ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01123512KASTUpdated Oct 9, 2014Results posted

The Kiva® System as a Vertebral Augmentation Treatment

A Phase 3 interventional study of Vertebral augmentation in Spinal Fractures, Fractures, Compression and Back Injuries, sponsored by Benvenue Medical, Inc.. Completed at 21 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-09.

Sponsored by Benvenue Medical, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Kiva VCF Treatment system in comparison to balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Fractures
  • Fractures, Compression
  • Back Injuries

Keywords

  • Vertebral Compression Fracture
  • Kyphoplasty
  • Spine
  • Vertebral Body Compression Fracture
  • Back Pain
03

In context

Spinal Fractures

144 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Fractures; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 300 is above the median of 85 across 85 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Fractures.

Browse Spinal Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Benvenue Medical, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria below to be included as research subjects:

  1. The patient is at least 50 years of age
  2. The patient has a score on the back pain visual analog scale (VAS) of ≥70 mm after 2 to 6 weeks of conservative care OR a VAS of ≥ 50 mm after 6 weeks of conservative care
  3. The patient has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 30%
  4. The patient has radiographic evidence of one or two (1-2) A 1.1, A 1.2, A 1.3. fractures as classified by the AO Spine Fracture classification, due to primary or secondary osteoporosis in the thoracic and / or lumbar spine. Note that patients are eligible if they have had treatment of or healed VCF(s) at any non-index level
  5. The patient has central pain over the spinous process(es) upon palpation at the Index level(s)
  6. The Index fracture(s) is / are acute or persistent (not healed), as demonstrated by T2 weighted STIR MRI (or bone scan if patient is for MRI
  7. The Index fracture(s) has / have failed conservative care of at least 2 weeks but no longer than 6 months
  8. The Index fracture(s) shows radiographic evidence of at least 5% vertebral collapse
  9. The pedicle identified for access to the index fracture has a diameter that is ≥ 6 mm
  10. The patient is mentally capable and willing to sign a study-specific as documentation of the informed consent process prior to any study procedures
  11. The patient is willing and able to comply with all study requirements including follow-up visits and radiographic assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will not be allowed to participate in the study if they meet any of the exclusion criteria below:

  1. The index fracture(s) has/have been caused by high-energy trauma
  2. The index fracture(s) has / have known tumor involvement
  3. The index fracture(s) is/are diagnosed as an osteonecrotic fracture(s) by the treating physician
  4. The Index fracture(s) is a/are translational force fracture(s) (A2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
  5. The index fracture(s) is a/are burst fracture(s) (A 3.3., B or C type) or pedicle fracture(s) with posterior cortical wall disruption
  6. The index fracture(s) has / have posterior vertebral wall displacement occupying more than 20% of the cross sectional area of the spinal canal
  7. The index fracture(s) has / have severe deformity with reduction of >75% in any height and accompanying area, using adjacent level as comparison
  8. The index level(s) has / have undergone previous surgical treatment for a vertebral body compression fracture or other surgical procedure at the index level(s)
  9. Angulation of index fracture(s) makes treatment with Kiva System impossible (at discretion of surgeon)
  10. The pedicle identified for access to the index fracture has a diameter less than 6 mm
  11. The patient has Paget's disease
  12. The patient has a > 35
  13. The patient has uncontrolled diabetes as characterized by >7% and/or blood sugar >180mg/dL
  14. The patient has severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
  15. The patient has myelopathy
  16. The patient is on long-term therapy (steroid dose ≥ 30 mg /day for > 3 months)
  17. A medical to spinal surgery and/or general anesthesia, such as coagulopathy (with a threshold for normal being ≤ 1.5, PTT within lab normal range, and count > 100,000)
  18. The patient has spinal canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level(s) to be treated;
  19. The patient has neurologic symptoms or deficits or radiculopathy related to the VCF
  20. The patient has pain based on clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus palposus or severe spinal stenosis (progressive weakness or paralysis)
  21. The patient has indications of instability related to the index fracture (≥ 30 degrees of kyphosis, translation >4mm, interspinous process widening, > Grade 1 spondylolisthesis and/or > 25 degrees of scoliosis if the index level is included in the curve)
  22. The patient has planned spine surgery for any disorder during or up to 30 days after the study treatment
  23. The patient has had spine surgery for any disorder in the 30 days prior to enrollment
  24. The patient has a documented active systemic or local infection, such as osteomyelitis or discitis, with a WBC > 15.0 x 10\^3/µL and a temperature > 101.5°F
  25. The patient has a known allergy to the device materials and / or acrylics / polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or a to monomers
  26. The patient has been diagnosed with hemorrhagic diathesis
  27. The patient has uncontrolled psychiatric illness or severe dementia
  28. The patient has a baseline back pain visual analog scale (VAS) of \<50 mm if patient has at least 6 weeks of conservative care or \<70 mm if patient has 2-6 weeks conservative care
  29. The patient has a baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of \<30%
  30. The patient is currently on anti-cancer therapy or anti- therapy
  31. Patient has or inflammatory rheumatic disease
  32. Patient's is less than the study duration or undergoing palliative care
  33. The patient is known to be a current alcohol or drug abuser
  34. The patient is known to be involved in medical litigation including Workmen's Compensation
  35. The patient is a prisoner
  36. The patient is participating in another investigational study that has a potential for effect to the study treatment or the study endpoints
  37. The patient is pregnant or considering getting pregnant during study participation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kiva VCF Treatment System

    Device: Vertebral augmentation

  • Active comparator
    Balloon Kyphoplasty

    Device: Vertebral augmentation

Interventions

  • DeviceVertebral augmentation

    Vertebral augmentation for one or two osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Study Success

    Patient success will be defined as: 1. Reduction in VCF fracture-related pain at 12 months by \>15 mm from baseline as measured by a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 2. Maintenance or improvement in function at 12 months from baseline as measured by the 100 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 3. Absence of device-related serious adverse events, defined as device-related adverse events requiring surgical reintervention or retreatment at the index level, including revision, removal, reoperation, and/or supplemental fixation

    Time frame: 12 Month Post-op

07

Results

Posted Aug 21, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneKiva VCF Treatment SystemBalloon Kyphoplasty
Started153147
Completed127126
Not completed2621

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Participants With Study Success

Patient success will be defined as: 1. Reduction in VCF fracture-related pain at 12 months by \>15 mm from baseline as measured by a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 2. Maintenance or improvement in function at 12 months from baseline as measured by the 100 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 3. Absence of device-related serious adverse events, defined as device-related adverse events requiring surgical reintervention or retreatment at the index level, including revision, removal, reoperation, and/or supplemental fixation

Time frame:
12 Month Post-op
Reported as:
Number · participants
Proportion of Participants With Study Success
participantsKiva VCF Treatment SystemBalloon Kyphoplasty
Proportion of Participants With Study Success120123
Statistical analysis
  • Kiva VCF Treatment System vs Balloon Kyphoplasty · Bayesian test of proportions · % probability of equivalence = 99.92: 99.92

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Kiva VCF Treatment System—44/153 (28.8%)81/153 (52.9%)
Balloon Kyphoplasty—51/147 (34.7%)80/147 (54.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 102
Most frequent serious events
EventKiva VCF Treatment SystemBalloon Kyphoplasty
Spinal compression fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications10/15313/147
PneumoniaInfections and infestations5/1533/147
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations2/1534/147
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/1533/147
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/1533/147
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/1533/147
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders1/1532/147
SepsisInfections and infestations1/1532/147
Electrolyte imbalanceMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/1532/147
Ischaemic strokeNervous system disorders0/1532/147
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventKiva VCF Treatment SystemBalloon Kyphoplasty
Spinal compression fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications49/15340/147
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders39/15341/147
Reflexes abnormalNervous system disorders7/1533/147
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1534/147
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/1532/147
PainGeneral disorders1/1533/147
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1533/147
Motor dysfunctionNervous system disorders0/1533/147
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders3/1532/147
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations3/1531/147

Baseline characteristics

As-Treated population

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Kiva VCF Treatment SystemBalloon KyphoplastyTotal
Mean76.03 ± 8.8275.09 ± 9.6275.57 ± 9.22
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Kiva VCF Treatment SystemBalloon KyphoplastyTotal
Female105106211
Male393574
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • CORE Orthopaedic Medical Center
    Encinitas, California 92021, United States
  • El Camino Hospital
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
  • Radiological Associates of Sacramento
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • St. Mary's Spine Center
    San Francisco, California 94117, United States
  • Radiology Imaging Associates
    Englewood, Colorado 80112, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Evanston Hospital
    Evanston, Illinois 60201, United States
  • Adventist Hospital
    Hinsdale, Illinois 60521, United States
  • Spine Institute of Louisiana
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71101, United States
  • Mayo Clinic-Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Sierra Regional Spine Institute
    Reno, Nevada 89509, United States
  • Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma
    Edmond, Oklahoma 73013, United States
  • Penn State Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • CHC Saint Joseph
    Liege, Belgium
  • Toronto Western Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
  • Montreal General Hospital
    Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
  • CHU Amiens Sud
    Amiens, 80054, France
  • Universitatsklinikum Bonn
    Bonn, Germany
  • Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gGmbH
    Potsdam, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Beall DP, Coe JD, McIlduff M, Bloch D, Hornberger J, Warner C, Tutton S. Serious Adverse Events Associated with Readmission Through One Year After Vertebral Augmentation with Either a Polyetheretherketone Implant or Balloon Kyphoplasty. Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):521-528. PubMed 28934783 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01123512
Lead sponsor
Benvenue Medical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2010
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
May 2013
Completion
May 2013
Results posted
Aug 21, 2014
Last update
Oct 9, 2014

Study contacts

Steven R. Garfin, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Diego, CA
Sean M. Tutton, MD, FSIR
principal investigator · Medical College of Wisconsin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion