CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01057693Updated Jan 20, 2021Results posted

Study Of Pregabalin (Lyrica) In Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

A Phase 3 interventional study of pregabalin (Lyrica) and Placebo in Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful, sponsored by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.. Completed at 172 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-20.

Sponsored by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
633
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients will be switched from their current medication for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pregabalin as compared to placebo. All patients will receive pregabalin, and half of patients will receive placebo at some point during the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Keywords

  • Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
  • Lyrica
  • pregabalin
  • pain
03

In context

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 633 is above the median of 60 across 768 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Peripheral Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. is the lead sponsor of 431 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must have painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy and be receiving treatment for this condition.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other pain conditions cannot participate.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
633 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    pregabalin (Lyrica)

    Drug: pregabalin (Lyrica)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugpregabalin (Lyrica)

    Lyrica 150-300 mg/day. Medication is supplied as capsules and given 3 times daily.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo is supplied as capsules and given 3 times daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Single-Blind Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Week 19 During Double-Blind Phase

    Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 19 (DB Phase)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Loss of Pain Response (Double-Blind Phase)

    Time to loss of pain response (based on the daily pain diary data) during the DB treatment phase was analyzed using survival analysis technique. Loss of pain response was defined as less than (\<) 15% pain response relative to the SB baseline. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

    Time frame: SB Baseline up to Week 19

  2. Change From Single-Blind Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Week 6 During Single-Blind Phase

    Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 6 (SB Phase)

  3. Weekly Mean Pain Scores (Single-Blind Phase)

    Weekly mean pain score was defined as the mean of the daily diary pain ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain.

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

  4. Weekly Mean Pain Scores (Double-Blind Phase)

    Weekly mean pain score was defined as the mean of the daily diary pain ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1. DB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including DB Day 1.

    Time frame: DB Baseline, Week 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

  5. Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction in Mean Pain Score (Single-Blind Phase)

    Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Percentage of participants who had at least 30% and 50% pain reduction from SB baseline to Week 6 is reported. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

    Time frame: Week 6

  6. Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction in Mean Pain Score (Double-Blind Phase)

    Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Percentage of participants who had at least 30% and 50% pain reduction from SB baseline to Week 19 is reported.

    Time frame: Week 19

  7. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (Single-Blind Phase)

    PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category are reported.

    Time frame: Week 6

  8. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (Double-Blind Phase)

    PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category are reported.

    Time frame: Week 19

  9. Medical Outcomes Study -Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Single-Blind Phase)

    Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 6

  10. Medical Outcomes Study -Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Double-Blind Phase)

    Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment.

    Time frame: Week 19

  11. Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Single-Blind Phase)

    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 6

  12. Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Double-Blind Phase)

    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no.

    Time frame: Week 19

  13. Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Score (Single-Blind Phase)

    Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

  14. Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Score (Double-Blind Phase)

    Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain).

    Time frame: DB Baseline, Week 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

  15. Endpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Single-Blind Phase)

    Endpoint mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the last 7 sleep interference diaries while receiving SB treatment. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain).

    Time frame: Week 6

  16. Endpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Double-Blind Phase)

    Endpoint mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the last 7 sleep interference diaries while receiving DB treatment. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain).

    Time frame: Week 19

  17. Quality of Life Questionnaire- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) (Single-Blind Phase)

    QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. Consists of 5 domains: Physical functioning(Ph Fn)/large fiber (sum of item 8, 11, 13-15, 24, 27-35; range -4 to 56); Activities of daily living (sum of item 12, 22, 23, 25, 26; range 0 to 20); Symptoms (sum of item 1-7, 9; range 0 to 32); Small fiber (sum of item 10, 16, 17, 18; range 0 to 16); Autonomic (sum of item 19, 20, 21; range 0 to 12) and total QOL score (sum of items 1-35) range: -4 to 136. Higher score implied worse QOL.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 6

  18. Quality of Life Questionnaire- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) (Double-Blind Phase)

    QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. Consists of 5 domains: Physical functioning(Ph Fn)/large fiber (sum of item 8, 11, 13-15, 24, 27-35; range -4 to 56); Activities of daily living (sum of item 12, 22, 23, 25, 26; range 0 to 20); Symptoms (sum of item 1-7, 9; range 0 to 32); Small fiber (sum of item 10, 16, 17, 18; range 0 to 16); Autonomic (sum of item 19, 20, 21; range 0 to 12) and total QOL score (sum of items 1-35) range: -4 to 136. Higher score implied worse QOL.

    Time frame: Week 19

  19. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Single-Blind Phase)

    Participants rated their pain on a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 6

  20. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Double-Blind Phase)

    Participants rated their pain on a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.

    Time frame: Week 19

  21. Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) (Single-Blind Phase)

    BPI-sf: self-administered questionnaire developed to assess severity, impact of pain on daily functions, consisted of 5 questions. Questions 1-4 measured the severity of pain based on pain experienced over the past 24-hours on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to10 (worst possible pain). Question 5: 7 item subsets that measured level of interference of pain on daily functions on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 6

  22. Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) (Double-Blind Phase)

    BPI-sf: self-administered questionnaire developed to assess severity, impact of pain on daily functions, consisted of 5 questions. Questions 1-4 measured the severity of pain based on pain experienced over the past 24-hours on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to10 (worst possible pain). Question 5: 7 item subsets that measured level of interference of pain on daily functions on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

    Time frame: Week 19

  23. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Single-Blind Phase)

    HADS: self-administered questionnaire, consists of 2 sub-scales; measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and depression (HADS-D). Each sub-scale consists of 7 items on which participants responded as to how each item applies to them on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range for each sub-scale = 0 to 21, where higher score indicates more severe anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: SB Baseline, Week 6

  24. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Double-Blind Phase)

    HADS: self-administered questionnaire, consists of 2 sub-scales; measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and depression (HADS-D). Each sub-scale consists of 7 items on which participants responded as to how each item applies to them on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range for each sub-scale = 0 to 21, where higher score indicates more severe anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: Week 19

  25. Patient Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) (Single-Blind Phase)

    GESM: single-item, self-administered treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Participants answered "how would you rate the study medication you received for pain?" on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 7 (very dissatisfied). Number of participants in each category are reported.

    Time frame: Week 6

  26. Patient Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) (Double-Blind Phase)

    GESM: single-item, self-administered treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Participants answered "how would you rate the study medication you received for pain?" on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 7 (very dissatisfied). Number of participants in each category are reported.

    Time frame: Week 19

07

Results

Posted Feb 22, 2013

Participant flow

Single-Blind Phase (Up to Week 6)
Participant flow — Single-Blind Phase (Up to Week 6)
MilestonePregabalin SBPregabalin DBPlacebo
Started66500
Completed56600
Not completed9900
Withdrew: Adverse event4500
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy700
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1400
Withdrew: Protocol violation900
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2200
Withdrew: Other200
Between Single-Blind and Double-Blind
Participant flow — Between Single-Blind and Double-Blind
MilestonePregabalin SBPregabalin DBPlacebo
Started56600
Completed29600
Not completed27000
Withdrew: Adverse event500
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy24700
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100
Withdrew: Protocol violation700
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject400
Withdrew: Other600
Double-Blind Phase (Week 7 to Week 19)
Participant flow — Double-Blind Phase (Week 7 to Week 19)
MilestonePregabalin SBPregabalin DBPlacebo
Started0147149
Treated0147147
Completed0125113
Not completed02236
Withdrew: Adverse event0811
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy038
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up025
Withdrew: Protocol violation004
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject086
Withdrew: Other010
Withdrew: Randomized, not treated002

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Single-Blind Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Week 19 During Double-Blind Phase

Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 19 (DB Phase)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Single-Blind Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Week 19 During Double-Blind Phase
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
Single-Blind Baseline6.8 ± 1.246.7 ± 1.32
Change at Week 19 (DB Phase)-3.9 ± 1.92-3.5 ± 2.10
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin DB vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1221 · Least squares mean difference: -0.32 · 95% CI -0.74 to 0.09
SecondaryTime to Loss of Pain Response (Double-Blind Phase)

Time to loss of pain response (based on the daily pain diary data) during the DB treatment phase was analyzed using survival analysis technique. Loss of pain response was defined as less than (\<) 15% pain response relative to the SB baseline. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

Time frame:
SB Baseline up to Week 19
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Loss of Pain Response (Double-Blind Phase)
daysPregabalin DBPlacebo
Time to Loss of Pain Response (Double-Blind Phase)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryChange From Single-Blind Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Week 6 During Single-Blind Phase

Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 6 (SB Phase)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Single-Blind Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Week 6 During Single-Blind Phase
units on a scalePregabalin SB
SB Baseline (n= 663)6.7 ± 1.27
Change at Week 6 (SB Phase) (n= 658)-2.2 ± 2.03
SecondaryWeekly Mean Pain Scores (Single-Blind Phase)

Weekly mean pain score was defined as the mean of the daily diary pain ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain.

Time frame:
Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Weekly Mean Pain Scores (Single-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin SB
Week 1 (n= 657)6.0 ± 1.62
Week 2 (n= 636)5.4 ± 1.82
Week 3 (n= 613)4.9 ± 1.93
Week 4 (n= 585)4.6 ± 1.93
Week 5 (n= 565)4.5 ± 1.92
Week 6 (n= 548)4.3 ± 2.02
SecondaryWeekly Mean Pain Scores (Double-Blind Phase)

Weekly mean pain score was defined as the mean of the daily diary pain ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1. DB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including DB Day 1.

Time frame:
DB Baseline, Week 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Weekly Mean Pain Scores (Double-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
DB Baseline (n= 147, 147)3.1 ± 1.423.0 ± 1.40
Week 7 (n= 144, 145)3.2 ± 1.603.3 ± 1.80
Week 8 (n= 143, 142)3.2 ± 1.723.6 ± 1.79
Week 9 (n= 140, 133)3.0 ± 1.653.4 ± 1.76
Week 10 (n= 138, 133)3.0 ± 1.703.4 ± 1.77
Week 11 (n= 138, 128)2.9 ± 1.643.3 ± 1.63
Week 12 (n= 135, 123)2.9 ± 1.683.2 ± 1.70
Week 13 (n= 134, 122)2.9 ± 1.683.1 ± 1.69
Week 14 (n= 133, 122)2.9 ± 1.643.1 ± 1.70
Week 15 (n= 131, 118)2.9 ± 1.633.0 ± 1.64
Week 16 (n= 132, 118)2.8 ± 1.653.0 ± 1.58
Week 17 (n= 128, 115)2.7 ± 1.612.9 ± 1.70
Week 18 (n= 128, 115)2.8 ± 1.662.9 ± 1.73
Week 19 (n= 115, 104)2.7 ± 1.572.8 ± 1.71
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction in Mean Pain Score (Single-Blind Phase)

Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Percentage of participants who had at least 30% and 50% pain reduction from SB baseline to Week 6 is reported. SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction in Mean Pain Score (Single-Blind Phase)
percentage of participantsPregabalin SB
>=30 % Reduction49.92
>=50 % Reduction27.22
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction in Mean Pain Score (Double-Blind Phase)

Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their DPN pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Percentage of participants who had at least 30% and 50% pain reduction from SB baseline to Week 19 is reported.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction in Mean Pain Score (Double-Blind Phase)
percentage of participantsPregabalin DBPlacebo
>=30% Reduction82.9979.19
>=50% Reduction62.5955.03
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (Single-Blind Phase)

PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category are reported.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (Single-Blind Phase)
participantsPregabalin SB
Very Much Improved93
Much Improved221
Minimally Improved194
No Change65
Minimally Worse29
Much Worse15
Very Much Worse3
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (Double-Blind Phase)

PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category are reported.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (Double-Blind Phase)
participantsPregabalin DBPlacebo
Very Much Improved2323
Much Improved5046
Minimally Improved2728
No Change2820
Minimally Worse96
Much Worse18
Very Much Worse03
SecondaryMedical Outcomes Study -Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Single-Blind Phase)

Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Medical Outcomes Study -Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Single-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin SB
SB Baseline: Sleep disturbance (n= 665)53.6 ± 24.00
SB Baseline: Snoring (n= 664)44.7 ± 34.73
SB Baseline: Awaken SOB or With Headache (n=665)18.9 ± 24.18
SB Baseline: Quantity of sleep (n=663)5.9 ± 1.40
SB Baseline: Sleep Adequacy (n=665)39.2 ± 23.22
SB Baseline: Somnolence (n=665)42.6 ± 23.49
SB Baseline: Sleep Problems Index (n=665)49.2 ± 18.17
Week 6: Sleep disturbance (n= 621)33.6 ± 24.31
Week 6: Snoring (n= 621)39.9 ± 34.83
Week 6: Awaken SOB or With Headache (n= 621)12.6 ± 22.64
Week 6: Quantity of sleep (n= 615)6.6 ± 1.64
Week 6: Sleep Adequacy (n= 621)52.6 ± 25.55
Week 6: Somnolence (n= 621)34.2 ± 24.11
Week 6: Sleep Problems Index (n= 621)34.4 ± 18.82
SecondaryMedical Outcomes Study -Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Double-Blind Phase)

Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Medical Outcomes Study -Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Double-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
Sleep disturbance26.6 ± 21.6930.9 ± 23.05
Snoring41.9 ± 36.2435.4 ± 35.95
Awaken SOB or With Headache12.3 ± 23.7212.2 ± 23.89
Quantity of sleep6.7 ± 1.346.5 ± 1.47
Sleep Adequacy59.2 ± 28.6759.0 ± 27.67
Somnolence29.7 ± 24.3930.6 ± 22.98
Sleep Problems Index28.5 ± 17.8630.9 ± 18.59
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Single-Blind Phase)

MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Single-Blind Phase)
participantsPregabalin SB
SB Baseline180
Week 6266
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Double-Blind Phase)

MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Double-Blind Phase)
participantsPregabalin DBPlacebo
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) (Double-Blind Phase)6760
SecondaryWeekly Mean Sleep Interference Score (Single-Blind Phase)

Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). SB baseline refers to the last 7 pain diary entries up to and including Day 1.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Score (Single-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin SB
SB Baseline (n= 663)5.9 ± 2.09
Week 1 (n= 657)5.1 ± 2.22
Week 2 (n= 636)4.5 ± 2.29
Week 3 (n= 614)4.1 ± 2.30
Week 4 (n= 589)3.8 ± 2.30
Week 5 (n= 566)3.7 ± 2.29
Week 6 (n= 548)3.6 ± 2.35
SecondaryWeekly Mean Sleep Interference Score (Double-Blind Phase)

Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain).

Time frame:
DB Baseline, Week 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Score (Double-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
DB Baseline (n= 147, 147)2.5 ± 1.792.3 ± 1.66
Week 7 (n= 144, 145)2.6 ± 1.922.7 ± 1.99
Week 8 (n= 143, 142)2.6 ± 1.983.0 ± 1.98
Week 9 (n= 140, 134)2.3 ± 1.882.7 ± 1.94
Week 10 (n= 138, 133)2.3 ± 1.902.7 ± 1.98
Week 11 (n= 138, 128)2.2 ± 1.812.5 ± 1.78
Week 12 (n= 136, 123)2.3 ± 1.902.4 ± 1.84
Week 13 (n= 134, 122)2.3 ± 1.872.3 ± 1.78
Week 14 (n= 133, 122)2.3 ± 1.932.3 ± 1.80
Week 15 (n= 132, 120)2.4 ± 1.932.3 ± 1.80
Week 16 (n= 132, 120)2.3 ± 1.902.3 ± 1.77
Week 17 (n= 129, 116)2.2 ± 1.882.2 ± 1.85
Week 18 (n= 128, 116)2.3 ± 1.922.3 ± 1.85
Week 19 (n= 121, 111)2.3 ± 2.052.2 ± 1.80
SecondaryEndpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Single-Blind Phase)

Endpoint mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the last 7 sleep interference diaries while receiving SB treatment. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain).

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Endpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Single-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin SB
Endpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Single-Blind Phase)3.8 ± 2.42
SecondaryEndpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Double-Blind Phase)

Endpoint mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the last 7 sleep interference diaries while receiving DB treatment. Participants rated how painful DPN has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain).

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Endpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Double-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
Endpoint Mean Sleep Interference Score (Double-Blind Phase)2.4 ± 2.102.4 ± 2.05
SecondaryQuality of Life Questionnaire- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) (Single-Blind Phase)

QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. Consists of 5 domains: Physical functioning(Ph Fn)/large fiber (sum of item 8, 11, 13-15, 24, 27-35; range -4 to 56); Activities of daily living (sum of item 12, 22, 23, 25, 26; range 0 to 20); Symptoms (sum of item 1-7, 9; range 0 to 32); Small fiber (sum of item 10, 16, 17, 18; range 0 to 16); Autonomic (sum of item 19, 20, 21; range 0 to 12) and total QOL score (sum of items 1-35) range: -4 to 136. Higher score implied worse QOL.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life Questionnaire- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) (Single-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin SB
SB Baseline: Total QOL Scores (n= 665)42.6 ± 22.22
SB Baseline: Ph Fn/Large Fiber (n= 665)23.9 ± 13.07
SB Baseline: Activities of Daily Living (n= 665)3.2 ± 3.69
SB Baseline: Symptoms (n= 665)10.8 ± 5.55
SB Baseline: Small Fiber (n= 665)3.4 ± 3.40
SB Baseline: Autonomic (n= 665)1.3 ± 1.74
Week 6: Total QOL Scores (n= 618)29.3 ± 21.76
Week 6: Ph Fn/Large Fiber (n= 618)15.8 ± 12.62
Week 6: Activities of Daily Living (n= 618)2.2 ± 3.08
Week 6: Symptoms (n= 618)7.8 ± 5.72
Week 6: Small Fiber (n= 618)2.3 ± 2.99
Week 6: Autonomic (n= 618)1.1 ± 1.69
SecondaryQuality of Life Questionnaire- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) (Double-Blind Phase)

QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. Consists of 5 domains: Physical functioning(Ph Fn)/large fiber (sum of item 8, 11, 13-15, 24, 27-35; range -4 to 56); Activities of daily living (sum of item 12, 22, 23, 25, 26; range 0 to 20); Symptoms (sum of item 1-7, 9; range 0 to 32); Small fiber (sum of item 10, 16, 17, 18; range 0 to 16); Autonomic (sum of item 19, 20, 21; range 0 to 12) and total QOL score (sum of items 1-35) range: -4 to 136. Higher score implied worse QOL.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life Questionnaire- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) (Double-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
Total QOL Scores21.9 ± 20.0224.1 ± 21.06
Ph Fn/Large Fiber11.4 ± 11.2812.9 ± 12.72
Activities of Daily Living1.8 ± 2.851.8 ± 2.79
Symptoms6.1 ± 5.046.6 ± 5.29
Small Fiber1.8 ± 3.381.7 ± 2.50
Autonomic0.9 ± 1.551.1 ± 1.53
SecondaryPain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Single-Blind Phase)

Participants rated their pain on a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Single-Blind Phase)
mmPregabalin SB
SB Baseline (n= 665)68.1 ± 13.79
Week 6 (n= 621)39.8 ± 23.19
SecondaryPain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Double-Blind Phase)

Participants rated their pain on a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Double-Blind Phase)
mmPregabalin DBPlacebo
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Double-Blind Phase)25.3 ± 20.9830.1 ± 23.44
SecondaryBrief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) (Single-Blind Phase)

BPI-sf: self-administered questionnaire developed to assess severity, impact of pain on daily functions, consisted of 5 questions. Questions 1-4 measured the severity of pain based on pain experienced over the past 24-hours on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to10 (worst possible pain). Question 5: 7 item subsets that measured level of interference of pain on daily functions on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) (Single-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin SB
SB Baseline: Pain Severity (n= 665)6.1 ± 1.45
SB Baseline: Pain Interference (n= 665)5.2 ± 2.09
Week 6: Pain Severity (n= 637)3.9 ± 2.13
Week 6: Pain Interference (n= 637)3.1 ± 2.31
SecondaryBrief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) (Double-Blind Phase)

BPI-sf: self-administered questionnaire developed to assess severity, impact of pain on daily functions, consisted of 5 questions. Questions 1-4 measured the severity of pain based on pain experienced over the past 24-hours on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to10 (worst possible pain). Question 5: 7 item subsets that measured level of interference of pain on daily functions on an 11-point scale ranged from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) (Double-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
Pain Severity2.6 ± 1.853.0 ± 2.03
Pain Interference2.0 ± 2.052.4 ± 2.10
SecondaryHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Single-Blind Phase)

HADS: self-administered questionnaire, consists of 2 sub-scales; measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and depression (HADS-D). Each sub-scale consists of 7 items on which participants responded as to how each item applies to them on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range for each sub-scale = 0 to 21, where higher score indicates more severe anxiety or depression.

Time frame:
SB Baseline, Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Single-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin SB
SB Baseline: HADS-A (n= 663)5.8 ± 3.95
SB Baseline: HADS-D (n= 663)5.3 ± 3.70
Week 6: HADS-A (n= 616)4.6 ± 3.54
Week 6: HADS-D (n= 616)4.0 ± 3.52
SecondaryHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Double-Blind Phase)

HADS: self-administered questionnaire, consists of 2 sub-scales; measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and depression (HADS-D). Each sub-scale consists of 7 items on which participants responded as to how each item applies to them on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range for each sub-scale = 0 to 21, where higher score indicates more severe anxiety or depression.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Double-Blind Phase)
units on a scalePregabalin DBPlacebo
HADS-A3.8 ± 2.944.3 ± 3.56
HADS-D3.3 ± 3.123.5 ± 3.28
SecondaryPatient Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) (Single-Blind Phase)

GESM: single-item, self-administered treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Participants answered "how would you rate the study medication you received for pain?" on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 7 (very dissatisfied). Number of participants in each category are reported.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) (Single-Blind Phase)
participantsPregabalin SB
Very Satisfied241
Somewhat Satisfied181
Slightly Satisfied66
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied71
Slightly Dissatisfied22
Somewhat Dissatisfied21
Very Dissatisfied19
SecondaryPatient Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) (Double-Blind Phase)

GESM: single-item, self-administered treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Participants answered "how would you rate the study medication you received for pain?" on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 7 (very dissatisfied). Number of participants in each category are reported.

Time frame:
Week 19
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM) (Double-Blind Phase)
participantsPregabalin DBPlacebo
Very Satisfied8064
Somewhat Satisfied3536
Slightly Satisfied914
Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied610
Slightly Dissatisfied52
Somewhat Dissatisfied16
Very Dissatisfied22

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pregabalin SB—17/665 (2.6%)331/665 (49.8%)
Pregabalin DB—11/147 (7.5%)86/147 (58.5%)
Placebo—6/149 (4%)94/149 (63.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 42
Most frequent serious events
EventPregabalin SBPregabalin DBPlacebo
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/6652/1470/149
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders0/6651/1470/149
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/6651/1470/149
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/6651/1470/149
Chest painGeneral disorders1/6651/1470/149
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders0/6651/1470/149
GangreneInfections and infestations0/6651/1470/149
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/6651/1470/149
SepsisInfections and infestations0/6651/1470/149
TracheitisInfections and infestations0/6651/1470/149
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 277
Most frequent other events
EventPregabalin SBPregabalin DBPlacebo
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders53/66520/14716/149
DizzinessNervous system disorders45/6654/1472/149
SomnolenceNervous system disorders38/6656/1475/149
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders19/6653/1478/149
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations11/6657/1477/149
HeadacheNervous system disorders29/6654/1474/149
OedemaGeneral disorders10/6656/1475/149
Weight increasedInvestigations11/6656/1473/149
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders15/6655/1476/149
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders12/6655/1473/149

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Pregabalin SB
18 to 44 Years58
45 to 64 Years417
>=65 Years190
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pregabalin SB
Female302
Male363
08

Study locations

172 sites
  • Greystone Medical Research, LLC
    Birmingham, Alabama 35242, United States
  • Neurology Clinic, PC
    Northport, Alabama 35476, United States
  • Horizon Clinical Research Associates, PLLC
    Gilbert, Arizona 85295, United States
  • Dedicated Clinical Research, Inc.
    Goodyear, Arizona 85395, United States
  • Dedicated Clinical Research
    Goodyear, Arizona 85395, United States
  • Novara Clinical Research
    Mesa, Arizona 85206, United States
  • Arizona Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85023, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Genova Clinical Research, Inc.
    Tucson, Arizona 85704, United States
  • Central Arkansas Research
    Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913, United States
  • Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Convergys Clinical Research, Inc.
    Anaheim, California 92805, United States
  • Providence Clinical Research
    Burbank, California 91505, United States
  • Valley Research
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • Center for United Research, Inc.
    Lakewood, California 90712, United States
  • Healthcare Partners Medical Group
    Los Angeles, California 90015, United States
  • University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Department of Neurology
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Richard S. Cherlin, MD
    Los Gatos, California 95032, United States
  • Northridge Neurological Research
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • Remek Research
    Pomona, California 91767, United States
  • Sierra Clinical Research
    Roseville, California 95661, United States
  • CNRI-San Diego, LLC
    San Diego, California 92102, United States
  • San Diego Clinical Trials
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • Center for Clinical Research, Inc.
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Apex Research Institute
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Neurological Research Institute
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Diablo Clinical Research, Inc.
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • Foothills Pain Management
    West Covina, California 91790, United States
  • Aurora Family Medicine Center, PC
    Aurora, Colorado 80012, United States
  • Alpine Clinical Research Center, Inc.
    Boulder, Colorado 80304, United States
  • Mountain View Clinical Research
    Denver, Colorado 80209, United States
  • Chase Medical Research, LLC
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.
    Boynton Beach, Florida 33472, United States
  • Bradenton Research Center
    Bradenton, Florida 34205, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Brooksville, Florida 34601, United States
  • Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • Deerfield Beach Cardiology Research
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442, United States
  • Gulfcoast Clinical Research Center
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912, United States
  • MD Clinical
    Hallandale Beach, Florida 33009, United States
  • Elite Research Institute
    Miami, Florida 33169, United States
  • Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc.
    New Port Richey, Florida 34652, United States
  • Laszlo J. Mate, MD
    North Palm Beach, Florida 33408, United States
  • Family Care Specialists, Inc.
    Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • Renstar Medical Research
    Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • Compass Research, LLC
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Palm Beach Neurological Center, Advanced Research Consultants, Inc.
    Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33418, United States
  • Suncoast Clinical Research
    Palm Harbor, Florida 34684, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33709, United States
  • Neurology Clinical Research, Inc.
    Sunrise, Florida 33351, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Clinical Research of Central Florida
    Winter Haven, Florida 33880, United States
  • NeuroTrials Research, Incorporated
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • CPM Research Institute
    Austell, Georgia 30106, United States
  • Columbus Research Foundation
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Rockdale Medical Research Associates
    Conyers, Georgia 30094, United States
  • Prism Research Group
    Rome, Georgia 30165, United States
  • Valley Health Care
    Rome, Georgia 30165, United States
  • East-West Medical Research Institute
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96814, United States
  • Advanced Clinical Research
    Meridian, Idaho 83642, United States
  • AMR Sakeena Research
    Aurora, Illinois 60504, United States
  • Chicago Research Center, Inc.
    Chicago, Illinois 60634, United States
  • American Medical Research, Inc.
    Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, United States
  • MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
    Evansville, Indiana 47714, United States
  • American Health Network
    Greenfield, Indiana 46140, United States
  • Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Heartland Research Associates, LLC
    Wichita, Kansas 67207, United States
  • Kentucky Medical Research Center
    Lexington, Kentucky 40504, United States
  • Endocrinology Center of Southwest Louisiana
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Heartland Research, LLC
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Primary Physician Care, LLC
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Arthritis and Diabetes Clinic, Inc
    Monroe, Louisiana 71203, United States
  • Miray Medical Center
    Brockton, Massachusetts 02301, United States
  • Clinical Research Center of Cape Cod, Inc.
    Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601, United States
  • MedVadis Research Corporation
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, United States
  • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, United States
  • Michigan Head Pain and Neurological Institute
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, United States
  • Harris and Associates MD, PC
    Detroit, Michigan 48235, United States
  • Borgess Diabetes Center
    Kalamazoo, Michigan 49048, United States
  • Borgess Research Institute
    Kalamazoo, Michigan 49048, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • KMED Research
    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan 48081, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Troy, Michigan 48085, United States
  • Troy Internal Medicine, PC
    Troy, Michigan 48098, United States
  • MAPS Applied Research Center, Inc.
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • Medical Advanced Pain Specialists (MAPS)
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • Medical Advanced Pain Specialists
    Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369, United States
  • Medical Advanced Pain Specialists
    Shakopee, Minnesota 55379, United States
  • CRC of Jackson
    Jackson, Mississippi 39202, United States
  • Physician's Surgery Center
    Jackson, Mississippi 39202, United States
  • Randall T. Huling, Jr., MD, CPI
    Olive Branch, Mississippi 38654, United States
  • University of Missouri Healthcare/Cosmopolitan Diabetes and Endocrinology Center
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
  • Melinda A. Crockett-Maples
    Marionville, Missouri 65705, United States
  • A & A Pain Institute of Saint Louis
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Mercy Health Research
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Clinvest
    Springfield, Missouri 65807, United States
  • Lincoln Internal Medicine Associates
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68516, United States

Showing the first 100 of 172 sites across 4 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Raskin P, Huffman C, Toth C, Asmus MJ, Messig M, Sanchez RJ, Pauer L. Pregabalin in patients with inadequately treated painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomized withdrawal trial. Clin J Pain. 2014 May;30(5):379-90. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31829ea1a1. PubMed 23887339 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01057693
Lead sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2010
Start date
Mar 31, 2010
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2012
Completion
Jan 30, 2012
Results posted
Feb 22, 2013
Last update
Jan 20, 2021

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion