ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01076049Updated Aug 23, 2021Results posted

The Effect of Irrisept for Irrigation of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (Irrisept USF Study)

An interventional study of Standard of Care (SoC) and Irrisept Delivery System in Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and Abscess, sponsored by Irrimax Corporation. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-23.

Sponsored by Irrimax Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
Suboptimal Recruitment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to determine whether Irrisept can effectively prevent the progression of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) as compared to treatment by the current Standard of Care.

Read the detailed description

After being informed about the trial and potential risks, subjects completed an informed consent form prior to participation. After eligibility criteria was verified, an initial wound assessment examination was performed. Subjects were then randomized to the Irrisept or Standard of Care treatment group. Forty-eight hours later, wound progression and signs of infection were assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
  • Abscess
03

In context

Soft Tissue Infections

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Soft Tissue Infections; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 114 is close to the median of 120 across 61 interventional studies indexed under Soft Tissue Infections.

Browse Soft Tissue Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Irrimax Corporation is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 to 80
  2. Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), in the form of an abscess, which will require incision and drainage.
  3. Patient able to provide an informed consent.
  4. Patient volunteers to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Wound was caused by human or animal bite.
  2. Wound is a blunt crush injury or has tendon, bone, or joint involvement.
  3. Diabetic foot infection.
  4. Anticipated incision size less than 5mm.
  5. Abscess extends to the muscle layer.
  6. Admission to hospital for any reason, including IV antibiotics.
  7. Clinical signs of systemic infection on initial patient encounter.
  8. Prior history of allergy or hypersensitivity to CHG.
  9. Neutropenic (known ANC\<500/mm3), HIV (known CD4\<50), or other severely immunocompromised state (e.g., receiving chemotherapy).
  10. Patient is diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus or other immunological disease.
  11. Currently in police custody.
  12. Patient withdraws from participation.
  13. Patient unable or unwilling to give informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care (SoC)

    For subjects randomized to the control group, the preferred irrigation solution was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s).

    Device: Standard of Care (SoC)

  • Active comparator
    Irrisept

    For subjects randomized to the investigational group, Irrisept was used.

    Device: Irrisept Delivery System

Interventions

  • DeviceStandard of Care (SoC)

    The preferred irrigation solution and method was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s) and could vary between subjects. The type of SoC was recorded in the source document and the same solution and irrigation method were used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.

  • DeviceIrrisept Delivery System

    Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression. Irrisept was recorded in the source document and used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.

    Also known as: Irrisept

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up Visit

    The primary endpoint was overall wound progression and signs of infection 48 hours post-treatment. This was measured via a blinded investigator's discretion and recorded as 'improved', 'no change', 'progression of signs or symptoms of infection', or 'immediate treatment required' if an infection had progressed to a certain extent.

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC

    The study tracked any instance of a subject's conditions worsening compared to their baseline measurements. This included a worsening in the size (length and width) and clinical signs (erythema, area, induration, tenderness, warm, pain, cellulitis and other) of the infection. While the protocol states the overall prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) colonization is the secondary objective, this information was not collected by the site. Therefore, worsening of clinical outcomes is considered the secondary objective.

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Results

Posted Jul 28, 2021

Participant flow

From January 2010 to December 2011, patients with skin and soft tissue infections were recruited from the Tampa General Hospital, University of South Florida emergency department.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Delivery SystemRandomization Unknown
Started52551
Completed45521
Not completed730

Outcome measures

PrimaryWound State at 48-Hour Follow-up Visit

The primary endpoint was overall wound progression and signs of infection 48 hours post-treatment. This was measured via a blinded investigator's discretion and recorded as 'improved', 'no change', 'progression of signs or symptoms of infection', or 'immediate treatment required' if an infection had progressed to a certain extent.

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up Visit
ParticipantsStandard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Device SystemRandomization Unknown
Improved Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up40470
No Change Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up110
Progression Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up320
Immediate Treatment Required Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up121
SecondaryClinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC

The study tracked any instance of a subject's conditions worsening compared to their baseline measurements. This included a worsening in the size (length and width) and clinical signs (erythema, area, induration, tenderness, warm, pain, cellulitis and other) of the infection. While the protocol states the overall prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) colonization is the secondary objective, this information was not collected by the site. Therefore, worsening of clinical outcomes is considered the secondary objective.

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Number · Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Total Number of Worsening OutcomesStandard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Delivery SystemRandomization Unknown
Increased Length (cm)590
Increased Width (cm)351
Erythema400
Area (cm2)130
Induration620
Tenderness220
Warmth630
Pain330
Cellulitis000
Other210
No Signs of Infection Worsening25360
Post-hocWorsening Events Causality

Causality for each worsening event was determined by using the following categories: 'related', 'possibly related', 'unlikely related', or 'unrelated'.

Time frame:
48 Hours
Reported as:
Count of units · Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
Worsening Events Causality
Total Number of Worsening OutcomesStandard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Delivery SystemRandomization Unknown
Related Worsening Event000
Possibly Related Worsening Event000
Unlikely Related Worsening Event28260
Unrelated Worsening Event421

Adverse events

Collected over The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard of Care (SoC)——20/45 (44.4%)
Irrisept Delivery System——16/52 (30.8%)
Randomization Unknown——1/1 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStandard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Delivery SystemRandomization Unknown
Increased WidthInfections and infestations3/455/521/1
Increased LengthInfections and infestations5/459/520/1
IndurationInfections and infestations6/452/520/1
WarmthInfections and infestations6/453/520/1
ErythemaInfections and infestations4/450/520/1
PainInfections and infestations3/453/520/1
AreaInfections and infestations1/453/520/1
TendernessInfections and infestations2/452/520/1
OtherInfections and infestations2/451/520/1
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/450/520/1

Baseline characteristics

A total of 114 subjects were consented. There were 6 screen failures. There were 107 subjects randomized (55 to Irrisept and 52 to SoC). One (1) subject had no randomization information available. There were 52 Irrisept and 45 SoC subjects that completed the trial. For one SoC subject, the gender is unknown.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Standard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Device SystemRandomization UnknownTotal
Subject Accounting4552198
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Standard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Device SystemRandomization UnknownTotal
Gender — Female2527052
Gender — Male1925145
Gender — Unknown Gender1001
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Standard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Device SystemRandomization UnknownTotal
Race (Black)1525040
Race (White)2318142
Ethnicity (Hispanic)67013
Unknown Race/Ethnicity1203
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Standard of Care (SoC)Irrisept Device SystemRandomization UnknownTotal
United States4552198
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Tampa General Hospital - University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 30, 2010

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01076049
Lead sponsor
Irrimax Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2010
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Results posted
Jul 28, 2021
Last update
Aug 23, 2021

Study contacts

David Wein, MD
principal investigator · Tampa General Hospital, University South Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion