ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01122745Updated May 30, 2014

Single Shot vs Continuous Interscalene Block for Rotator Cuff Repair

An observational study in Pain, Rotator Cuff and Surgery, sponsored by University of Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-30.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
88
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. Rotator cuff have painful post surgery recovery.
  2. Single shot interscalene with oral analgesics may or may not be enough
  3. Continuous nerve block may be too much for the surgery
  4. The idea is to compare two techniques to see if the two techniques can improve patient pain control and satisfaction.
Read the detailed description

After consent patients will be randomized to one of the two groups: Control Group or the Experimental Group. Patients will be blinded to the group assignment.

In the Control Group the patient will be given single shot interscalene block using ultrasound technique following established guidelines. The procedure will be done after starting intravenous access and placing standard anesthesia monitors (EKG, Blood Pressure Cuff and Pulse-Ox) on the patient. Following accepted aseptic guidelines the nerves will be visualized at the base of the neck using ultrasound machine. Once proper nerve roots or trunks visualized 3 mg/kg of 0.5 % bupivacaine will be injected in small blouses.

In the Experimental Group, after placement of monitors, the nerves will be visualized using ultrasound machine. There after a catheter will be placed. They subjects will be dosed using 0.5% bupivacaine 3 mg/kg for the surgery via the catheter.

The extent of block before the surgery will be evaluated at 30 minutes post injection. Surgery will be done with sedation. Conversion of anesthetic technique to general anesthesia will be considered failure of the technique to provide adequate surgical anesthesia.

At the end of the case the patient will be taken to recovery and will be evaluated for pain. If patient is having pain of 3 or more then they will be treated as follows.

In single shot group will be offered to be blocked again or treated with oral narcotics.

In the catheter group patient will be dosed with 10 ml 1% lidocaine. If it fails to provide any relief then the catheter will be pulled back and another 10 ml1% lidocaine will be given. If still not effective then it will be replaced. Refusal of patient to replace the catheter will result in patient dropping out of the study.

Working catheter will be left in place for at least 48 hrs. Patients will be allowed to take oral pain medicines as prescribed by their surgeons. The patient will be sent home with pain pump to continuously give them 0.125% bupivacaine at 5 ml per hr with an option to get extra dose of 5 ml q hr if needed. The pain control will be monitored by phone daily till catheter comes out.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Rotator Cuff
  • Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • continuous block
  • single shot
  • interscalene
  • rotator cuff surgery
03

In context

Pain

2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is below the median of 100 across 301 observational studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 924 studies on the registry; 186 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 71 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All pateint undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff surgrey and agreed to have regional block for pain control

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult
  • rotator cuff surgery
  • agreeing to regional block for pain control

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • neuropathy
  • any allergies to local anesthetics
  • any contraindication to nerve blocks
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Catheter Group

    Patient will have continuous interscalene block for pain relief placed preoperatively. They will go home with the portable pump. Pain score will be tracked via phone and compared with the control or single short group.

  • Single shot group

    Patient will have single shot interscalene block and will go home. Pain will be tracked using phone. Pain will be compared with the catheter group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain relief

    Patients having rotator cuff repair surgery will be randomized to either single shot or continuous catheter group. Pain score will be followed for 2 days to see which group gets better pain relief.

    Time frame: 2-3 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Chicago Hospitals
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2010, a primary completion of Oct 2013 and a completion of Oct 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 11, 2010
First posted
May 13, 2010
Start
Aug 2010
Primary completionActual
Oct 2013
CompletionActual
Oct 2013
Last update
May 30, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01122745
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 13, 2010
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Oct 2013
Last update
May 30, 2014

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion