ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01091545MBTSTUpdated Nov 13, 2019

Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial

An interventional study of DBT and FFDM in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Region Skane. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 40 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-13.

Sponsored by Region Skane · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15,000
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years to 74 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To compare digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with full field digital mammography (FFDM) regarding effectiveness as screening modalities.

Read the detailed description

Mammography is the only approved method for breast cancer screening, but not all tumors can be detected with mammography. The main reason is overlapping structures that can either mimic or hide a tumor on a 2-dimensional image like mammography. Digital breast tomosynthesis, (DBT) is a 3-dimensional x-ray technique that has been developed during the last years. A tomographic technique like DBT, which reduces or eliminates the detrimental effect of over- and underlying tissue, can probably help to find more tumors. This study aims to investigate whether more breast cancers can be detected with DBT compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in population invited to screening. An interim analysis will be performed during 2013 including the first 7,500 women of the study cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • screening
  • sensitivity
  • tomosynthesis
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,815 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15,000 is above the median of 72 across 9,494 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Region Skane is the lead sponsor of 382 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women 40-74 years old
  • in the regular population based mammographic screening program in Malmö, Sweden.

Exclusion Criteria: pregnancy and women not speaking English or Swedish

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15,000 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    FFDM+DBT

    Single-armed study. Women are their own controls with paired images of digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.

    Radiation: DBT and FFDM

Interventions

  • RadiationDBT and FFDM

    Women in the study will once undergo both standard FFDM screening (2-views) and DBT (1 view, MLO). This will result in a doubled radiation dose compared to only 2-view FFDM, which is the standard procedure for women in the screening program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection for DBT and DM respectively

    Sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection will be assessed for DBT and DM respectively. The following screening performance measures will also also investigated: the number of detected cancers per 1000 women screened, the number of recalled women/100 screens (recall rate) after consensus, and the positive predictive value (PPV) for screen-recall and the negative predictive value (NPV), in both reading arms. Analyses of the contribution from different reading steps will be investigated. A follow-up period of 24 months after the intervention period will provide information on the actual numbers of breast cancers in the study population through record linkage with the Swedish Cancer Registry.

    Time frame: 24 months after trial screening

Secondary outcomes

  1. What kind of cancers are detected and not detected with DBT?

    To investigate the biological characteristics of the cancers in the trial by mode of detection (screening detected, interval cancers)

    Time frame: 24 months after trial screening

  2. Cost-effectiveness of DBT in screening

    to investigate the cost-effectiveness of DBT in screening

    Time frame: 24 months after trial screening

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Malmö Breast Screening Unit, Skåne University Hospital
    Malmö, SE 20502, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Olinder J, Johnson K, Akesson A, Fornvik D, Zackrisson S. Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 4;25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01712-6. PubMed 37794480 ↗
  • Dahlblom V, Andersson I, Lang K, Tingberg A, Zackrisson S, Dustler M. Artificial Intelligence Detection of Missed Cancers at Digital Mammography That Were Detected at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Radiol Artif Intell. 2021 Sep 1;3(6):e200299. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2021200299. eCollection 2021 Nov. PubMed 34870215 ↗
  • Zackrisson S, Lang K, Rosso A, Johnson K, Dustler M, Fornvik D, Fornvik H, Sartor H, Timberg P, Tingberg A, Andersson I. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1493-1503. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30521-7. Epub 2018 Oct 12. PubMed 30322817 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 30, 2009

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01091545
Lead sponsor
Region Skane
Collaborators
Unilabs AB Sweden
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2010
Start date
Feb 1, 2010
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2017
Completion
Sep 30, 2019
Last update
Nov 13, 2019

Study contacts

Sophia Zackrisson, MD PhD
principal investigator · Region Skane
Ingvar Andersson, MD PhD
principal investigator · Lund University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion