CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01149707Updated May 1, 2018

Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy Study of PUR 0110 Rectal Enema in Mild-to-Moderate Distal Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 250 mg and PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 500 mg in Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis and Proctosigmoiditis, sponsored by PurGenesis Technologies Inc.. Completed at 6 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-01.

Sponsored by PurGenesis Technologies Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

PUR 0110 is a 100% natural novel investigational medicinal product that has been demonstrated in several in vitro and in vivo pharmacology studies to have potent anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative and immunomodulatory effects. This exploratory Phase 2a study is a first-in-patient study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, biomarker effect and efficacy of PUR 0110 rectal enema in patients with active mild-to-moderate distal ulcerative colitis (UC).

The study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study. To be eligible for inclusion into the study, patients must either be newly diagnosed or have on-going active mild-to-moderate distal ulcerative colitis of at least 3 months duration confirmed in either case by flexible sigmoidoscopy and biopsy at the Screening Visit. In addition, patients must have a modified Mayo score of ≥5 to ≤10 including a sigmoidoscopy inflammation grade and rectal bleeding scores of ≥2 each. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either PUR 0110 250 mg, 500 mg or 1000 mg or placebo rectal enema in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Patients will self-administer the assigned study medication intrarectally once-daily at bedtime (10:00 p.m +/- 1 hour) for 2 weeks.

Patients will be evaluated for safety by adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), and concomitant medications. Efficacy evaluations will include the modified Mayo score, patient-defined response and remission, Investigator Assessment of Ulcerative Colitis Symptom Score, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and biomarkers of inflammation, apoptosis and total cell death, lipid peroxidation and in vivo oxidative stress, and antioxidant defense mechanisms in plasma, serum, urine, feces and biopsy tissue. Patients will have a flexible sigmoidoscopy and biopsy 12 hours after the last dose of study medication.

Read the detailed description

Safety/Primary Outcome Parameters:

  • Incidence, nature and severity of adverse events
  • Incidence, nature and severity of clinical laboratory test abnormalities

Efficacy/Secondary Outcome Parameters:

  • Clinical remission defined as an endoscopy score of ≤ 1, a rectal bleeding score of 0, and an improvement or no change from baseline in the stool frequency score at the end of 2 weeks of treatment / withdrawal visit;
  • Clinical response rate defined as the percentage of patients with a drop of ≥3 points from the baseline overall modified Mayo score;
  • Patient defined response and remission rates;
  • Change from baseline in the overall modified Mayo score (Disease Activity Index);
  • Change from baseline in each of the 4 individual sub-scores of the modified Mayo score;
  • Change from baseline in Investigator Assessment of UC Symptom Score (total and individual symptom scores)
  • Change from baseline in IBDQ score (total and the 4 individual dimension scores)
  • Proportion of patients with treatment failure;
  • Change from baseline in serum lutein levels;
  • Change from baseline in C-reactive protein (CRP), high sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fecal calprotectin (FCP), and fecal lactoferrin (FL).
  • Change from baseline in exploratory biomarkers including: serum interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, IL-8, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), IL-4, IL-10, IL-17, IL-23, human beta-Defensin-2 (hBD-2), malondialdehyde (MDA), lipoxin A4 (LXA4), glutathione (GSH), M30 and M65 apoptosomes in serum and biopsies, and plasma and urinary isoprostane levels.
02

Conditions studied

  • Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis
  • Proctosigmoiditis

Keywords

  • PUR 0110
  • PUR 0110 Rectal Enema
  • Distal Ulcerative Colitis
  • Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis
  • Mild
  • Moderate
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 60 across 771 interventional studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

PurGenesis Technologies Inc. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Outpatient males and females between 18 and 75 years.
  2. Females of child bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and must be sexually inactive (abstinent) for 3 months prior to dosing and throughout the study or be using one of the following acceptable methods of contraception:

    • barrier methods (condom, diaphragm with spermicide);
    • Intrauterine device (IUD) in place for at least 3 months;
    • surgical sterilization of the partner (vasectomy for at least 6 months); or
    • hormonal contraceptives for at least 3 months prior to dosing. [Female subjects of childbearing potential must be advised to remain sexually inactive or maintain the same method of contraception for ≥7 days following the end of dosing of study treatment]
  3. Patients newly diagnosed or with ongoing active distal ulcerative colitis of >3 months duration, confirmed by flexible sigmoidoscopy during screening, and extending 5 to 50 cm from the anal margin. Sigmoidoscopy must be conducted within not more than 3 +/- 1 days before the Baseline (Day 0) Visit.
  4. Patients with ongoing active distal ulcerative colitis of ≥3 months duration must be on a stable dose of oral mesalamine (5-ASA) for ≥2 months before the Baseline (Day 0) Visit.
  5. Modified Mayo Score (Disease Activity Index) of ≥5 to ≤10 at Baseline, including a sigmoidoscopic inflammation grade score of ≥2 and a rectal bleeding score ≥2.
  6. Negative stool test at screening to rule out parasites, bacterial pathogens and Clostridium difficile.
  7. Able and willing to fill in (maintain) daily diary cards from Day -7 to Day 21 of the study.
  8. Able to provide voluntary written informed consent prior to initiation of screening, must be capable of following the verbal and written study instructions, and be able to commit to the return visits during the entire period of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History or presence of clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatological, neurological, or psychiatric disease, that could compromise patient's ability to participate in the study, and/or interfere with absorption of the study drug or the interpretation of the study data.
  2. Patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease.
  3. Patients with a modified Mayo score of ≥11 at the Screening (Day -7 \& Day -3) Visits.
  4. Patients at immediate or significant risk of toxic megacolon; those with bowel stricture, colonic dysplasia, adenoma or carcinoma.
  5. Use of botanical treatments and supplements for ulcerative colitis within 14 days prior to the Baseline Visit.
  6. Patients with any enteric pathogens, ova or parasites, or Clostridium difficile toxin in stool.
  7. Female patients with a positive pregnancy test or lactating at the Screening/Baseline Visits.
  8. History of allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to spinach, spinach tablet, spinach powder or spinach extract; and to latex, molds and mushrooms.
  9. History of gout, pseudogout or hyperuricemia, or kidney stones.
  10. History of pseudoallergic hypersensitivity to the food color additives, tartrazine (E102), sunset yellow (E110) and FD \& C Blue No.1 (Brilliant blue FCF; E133), allergic asthma, aspirin intolerance, and severe or multiple allergies.
  11. Past medical history of significant gastrointestinal surgery including but not limited to colostomy, ileostomy, or previous colonic surgery other than appendectomy.
  12. Patients with anatomical abnormalities of the colon, e.g., short bowel or other abnormalities.
  13. Patients with any current infectious, ischemic, or immunologic disease with gastrointestinal involvement.
  14. Patients with a history of failure to retain enemas.
  15. Use of antibiotics for reasons related to the primary diagnosis or for other gastrointestinal-related conditions within 14 days of Baseline Visit.
  16. Patients who used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, within 14 days prior to Baseline Visit. Except aspirin ≤325 mg/day for cardiovascular prophylaxis.
  17. Patients who used the following medications used for treating ulcerative colitis from the times indicated below to the end of Week 3 (Visit 6):

    • Topical intrarectal corticosteroids or topical intrarectal mesalamine within 14 days of Baseline Visit;
    • Systemic corticosteroids (oral or injectable, including adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH]) within 30 days of Baseline Visit;
    • Immunosuppressant therapy (methotrexate, azathioprine, 6-mercatopurine or cyclosporine) within 60 days of Baseline Visit; and
    • Biologic therapy (tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, etc.) within 90 days of Baseline Visit.
  18. Patients with a history of active malignancy within the past 5 years except for squamous cell or basal cell cancers of the skin.
  19. History of any clinical laboratory abnormality deemed significant by the Principal Investigator.
  20. History of significant alcohol or drug abuse within one year prior to the Screening Visit.
  21. Patients who tested positive at Screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) or hepatitis C virus (HCV).
  22. Exposure to any investigational or non-registered drug within 30 days prior to administration of study drug.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 250 mg

    Active treatment

    Drug: PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 250 mg

  • Experimental
    PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 500 mg

    Active treatment

    Drug: PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 500 mg

  • Experimental
    PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 1000 mg

    Active treatment

    Drug: PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 1000 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Enema

    Placebo comparator

    Drug: Placebo Enema

Interventions

  • DrugPUR 0110 Rectal Enema 250 mg

    PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 250 mg, once-daily, intrarectally

    Also known as: Active treatment arm

  • DrugPUR 0110 Rectal Enema 500 mg

    PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 500 mg, once-daily, intrarectally

    Also known as: Active treatment arm

  • DrugPUR 0110 Rectal Enema 1000 mg

    PUR 0110 Rectal Enema 1000 mg, once-daily, intrarectally

    Also known as: Active treatment arm

  • DrugPlacebo Enema

    Placebo Enema, once-daily, intrarectally

    Also known as: Placebo arm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events

    Safety \& Tolerability of PUR0110 rectal enema compared to placebo as per Incidence, nature and severity of adverse events (AEs); and abnormal clinical laboratory test results.

    Time frame: At Week 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on remission rate

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per Clinical remission rate with clinical remission defined as an endoscopy score of ≤ 1, a rectal bleeding score of 0, and an improvement or no change from baseline in the stool frequency score at the end of 2 weeks of treatment / withdrawal visit.

    Time frame: At week 2

  2. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on clinical response rate

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per : Clinical response rate defined as the percentage of subjects with a drop of ≥3 points from the baseline overall modified Mayo score.

    Time frame: At week 2

  3. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on subject response and remission rate

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per Subject defined response and remission rates based on their well being : 1= much better; 2= some better; 3=a little better; 4= about the same; 5=a little worse; 6= some worse \& 7= much worse.ed as : o= none; 1 = mild; 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4 = incapacitating.

    Time frame: At week 2

  4. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on overall Mayo score

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per Change from baseline in the overall modified Mayo score.

    Time frame: At week 2

  5. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on in each of the 4 individual sub-scores of the modified Mayo score.

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per Change from baseline in each of the 4 individual sub-scores of the modified Mayo score.

    Time frame: At week 2

  6. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on investigator assessment of ulcerative colitis symptom score

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per Change from baseline in investigator assessment of ulcerative colitis symptom score : 0= none; 1= Mild; 2=Moderate; 3=Severe and 4 = incapacitating

    Time frame: At week 2

  7. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ) score

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per Change from baseline in inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ) score.

    Time frame: At week 2

  8. Effectiveness of PUR0110 on proportion of subjects with treatment failure defined as unchanged, worsened or missing modified Mayo score

    Effectiveness of PUR0110 compared to placebo as per : Proportion of subjects with treatment failure;

    Time frame: At week 2

  9. Effect of PUR0110 on biomarkers of inflammation

    Change from baseline in exploratory biomarkers - serum IL-2, IL-6, IL8, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-4, IL-10, IL-17, IL-23, hβD-2, MDA, LXA4, GSH and LTB4 levels in serum and biopsies; plasma and urinary isoprostane levels and serum lipoxin A4 levels..

    Time frame: At week 2

  10. Effect of PUR0110 on C-reactive Protein (CRP), high sensitivity CRP (hsCRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Fecal Falprotectin (FCP) and Fecal Lactoferrin (FL) compared to placebo

    Change from baseline in CRP, hs-CRP, ESR, FCP and FL .

    Time frame: At week 2

  11. Effect of PUR0110 on M30 apoptosome in serum and biopsies

    Effect of PUR0110 on M30 apoptosome in serum and biopsies compared to placebo

    Time frame: At week 2

  12. Effect of PUR0110 on M65 apoptosome in serum and biopsies

    Effect of PUR0110 on M65 apoptosome in serum and biopsies compared to placebo

    Time frame: At week 2

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • PurGenesis Investigational Site
    Jena, 07740, Germany
  • PurGenesis Investigational Site
    Köln-Merheim, 51109, Germany
  • PurGenesis Investigational Site
    Ludwigshafen, 67067, Germany
  • PurGenesis Investigational Site
    Minden, 32423, Germany
  • PurGenesis Investigational Site
    Oelde, 59302, Germany
  • PurGenesis Investigational Site
    Werden, 45239, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01149707
Lead sponsor
PurGenesis Technologies Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 23, 2010
Start date
Jun 1, 2010
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2014
Completion
Jun 20, 2015
Last update
May 1, 2018

Study contacts

Theophilus J Gana, MD, PhD
study director · Devonian Health Group Inc.
Michael Rünzi, Prof. Dr. med.
principal investigator · Essen-Werden, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion