ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01135056SIRveNIBUpdated Apr 24, 2018

Study to Compare Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

A Phase 3 interventional study of SIR-Spheres and Sorafenib tosylate in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, sponsored by Singapore General Hospital. Status unknown at 29 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-24.

Sponsored by Singapore General Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2018), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
360
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of SIRT as compared with Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced liver cancer in terms of overall survival (OS).

The Study null hypothesis is, there is no difference in overall survival between patients receiving SIRT and those receiving Sorafenib therapy.

Read the detailed description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 5th most common cancer worldwide but unfortunately between 70 - 80% of all HCC are in the Asia-Pacific because of the prevalence of chronic viral hepatitis in the region. The increase in the prevalence of chronic hepatitis C in the Western world however predicts that HCC will similarly be an important cause of death there in the next 20 years.

Only 15-20% of HCC are today potentially curable by surgery at the time of diagnosis. Another 10-15% of patients may benefit from potentially curative locally ablative therapy such as radio-frequency ablation. Prognosis in the majority of patients has been dismal as conventional systemic therapies have been largely inefficacious. The first successfully trialed systemic targeted therapy, sorafenib (2007) prolonged survival by a modest average of 3 months in patients with good underlying liver function.

While the liver is radio-sensitive, external beam radiation causes significant radio-toxicity. To overcome this, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) was developed to deliver a radiation source directly to liver cancer via the arterial route. Sir-sphere is radioactive yttrium on a 90 micro-meter diameter resin carrier and is an established therapy in colorectal metastasis. Sir-sphere has been reported to cause significantly tumour regression in HCC.

This study will evaluate the efficacy of SIRT using SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 microspheres compared to sorafenib in the treatment of patients with locally advanced primary HCC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Randomized
  • Open-label
  • Multi-Centre
  • Phase III
  • Sorafenib
  • SIR-Spheres
03

In context

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

3,648 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; 1,061 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 360 is above the median of 54 across 2,618 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.

Browse Carcinoma, Hepatocellular studies →

Lead sponsor

Singapore General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 270 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Disease must be locally advanced as defined by BCLC (B) intermediate stage or BCLC (C) advanced stage without extra-hepatic disease (only with branch portal vein thrombosis).
  • Willing, able and mentally competent to provide written prior to any testing undertaken for this study protocol, including screening tests and evaluations that are not considered to be part of the subject's routine care.
  • Aged 18 years/older (either gender).
  • Unequivocal diagnosis of HCC.
  • HCC not amenable to surgical resection or immediate liver transplantation, or cannot be optimally treated with local ablative techniques such as RFA, consistent with the practice of the clinical trial centre.
  • , defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as ≥ 10 mm with spiral CT scan or MRI.
  • performance status 0-1.
  • A-B (up to 7 points)
  • Adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function as follows:
  • Leukocytes ≥ 2,500/μL
  • ≥ 80,000/μL
  • > 9.5g/dL
  • Total \< 2.0mg/dL
  • ≤ 2.0
  • ALP ≤ 5 x institutional
  • and ALT ≤ 5 x institutional ULN
  • Albumin ≥ 2.5g/dL
  • Creatinine ≤ 2.0mg/dL
  • of at least 3 months without any active treatment.
  • Suitable for protocol treatment as determined by clinical assessment undertaken by the Investigator.
  • Female patients must be either or, if premenopausal, must have a negative pregnancy test and agree to use 2 forms of if sexually active during their study participation.
  • Male patients must be surgically sterile, or if sexually active and having a pre-menopausal female partner then must be using an acceptable form of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have had more than 2 administrations of hepatic artery directed therapy.
  • Subjects who have had hepatic artery directed therapy done \< 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  • Have had systemic chemotherapy for HCC except for prior or neoadjuvant therapy given more than 6 months from enrolment.
  • have had prior treatment with Sorafenib or VEGF inhibitors.
  • Prior hepatic radiation therapy for HCC or other .
  • Currently receiving any other agents for the treatment of their cancer.
  • Has intractable clinical ascites (in spite of optimal diuretic treatment) or any other clinical signs of liver failure, on physical examination.
  • Complete main portal vein thrombosis.
  • Any disease (local-regional lymph nodes measuring less than 2 cm in greatest diameter or lung nodules measuring less than 1 cm are not as per Investigator discretion).
  • Any other concurrent malignancy, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has been disease-free for at least 5 years.
  • Presence of clinical signs of due to their poor prognosis and because progressive neurologic dysfunction would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events.
  • Uncontrolled inter-current illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection (except viral hepatitis), symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Any of the following contraindications to angiography and selective visceral catheterization:
  • Bleeding diathesis, not correctable by the standard forms of therapy.
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease that would preclude arterial catheterization.
  • Portal hypertension with hepato-fugal flow as documented on baseline spiral CT scan.
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to SIR-Spheres or Sorafenib.
  • Inability or unwillingness to understand or sign a written document.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or currently breastfeeding.
  • Female subjects, unless or surgically sterile, unwillingness to practice effective , as per Investigator discretion during the study. The rhythm method is not to be used as the sole method of contraception.
  • Male subjects, unwillingness to practice effective contraception (per Investigator discretion) while taking part in this study, because the effect of the SIR-Spheres treatment on sperm or upon the development of an unborn child are unknown.
  • Current enrolment in any other investigational therapeutic drug or device study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(19)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
360 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Sorafenib, Multikinase Inhibitor, Tablet

    Sorafenib tosylate: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that decreases tumor cell proliferation. Sorafenib was shown to inhibit multiple intracellular (c-CRAF, BRAF and mutant BRAF) and cell surface kinases (KIT, FLT- 3, RET, VEGFR-1, VEGFR- 2, VEGFR- 3, and PDGFR- ß). Several of these kinases are thought to be involved in tumor cell signaling, angiogenesis and apoptosis. Sorafenib inhibited tumor growth of the human hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma, and several other human tumor xenografts in immunocompromised mice. A reduction in tumor angiogenesis and increases in tumor apoptosis was seen in models of human hepatocellular and renal cell carcinoma. Additionally a reduction in tumor cell signaling was seen in a model of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Drug: Sorafenib tosylate

  • Active comparator
    SIR-Spheres, Microspheres, Device

    SIR-Spheres: SIR-Spheres consist of biocompatible resin microspheres containing yttrium-90, with a size between 20 and 60 microns in diameter. Yttrium-90 is a high-energy pure beta-emitting isotope with no primary gamma emission. The half life of yttrium-90 is 64.1 hours. In clinical use which requires the isotope to decay to infinity, 94% of the radiation is delivered in 11 days leaving only background radiation with no therapeutic value. SIR-Spheres is implanted into hepatic tumours by delivery via either the common hepatic artery or the right or left hepatic artery using a catheter or implanted port . Once SIR-Spheres is implanted into the liver, it is not metabolised or excreted and it stays permanently in the liver.

    Device: SIR-Spheres

Interventions

  • DeviceSIR-Spheres

    One time treatment. Dose administered based on tumour volume. Each vial is 3.0GBq.

    Also known as: Yttrium-90 Microspheres

  • Oral Tablet, 400mg B.i.d, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops

    Also known as: Nexavar

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival is defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death due to any cause. All patients will be followed up until death to compare the overall survival between the two treatments. 2 years is an estimated time frame.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression free survival in the liver

    Progression-free survival in the liver is defined as the time interval between randomisation and the date of tumour progression in the liver or death, whichever is earlier. Tumour progression in the liver will be determined from serial CT scans. Diagnosis of tumour progression of disease should be made using the RECIST guideline version 1.1. 2 years is an estimated time frame.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Progression free survival overall

    Progression-free survival overall is defined as the time interval between randomisation and the date of tumour progression at any site in the body or death, whichever is earlier. Tumour progression at any site in the body will be measured by any definitive imaging technique including CT scan, MRI study or other nuclear medicine scan. The Investigator should clearly indicate the site of tumour progression (hepatic or extra-hepatic) at the time of recurrence. 2 years is an estimated time frame.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Tumour Response Rate

    Tumour response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the new response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) \[European Journal of Cancer (45): 228 - 247, 2009\] (http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/docs/recist_guideline.pdf). 2 years is an estimated time frame

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Toxicity and Safety

    Toxicity will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 4.02. Patients for both treatment arms will be followed-up for safety and toxicity from the time of study entry (randomisation day) until 30 days post study conclusion or until commencement of the next alternative therapy, which ever is earlier.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  5. Health Related Quality of Life (QoL)

    Quality of life (QoL) will be measured by using the EQ-5D questionnaire over the study period. QoL for patients will be measured until their first disease progression up to 2 years (estimated) which ever is earlier.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  6. Liver resection rate

    Patients will be assessed for suitability for liver resection every 12 weekly until their study conclusion up to 2 years which ever is earlier.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  7. Liver Transplantation Rate

    Patients will be assessed for suitability for liver transplantation every 12 weekly until their study conclusion up to 2 years which ever is earlier.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  8. Time to Disease Progression

    Time to Disease Progression (TTP) is defined as a measure of time after a disease is diagnosed (or treated) until the disease starts to get worse. Disease Progression will be measured by RECIST guideline version 1.1. TTP will be measured every 12 weekly up to 2 years (estimated).

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  9. Disease control rate

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

29 sites
  • The Brunei Cancer Centre
    Jerudong, Brunei 3122, Brunei Darussalam
  • Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • University of Udayana, Rumah Sakit Sanglah, Indonesia
    Denpasar, Bali 80114, Indonesia
  • Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital ,University of Indonesia
    Jakarta, 16424, Indonesia
  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Seoul, 120-752, Korea, Republic of
  • Korea University Anam Hospital
    Seoul, 136-705, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
    Seoul, 137- 040, Korea, Republic of
  • Asan Medical Center
    Seoul, 138-736, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Seoul, 463-707, Korea, Republic of
  • Sarawak General Hospital
    Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • University Malaya Medical Center
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Penang Adventist Hospital
    Penang, 10350, Malaysia
  • National Cancer Center of Mongolia
    Ulaanbaatar, 210648, Mongolia
  • Yangon GI & Liver Centre
    Yangon, 11141, Myanmar
  • Auckland City Hospital
    Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
  • Makati Medical Center
    Manila, Makati City 1229, Philippines
  • The Medical City
    Pasig City, Manila, Philippines
  • St. Luke's Medical Center, Philippines
    Quezon City, Manila 1102, Philippines
  • Davao Doctors Hospital
    Davao, Philippines
  • National University Hospital
    Singapore, 119075, Singapore
  • Singapore General Hospital
    Singapore, 168608, Singapore
  • National Cancer Center Singapore
    Singapore, 169610, Singapore
  • Khoo Teck Puat Hospital
    Singapore, 768828, Singapore
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei City, Taipei 100, Taiwan
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    Taipei City, Taipei 112, Taiwan
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, Taoyuan Hsien, Taiwan
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
  • China Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, 404, Taiwan
  • Chulabhorn Hospital
    Bangkok, 10210, Thailand
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chow PKH, Gandhi M, Tan SB, Khin MW, Khasbazar A, Ong J, Choo SP, Cheow PC, Chotipanich C, Lim K, Lesmana LA, Manuaba TW, Yoong BK, Raj A, Law CS, Cua IHY, Lobo RR, Teh CSC, Kim YH, Jong YW, Han HS, Bae SH, Yoon HK, Lee RC, Hung CF, Peng CY, Liang PC, Bartlett A, Kok KYY, Thng CH, Low AS, Goh ASW, Tay KH, Lo RHG, Goh BKP, Ng DCE, Lekurwale G, Liew WM, Gebski V, Mak KSW, Soo KC; Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials Group. SIRveNIB: Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Versus Sorafenib in Asia-Pacific Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):1913-1921. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0892. Epub 2018 Mar 2. PubMed 29498924 ↗
  • Gandhi M, Choo SP, Thng CH, Tan SB, Low AS, Cheow PC, Goh AS, Tay KH, Lo RH, Goh BK, Wong JS, Ng DC, Soo KC, Liew WM, Chow PK; Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials Group. Single administration of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy versus continuous treatment with sorafeNIB in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SIRveNIB): study protocol for a phase iii randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2868-y. PubMed 27821083 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01135056
Collaborators
National Cancer Centre, Singapore, National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Sirtex Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2010
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2018

Study contacts

Pierce KH Chow, MBBS, PhD
study chair · National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sorafenib

Start the discussion