CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01077492Updated Nov 2, 2012

Virtual Bronchoscopy Transbronchial Needle Aspiration(TBNA): a Proof of Concept Study

An observational study in Lung Cancer, sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. Terminated at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-11-02.

Sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine wether CT-PET virtual bronchoscopy guided transbronchial needle aspiration is suitable for the investigation of mediastinal lymph nodes which is needed for correct staging of lung cancer.

Read the detailed description

Accurate staging of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) in patients with lung carcinoma (LC) is paramount as the N stage largely determines treatment strategy, prognosis and outcome. Surgical staging such as mediastinoscopy is considered the gold standard. A less invasive alternative is transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA). This technique is limited however by moderate and operator dependent accuracy. Recently less invasive strategies such as esophageal ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endobronchial ultrasound guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) were introduced. These strategies have largely complemented TBNA and surgical staging, with high accuracy and low morbidity. Disadvantages compared to TBNA however are required specific expertise, higher equipment and maintenance costs, the need for more assisting personnel and the need for sedation. Advances in computer generated image processing based on available CT and PET images enable (quasi) real-time virtual bronchoscopy that can assist minimal invasive surgical performance including bronchoscopy. Optimizing the traditional TBNA procedure with these modern imaging techniques might be equally accurate and more cost effective.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • lung cancer
  • mediastinal lymph nodes
  • TBNA
  • staging lung cancer
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is below the median of 189 across 1,514 observational studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc is the lead sponsor of 302 studies on the registry; 84 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with suspected lung cancer requiring mediastinal lymph node staging after CT-PET scan during routine work-up according to local guidelines.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Proven or suspected lung cancer, base on clinical picture and/or CT-PET findings
  • Suspected involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes on CT-PET scan
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Suspected mediastianl lymph nodes

    Patients with (suspected) lung cancer requiring MLN staging after CT-PET during routine work-up according to existing staging guidelines.

    Other: Virtual Bronchoscopy Navigation

Interventions

  • OtherVirtual Bronchoscopy Navigation

    Use of dedicated virtual bronchoscopy navigation software using 4D CT-PET scan spacial data.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of VB in determining N2/N3 mediastinal lymph nodes

    Feasibility of virtual bronchoscopy in showing the presence or abscense of N2/N3 mediastinal lymph node (MLN) metastasis with accuracy of 0.6 in puncturing MLN \> 15 mm (CT images) and accuracy of 0.8 for MLN \< 15 mm in the second phase of the study.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of the session within the optimal time window of local anesthesia using lidocaine 1%; comparable to standard routine bronchoscopic procedure on an outpatient basis, i.e. not exceeding 30 minutes.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VU University Medical Center
    Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01077492
Lead sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
Philips Healthcare
First posted
Mar 1, 2010
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
May 2011
Completion
May 2011
Last update
Nov 2, 2012

Study contacts

Sayed Hashemi, MD
study chair · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Hans Daniels, MD
study chair · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Emiel Comans, PhD
study chair · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Otto Hoekstra, PhD
study chair · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Piet Postmus, PhD
study chair · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Tom Sutedja, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion