A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Drug Eluting Stent implantation in Myocardial Ischemia, sponsored by KCRI. Completed at 3 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-01-20.
Sponsored by KCRI · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of this study is the assessment of the performance, safety and efficacy of the ProNOVA XR Polymer Free Drug Eluting Stent System in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions.
This study is a prospective, single arm, multicenter registry of approximately 50 patients undergoing PCI with the ProNOVA Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System according to its Instructions for Use.
The purpose of this registry is the evaluation of the performance, safety and efficacy of ProNOVA XR DES in real-world patients. Following initial stent implantation, all patients will have clinical follow up at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months. Additionally all patients will have a angiographic F/U at 6 months to assess the late luminal loss by QCA measurements and the neointimal volume including stent apposition by intravascular ultrasound.
3,242 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Ischemia; 390 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 120 across 1,901 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Ischemia.
Browse Myocardial Ischemia studies →KCRI is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
General Inclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
ProNOVA XR Polymer Free Drug Eluting Stent implantation - single arm
Device: Drug Eluting Stent implantation
ProNOVA XR Drug Eluting Stent implantation
In-stent late luminal loss
Time frame: at 6 months after stent implantation
Clinically and non-clinically indicated target lesion revascularization
Time frame: at 30 days
Clinically and non-clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
Time frame: at 30 days
Incidence of total and cardiovascular death
Time frame: at 30 days
Incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction
Time frame: at 30 days
Definite, probable, and possible stent thrombosis
Time frame: at 30 days
Clinically and non-clinically indicated target lesion revascularization
Time frame: at 6 months
Clinically and non-clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
Time frame: at 6 months
Incidence of total and cardiovascular death
Time frame: at 6 months
Incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction
Time frame: at 6 months
Definite, probable, and possible stent thrombosis
Time frame: at 6 months
Clinically and non-clinically indicated target lesion revascularization
Time frame: at 12 months
Clinically and non-clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
Time frame: at 12 months
Incidence of total and cardiovascular death
Time frame: at 12 months
Incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction
Time frame: at 12 months
Definite, probable, and possible stent thrombosis
Time frame: at 12 months
In-stent and in-segment percent diameter stenosis (% DS)
Time frame: at 6 months after stent implantation
In-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate as assessed by QCA
Time frame: at 6 months after stent implantation
In-stent and in-segment minimal luminal diameter (MLD)as assessed by QCA
Time frame: at 6 months after stent implantation
In-stent and in-segment late luminal loss as assessed by QCA
Time frame: at 6 months after stent implantation
Neointimal hyperplasia as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
Time frame: at 6 months after stent implantation
Rate of incomplete stent apposition as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
Time frame: at 6 months after stent implantation
The record gives a start of Nov 2008, a primary completion of Sep 2010 and a completion of Sep 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.