CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01057225Updated Dec 12, 2017Results posted

Cyclophosphamide, Carfilzomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Active Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of carfilzomib and cyclophosphamide in Multiple Myeloma, Stage I Multiple Myeloma and Stage II Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-12.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Carfilzomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Thalidomide may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Giving combination chemotherapy together with carfilzomib and thalidomide may kill more cancer cells.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of carfilzomib when given together with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in treating patients with newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To establish the maximum tolerated dose of carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone. (Phase I) II. In newly diagnosed myeloma to evaluate the response rate (CR, nCR, and VGPR) to carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone after four 28 day cycles. (Phase II)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine the overall response rate (CR, nCR, PR) after 4, 8, 12 cycles. II. Determine the duration of progression-free and overall survival for patients receiving this regimen.

III. To evaluate the incidence of toxicities for this regimen. IV. To evaluate the ability to successfully collect peripheral blood stem cells following four months of combination therapy.

OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose escalation study of carfilzomib followed by a phase II study.

Patients receive carfilzomib IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; oral cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8, and 15; oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and oral thalidomide on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 3 months, then every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for up to 3 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Stage I Multiple Myeloma
  • Stage II Multiple Myeloma
  • Stage III Multiple Myeloma
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Creatinine =\< 2 mg/dL
  • Calculated Creatinine Clearance >= 30 mL/min
  • Total Bilirubin =\< 2.0 mg/dL
  • Alkaline Phosphatase =\< 3 x ULN
  • ALT =\< 3 x ULN
  • Absolute neutrophil count >= 1000/uL
  • Platelet >= 75000/uL
  • Hemoglobin >= 8.0 g/dL
  • Untreated symptomatic myeloma: Prior non-systemic therapy for the treatment of solitary plasmacytoma is permitted, but >= 1 month should have elapsed from the last day of radiation; prior therapy with clarithromycin, DHEA, anakinra, pamidronate or zoledronic acid is permitted; any additional agents not listed must be approved by the Principal Investigator
  • Prior high dose corticosteroid therapy for twelve days (480 mg total dose) or less is permitted for emergent complications from newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
  • Measurable disease of multiple myeloma, as defined by at least ONE of the following:
  • Serum monoclonal protein >= 1.0 g by protein electrophoresis
  • OR > 200 mg of monoclonal protein in the urine on 24 hour electrophoresis
  • OR serum immunoglobulin free light chain >= 10 mg/dL AND abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa to lambda free light chain ratio; OR monoclonal bone marrow plasmacytosis >= 30% (evaluable disease)
  • ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1, 2; ECOG PS of 3 will be allowed if secondary to pain in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Willingness and able to provide informed written consent
  • Negative serum pregnancy test done =\< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
  • Willingness to return to Mayo Clinic enrolling institution for follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion

  • MGUS or smoldering myeloma
  • Peripheral sensory neuropathy >= Grade 2 as defined by CTEP Active Version of the CTCAE
  • Active malignancy with the exception of non melanoma skin cancer or in situ cervical or breast cancer
  • Pregnant women or women of reproductive ability who are unwilling to use effective contraception
  • Nursing women
  • Men who are unwilling to use a condom (even if they have undergone a prior vasectomy) while having intercourse with any woman, while taking the drug and for 4 weeks after stopping treatment
  • Known hypersensitivity, allergy or inability to tolerate any of the agents employed
  • Active, uncontrolled infection
  • Severe cardiac comorbidity
  • New York Heart Association Class III or IV Heart Failure
  • Recent history of myocardial infarction in the six months prior to registration
  • Uncontrolled angina or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia
  • Severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias or electrocardiographic evidence of active conduction system abnormalities
  • Cardiac amyloidosis with hypotension (systolic BP less than 100 mmHg)
  • Other concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or any ancillary therapy considered investigational; NOTE: Bisphosphonates are considered to be supportive care rather than therapy, and are thus allowed while on protocol treatment
  • The following medications are not permitted during the trial: any other investigational treatment; any cytotoxic chemotherapy; any other systemic anti-neoplastic therapy including, but not limited to, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, or monoclonal antibody therapy
  • Palliative radiation therapy is permitted if clinically indicated and not indicative of progressive disease
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I

    Patients receive carfilzomib IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; oral cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8, and 15; oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and oral thalidomide on days 1-28.

    Drug: carfilzomib · Drug: cyclophosphamide · Drug: thalidomide · Drug: dexamethasone

Interventions

  • Drugcarfilzomib

    Given IV

    Also known as: PR-171

  • Drugcyclophosphamide

    Given orally

    Also known as: CPM, CTX, Cytoxan, Endoxan, Endoxana, Enduxan

  • Drugthalidomide

    Given orally

    Also known as: alpha-phthalimidoglutarimide, Contergan, Kevadon, Synovir, THAL, Thalomid

  • Drugdexamethasone

    Given orally

    Also known as: Aeroseb-Dex, Decaderm, Decadron, Decaspray, DM, DXM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Tolerated Dose (Phase I)

    To establish the maximum tolerated dose of carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone. For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as an adverse event attributed (definitely, probably, possibly) in the first or second cycle for patients enrolled to Dose Levels -1 and 0 and in the first cycle only for patients enrolled to Dose Levels 1 and 2. We are reporting the number of DLTs

    Time frame: From baseline to end of active treatment, up to 12 28-day cycles.

  2. Percentage of Patients Who Have at Least a Confirmed Very Good Partial Response (Phase II)

    The proportion of patients who have at least a confirmed very good partial response will be calculated by taking the number of patients with a very good partial response or a complete response divided by the total number of patients. A complete response is defined as: * Negative immunofixation of the serum and urine * If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, normalization of FLC ratio * \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow * Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas A very good partial response is defined as: * Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or * If at on study, serum measurable, ≥ 90% or greater reduction in serum Mcomponent * Urine M-component \<100 mg per 24 hour

    Time frame: Following the first 4 cycles of treatment (28 day cycles)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (Phase II)

    PFS was defined as the time from registration to progression or death due to any cause. Progression was defined as any one or more of the following: • Increase of 25% from lowest confirmed response in: Serum M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 0.5 g/dl)c Urine M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 200 mg/24 hour) If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be \>10 mg/dl) Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % must be 10%)d Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dl) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder

    Time frame: From baseline to progression or death up to 3 years

  2. Time to Treatment Failure

    The time from the date of registration to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, adverse events, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they were removed from treatment. The distribution of time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier

    Time frame: From baseline to end of active treatment

  3. Stem Cell Collection and Engraftment (Phase II)

    For patients going on to stem cell collection, the total number of CD34 positive cells collected per collection, days to platelets over 20,000 without transfusion and ANC over 1000 will be recorded. If a patient fails to collect adequate stem cells for transplant, this will be recorded as such. The number of patients with successful stem cell mobilization are reported.

    Time frame: Following the first 4 courses of treatment

  4. Complete Response (Phase II)

    In patients continuing beyond 4 cycles the ability to induce complete response will be evaluated at completion of planned therapy.

    Time frame: Following the first 4 courses of treatment

  5. Survival Time (Phase II)

    Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier

    Time frame: From baseline to death

  6. Progression Free Survival (12 Month)

    Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 12 month mark.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Progession Free Survival (24 Month)

    Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 24 month mark.

    Time frame: 24 months

  8. Overall Survival (12 Month)

    12 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to death

  9. Overall Survival (24 Month)

    24 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 24 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to death

07

Results

Posted Sep 23, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase I: Dose Level -1Phase I: Dose Level 0Phase I: Dose Level 1Phase I: Dose Level 2Phase II: Dose Level 0Phase II: Dose Level 1
Started33672223
Completed33672223
Not completed000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximum Tolerated Dose (Phase I)

To establish the maximum tolerated dose of carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone. For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as an adverse event attributed (definitely, probably, possibly) in the first or second cycle for patients enrolled to Dose Levels -1 and 0 and in the first cycle only for patients enrolled to Dose Levels 1 and 2. We are reporting the number of DLTs

Time frame:
From baseline to end of active treatment, up to 12 28-day cycles.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Maximum Tolerated Dose (Phase I)
participantsPhase I: Dose Level -1Phase I: Dose Level 0Phase I: Dose Level 1Phase I: Dose Level 2
Maximum Tolerated Dose (Phase I)0003
Statistical analysis
  • Phase I: Dose Level -1 vs Phase I: Dose Level 0 vs Phase I: Dose Level 1 vs Phase I: Dose Level 2 · Dose level: 1Using a cohort of 3 design, it was determined the maximum tolerated dose of carfilzomib is Dose Level 1: 20 mg/m\^2 for the first cycle and 36 mg/m\^2 for subsequent cycles.
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Have at Least a Confirmed Very Good Partial Response (Phase II)

The proportion of patients who have at least a confirmed very good partial response will be calculated by taking the number of patients with a very good partial response or a complete response divided by the total number of patients. A complete response is defined as: * Negative immunofixation of the serum and urine * If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, normalization of FLC ratio * \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow * Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas A very good partial response is defined as: * Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or * If at on study, serum measurable, ≥ 90% or greater reduction in serum Mcomponent * Urine M-component \<100 mg per 24 hour

Time frame:
Following the first 4 cycles of treatment (28 day cycles)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Have at Least a Confirmed Very Good Partial Response (Phase II)
percentage of participantsArm I
Percentage of Patients Who Have at Least a Confirmed Very Good Partial Response (Phase II)91
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (Phase II)

PFS was defined as the time from registration to progression or death due to any cause. Progression was defined as any one or more of the following: • Increase of 25% from lowest confirmed response in: Serum M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 0.5 g/dl)c Urine M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 200 mg/24 hour) If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be \>10 mg/dl) Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % must be 10%)d Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dl) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder

Time frame:
From baseline to progression or death up to 3 years
Reported as:
Number · months
Progression-free Survival (Phase II)
monthsArm I
Progression-free Survival (Phase II)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryTime to Treatment Failure

The time from the date of registration to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, adverse events, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they were removed from treatment. The distribution of time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier

Time frame:
From baseline to end of active treatment
Reported as:
Number · months
Time to Treatment Failure
monthsArm I
Time to Treatment FailureNA (NA to NA)
SecondaryStem Cell Collection and Engraftment (Phase II)

For patients going on to stem cell collection, the total number of CD34 positive cells collected per collection, days to platelets over 20,000 without transfusion and ANC over 1000 will be recorded. If a patient fails to collect adequate stem cells for transplant, this will be recorded as such. The number of patients with successful stem cell mobilization are reported.

Time frame:
Following the first 4 courses of treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Stem Cell Collection and Engraftment (Phase II)
participantsAll Treated Patients
Stem Cell Collection and Engraftment (Phase II)42
SecondaryComplete Response (Phase II)

In patients continuing beyond 4 cycles the ability to induce complete response will be evaluated at completion of planned therapy.

Time frame:
Following the first 4 courses of treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Complete Response (Phase II)
participantsDose Level -1Dose Level 0Dose Level 1Dose Level 2
Complete Response (Phase II)0230
SecondarySurvival Time (Phase II)

Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier

Time frame:
From baseline to death
Reported as:
Median · months
Survival Time (Phase II)
monthsAll Treated Patients
Survival Time (Phase II)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (12 Month)

Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 12 month mark.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants at 12 months
Progression Free Survival (12 Month)
percentage of participants at 12 monthsAll Treated Patients
Progression Free Survival (12 Month)85 (71 to 93)
SecondaryProgession Free Survival (24 Month)

Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 24 month mark.

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants at 24 months
Progession Free Survival (24 Month)
percentage of participants at 24 monthsAll Treated Patients
Progession Free Survival (24 Month)76 (59 to 87)
SecondaryOverall Survival (12 Month)

12 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 12 months.

Time frame:
From baseline to death
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Overall Survival (12 Month)
percentage of patientsAll Treated Patients
Overall Survival (12 Month)96 (86 to 99)
SecondaryOverall Survival (24 Month)

24 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 24 months.

Time frame:
From baseline to death
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Overall Survival (24 Month)
percentage of patientsAll Treated Patients
Overall Survival (24 Month)96 (86 to 99)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Treated Patients—30/64 (46.9%)64/64 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 54
Most frequent serious events
EventAll Treated Patients
Lung infectionInfections and infestations4/64
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations4/64
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations4/64
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders4/64
Heart failureCardiac disorders3/64
Creatinine increasedInvestigations3/64
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations3/64
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/64
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/64
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/64
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 113
Most frequent other events
EventAll Treated Patients
FatigueGeneral disorders51/64
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders35/64
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations32/64
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations30/64
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders27/64
White blood cell decreasedInvestigations27/64
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations26/64
Creatinine increasedInvestigations24/64
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders24/64
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders23/64

Baseline characteristics

All patients that were eligible and treated for the study were evaluated.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Treated Patients
Median62.5 (27 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Treated Patients
Female30
Male34
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Treated Patients
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American4
White54
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported5
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Treated Patients
United States64
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425-6350, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01057225
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2010
Start date
Mar 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2014
Completion
Sep 5, 2017
Results posted
Sep 23, 2016
Last update
Dec 12, 2017

Study contacts

Joseph R. Mikhael, M.D.
study chair · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion