ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01103063Updated Jun 16, 2015Results posted

Evaluate Azithromycin Plus Chloroquine And Sulfadoxine Plus Pyrimethamine Combinations For Intermittent Preventive Treatment Of Falciparum Malaria Infection In Pregnant Women In Africa

A Phase 3 interventional study of Azithromycin plus chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Intermittent Preventive Treatment In Pregnancy (IPTp), sponsored by Pfizer. Terminated at 9 sites in 5 countries. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-16.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
See termination reason in detailed description.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,891
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary objective is to establish superiority of AZCQ over SP in protective efficacy for IPTp as measured by the proportion of subjects with sub-optimal pregnancy outcome.

Read the detailed description

After interim analysis of efficacy data by an External Data Monitoring Committee, this study was terminated. Investigators were notified on 22 Aug 2013. There were no safety concerns that led to this termination.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intermittent Preventive Treatment In Pregnancy (IPTp)

Keywords

  • P. falciparum malaria
  • IPTp
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,334 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 601 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women (all gravidae) with ≥14 and ≤26 weeks of gestational age (by ultrasound).
  • Evidence of a personally signed and dated /assent document. Assent will be obtained from subjects \<18 years of age.
  • Subjects who are willing to and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.
  • Subjects who are available for follow up at delivery and on 28 days post delivery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<16 years old or >35 years old.
  • Multiple gestations as per the ultrasound at screening.
  • Clinical symptoms of malaria.
  • \< 8 g/dL (at enrollment).
  • Any condition requiring hospitalization at enrollment.
  • History of convulsions, hypertension, diabetes or any other chronic illness that may adversely affect fetal growth and viability.
  • Inability to tolerate oral treatment in tablet form.
  • Known allergy to the study drugs (azithromycin, chloroquine, and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) or to any macrolides or sulphonamides.
  • Requirement to use medication during the study that might interfere with the evaluation of the study drug eg, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use in subjects positive for infection.
  • Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation.
  • Evidence of current obstetric complications that may adversely impact the pregnancy and/or fetal outcomes, including presence of congenital anomalies, placenta previa or abruption.
  • Known severe Sickle Cell (SS) disease or Sickle Hemoglobin C (SC) anemia.
  • Known family history of prolonged Syndrome, serious ventricular arrhythmia, or sudden cardiac death.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,891 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AZCQ

    Azithromycin/chloroquine

    Drug: Azithromycin plus chloroquine

  • Active comparator
    SP

    sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (Fansidar)

    Drug: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

Interventions

  • DrugAzithromycin plus chloroquine

    Drug pages: Azithromycin · Chloroquine

    combination tablet of 250mg azithromycin/155 chloroquine, Once daily PO for three days per treatment. There are total 3 treatments at 4-8 weeks intervals. The first treatment course will be administered during the second trimester (14-26 weeks of gestation as confirmed by ultrasound). The last treatment course should be given to subjects prior to or during 36 weeks of gestation.

  • Drugsulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

    Fansidar tablet (500 mg sulfadoxine /25 mg pyrimethamine), once daily, PO, single dose per treatment. There are total 3 treatments at 4-8 weeks intervals. The first treatment course will be administered during the second trimester (14-26 weeks of gestation as confirmed by ultrasound). The last treatment course should be given to subjects prior to or during 36 weeks of gestation.

    Also known as: Fansidar

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Intent-to-Treat (IIT) Population

    Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as live-borne neonate (singleton) with low birth weight (LBW) (\<2,500 g), premature births (\<37 weeks as confirmed by the Ballard score), abortion (≤28 weeks), still birth (\>28 weeks), lost to follow-up prior to termination of pregnancy or delivery, or missing birth weight of the neonates.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Efficacy Analyzable Per Protocol (PP) Population

    Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as live-borne neonate (singleton) with LBW (\<2,500g), premature births (\<37 weeks as confirmed by the Ballard score), abortion (≤28 weeks), still birth (\>28 weeks), lost to follow-up prior to termination of pregnancy or delivery, or missing birth weight of the neonates.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  2. Percentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in ITT Population

    LBW was defined as live birth weight \<2500 g (up to and including 2499 g).

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  3. Percentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in Efficacy Analyzable PP Population

    LBW was defined as live birth weight \<2500 g (up to and including 2499 g).

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  4. Percentage of Participants With Severe Maternal Anemia (Hemoglobin [Hb] <8 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    Severe maternal anemia was defined as Hb \<8 g/dL.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Maternal Anemia (Hb <11 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    Anemia was defined as Hb \<11 g/dL.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Placental Parasitemia at Delivery

    Participants with placental parasitemia at delivery were diagnosed using Placental blood smear at birth from participants who deliver at hospital.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  7. Percentage of Participants With Placental Malaria at Delivery Based on Histology

    Participants positive for placental malaria at delivery were evaluated based on placental histology.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  8. Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Episodes Per Participant

    Number of episodes of sexually transmitted infection episodes per participant were noted. The STI's including Treponema pallidum, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, from first dose to delivery (diagnosis was based on clinical presentation and lab results).

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age .

  9. Percentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome Including Neonatal Death and Congenital Malformation

    Sub-optimal pregnancy outcome including neonatal deaths and congenital malformations, defined as any of the following: live-borne neonate (singleton) with low birth-weight (or LBW for short, defined as live birth weight \<2,500g), premature birth (\<37 weeks), abortion (≤28 weeks), still birth (\>28 weeks), neonatal death, congenital malformation, lost to follow-up prior to termination of pregnancy or delivery, or missing birth weight of the neonates.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age.

  10. Change From Baseline to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation in Hb Concentration.

    Change from Baseline to 36-38 weeks of gestation in Hb concentration was noted.

    Time frame: Baseline, at 36-38 weeks of gestation.

  11. Percentage of Neonates With Congenital Abnormalities at Birth

    Neonates with congenital abnormalities at birth were noted.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age.

  12. Percentage of Perinatal or Neonatal Deaths

    Percentage of perinatal or neonatal deaths were noted.

    Time frame: Day 28 after delivery.

  13. Birth Weight of Live Borne Neonate

    Birth weight of live borne neonates were calculated in grams.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age.

  14. Number of Episodes of Symptomatic Malaria Per Participant From First Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Falciparum Dose to Delivery

    This outcome measure determined if an episode of malaria started within the time period of first dose to delivery. Clinical episode of malaria was determined if the participant presented with clinical symptoms of malaria (fever \>37.5°C, oral) and diagnosed (either by rapid diagnostic tests or microscopy) with malaria.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  15. Percentage of Participants Requiring Additional Treatment for Symptomatic Malaria From First Dose to Delivery

    This outcome measure evaluated the participants requiring additional treatments for malaria during the study period following the first dose (diagnosed based on clinical presentation and/or lab test results).

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  16. Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    This outcome measure evaluated the percentage of participants positive for peripheral parasitemia at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A participant was positive for parasitemia if the number of asexual parasites per μL was \>0.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation

  17. Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at Delivery

    This outcome measure evaluated the percentage of participants positive for peripheral parasitemia at delivery. A participant was positive for parasitemia if the number of asexual parasites per μL was \>0.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  18. Percentage of Participants With Cord Blood Parasitemia at Delivery

    This outcome measure evaluated the percentage of participants positive for cord blood parasitemia at delivery. A participant was positive for parasitemia if the number of asexual parasites per μL was \>0.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  19. Percentage of Participants With Sexually Transmitted Infections From First Dose to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    Sexual transmitted disease included Treponema pallidum, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Chlamydia trachomatis infections. This was diagnosed based on clinical presentation prior to Week 36-38 and/or lab test results between Week 36-38.

    Time frame: Upto 36-38 weeks of gestation

  20. Percentage of Participants With Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    Participants positive for Chlamydia trachomatis infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected and PCR assay was used for analysis.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation

  21. Percentage of Participants With Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    Participants positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected and PCR assay was used for analysis.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation

  22. Percentage of Participants With Treponema Pallidum Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    Participants positive for Treponema pallidum infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. Treponema Pallidum particle Agglutination Assay was used.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation

  23. Percentage of Participants With Trichomonas Vaginalis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

    Participants positive for Trichomonas vaginalis infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected for the laboratory test.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation

  24. Percentage of Participants With Bacterial Vaginosis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation.

    Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected for the Gram staining.

    Time frame: At 36-38 weeks of gestation

  25. Percentage of Neonates With Ophthalmia Neonatorum at Birth Period

    Ophthalmia neonatorum was diagnosed at birth. The laboratory diagnosis was performed among neonates with purulent discharge.

    Time frame: Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  26. Percentage of Participants With Bacterial Infections Including Pneumonia and Other Lower Respiratory Tract Infections From First Dose to Delivery

    Participants positive for bacterial infections including other lower respiratory tract infections were measured anytime from first dose administration to delivery.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  27. Percentage of Participants With Pre-eclampsia From Week 20 to Delivery

    Pre-eclampsia was diagnosed as systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg on two separate readings taken at least 4 hours apart and proteinuria at least 300 mg protein in a 24 hour urine collection.

    Time frame: From Week 20 to approximately 40 weeks of gestational age

  28. Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive for Macrolide Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae

    This outcome measure evaluated the Streptococcus pneumoniae sensitivity against macrolide antibiotics.

    Time frame: Visits 6 and 7

  29. Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive for Penicillin Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae

    This outcome measure evaluated the Streptococcus pneumoniae sensitivity against penicillin antibiotics.

    Time frame: Visits 6 and 7

07

Results

Posted Sep 5, 2014
Limitations and caveats
This program was terminated by Pfizer based on the results of the pre-planned interim analysis for this pivotal study. The interim analysis showed no benefit of the study drug (AZCQ) compared to standard of care (SP).

Participant flow

This Phase 3, open label, randomized, parallel group study screened a total of 3259 participants in 6 sites. A total of 2891 were treated either with azithromycin+chloroquine or sulfadoxine+pyrimethamine.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Started14461445
Completed9691024
Not completed477421
Withdrew: Adverse event31
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up6851
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6015
Withdrew: Other1611
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor326342
Withdrew: Death31

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Intent-to-Treat (IIT) Population

Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as live-borne neonate (singleton) with low birth weight (LBW) (\<2,500 g), premature births (\<37 weeks as confirmed by the Ballard score), abortion (≤28 weeks), still birth (\>28 weeks), lost to follow-up prior to termination of pregnancy or delivery, or missing birth weight of the neonates.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Intent-to-Treat (IIT) Population
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Intent-to-Treat (IIT) Population26.16 (23.89 to 28.43)23.67 (21.48 to 25.86)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.12237 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint)) · Risk ratio (rr): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.97 to 1.25The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Efficacy Analyzable Per Protocol (PP) Population

Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as live-borne neonate (singleton) with LBW (\<2,500g), premature births (\<37 weeks as confirmed by the Ballard score), abortion (≤28 weeks), still birth (\>28 weeks), lost to follow-up prior to termination of pregnancy or delivery, or missing birth weight of the neonates.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Efficacy Analyzable Per Protocol (PP) Population
Percentage of ParticipantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome in Efficacy Analyzable Per Protocol (PP) Population10.38 (8.57 to 12.19)10.12 (8.40 to 11.84)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.84117 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint)) · Risk ratio (rr): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.31The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its SE, with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in ITT Population

LBW was defined as live birth weight \<2500 g (up to and including 2499 g).

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of neonates
Percentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in ITT Population
Percentage of neonatesAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in ITT Population5.01 (3.74 to 6.28)5.72 (4.40 to 7.04)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.4428 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.87 · 95% CI 0.62 to 1.23The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in Efficacy Analyzable PP Population

LBW was defined as live birth weight \<2500 g (up to and including 2499 g).

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of neonates
Percentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in Efficacy Analyzable PP Population
Percentage of neonatesAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Neonates With LBW (<2500 g) in Efficacy Analyzable PP Population4.72 (3.43 to 6.01)5.21 (3.92 to 6.50)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.6086 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.31The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Severe Maternal Anemia (Hemoglobin [Hb] <8 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

Severe maternal anemia was defined as Hb \<8 g/dL.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Severe Maternal Anemia (Hemoglobin [Hb] <8 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Severe Maternal Anemia (Hemoglobin [Hb] <8 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation1.80 (1.05 to 2.55)2.00 (1.24 to 2.76)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.7035 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.90 · 95% CI 0.51 to 1.57The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Maternal Anemia (Hb <11 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

Anemia was defined as Hb \<11 g/dL.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Maternal Anemia (Hb <11 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of ParticipantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Maternal Anemia (Hb <11 g/dL) at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation50.57 (47.77 to 53.37)49.11 (46.39 to 51.83)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.4605 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.11The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Placental Parasitemia at Delivery

Participants with placental parasitemia at delivery were diagnosed using Placental blood smear at birth from participants who deliver at hospital.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Placental Parasitemia at Delivery
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Placental Parasitemia at Delivery5.30 (3.92 to 6.67)5.67 (4.29 to 7.05)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.7105 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.93 · 95% CI 0.65 to 1.33The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Placental Malaria at Delivery Based on Histology

Participants positive for placental malaria at delivery were evaluated based on placental histology.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Placental Malaria at Delivery Based on Histology
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Placental Malaria at Delivery Based on Histology4.81 (3.51 to 6.11)5.73 (4.36 to 7.10)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.3468 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.59 to 1.21The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondarySexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Episodes Per Participant

Number of episodes of sexually transmitted infection episodes per participant were noted. The STI's including Treponema pallidum, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, from first dose to delivery (diagnosis was based on clinical presentation and lab results).

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age .
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Number of episodes
Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Episodes Per Participant
Number of episodesAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Episodes Per Participant0.14 (0.11 to 0.16)0.19 (0.17 to 0.21)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · ANOVA · p = 0.0011 (Analysis based on an ANOVA model with model terms for treatment group and randomization stratification variable. A negative mean difference between treatment groups favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine (reduction in number of STIs).) · Mean difference (final values): -0.05 · 95% CI -0.08 to -0.02
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome Including Neonatal Death and Congenital Malformation

Sub-optimal pregnancy outcome including neonatal deaths and congenital malformations, defined as any of the following: live-borne neonate (singleton) with low birth-weight (or LBW for short, defined as live birth weight \<2,500g), premature birth (\<37 weeks), abortion (≤28 weeks), still birth (\>28 weeks), neonatal death, congenital malformation, lost to follow-up prior to termination of pregnancy or delivery, or missing birth weight of the neonates.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome Including Neonatal Death and Congenital Malformation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Sub-optimal Pregnancy Outcome Including Neonatal Death and Congenital Malformation28.51 (26.18 to 30.84)26.51 (24.23 to 28.79)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.2265 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 1.08 · 95% CI 0.96 to 1.21The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation in Hb Concentration.

Change from Baseline to 36-38 weeks of gestation in Hb concentration was noted.

Time frame:
Baseline, at 36-38 weeks of gestation.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · g/dL
Change From Baseline to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation in Hb Concentration.
g/dLAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Change From Baseline to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation in Hb Concentration.0.13 (0.05 to 0.21)0.27 (0.19 to 0.34)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · ANCOVA · p = 0.0131 (Analysis based on an ANCOVA model with model terms for baseline value, treatment group and randomization stratification variable.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.14 · 95% CI -0.24 to -0.03
SecondaryPercentage of Neonates With Congenital Abnormalities at Birth

Neonates with congenital abnormalities at birth were noted.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of neonates
Percentage of Neonates With Congenital Abnormalities at Birth
Percentage of neonatesAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Neonates With Congenital Abnormalities at Birth2.19 (1.34 to 3.04)2.44 (1.56 to 3.31)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.6978 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.90 · 95% CI 0.53 to 1.53The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its SE, with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Perinatal or Neonatal Deaths

Percentage of perinatal or neonatal deaths were noted.

Time frame:
Day 28 after delivery.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of neonates
Percentage of Perinatal or Neonatal Deaths
Percentage of neonatesAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Perinatal or Neonatal Deaths2.19 (1.34 to 3.04)1.85 (1.08 to 2.62)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.6542 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 1.14 · 95% CI 0.64 to 2.01The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its SE, with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryBirth Weight of Live Borne Neonate

Birth weight of live borne neonates were calculated in grams.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · grams
Birth Weight of Live Borne Neonate
gramsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Birth Weight of Live Borne Neonate3148.3 (3120 to 3176)3146.2 (3119 to 3174)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · ANOVA · p = 0.9145 (Analysis based on an ANOVA model with model terms for treatment group and randomization stratification variable.) · Mean difference (final values): 2.1 · 95% CI -36.5 to 40.8
SecondaryNumber of Episodes of Symptomatic Malaria Per Participant From First Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Falciparum Dose to Delivery

This outcome measure determined if an episode of malaria started within the time period of first dose to delivery. Clinical episode of malaria was determined if the participant presented with clinical symptoms of malaria (fever \>37.5°C, oral) and diagnosed (either by rapid diagnostic tests or microscopy) with malaria.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Number of episodes
Number of Episodes of Symptomatic Malaria Per Participant From First Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Falciparum Dose to Delivery
Number of episodesAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Number of Episodes of Symptomatic Malaria Per Participant From First Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Falciparum Dose to Delivery0.06 (0.04 to 0.08)0.13 (0.11 to 0.15)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · ANOVA · p = <0.0001 (Analysis based on an ANOVA model with model terms for treatment group and randomization stratification variable. A negative mean difference between treatment groups favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine (reduction in number of symptomatic malaria).) · Mean difference (final values): -0.07 · 95% CI -0.09 to -0.04
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Requiring Additional Treatment for Symptomatic Malaria From First Dose to Delivery

This outcome measure evaluated the participants requiring additional treatments for malaria during the study period following the first dose (diagnosed based on clinical presentation and/or lab test results).

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Requiring Additional Treatment for Symptomatic Malaria From First Dose to Delivery
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants Requiring Additional Treatment for Symptomatic Malaria From First Dose to Delivery5.74 (4.54 to 6.94)10.52 (8.94 to 12.10)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.49 · 95% CI 0.38 to 0.62The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

This outcome measure evaluated the percentage of participants positive for peripheral parasitemia at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A participant was positive for parasitemia if the number of asexual parasites per μL was \>0.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation2.71 (1.74 to 3.68)4.38 (3.19 to 5.57)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.0360 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.62 · 95% CI 0.39 to 0.97The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its SE, with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at Delivery

This outcome measure evaluated the percentage of participants positive for peripheral parasitemia at delivery. A participant was positive for parasitemia if the number of asexual parasites per μL was \>0.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at Delivery
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Parasitemia at Delivery6.05 (4.59 to 7.51)7.46 (5.90 to 9.02)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.1975 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.81 · 95% CI 0.59 to 1.12The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Cord Blood Parasitemia at Delivery

This outcome measure evaluated the percentage of participants positive for cord blood parasitemia at delivery. A participant was positive for parasitemia if the number of asexual parasites per μL was \>0.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Cord Blood Parasitemia at Delivery
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Cord Blood Parasitemia at Delivery0.49 (0.06 to 0.92)0.75 (0.23 to 1.27)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.4655 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.66 · 95% CI 0.22 to 2.01The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its SE, with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Sexually Transmitted Infections From First Dose to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

Sexual transmitted disease included Treponema pallidum, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Chlamydia trachomatis infections. This was diagnosed based on clinical presentation prior to Week 36-38 and/or lab test results between Week 36-38.

Time frame:
Upto 36-38 weeks of gestation
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Sexually Transmitted Infections From First Dose to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Sexually Transmitted Infections From First Dose to 36-38 Weeks of Gestation12.32 (10.63 to 14.01)16.47 (14.56 to 18.38)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.0016 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.75 · 95% CI 0.62 to 0.90The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

Participants positive for Chlamydia trachomatis infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected and PCR assay was used for analysis.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation1.47 (0.61 to 2.33)0.63 (0.08 to 1.18)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.1113 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 2.34 · 95% CI 0.82 to 6.66The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

Participants positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected and PCR assay was used for analysis.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation0.40 (0.00 to 0.85)1.64 (0.76 to 2.52)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.0284 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.25 · 95% CI 0.07 to 0.86The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treponema Pallidum Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

Participants positive for Treponema pallidum infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. Treponema Pallidum particle Agglutination Assay was used.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treponema Pallidum Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Treponema Pallidum Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation0.93 (0.24 to 1.62)2.01 (1.04 to 2.98)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.0188 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.46 · 95% CI 0.24 to 0.88The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Trichomonas Vaginalis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation

Participants positive for Trichomonas vaginalis infection was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected for the laboratory test.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Trichomonas Vaginalis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Trichomonas Vaginalis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation8.24 (6.59 to 9.89)10.67 (8.88 to 12.46)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.0527 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.77 · 95% CI 0.59 to 1.00The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Bacterial Vaginosis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation.

Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed based on laboratory result at 36-38 weeks of gestation. A vaginal swab was collected for the Gram staining.

Time frame:
At 36-38 weeks of gestation
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Bacterial Vaginosis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation.
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Bacterial Vaginosis Infection at 36-38 Weeks of Gestation.8.58 (6.57 to 10.59)11.84 (9.59 to 14.09)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.0384 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.73 · 95% CI 0.54 to 0.98The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Neonates With Ophthalmia Neonatorum at Birth Period

Ophthalmia neonatorum was diagnosed at birth. The laboratory diagnosis was performed among neonates with purulent discharge.

Time frame:
Approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of neonates
Percentage of Neonates With Ophthalmia Neonatorum at Birth Period
Percentage of neonatesAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Neonates With Ophthalmia Neonatorum at Birth Period0.35 (0.01 to 0.69)0.17 (0.00 to 0.40)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.3942 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 2.09 · 95% CI 0.38 to 11.38The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Bacterial Infections Including Pneumonia and Other Lower Respiratory Tract Infections From First Dose to Delivery

Participants positive for bacterial infections including other lower respiratory tract infections were measured anytime from first dose administration to delivery.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Bacterial Infections Including Pneumonia and Other Lower Respiratory Tract Infections From First Dose to Delivery
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Bacterial Infections Including Pneumonia and Other Lower Respiratory Tract Infections From First Dose to Delivery0.48 (0.13 to 0.84)1.25 (0.67 to 1.82)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.0332 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.39 · 95% CI 0.16 to 0.93The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Pre-eclampsia From Week 20 to Delivery

Pre-eclampsia was diagnosed as systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg on two separate readings taken at least 4 hours apart and proteinuria at least 300 mg protein in a 24 hour urine collection.

Time frame:
From Week 20 to approximately 40 weeks of gestational age
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Pre-eclampsia From Week 20 to Delivery
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Percentage of Participants With Pre-eclampsia From Week 20 to Delivery0.63 (0.22 to 1.03)1.04 (0.51 to 1.55)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.2321 (Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common relative risk is presented, adjusting for randomization strata. A relative risk less than 1 favors Azithromycin + Chloroquine treatment group (reduction in risk for the endpoint).) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.61 · 95% CI 0.27 to 1.38The estimated risk ratio is presented along with its standard error (SE), with the SE on the log(e) scale.
SecondaryNasopharyngeal Swabs Positive for Macrolide Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae

This outcome measure evaluated the Streptococcus pneumoniae sensitivity against macrolide antibiotics.

Time frame:
Visits 6 and 7
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive for Macrolide Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Visit 6 (N = 8 and 17 respectively)011.76
Visit 7 (N = 16 and 11 respectively)00
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Fisher Exact · p = 1.0000 · Mean difference (final values): -11.76
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Fisher Exact · p = 1.0000 · Mean difference (final values): 0
SecondaryNasopharyngeal Swabs Positive for Penicillin Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae

This outcome measure evaluated the Streptococcus pneumoniae sensitivity against penicillin antibiotics.

Time frame:
Visits 6 and 7
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive for Penicillin Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae
Percentage of participantsAzithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine
Visit 6 (N = 8 and 17 respectively)00
Visit 7 (N = 16 and 11 respectively)00
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Fisher Exact · p = 1.0000 · Mean difference (final values): 0
  • Azithromycin + Chloroquine vs Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine · Fisher Exact · p = 1.0000 · Mean difference (final values): 0

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Visit 7 (6 months post last dose). Includes data up to 35 days after last dose of study drug for mothers (treatment emergent), and includes all data for neonates.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mother (Azithromycin + Chloroquine)—65/1,446 (4.5%)1,177/1,446 (81.4%)
Mother (Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine)—42/1,445 (2.9%)888/1,445 (61.5%)
Neonate (Azithromycin + Chloroquine)—101/1,149 (8.8%)301/1,149 (26.2%)
Neonate (Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine)—104/1,196 (8.7%)326/1,196 (27.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 99
Most frequent serious events
EventMother (Azithromycin + Chloroquine)Mother (Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine)Neonate (Azithromycin + Chloroquine)Neonate (Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine)
PolydactylyCongenital, familial and genetic disorders0/14460/144516/114921/1196
Premature babyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/14460/144517/114912/1196
Sepsis neonatalInfections and infestations0/14460/144511/114913/1196
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/14461/14459/114910/1196
Low birth weight babyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/14460/14459/114910/1196
Neonatal asphyxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/14460/14456/11499/1196
MalariaInfections and infestations2/14469/14452/11493/1196
StillbirthPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions5/14467/14450/11490/1196
Haemorrhage in pregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions7/14461/14450/11490/1196
Premature deliveryPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions7/14465/14450/11490/1196
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventMother (Azithromycin + Chloroquine)Mother (Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine)Neonate (Azithromycin + Chloroquine)Neonate (Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine)
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders650/144696/14450/11490/1196
DizzinessNervous system disorders460/144684/14450/11490/1196
HeadacheNervous system disorders300/1446219/14450/11490/1196
AstheniaGeneral disorders239/144640/14450/11490/1196
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders216/144658/14450/11490/1196
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders205/1446192/144521/114914/1196
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders205/144614/14450/11490/1196
White blood cells urine positiveInvestigations149/1446162/14450/11490/1196
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations127/1446153/1445125/1149116/1196
Vision blurredEye disorders145/14461/14450/11490/1196

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Azithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + PyrimethamineTotal
Mean23.3 ± 4.523.3 ± 4.623.3 ± 4.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Azithromycin + ChloroquineSulfadoxine + PyrimethamineTotal
Female144614452891
Male000
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Centre de Santé d'AHOUANSORI-AGUE
    Cotonou, Benin
  • Hôpital Bethesda
    Cotonou, Benin
  • Siaya District Hospital
    Siaya, Kenya
  • Zomba Central Hospital
    Zomba, Malawi
  • Teule Hospital
    Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania
  • Bugando Medical Centre
    Mwanza, 1903, Tanzania
  • Nyamagana District Hospital, c/o National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Centre
    Mwanza, Tanzania
  • Nyamagana District Hospital
    Mwanza, Tanzania
  • Mulago Hospital Complex
    Kampala, Uganda
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mtove G, Kimani J, Kisinza W, Makenga G, Mangesho P, Duparc S, Nakalembe M, Phiri KS, Orrico R, Rojo R, Vandenbroucke P. Multiple-level stakeholder engagement in malaria clinical trials: addressing the challenges of conducting clinical research in resource-limited settings. Trials. 2018 Mar 22;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2563-1. PubMed 29566732 ↗
  • Kimani J, Phiri K, Kamiza S, Duparc S, Ayoub A, Rojo R, Robbins J, Orrico R, Vandenbroucke P. Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin-Chloroquine versus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Infection in Pregnant Women in Africa: An Open-Label, Randomized Trial. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0157045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157045. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27326859 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2010, a primary completion of Oct 2013 and a completion of Nov 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Sep 2014, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 7, 2010
First posted
Apr 13, 2010
Start
Oct 2010
Primary completionActual
Oct 2013
CompletionActual
Nov 2013
Results first posted
Sep 5, 2014
Last update
Jun 16, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01103063
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Collaborators
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Medicines for Malaria Venture
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 13, 2010
Start date
Oct 2010
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Results posted
Sep 5, 2014
Last update
Jun 16, 2015

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Azithromycin · Chloroquine

Start the discussion