as abnormal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.
| Percent of Sensitivity-Abnormal Reads | Sensitivity-Abnormal Visual Reads |
|---|---|
| Reader 1 | 91 (78 to 97) |
| Reader 2 | 95 (84 to 99) |
| Reader 3 | 98 (88 to 100) |
| Reader 4 | 91 (78 to 97) |
| Reader 5 | 91 (77 to 97) |
Blinded visual interpretation of each subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection brain PET images as normal, with anatomic CT brain images for reference.
| Percent of Specificity-Normal Reads | Specificity-Normal Visual Reads |
|---|---|
| Reader 1 | 92 (74 to 99) |
| Reader 2 | 88 (69 to 98) |
| Reader 3 | 56 (35 to 76) |
| Reader 4 | 88 (69 to 98) |
| Reader 5 | 92 (74 to 99) |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flutemetamol Injection | — | 4/180 (2.2%) | 0/180 (0%) |
| Event | Flutemetamol Injection |
|---|---|
| Prostate CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 1/180 |
| AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/180 |
| Senile DementiaPsychiatric disorders | 1/180 |
| Change in Mental StatusPsychiatric disorders | 1/180 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Flutemetamol Injection |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 15 |
| >=65 years | 165 |
| Age Continuous(years) | Flutemetamol Injection |
|---|---|
| Mean | 79.9 ± 9.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Flutemetamol Injection |
|---|---|
| Female | 103 |
| Male | 77 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Flutemetamol Injection |
|---|---|
| United States | 168 |
| United Kingdom | 12 |
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
GE Healthcare