ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01109745PELICANIIUpdated Mar 18, 2014

Effectiveness of the Pelican Instrument in Medical Care

An interventional study of PELICAN Primary Care and PELICAN Secondary Care in Asthma, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 6 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-18.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this project is to establish the effectiveness of implementation of a self-administered electronic asthma-specific quality of life instrument for childhood asthma in primary care and specialist care.

Read the detailed description

Health related quality of life (HRQL) is important to the asthmatic child and if HRQL aspects are taken into account in daily care this could result in improved treatment satisfaction, compliance, asthma control and, ultimately, improved HRQL. The Pelican instrument we have developed has the essential features to be useful in daily care. In this study, the effectiveness of implementing the Pelican instrument in medical care is assessed. An intervention study with 9 months follow-up in primary and secondary care will be carried out.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • health-related quality of life
  • patient-centred care
03

In context

Asthma

4,012 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 83 across 2,814 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 985 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 6 to 12 years
  • physician-diagnosed asthma
  • use of bronchodilators and / or inhaled corticosteroids for at least six weeks during the previous year
  • child is treated for its asthma by the recruiting physician
  • signed informed consent by parent (or caretaker)
  • child agrees to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • comorbid condition that significantly influences HRQL
  • child does not master the Dutch language sufficiently
  • not being able to attend a regular school class
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    usual primary care

    Number of participating children: 85

  • Experimental
    PELICAN Primary care

    Intervention arm: the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument (i.e., individualised HRQL information) in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. Number of participants: 85 children

    Other: PELICAN Primary Care

  • No intervention
    usual secondary care

    number of participating children: 50

  • Experimental
    PELICAN Secondary Care

    Intervention arm: the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument (i.e., individualised HRQL information) in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. Number of participants: 50 children

    Other: PELICAN Secondary Care

Interventions

  • OtherPELICAN Primary Care

    The intervention is the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. The general practitioner can integrate the information of the Pelican instrument in their consultation and disease management decisions. The general practitioner will be trained and supported to negotiate the child's, and physicians' agendas based on the outcome of the instrument, and discuss possible interventions. All participating children of a GP will be allocated to the same treatment group (i.e., hierarchical or nested design).

  • OtherPELICAN Secondary Care

    The intervention is the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in secondary care. The nurse can integrate the information of the Pelican instrument in their consultation and disease management decisions. The paediatricians will be trained and supported to negotiate the child's, and nurses' agendas based on the outcome of the instrument, and discuss possible interventions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. quality of life

    Asthma specific health related quality of life measured with the Pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire PAQLQ(S)

    Time frame: 9 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. asthma control

    asthma control will be measured with the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT)

    Time frame: 9 months

  2. Symptoms and medication

    asthmatic symptoms (e.g., wheezing, dyspnea) and medication use (e.g., use of inhaled corticosteroids, and short-acting bronchodilators) are assessed with a diary

    Time frame: 9 months

  3. Lung function

    Lung function indices (FEV1 and FVC before and 15 minutes after inhalation of 400 µg salbutamol) are measured by a certified lung function technician specifically trained to coach children using a spirometer with child-incentive. Spirometry tests will be performed according to ERS/ATS spirometry standards and recommendations regarding testing in children. Spirometry is performed at least 8 hrs after the last inhalation of a short-acting bronchodilator, and 12 hrs after a long-acting bronchodilator.

    Time frame: 9 months

  4. Cost-effectiveness

    A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective will be performed and reported according to national and international guidelines. In the CEA an effect is defined as a relevant change in HRQL (i.e., ∆PAQLQ ≥0.5 point) in the denominator and the total of all relevant costs in the nominator. C/E ratios with and without inclusion of the indirect cost will be reported. A sensitivity analysis will be performed in order to estimate the susceptibility of C/E ratio's to variation in prior assumptions and choices, including 'worst case - best case' scenarios.

    Time frame: 9 months

  5. caregiver quality of life

    The quality of life of the parents of the participating children is assessed with the Paediatric asthma caregiver quality of life (PACQoL) instrument.

    Time frame: 9 months

  6. process-outcomes

    The implementation of the Pelican instrument in daily care is an complex intervention. A detailed process evaluation is crucial to evaluate how the intervention works: what are the active ingredients and how are they exerting their effect?

    Time frame: 9 months

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis
    Breda, North Brabant 4819 EV, Netherlands
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis
    Eindhoven, North Brabant 5623 EJ, Netherlands
  • Reinier de Graaf Groep
    Delft, South Holland 2625 AD, Netherlands
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
    's-Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ, Netherlands
  • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
    Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
  • Viecuri Medical Centre
    Venlo, 5912 BL, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van den Bemt L, Kooijman S, Linssen V, Lucassen P, Muris J, Slabbers G, Schermer T. How does asthma influence the daily life of children? Results of focus group interviews. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 14;8:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-5. PubMed 20074334 ↗
  • van Bragt S, van den Bemt L, Cretier R, van Weel C, Merkus P, Schermer T. PELICAN: Content evaluation of patient-centered care for children with asthma based on an online tool. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Oct;51(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23397. Epub 2016 Apr 29. PubMed 27128738 ↗
  • van Bragt S, van den Bemt L, Thoonen B, van Weel C, Merkus P, Schermer T. PELICAN: A quality of life instrument for childhood asthma: study protocol of two randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care in the Netherlands. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 30;12:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-137. PubMed 22935133 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01109745
Responsible party
T. Schermer (PhD, Radboud University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 23, 2010
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Mar 2014
Last update
Mar 18, 2014

Study contacts

Lisette van den Bemt, PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Medical Center
Tjard RJ Schermer, PhD
study director · Radboud University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion