A Phase 1/2 interventional study of carfilzomib and cyclophosphamide in Multiple Myeloma, Stage I Multiple Myeloma and Stage II Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-12.
Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Carfilzomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Thalidomide may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Giving combination chemotherapy together with carfilzomib and thalidomide may kill more cancer cells.
PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of carfilzomib when given together with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in treating patients with newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To establish the maximum tolerated dose of carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone. (Phase I) II. In newly diagnosed myeloma to evaluate the response rate (CR, nCR, and VGPR) to carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone after four 28 day cycles. (Phase II)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine the overall response rate (CR, nCR, PR) after 4, 8, 12 cycles. II. Determine the duration of progression-free and overall survival for patients receiving this regimen.
III. To evaluate the incidence of toxicities for this regimen. IV. To evaluate the ability to successfully collect peripheral blood stem cells following four months of combination therapy.
OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose escalation study of carfilzomib followed by a phase II study.
Patients receive carfilzomib IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; oral cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8, and 15; oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and oral thalidomide on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 3 months, then every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for up to 3 years.
3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.
Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.
Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion
Patients receive carfilzomib IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; oral cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8, and 15; oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and oral thalidomide on days 1-28.
Drug: carfilzomib · Drug: cyclophosphamide · Drug: thalidomide · Drug: dexamethasone
Given IV
Also known as: PR-171
Given orally
Also known as: CPM, CTX, Cytoxan, Endoxan, Endoxana, Enduxan
Given orally
Also known as: alpha-phthalimidoglutarimide, Contergan, Kevadon, Synovir, THAL, Thalomid
Given orally
Also known as: Aeroseb-Dex, Decaderm, Decadron, Decaspray, DM, DXM
Maximum Tolerated Dose (Phase I)
To establish the maximum tolerated dose of carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone. For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as an adverse event attributed (definitely, probably, possibly) in the first or second cycle for patients enrolled to Dose Levels -1 and 0 and in the first cycle only for patients enrolled to Dose Levels 1 and 2. We are reporting the number of DLTs
Time frame: From baseline to end of active treatment, up to 12 28-day cycles.
Percentage of Patients Who Have at Least a Confirmed Very Good Partial Response (Phase II)
The proportion of patients who have at least a confirmed very good partial response will be calculated by taking the number of patients with a very good partial response or a complete response divided by the total number of patients. A complete response is defined as: * Negative immunofixation of the serum and urine * If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, normalization of FLC ratio * \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow * Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas A very good partial response is defined as: * Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or * If at on study, serum measurable, ≥ 90% or greater reduction in serum Mcomponent * Urine M-component \<100 mg per 24 hour
Time frame: Following the first 4 cycles of treatment (28 day cycles)
Progression-free Survival (Phase II)
PFS was defined as the time from registration to progression or death due to any cause. Progression was defined as any one or more of the following: • Increase of 25% from lowest confirmed response in: Serum M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 0.5 g/dl)c Urine M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 200 mg/24 hour) If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be \>10 mg/dl) Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % must be 10%)d Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dl) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder
Time frame: From baseline to progression or death up to 3 years
Time to Treatment Failure
The time from the date of registration to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, adverse events, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they were removed from treatment. The distribution of time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier
Time frame: From baseline to end of active treatment
Stem Cell Collection and Engraftment (Phase II)
For patients going on to stem cell collection, the total number of CD34 positive cells collected per collection, days to platelets over 20,000 without transfusion and ANC over 1000 will be recorded. If a patient fails to collect adequate stem cells for transplant, this will be recorded as such. The number of patients with successful stem cell mobilization are reported.
Time frame: Following the first 4 courses of treatment
Complete Response (Phase II)
In patients continuing beyond 4 cycles the ability to induce complete response will be evaluated at completion of planned therapy.
Time frame: Following the first 4 courses of treatment
Survival Time (Phase II)
Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier
Time frame: From baseline to death
Progression Free Survival (12 Month)
Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 12 month mark.
Time frame: 12 months
Progession Free Survival (24 Month)
Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 24 month mark.
Time frame: 24 months
Overall Survival (12 Month)
12 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 12 months.
Time frame: From baseline to death
Overall Survival (24 Month)
24 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 24 months.
Time frame: From baseline to death
| Milestone | Phase I: Dose Level -1 | Phase I: Dose Level 0 | Phase I: Dose Level 1 | Phase I: Dose Level 2 | Phase II: Dose Level 0 | Phase II: Dose Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 22 | 23 |
| Completed | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 22 | 23 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
To establish the maximum tolerated dose of carfilzomib given in combination with oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide and dexamethasone. For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as an adverse event attributed (definitely, probably, possibly) in the first or second cycle for patients enrolled to Dose Levels -1 and 0 and in the first cycle only for patients enrolled to Dose Levels 1 and 2. We are reporting the number of DLTs
| participants | Phase I: Dose Level -1 | Phase I: Dose Level 0 | Phase I: Dose Level 1 | Phase I: Dose Level 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Tolerated Dose (Phase I) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
The proportion of patients who have at least a confirmed very good partial response will be calculated by taking the number of patients with a very good partial response or a complete response divided by the total number of patients. A complete response is defined as: * Negative immunofixation of the serum and urine * If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, normalization of FLC ratio * \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow * Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas A very good partial response is defined as: * Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or * If at on study, serum measurable, ≥ 90% or greater reduction in serum Mcomponent * Urine M-component \<100 mg per 24 hour
| percentage of participants | Arm I |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Who Have at Least a Confirmed Very Good Partial Response (Phase II) | 91 |
PFS was defined as the time from registration to progression or death due to any cause. Progression was defined as any one or more of the following: • Increase of 25% from lowest confirmed response in: Serum M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 0.5 g/dl)c Urine M-component (absolute increase must be ≥ 200 mg/24 hour) If at on study, only the measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC, the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be \>10 mg/dl) Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % must be 10%)d Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dl) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder
| months | Arm I |
|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (Phase II) | NA (NA to NA) |
The time from the date of registration to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, adverse events, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they were removed from treatment. The distribution of time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier
| months | Arm I |
|---|---|
| Time to Treatment Failure | NA (NA to NA) |
For patients going on to stem cell collection, the total number of CD34 positive cells collected per collection, days to platelets over 20,000 without transfusion and ANC over 1000 will be recorded. If a patient fails to collect adequate stem cells for transplant, this will be recorded as such. The number of patients with successful stem cell mobilization are reported.
| participants | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Stem Cell Collection and Engraftment (Phase II) | 42 |
In patients continuing beyond 4 cycles the ability to induce complete response will be evaluated at completion of planned therapy.
| participants | Dose Level -1 | Dose Level 0 | Dose Level 1 | Dose Level 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Response (Phase II) | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier
| months | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Survival Time (Phase II) | NA (NA to NA) |
Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 12 month mark.
| percentage of participants at 12 months | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (12 Month) | 85 (71 to 93) |
Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had disease progression at the time of their death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression 1 day post-registration. This is reported as the percentage of patients alive and progression free at the 24 month mark.
| percentage of participants at 24 months | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Progession Free Survival (24 Month) | 76 (59 to 87) |
12 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 12 months.
| percentage of patients | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Overall Survival (12 Month) | 96 (86 to 99) |
24 Month Overall survival is defined as the proportion of patients to still be alive after 24 months.
| percentage of patients | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Overall Survival (24 Month) | 96 (86 to 99) |
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Treated Patients | — | 30/64 (46.9%) | 64/64 (100%) |
| Event | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Lung infectionInfections and infestations | 4/64 |
| Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 4/64 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 4/64 |
| Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders | 4/64 |
| Heart failureCardiac disorders | 3/64 |
| Creatinine increasedInvestigations | 3/64 |
| Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations | 3/64 |
| HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 3/64 |
| HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 3/64 |
| AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 2/64 |
| Event | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 51/64 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 35/64 |
| Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations | 32/64 |
| Platelet count decreasedInvestigations | 30/64 |
| AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 27/64 |
| White blood cell decreasedInvestigations | 27/64 |
| Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations | 26/64 |
| Creatinine increasedInvestigations | 24/64 |
| HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 24/64 |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders | 23/64 |
All patients that were eligible and treated for the study were evaluated.
| Age, Continuous(years) | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Median | 62.5 (27 to 82) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| Female | 30 |
| Male | 34 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
| Asian | 1 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 4 |
| White | 54 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 5 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | All Treated Patients |
|---|---|
| United States | 64 |
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mayo Clinic