CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01083160FALLAUpdated Jan 19, 2012Results posted

Clinical Outcomes, Compliance and Effectiveness of Switching From Infliximab or Etanercept to Adalimumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). A Multicenter Post-Marketing Observational Study in Routine Clinical Use

An observational study in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Abbott. Terminated at 12 sites in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-01-19.

Sponsored by Abbott · Observational

Why this study was terminated
The study was terminated due to low enrollment because inclusion criteria are obsolete.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
82
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, single-arm, post marketing observational study in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are discontinuing treatment due to lack of efficacy, intolerance or to an incomplete response with either infliximab or etanercept.

The aim of this post-marketing observational study is to obtain data on clinical outcomes, compliance and tolerability to determine the effectiveness of switching from infliximab or etanercept to adalimumab. In this cohort, the different treatment strategies are to be studied in the context of the routine clinical practice in the different participating places.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-arm, post marketing observational study in adult patients with active RA who are discontinuing treatment due to lack of efficacy, intolerance or to an incomplete response with either infliximab or etanercept.

The aim of this post-marketing observational study is to obtain data on clinical outcomes, compliance and tolerability to determine the effectiveness of switching from infliximab or etanercept to Adalimumab. In this cohort, the different treatment strategies are to be studied in the context of the routine clinical practice in the different participating places.

Study Objectives:

Primary objective:

To assess the effectiveness of the treatment with adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that have failed or presented an incomplete response to current treatment with either infliximab or etanercept.

Secondary objective:

To evaluate the compliance and clinical tolerability with adalimumab

Investigational Plan and Selection of Study Population:

All patients belonging to any of the centres participating in the study that meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be considered eligible.

Patients considered eligible for the study will have to give their consent for the use and/or disclose of the patient's personal and/or health data. Patient's consent will be obtained before his/her participation in the study and will be documented in an Informed Consent Form approved by an Ethics Committee.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Anti-TNF
  • Adalimumab
  • Infliximab
  • Etanercept
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 82 is below the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbott is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community sample

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥18 and \<75 years of age that meet the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for RA.
  • Patients with active RA defined as:

    1. ≥3 tender joints and ≥3 swollen joints, or
    2. DAS 28 score >3.1
  • Patients who are discontinuing treatment with either infliximab or etanercept due to:

    1. Lack of efficacy, or
    2. Incomplete response.
  • Patients that, in the opinion of the physician could result beneficiated with the locally approved treatment scheme of adalimumab
  • Those patients who switch from infliximab or etanercept to adalimumab has been done in the last 60 days could be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The following patients will not be included in the study:

  • Patients who have active infections.
  • Patients with latent TB. For this protocol, evidence of latent TB infection is defined as an induration (not erythema) of 5 mm or greater, 48-72 hrs after placement. Any suggested data on the clinical history or chest x-ray.
  • Patients participating into another study or clinical trial
  • Any condition that according to the criteria of the participating physician represents an obstacle for study conduct and/or represents a potential unacceptable risk for patients.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Non responders to other anti-TNF

    Patients with lack of efficacy to infliximab or etanercept treated with adalimumab according to the routine clinical practice of the participating centers. A 40 mg dose was administered every other week for 24 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DAS28 (Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints)

    The DAS 28 index measures disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and is derived from the number swollen/tender joints, laboratory tests of inflammation, and participant assessment of global health (by marking a 10 cm line from "very good" to "very bad"). Ranges were used to classify participants, with a higher score indicating worse control of disease: Remission (\<= 2.6), Low Disease Activity (\>2.6 to \<=3.2), Moderate Disease Activity (\>3.2 to \<= 5.1) and High Disease Activity (\>5.1). The mean change in DAS 28 score from baseline to each visit is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8,16 and 24

  2. Tender Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count

    The treating physician was to clinically assess each participant at each study visit and report the number of tender and swollen joints. The mean number of painful or swollen joints for participants evaluated at each time point are presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8,16 and 24

  3. Severity of Pain in a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 100mm)

    Participants assessed the severity of their pain using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The far left end indicated no pain (0 mm) and the far right meant the worst possible pain (100 mm). Participants drew a vertical line on the horizontal scale to indicate their current level of pain at each visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8,16 and 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the Compliance and Clinical Tolerability With Adalimumab

    To assess compliance, participants were asked at the Week 8 and Week 16 visits how many doses they had missed since their previous visit. Adverse events were collected throughout the study, from the time the participant signed the informed consent form until 30 days or 5 half-lives after the last dose of study drug. For additional information see the Reported Adverse Event section.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

07

Results

Posted Jan 2, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNon Responders to Other Anti-TNF
Started82
Evaluable population71
Completed81
Not completed1
Withdrew: Adverse event1

Outcome measures

PrimaryDAS28 (Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints)

The DAS 28 index measures disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and is derived from the number swollen/tender joints, laboratory tests of inflammation, and participant assessment of global health (by marking a 10 cm line from "very good" to "very bad"). Ranges were used to classify participants, with a higher score indicating worse control of disease: Remission (\<= 2.6), Low Disease Activity (\>2.6 to \<=3.2), Moderate Disease Activity (\>3.2 to \<= 5.1) and High Disease Activity (\>5.1). The mean change in DAS 28 score from baseline to each visit is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Weeks 8,16 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
DAS28 (Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints)
units on a scaleNon Responders to Other Anti-TNF
DAS 28 at Baseline (n=82)6.04 ± 1.17
DAS 28 at Week 8 (n=80)4.63 ± 1.77
DAS 28 at Week 16 (n=79)4.05 ± 1.74
DAS 28 at Week 24 (n=71)3.68 ± 1.47
PrimaryTender Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count

The treating physician was to clinically assess each participant at each study visit and report the number of tender and swollen joints. The mean number of painful or swollen joints for participants evaluated at each time point are presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Weeks 8,16 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · Joints
Tender Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count
JointsNon Responders to Other Anti-TNF
Tender joints at Baseline (n=82)13.05 ± 7.29
> Week 8 (n=80)7.16 ± 6.37
>Week 16 (n=80)5.44 ± 5.76
>Week 24 (n=71)4.23 ± 5.32
Swollen joints at Baseline (n=82)9.56 ± 5.97
>Week 8 (n=80)4.48 ± 4.68
>Week 16 (n=80)3.15 ± 4.67
>Week 24 (n=71)2.52 ± 4.10
PrimarySeverity of Pain in a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 100mm)

Participants assessed the severity of their pain using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The far left end indicated no pain (0 mm) and the far right meant the worst possible pain (100 mm). Participants drew a vertical line on the horizontal scale to indicate their current level of pain at each visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Weeks 8,16 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Severity of Pain in a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 100mm)
Units on a scaleNon Responders to Other Anti-TNF
VAS at Baseline (n=82)62.88 ± 22.31
>Week 8 (n=80)39.69 ± 25.40
>Week 16 (n=80)32.35 ± 26.02
>Week 24 (n=71)28.70 ± 23.32
SecondaryEvaluate the Compliance and Clinical Tolerability With Adalimumab

To assess compliance, participants were asked at the Week 8 and Week 16 visits how many doses they had missed since their previous visit. Adverse events were collected throughout the study, from the time the participant signed the informed consent form until 30 days or 5 half-lives after the last dose of study drug. For additional information see the Reported Adverse Event section.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Evaluate the Compliance and Clinical Tolerability With Adalimumab
ParticipantsNon Responders to Other Anti-TNF
Reported 1 missed dose at Week 81
Reported 2 missed doses at Week 83
Reported 2 missed doses at Week 161
Reported 3 missed doses at Week 161
Experienced a non-serious adverse event6
Experienced a serious adverse event1

Adverse events

Collected over Duration of study participation was 24 weeks. Adverse events were collected from the time the participant signed the informed consent form until 30 days or 5 half-lives following the intake of the last dose of physician-prescribed treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Non Responders to Other Anti-TNF—1/82 (1.2%)6/82 (7.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNon Responders to Other Anti-TNF
rectal bleedingGastrointestinal disorders1/82
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventNon Responders to Other Anti-TNF
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/82
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/82
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/82
AstheniaGeneral disorders1/82
ChillsGeneral disorders1/82
PhosphenesGeneral disorders1/82
PainGeneral disorders1/82
Swelling in administration siteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/82
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/82
RhinorreaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/82

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Non Responders to Other Anti-TNF
Mean48.34 ± 11.56
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)Non Responders to Other Anti-TNF
Female66
Male13
Gender not reported3
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Non Responders to Other Anti-TNF
Mexico82
08

Study locations

12 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27882
    Chihuahua, 31000, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27883
    Chihuahua, 31200, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27884
    Culiacán Sin., 80000, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27888
    Guadalajara, Jal., 44320, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27886
    Guadalajara, Jal., 44650, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27887
    Guadalajara, Jal., 44670, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 25943
    Leon, Gto., 37000, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27885
    Mexico City,, 06700, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 28059
    Mexico City, 03100, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27890
    Puebla, Pue., 72000, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 27889
    Puebla, Pue., 72570, Mexico
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 28057
    Tuxtla Gutierrez, 29000, Mexico
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01083160
Lead sponsor
Abbott
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2010
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2010
Results posted
Jan 2, 2012
Last update
Jan 19, 2012

Study contacts

Juan Pozos, MD
study chair · Abbott
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion