CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01050231Updated Apr 19, 2021Results posted

Robotics For Rehabilitation Therapy: Functional Versus Individual Joint Training

An interventional study of Functional/ Multi-joints activities and Individual Joint Training in Cerebrovascular Accident, sponsored by University of California, Irvine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 73 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-19.

Sponsored by University of California, Irvine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 73 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to develop an upper extremity robotic training system for use by people with stroke to practice arm and hand movement in the clinic.

Read the detailed description

Each year in the U.S. over 400,000 people survive a stroke and approximately 80% of acute stroke survivors lose arm and hand movement skills. Movement impairments are typically treated with intensive, hands-on physical and occupational therapy for several weeks after the initial brain injury. Unfortunately, due to economic pressure on the U.S. health care system, stroke patients are receiving less therapy and going home sooner. Our goal for this study is to develop an upper extremity robotic training system for both acute and chronic stroke population to improve movement ability with intensive and repetitive movement in the clinic without continuous supervision from a therapist.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebrovascular Accident

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • cerebrovascular accident
  • robot
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Irvine is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Of its 41 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 73 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 73
  • Sustained single stroke at least three months previously
  • Minimal to moderate lost motor control of the arm after stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent severe medical problems
  • Severe cognitive dysfunction
  • Severe neglect or apraxia
  • Severe visual deficits
  • Significant subluxation of the shoulder
  • Presence of severe elbow or wrist contracture
  • Any metal implants or surgical clips or mechanical devices
  • Metallic hardware on scalp region
  • prior diagnosis of seizure and epilepsy
  • severe migraine headache
  • currently pregnant or lactating
  • claustrophobic
  • currently taking medication that lower seizure threshold
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robotic group (Type I)

    Type I Robotic Therapy (Functional activities first) Participants in this group will participate in functional/task-oriented multi-joint training with the BONES robot first, followed by individual joint training with the BONES robot. A one-week break was provided between interventions.

    Device: Functional/ Multi-joints activities · Device: Individual Joint Training

  • Active comparator
    Robotic group (Type II)

    Type II Robotic Therapy (Individual joints first) Participants in this group will participate in individual joint training with the BONES robot first, followed by functional/task-oriented multi-joint training with the BONES robot. A one-week break was provided between interventions.

    Device: Functional/ Multi-joints activities · Device: Individual Joint Training

Interventions

  • DeviceFunctional/ Multi-joints activities

    Subjects participated in 4 weeks of robotic training with the device: BONES (Biomimetic Orthosis Neurorehabilitation for Elbow and Shoulder), 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with the robotic exercise program focusing on functional tasks such as cleaning the windows, driving a steering wheel, grocery shopping, etc.

  • DeviceIndividual Joint Training

    Subjects participated in 4 weeks of training with the robotic device BONES, 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with a robot-assisted exercise program. The robotic exoskeleton assists in arm and hand movements focusing on one joint at a time.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Box & Blocks Test

    We measured the Box and Blocks Test scores at baseline evaluation, after each intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post first intervention at 5 weeks, post second intervention at 11 weeks, and 3-month after the completion of the second intervention.

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIndividual Joints and Functional Multi-joints TasksFunctional Multi-joints Activities and Individual Joints
Started1010
Completed1010
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryBox & Blocks Test

We measured the Box and Blocks Test scores at baseline evaluation, after each intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Post first intervention at 5 weeks, post second intervention at 11 weeks, and 3-month after the completion of the second intervention.
Reported as:
Mean · blocks
Box & Blocks Test
blocksFunctional Multi-joint Training Then Individual Joint TrainingIndividual Joint Training Then Functional Multi-joint Training
Baseline evaluation25 ± 1136 ± 14
Post 1st Intervention29 ± 1842 ± 14
Post 2nd Intervention31 ± 1143 ± 13
3-month follow up evaluation28 ± 546 ± 9

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Individual Joints0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Functional Multi-Joint Activities0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Type I Robotic Therapy (Functional Activities Then Individual Joint Exercises)Type II Robotic Therapy (Individual Joints Exercises Then Functional Activities)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7916
>=65 years314
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Type I Robotic Therapy (Functional Activities Then Individual Joint Exercises)Type II Robotic Therapy (Individual Joints Exercises Then Functional Activities)Total
Mean60 ± 760 ± 760 ± 7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Type I Robotic Therapy (Functional Activities Then Individual Joint Exercises)Type II Robotic Therapy (Individual Joints Exercises Then Functional Activities)Total
Female6410
Male4610
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Type I Robotic Therapy (Functional Activities Then Individual Joint Exercises)Type II Robotic Therapy (Individual Joints Exercises Then Functional Activities)Total
United States101020
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Irvine
    Irvine, California 92697, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Milot MH, Spencer SJ, Chan V, Allington JP, Klein J, Chou C, Bobrow JE, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Dec 19;10:112. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-112. PubMed 24354476 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01050231
Lead sponsor
University of California, Irvine
Responsible party
David Reinkensmeyer (Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2010
Start date
Oct 2006
Primary completion
Jan 2012
Completion
Jan 2012
Results posted
Mar 18, 2021
Last update
Apr 19, 2021

Study contacts

David J Reinkensmeyer, Ph.D
principal investigator · University of California, Irvine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion