CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01077323Updated Apr 15, 2015Results posted

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Acute Pancreatitis in Relation to Use of Exenatide and Other Antidiabetic Agents

An observational study in Type 2 Diabetes (Treated With Exenatide or Other Oral Antidiabetic Therapies) and Healthy Subjects (Treated With no Diabetes Therapies), sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-15.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
363,766
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research was to assess the absolute and relative incidence of acute pancreatitis in persons initiating exenatide compared with persons initiating a different antidiabetic agent, and secondarily, persons without diabetes. This protocol summarizes a retrospective cohort study using eligibility, pharmacy claims, and medical claims data from a large US health plan affiliated with i3 Drug Safety.

Read the detailed description

Limitations of the study: The results provided below should be interpreted in light of the following limitations:

  • Misclassification of acute pancreatitis may have distorted our estimates of absolute and relative IRs. In cases where the degree of misclassification is non-differential with respect to the exposure cohort, as is likely the case in administrative data, the RR would be biased toward the null value, although the magnitude of bias will depend on the amount of misclassification.
  • Lack of information on important potential confounders, like obesity and alcohol use, is another limitation of the present analysis. Although we adjusted for propensity scores of exenatide initiation, which included a large number of factors derived from the claims data, it is likely that the present estimates are somewhat inaccurate due to residual confounding.
  • Our definition of current use in the time-on-drug analysis, which extended 31 days past the nominal end of the last dispensing of the cohort-defining drug, may be too long in duration and thus misclassify exposure during the relevant etiologic period.
  • Additionally, these analyses assume that when pharmacies submit a claim for a medication that patients receive and consume the medication. While it is possible that misclassification of exposure by non-adherence to the medications dispensed occurred, prior work showed that pharmacy claims are valid for ascertaining medication exposure.
02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes (Treated With Exenatide or Other Oral Antidiabetic Therapies)
  • Healthy Subjects (Treated With no Diabetes Therapies)

Keywords

  • pancreatitis
  • exenatide
  • Byetta
  • Amylin
  • Lilly
03

In context

Pancreatitis

752 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis; 181 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 363,766 is above the median of 180 across 277 observational studies indexed under Pancreatitis.

Browse Pancreatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,429 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.

Of its 357 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 173 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This retrospective study utilized medical claims data from a large US health plan affiliated with i3 Drug Safety. The individuals covered by this health plan are geographically diverse across the United States. The health plan provides fully insured coverage for physician, hospital and prescription drug services. The providers of these services submit their claims for payment directly to the health plan. i3 Drug Safety uses de-identified data derived from these claims daily for a wide range of safety, utilization, and economic analyses.

Inclusion criteria

  • Exenatide Initiators: The date of the first dispensing of exenatide under which a potential cohort member might qualify will be 1 June 2005, and the latest date will be 31 December 2007. We will note the first initiation of exenatide, and also note subsequent initiation of other antidiabetic drugs. Eligible exenatide initiators will be included in the exenatide initiator cohort on the first eligible dispensing following at least 9 months of continuous health plan enrollment.
  • Other Antidiabetic Drug Initiators: The date of the first dispensing of an antidiabetic drug other than exenatide under which a potential cohort member might qualify will be 1 June 2005, and the latest date will be 31 December 2007. We will note the earliest date of other antidiabetic drug dispensings within their cohort membership, and also note subsequent initiation of other antidiabetic drugs. We will choose a subset of this comparator cohort randomly selected to be approximately 9 times larger than the exenatide initiators and will oversample patients receiving certain drugs to the extent necessary to ensure inclusion of at least as many persons initiating these drugs as initiating exenatide. Specifically, oversampling will be performed as needed on initiators of metformin, TZDs, SUs, sitagliptin and insulin glargine to allow for further sub-analysis.
  • Exenatide and Other Antidiabetic Drug Initiators: For all patients in these two study cohorts, the date of cohort entry (the date ranged between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007) marked the beginning of observation for study outcomes (follow-up). The end of observation for a given patient happened on the earliest of occurrence of likely acute pancreatitis, end of the study period (March 31, 2008), or disenrollment from the health plan.
  • Non-Diabetes Cohort: A third cohort will consist of randomly-selected Ingenix Research Data Mart members who have no claim associated with a diabetes diagnosis or antidiabetic drug dispensing in the baseline continuous enrollment period. This cohort will enter as of the later of 1 June 2005 or completion of 9 months continuous baseline enrollment and will provide follow-up through end of enrollment or 31 March 2008, or the receipt of an antidiabetic drug dispensing or diabetes diagnosis, at which point they may enter one of the other exposure cohorts.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The 3 cohorts (exenatide initiators, other antidiabetic initiators, and those without diabetes) will be subject to minimal exclusions in order to observe acute pancreatitis across a wide spectrum of patient characteristics. We will apply a baseline enrollment requirement of 9 months prior to cohort entry so that the first day of follow-up (on which acute pancreatitis could occur) will be characterized with the same level of detail (based on 9 months of preceding health insurance claims) as any other day during the study.
  • Consistent with the principle of minimal exclusions, we will only exclude from the cohorts people who have baseline claims associated with pancreatitis (in the 9-month period preceding cohort entry) as these people either had pre-existing pancreatitis or had a pre-existing suspicion of pancreatitis. We will not exclude persons with a type I diabetes diagnosis as we intend to observe the spectrum of clinical practice with respect to antidiabetic drug initiation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
363,766 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Exenatide Initiators

    Drug: exenatide

  • Other Antidiabetic Drug Initiators

    Drug: Other antidiabetic therapies

  • Non-Diabetes Cohort

    Other: No diabetes therapy

Interventions

  • Drugexenatide

    subcutaneous injection, dosing according to normal clinical practice

    Also known as: Byetta

  • DrugOther antidiabetic therapies

    Includes metformin, thiazolidinediones, insulins, sulfonylureas, non-sulfonylurea secretagogues, sitagliptin, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors; In all cases, dosing according to normal clinical practice

  • OtherNo diabetes therapy

    Subjects not diagnosed with diabetes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Current Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis

    Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is "current use" period, described as "time during current day's supply plus 31 days."

    Time frame: 43 months

  2. Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (Among "Recent Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis

    Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is the "recent use" period, described as "time following current use plus an additional 31 days excluding subsequent current use."

    Time frame: 43 months

  3. Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Past Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis

    Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is "past use" period, described as "time following recent use excluding subsequent current or recent use."

    Time frame: 43 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis Among Initiators of Exenatide, Diabetics Initiating Other Antidiabetic Drugs, and the Non-diabetes Cohort - Intent to Treat Analysis

    Crude intent-to-treat incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort.

    Time frame: 43 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 6, 2010

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes Cohort
Started3709762079912015600
Completed25719234536103511
Not completed1137838626311912089
Withdrew: <9 months enroll before drug dispensed1122626395411655523
Withdrew: Dispensing of drug in baseline period0120229256446
Withdrew: Baseline diagnosis of pancreatic disease1522080120

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Current Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis

Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is "current use" period, described as "time during current day's supply plus 31 days."

Time frame:
43 months
Reported as:
Number · Cases per 100,000 person-years
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Current Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis
Cases per 100,000 person-yearsExenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes Cohort
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Current Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis219.7 (155.5 to 301.6)226.7 (205.4 to 249.6)56.2 (43.7 to 71.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Exenatide Initiators vs Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators · Adjusted rate ratio (arr): 0.87 · 95% CI 0.59 to 1.28ARR equals adjusted incidence rate of acute pancreatitis in exenatide cohort divided by adjusted incidence of acute pancreatitis in OAD cohort. Adjusted incidence rates were calculated using a Poisson regression model adjusted for propensity score.
SecondaryIncidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis Among Initiators of Exenatide, Diabetics Initiating Other Antidiabetic Drugs, and the Non-diabetes Cohort - Intent to Treat Analysis

Crude intent-to-treat incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort.

Time frame:
43 months
Reported as:
Number · Cases per 100,000 person-years
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis Among Initiators of Exenatide, Diabetics Initiating Other Antidiabetic Drugs, and the Non-diabetes Cohort - Intent to Treat Analysis
Cases per 100,000 person-yearsExenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes Cohort
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis Among Initiators of Exenatide, Diabetics Initiating Other Antidiabetic Drugs, and the Non-diabetes Cohort - Intent to Treat Analysis272.7 (215.6 to 340.4)227.6 (209.4 to 246.9)56.2 (43.7 to 71.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Exenatide Initiators vs Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators · Adjusted rate ratio (arr): 1.1 · 95% CI 0.8 to 1.5ARR equals adjusted incidence rate of acute pancreatitis in exenatide cohort divided by adjusted incidence of acute pancreatitis in OAD cohort.Rate ratios adjusted for propensity score of exenatide initiation using Cox Proportional Hazards Regression
PrimaryIncidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (Among "Recent Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis

Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is the "recent use" period, described as "time following current use plus an additional 31 days excluding subsequent current use."

Time frame:
43 months
Reported as:
Number · Cases per 100,000 person-years
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (Among "Recent Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis
Cases per 100,000 person-yearsExenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes Cohort
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (Among "Recent Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis321.4 (117.9 to 699.5)325.5 (243.8 to 425.7)56.2 (43.7 to 71.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Exenatide Initiators vs Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators · Adjusted rate ratio (arr): 0.87 · 95% CI 0.36 to 2.09ARR equals adjusted incidence rate of acute pancreatitis in exenatide cohort divided by adjusted incidence of acute pancreatitis in OAD cohort. Adjusted incidence rates were calculated using a Poisson regression model adjusted for propensity score.
PrimaryIncidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Past Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis

Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is "past use" period, described as "time following recent use excluding subsequent current or recent use."

Time frame:
43 months
Reported as:
Number · Cases per 100,000 person-years
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Past Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis
Cases per 100,000 person-yearsExenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes Cohort
Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During "Past Use" Period) - Time on Drug Analysis354.5 (245.5 to 495.4)218.1 (183.0 to 258.0)56.2 (43.7 to 71.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Exenatide Initiators vs Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators · Adjusted rate ratio (arr): 1.39 · 95% CI 0.86 to 2.25ARR equals adjusted incidence rate of acute pancreatitis in exenatide cohort divided by adjusted incidence of acute pancreatitis in OAD cohort. Adjusted incidence rates were calculated using a Poisson regression model adjusted for propensity score.

Adverse events

Collected over SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS AND ADVERSE EVENTS NOT APPLICABLE (please see additional description below).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Exenatide Initiators———
Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators———
Non-Diabetes Cohort———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
<=18 years5429822496327999
Between 18 and 65 years2349620231773622299435
>=65 years216929237492636332
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
Female1438111496052444181785
Male1133811957651067181981
Has a History of Congestive Heart Failure
Has a History of Congestive Heart Failure(participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
Number82082273159362
Has a History of Hyperlipidemia
Has a History of Hyperlipidemia(participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
Number1974112738413178160303
Has a History of Hypertension
Has a History of Hypertension(participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
Number1633611459310121141050
Has a History of Ischemic Heart Disease
Has a History of Ischemic Heart Disease(participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
Number322824900177529903
Has a History of Myocardial Infarction
Has a History of Myocardial Infarction(participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
Number30139511934445
Has a History of Obesity
Has a History of Obesity(participants)Exenatide InitiatorsOther Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) InitiatorsNon-Diabetes CohortTotal
Number410718933123024270

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Research Site
    Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01077323
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company, i3 Drug Safety
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 1, 2010
Start date
Sep 2004
Primary completion
Mar 2008
Completion
Mar 2008
Results posted
Oct 6, 2010
Last update
Apr 15, 2015

Study contacts

Vice President Research and Development, MD
study director · Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion