CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01124006Updated Feb 24, 2016Results posted

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Effectiveness of 2 Doses of Intradiscal rhGDF-5 (Single Administration) for the Treatment of Early Stage Lumbar Disc Degeneration

A Phase 2 interventional study of Intradiscal rhGDF-5 and Water for injection in Degenerative Disc Disease, sponsored by DePuy Spine. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-24.

Sponsored by DePuy Spine · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study to show the safety and tolerability of Intradiscal rhGDF-5 in subjects with early lumbar disc degeneration

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Disc Disease
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

464 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 60 across 261 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

DePuy Spine is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Persistent low back pain with at least 3 months of non-surgical therapy at one suspected symptomatic lumbar level (L3/L4 to L5/S1) as confirmed using a standardized provocative discography protocol. The required discography protocol will be provided by the sponsor. Subjects with multilevel disease must have a provocative discogram confirming that only 1 level is symptomatic at least 2 weeks prior to administration. Historical provocative discograms may be used for screening purposes, with an expiry of 12 calendar months from the date performed. If the study treatment is not performed within those 12 calendar months, a new discogram will be required.
  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low back pain of 30 or greater
  3. Low Back Pain score greater than or equal to 4 cm as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Visit 1 Baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Persons unable to have a discogram, CT, or MRI
  2. Abnormal neurological exam at baseline (e.g., chronic radiculopathy)
  3. Active radicular pain due to anatomical compression such as stenosis or disc herniation (radicular pain is defined as pain below the knee)
  4. Extravasation of contrast agent during the discogram, into the epidural space (does not include leakage of contrast agent along the needle track or leakage to the outer annular ring at the posterior longitudinal ligament vicinity)
  5. Suspected symptomatic facet joints and/or severe facet joint degeneration at the index level or adjacent segments
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intradiscal rhGDF-5

    The API is recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5), a recombinant version of human GDF-5. GDF-5 is a member of the transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) superfamily and the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) subfamily, and is known to influence the growth and differentiation of various tissues, including the intervertebral disc. In vitro experiments have shown that rhGDF-5 can stimulate gene expression and synthesis of the extracellular matrix proteins type II collagen and aggrecan. In vivo experiments in rabbit models of disc degeneration have shown that intradiscal injections of rhGDF-5 can stimulate an increase in disc height and hydration.

    Drug: Intradiscal rhGDF-5

  • Placebo comparator
    Water for injection

    Sterile water for injection

    Other: Water for injection

Interventions

  • DrugIntradiscal rhGDF-5

    The API is recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5), a recombinant version of human GDF-5. GDF-5 is a member of the transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) superfamily and the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) subfamily, and is known to influence the growth and differentiation of various tissues, including the intervertebral disc. In vitro experiments have shown that rhGDF-5 can stimulate gene expression and synthesis of the extracellular matrix proteins type II collagen and aggrecan. In vivo experiments in rabbit models of disc degeneration have shown that intradiscal injections of rhGDF-5 can stimulate an increase in disc height and hydration.

  • OtherWater for injection

    Sterile water for injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory

    Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory- Number of patients with Clinically Significant Abnormal results at 12 months. For Motor Function, Clinically Significant Abnormal results are determined by the surgeon investigator and are further classified by grade: 0= No Movement, 1= Flicker/trace of contraction, 2=Active movement when gravity removed, 3= Active movement against gravity, 4= Active Movement against gravity and resistance. For Reflexes/Sensory, Clinically Significant Abnormal results are determined by the surgeon investigator and are based on exams of the Knee, Ankle, L3-L5 Dermatone, and S1 Dermatome. Tension signs are evaluated with a straight leg raise to determine at which point, if any, sciatic pain occurs.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug

    Number of patients with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events that were designated as Definitely Related to Study Drug.

    Time frame: Through a 12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-up.

  3. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug

    Number of patients with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events that were designated as Possibly or Probably Related to Study Drug.

    Time frame: 12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-category (Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Sex Life, Social Life, Traveling) disability measurement scale with a graded response from 0 to 5, with 0 being the best score (no impairment) to 5 being the worst score (significant impairment). ODI score for a subject is calculated by adding the scores and converting the score to a 100 point scale.

    Time frame: 12-month

  2. Change in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score asks the subject to place a vertical mark on a horizontal line ( that is approximately 10cm long) with 'No Pain' (score of 0=0cm) listed on the left and 'Very severe pain' (score of 10=10cm) labeled on the right. The subject is instructed to indicate the amount of pain they feel in their back.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Change in Physical Component Summary of Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short-Form 36 at 12 Months From Baseline.

    The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a patient reported outcome survey that evaluates functional health and well-being. The survey is converted into two summary measures (the Physical Component- PCS and Mental Component- MCS) that are scored from 0 to 100 (where 100 indicates the highest level of health)

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Change in Mental Component Summary Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form SF-36 at 12 Months From Baseline.

    The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a patient reported outcome survey that evaluates functional health and well-being. The survey is converted into two summary measures (the Physical Component- PCS and Mental Component- MCS) that are scored from 0 to 100 (where 100 indicates the highest level of health)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Feb 24, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Started10104
Completed782
Not completed322
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject220
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up101
Withdrew: Other001

Outcome measures

PrimaryNeurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory

Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory- Number of patients with Clinically Significant Abnormal results at 12 months. For Motor Function, Clinically Significant Abnormal results are determined by the surgeon investigator and are further classified by grade: 0= No Movement, 1= Flicker/trace of contraction, 2=Active movement when gravity removed, 3= Active movement against gravity, 4= Active Movement against gravity and resistance. For Reflexes/Sensory, Clinically Significant Abnormal results are determined by the surgeon investigator and are based on exams of the Knee, Ankle, L3-L5 Dermatone, and S1 Dermatome. Tension signs are evaluated with a straight leg raise to determine at which point, if any, sciatic pain occurs.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory
participantsIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory0—0
SecondaryChange in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-category (Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Sex Life, Social Life, Traveling) disability measurement scale with a graded response from 0 to 5, with 0 being the best score (no impairment) to 5 being the worst score (significant impairment). ODI score for a subject is calculated by adding the scores and converting the score to a 100 point scale.

Time frame:
12-month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.
units on a scaleIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Change in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.-19.8 ± 21.22-18.8 ± 22.43-6.0 ± 29.98
SecondaryChange in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score asks the subject to place a vertical mark on a horizontal line ( that is approximately 10cm long) with 'No Pain' (score of 0=0cm) listed on the left and 'Very severe pain' (score of 10=10cm) labeled on the right. The subject is instructed to indicate the amount of pain they feel in their back.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.
units on a scaleIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Change in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.-2.33 ± 3.645-2.78 ± 3.751-1.10 ± 3.336
SecondaryChange in Physical Component Summary of Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short-Form 36 at 12 Months From Baseline.

The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a patient reported outcome survey that evaluates functional health and well-being. The survey is converted into two summary measures (the Physical Component- PCS and Mental Component- MCS) that are scored from 0 to 100 (where 100 indicates the highest level of health)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Physical Component Summary of Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short-Form 36 at 12 Months From Baseline.
units on a scaleIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Change in Physical Component Summary of Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short-Form 36 at 12 Months From Baseline.7.22 ± 9.7288.61 ± 14.2136.21 ± 8.245
SecondaryChange in Mental Component Summary Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form SF-36 at 12 Months From Baseline.

The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a patient reported outcome survey that evaluates functional health and well-being. The survey is converted into two summary measures (the Physical Component- PCS and Mental Component- MCS) that are scored from 0 to 100 (where 100 indicates the highest level of health)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Mental Component Summary Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form SF-36 at 12 Months From Baseline.
units on a scaleIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Change in Mental Component Summary Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form SF-36 at 12 Months From Baseline.2.86 ± 11.142-0.92 ± 9.1631.31 ± 20.276
PrimaryTreatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug

Number of patients with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events that were designated as Definitely Related to Study Drug.

Time frame:
Through a 12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-up.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug
participantsIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug000
PrimaryTreatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug

Number of patients with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events that were designated as Possibly or Probably Related to Study Drug.

Time frame:
12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug
participantsIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug410

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected through a 12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 months and 36 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)—0/10 (0%)9/10 (90%)
Placebo—0/10 (0%)10/10 (100%)
Intradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)—2/4 (50%)4/4 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Intervertebral Disc ProtrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/100/101/4
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/100/101/4
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 53
Most frequent other events
EventIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/106/103/4
Pain in ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/100/103/4
Procedural PainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/100/101/4
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/103/101/4
InfluenzaInfections and infestations3/101/100/4
Injection Site PainGeneral disorders1/103/101/4
Intervertebral Disc ProtrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/101/101/4
Joint SwellingMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/100/101/4
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/100/101/4
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/100/101/4

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)Total
Mean39.7 ± 9.5644.7 ± 7.8642.4 ± 6.3842.2 ± 8.40
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)Total
Female4318
Male67316
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Intradiscal rhGDF-5 (1.0mg)PlaceboIntradiscal rhGDF-5 (2.0mg)Total
United States1010424
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Hope Research Institute
    Phoenix, Arizona 85050, United States
  • The Spine Institute
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Durango Orthopedic Associates/Spine Colorado
    Durango, Colorado 81301, United States
  • Drug Studies America
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Hospital for Special Surgery
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • University Orthopedics Center
    State College, Pennsylvania 16801, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29401, United States
  • Spine Team Texas
    Southlake, Texas 76092, United States
  • Texas Spine & Joint Hospital
    Tyler, Texas 75701, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01124006
Lead sponsor
DePuy Spine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2010
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Sep 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Results posted
Feb 24, 2016
Last update
Feb 24, 2016
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion