CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01049217Updated Jan 28, 2021Results posted

Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy

A Phase 3 interventional study of pregabalin and placebo in Neuropathy, sponsored by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.. Terminated at 63 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-28.

Sponsored by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
See termination reason in detailed description.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
377
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy.

Read the detailed description

Based on DMC interim efficacy analysis results indicating a low probability for success the study was terminated on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact patient health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuropathy

Keywords

  • neuropathy
  • pain
  • HIV-1
  • HIV Infections
03

In context

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 377 is above the median of 60 across 768 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Peripheral Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. is the lead sponsor of 431 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women, ages of 18 or greater
  • Documented evidence of HIV-1 infection
  • Documented diagnosis of HIV-associated Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy (DSP) with subjective sensory symptom of pain
  • Pain starts in the feet

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has untreated vitamin B12 deficiency (serum B12 level \<200 pg/ml) or if treated B12 deficiency -treatment is less than 6 months of B12 supplementation (injection or intranasal B12) prior to screening
  • Diabetes mellitus requiring regular medical treatment (other than diet and exercise) or HbA1C >6.9
  • Subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain that is not associated with HIV infection; including subjects with conditions such as: Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), familial neuropathies; compression related neuropathy, radicular pain, other infection related neuropathies (eg, leprosy); neuropathy related to: metabolic abnormalities; nutritional factors; vascular insults; inflammation; autoimmune disease; and malignancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
377 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active drug

    Drug: pregabalin

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugpregabalin

    Pregabalin 75 mg-300mg twice daily during the course of the study.

  • Drugplacebo

    Subjects may be assigned to placebo during this study. The study duration is approximately 19 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method, modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF).

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category is reported.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

    The CGIC scale measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition at final visit in terms of change relative to the start of treatment (CGIC). At final visit, the participants CGIC will be categorized into a three point scale as: improvement: CGI response of very much improved, much improved or minimally improved; no change: CGI response of no change; worsening: CGI response of very much worse, much worse or minimally worse. Number of participants in each category is reported.

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how HIV neuropathy pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  4. Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Weekly current pain score was defined as the mean of the daily current pain diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated current ("right now") HIV neuropathy pain an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  5. Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    BPI-sf:5-item self-administered questionnaire to assess severity,impact of pain on daily functions. Pain Severity Index (PSI):average of Question 1-4 each measured severity of pain over past 24-hours on 11-point scale (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain). Pain Interference Index (PII):average of 7 pain interference items of Question 5 that measured level of interference of pain on daily function on 11-point scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). For PSI, PII range:0-10 higher score=higher pain/interference. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  6. Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors and 2 temporal items. Results reported for the 10 descriptors (burning, squeezing, pressure, electric shocks, stabbing, light touching of area, pressure of area, cold of area, pins and needles, tingling) quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) scale. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  7. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors, and 2 temporal items. Results reported for categorical change in temporal items assessed on 5-point scale for duration of spontaneous pain (1=continuously, 2=8-12 hours \[hrs\], 3=4-7 hrs, 4=1-3 hrs, 5=less than 1 hr), numbers of pain attacks (1=more than 20, 2=11-20 attacks, 3=6-10 attacks, 4=1-5 attacks, 5=no attack). Change data categorized as worsened (negative change), unchanged (no change), and improved (positive change). Endpoint=last observation as per imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  8. Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (subscales: burning \[superficial\] spontaneous pain, pressing \[deep\] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia \[P/D\]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. The relevant subscales and total score were transformed to 0-1, higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  9. Total Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)

    Total sleep time is the number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening and MIS is the number of minutes spent awake after sleep onset to final awakening. TST and MIS were determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  10. Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)

    SFI is a measure to quantify sleep restlessness. SFI calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. SFI determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  11. Sleep Efficiency

    Sleep efficiency is the time spent asleep divided by total time between sleep onset and sleep end, multiplied by 100. Sleep efficiency was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  12. Total Activity Counts

    Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the "day" (non sleep period). A total activity count was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  13. Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level

    Percentage of time above sedentary level is number of epochs (60 seconds) with greater than (\>) 200 activity counts per minute divided by total number of epochs during the "day" (non sleep period) multiplied by 100. This was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  14. Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  15. Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep

    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  16. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  17. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical \[R-P\], role-emotional \[R-E\]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

    Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  18. Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which specific health problem (SHP) affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded "Yes/No" to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17

  19. Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days. A participant who had responded 'no' to question 1 regarding employment status reported hours of work and as this was a self-reported questionnaire the source data were included.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17

  20. Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17

  21. Diagnostic Neuropathy Assessment

    Time frame: Screening

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose

  2. Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Findings

    Laboratory tests included hematology, chemistry, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) count, HIV plasma viral load, B12, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL), toxic screens for drugs and alcohol, reflex thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), urinalysis. Number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time was reported.

    Time frame: Screening up to Week 17

  3. Number of Participants With Positive Serum and Urine Pregnancy

    Serum pregnancy test (regardless of childbearing potential) and urine pregnancy test for all female participants were performed.

    Time frame: Screening for serum pregnancy test, Week 1 for urine pregnancy test

  4. Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings

    A physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, chest, pulses, pulmonary, cardiovascular, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, abdominal, and extremities.

    Time frame: Screening, Week 8, 17

  5. Body Weight

    Time frame: Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17

  6. Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle of heart. Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles of heart.

    Time frame: Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17

  7. Sitting Heart Rate

    Time frame: Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17

  8. Number of Participants With Neurological Examination Findings

    A neurological examination consisted of examination of the mental state, cranial nerve function, motor function (reflexes of patellar, achilles, biceps, babinski and coordination) and sensory function (sharp sensation of dorsal surface of right and left great toe, light touch of lower extremities \[LE\], right and left first metatarsal joint position sense, and vibration sensation \[vibration is felt for \< 6 seconds = markedly diminished, 6 to 10 seconds = mild loss, \> 10 seconds = normal\]).

    Time frame: Screening

  9. Number of Participants Who Met Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Criteria

    MINI: short structured clinical interview to make diagnoses of psychiatric disorders according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) or International Classifications of Disease-10 (ICD-10). In the MINI Modules, participants were asked a series of Yes/No questions.

    Time frame: Screening

  10. Number of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories

    S-STS:8-item clinician/participant administered prospective rating scale to assess TE suicidal(Su) ideation(ID),behavior(BHV).Items 1a,2-6,7a,8 scored on 5-point Likert scale 0(not at all) to 4(extremely). Items 1,1b,7 require yes/no response. S-STS total score range 0-30. Lower score=reduced Su tendency. Responses on S-STS were mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA) as 1:Completed Su; 2: Su attempt; 3: Preparatory acts; 4: Su ID; 5: Self-injurious (SI) BHV, intent unknown; 6: Not enough information; 7: SI BHV, no Su intent; 8: Other, no deliberate self harm.

    Time frame: Screening, Post-Baseline (Week 4 up to Week 17)

  11. Number of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)

    PHQ-8: 8-item self-administered validated subset of PHQ-9, which comprises first 8 items of measure. Participant rated "Over past 2 weeks, how often bothered by any of following problems?": little interest in doing things(1); feeling down(2); trouble falling or staying asleep/sleeping too much(3); feeling tired(4); poor appetite/overeating(5); feeling bad about self(6); trouble concentrating(7); moving or speaking slowly or being so fidgety/moving around more than usual (8). Each item scored on scale of 0(not at all)-3(nearly every day). Total score range: 0-24, higher score=greater severity.

    Time frame: Screening

07

Results

Posted Jul 17, 2013
Limitations and caveats
Based on Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) interim efficacy analysis results indicating a low probability for success, the study was terminated on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact participant health.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePregabalinPlacebo
Started183194
Treated183192
Completed127131
Not completed5663
Withdrew: Adverse event21
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up38
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Withdrew: Protocol violation13
Withdrew: Pregnancy10
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor4343
Withdrew: Other12
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated02

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method, modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF).

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline6.76 ± 1.1946.85 ± 1.222
Change at Endpoint-2.26 ± 2.200-2.36 ± 2.288
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7090 · Least squares (ls) mean difference: 0.07 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.45
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category is reported.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Very Much Improved4251
Much Improved6966
Minimally Improved4236
No Change1317
Minimally Worse52
Much Worse24
Very Much Worse00
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5049
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

The CGIC scale measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition at final visit in terms of change relative to the start of treatment (CGIC). At final visit, the participants CGIC will be categorized into a three point scale as: improvement: CGI response of very much improved, much improved or minimally improved; no change: CGI response of no change; worsening: CGI response of very much worse, much worse or minimally worse. Number of participants in each category is reported.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Very Much Improved4547
Much Improved5953
Minimally Improved4849
No Change1725
Minimally Worse32
Much Worse00
Very Much Worse00
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4271
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how HIV neuropathy pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline (n=183, 191)6.55 ± 1.6436.70 ± 1.456
Change at Week 1 (n=177, 182)-0.48 ± 1.067-0.37 ± 1.003
Change at Week 2 (n=168, 170)-0.85 ± 1.317-0.66 ± 1.292
Change at Week 3 (n=163, 163)-1.09 ± 1.505-0.81 ± 1.373
Change at Week 4 (n=153, 160)-1.42 ± 1.804-1.20 ± 1.665
Change at Week 5 (n=150, 159)-1.81 ± 1.952-1.49 ± 1.824
Change at Week 6 (n=144, 152)-1.95 ± 2.125-1.81 ± 1.903
Change at Week 7 (n=145, 145)-2.06 ± 2.234-1.94 ± 1.987
Change at Week 8 (n=139, 145)-2.01 ± 2.194-2.04 ± 2.103
Change at Week 9 (n=135, 137)-2.45 ± 2.382-2.32 ± 2.154
Change at Week 10 (n=131, 135)-2.48 ± 2.315-2.39 ± 2.175
Change at Week 11 (n=125, 133)-2.56 ± 2.393-2.47 ± 2.207
Change at Week 12 (n=122, 131)-2.69 ± 2.354-2.59 ± 2.291
Change at Week 13 (n=118, 127)-2.73 ± 2.337-2.82 ± 2.262
Change at Week 14 (n=118, 129)-2.81 ± 2.442-2.90 ± 2.346
Change at Week 15 (n=117, 127)-2.90 ± 2.438-2.95 ± 2.325
Change at Week 16 (n=103, 121)-3.14 ± 2.475-2.94 ± 2.324
Change at Endpoint (n=183, 189)-2.40 ± 2.323-2.43 ± 2.296
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2084 · Ls mean difference: -0.12 · 95% CI -0.31 to 0.07
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1516 · Ls mean difference: -0.18 · 95% CI -0.43 to 0.07
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0468 · Ls mean difference: -0.28 · 95% CI -0.56 to -0.00
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1224 · Ls mean difference: -0.27 · 95% CI -0.62 to 0.07
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0373 · Ls mean difference: -0.39 · 95% CI -0.75 to -0.02
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1660 · Ls mean difference: -0.28 · 95% CI -0.67 to 0.12
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3246 · Ls mean difference: -0.21 · 95% CI -0.63 to 0.21
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4879 · Ls mean difference: -0.15 · 95% CI -0.58 to 0.28
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2669 · Ls mean difference: -0.25 · 95% CI -0.69 to 0.19
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5452 · Ls mean difference: -0.13 · 95% CI -0.56 to 0.30
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5469 · Ls mean difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.59 to 0.31
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7843 · Ls mean difference: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.54 to 0.41
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9008 · Ls mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.50 to 0.44
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9064 · Ls mean difference: 0.03 · 95% CI -0.45 to 0.50
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7205 · Ls mean difference: -0.09 · 95% CI -0.57 to 0.39
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4334 · Ls mean difference: -0.20 · 95% CI -0.71 to 0.31
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8402 · Ls mean difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.43 to 0.35
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Weekly current pain score was defined as the mean of the daily current pain diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated current ("right now") HIV neuropathy pain an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline (n=183, 192)6.66 ± 1.2086.71 ± 1.245
Change at Week 1 (n=181, 190)-0.43 ± 1.000-0.34 ± 0.917
Change at Week 2 (n=174, 179)-0.79 ± 1.236-0.67 ± 1.282
Change at Week 3 (n=170, 172)-1.10 ± 1.440-0.82 ± 1.410
Change at Week 4 (n=158, 169)-1.41 ± 1.682-1.17 ± 1.649
Change at Week 5 (n=157, 166)-1.74 ± 1.893-1.48 ± 1.845
Change at Week 6 (n=152, 157)-1.87 ± 2.042-1.73 ± 1.965
Change at Week 7 (n=153, 153)-1.92 ± 2.074-1.88 ± 2.006
Change at Week 8 (n=148, 153)-2.01 ± 2.106-1.99 ± 2.105
Change at Week 9 (n=143, 148)-2.30 ± 2.199-2.21 ± 2.180
Change at Week 10 (n=138, 142)-2.38 ± 2.172-2.24 ± 2.225
Change at Week 11 (n=132, 136)-2.42 ± 2.250-2.37 ± 2.218
Change at Week 12 (n=128, 135)-2.55 ± 2.241-2.44 ± 2.247
Change at Week 13 (n=126, 133)-2.53 ± 2.241-2.60 ± 2.208
Change at Week 14 (n=124, 131)-2.66 ± 2.307-2.74 ± 2.303
Change at Week 15 (n=120, 132)-2.77 ± 2.283-2.78 ± 2.283
Change at Week 16 (n=111, 128)-2.94 ± 2.370-2.81 ± 2.353
Change at Endpoint (n=183, 191)-2.24 ± 2.239-2.29 ± 2.302
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3098 · Ls mean difference: -0.09 · 95% CI -0.25 to 0.08
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2429 · Ls mean difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.37 to 0.09
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0504 · Ls mean difference: -0.27 · 95% CI -0.54 to 0.00
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1141 · Ls mean difference: -0.26 · 95% CI -0.58 to 0.06
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0667 · Ls mean difference: -0.32 · 95% CI -0.66 to 0.02
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2104 · Ls mean difference: -0.24 · 95% CI -0.61 to 0.13
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4830 · Ls mean difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.53 to 0.25
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5757 · Ls mean difference: -0.11 · 95% CI -0.51 to 0.29
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3231 · Ls mean difference: -0.21 · 95% CI -0.62 to 0.20
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3143 · Ls mean difference: -0.21 · 95% CI -0.63 to 0.20
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6300 · Ls mean difference: -0.11 · 95% CI -0.54 to 0.33
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5752 · Ls mean difference: -0.13 · 95% CI -0.57 to 0.32
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8905 · Ls mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.46 to 0.40
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9991 · Ls mean difference: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.45 to 0.45
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8927 · Ls mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.48 to 0.42
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8067 · Ls mean difference: -0.06 · 95% CI -0.54 to 0.42
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9009 · Ls mean difference: 0.02 · 95% CI -0.35 to 0.40
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

BPI-sf:5-item self-administered questionnaire to assess severity,impact of pain on daily functions. Pain Severity Index (PSI):average of Question 1-4 each measured severity of pain over past 24-hours on 11-point scale (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain). Pain Interference Index (PII):average of 7 pain interference items of Question 5 that measured level of interference of pain on daily function on 11-point scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). For PSI, PII range:0-10 higher score=higher pain/interference. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: PSI (n=182, 192)6.49 ± 1.1756.47 ± 1.292
Change at Week 4: PSI (n=158, 169)-1.55 ± 1.725-1.28 ± 1.811
Change at Week 8: PSI (n=146, 154)-2.15 ± 2.142-2.02 ± 2.117
Change at Week 12: PSI (n=126, 137)-2.49 ± 2.311-2.60 ± 2.169
Change at Week 16: PSI (n=166, 166)-2.38 ± 2.335-2.55 ± 2.354
Change at Endpoint: PSI (n=175,182)-2.36 ± 2.291-2.44 ± 2.334
Baseline: PII (n=182, 192)5.51 ± 1.9635.44 ± 2.013
Change at Week 4: PII (n=158, 169)-1.43 ± 2.068-1.40 ± 2.358
Change at Week 8: PII (n=146, 154)-2.00 ± 2.319-1.97 ± 2.312
Change at Week 12: PII (n=126, 137)-2.32 ± 2.450-2.32 ± 2.183
Change at Week 16: PII (n=166, 165)-2.14 ± 2.434-2.38 ± 2.290
Change at Endpoint: PII (n=175,182)-2.12 ± 2.415-2.31 ± 2.306
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0948 · Ls mean difference: -0.30 · 95% CI -0.64 to 0.05
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4167 · Ls mean difference: -0.17 · 95% CI -0.57 to 0.23
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8179 · Ls mean difference: 0.05 · 95% CI -0.39 to 0.50
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6913 · Ls mean difference: 0.08 · 95% CI -0.33 to 0.50
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9475 · Ls mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.39 to 0.41
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7412 · Ls mean difference: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.47 to 0.33
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9715 · Ls mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.41 to 0.43
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8163 · Ls mean difference: 0.05 · 95% CI -0.38 to 0.48
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3682 · Ls mean difference: 0.18 · 95% CI -0.22 to 0.58
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3511 · Ls mean difference: 0.19 · 95% CI -0.21 to 0.58
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors and 2 temporal items. Results reported for the 10 descriptors (burning, squeezing, pressure, electric shocks, stabbing, light touching of area, pressure of area, cold of area, pins and needles, tingling) quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) scale. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: Burning (n=183, 192)6.1 ± 2.336.2 ± 2.52
Change at Endpoint: Burning (n=173, 176)-2.4 ± 2.91-2.6 ± 3.06
Baseline: Squeezing (n=183, 192)5.3 ± 2.575.2 ± 2.98
Change at Endpoint: Squeezing (n=173, 176)-2.1 ± 3.02-2.1 ± 3.03
Baseline: Pressure (n=183, 192)5.8 ± 2.505.5 ± 2.73
Change at Endpoint: Pressure (n=172, 176)-2.3 ± 3.19-2.2 ± 3.15
Baseline: Electric Shocks (n=183, 192)5.4 ± 2.765.1 ± 2.84
Change at Endpoint: Electric Shocks (n=173, 176)-2.2 ± 3.18-2.0 ± 3.10
Baseline: Stabbing (n=183, 192)5.8 ± 2.466.1 ± 2.58
Change at Endpoint: Stabbing (n=173, 176)-2.2 ± 3.00-2.5 ± 3.11
Baseline: Light Touching (n=183, 192)5.0 ± 2.605.0 ± 2.62
Change at Endpoint: Light Touching (n=173, 176)-1.9 ± 2.91-1.9 ± 3.05
Baseline: Pressure of Area (n=183, 192)6.0 ± 2.126.0 ± 2.25
Change at Endpoint: Pressure of Area (n=173, 176)-2.5 ± 2.75-2.3 ± 2.99
Baseline: Cold of Area (n=183, 192)5.9 ± 2.565.5 ± 2.87
Change at Endpoint: Cold of Area (n=173, 176)-2.2 ± 2.98-2.0 ± 3.07
Baseline: Pins and Needles (n=183, 192)6.7 ± 2.146.6 ± 2.23
Change at Endpoint: Pins and Needles (n=173, 176)-2.6 ± 2.90-2.6 ± 3.12
Baseline: Tingling (n=183, 192)5.8 ± 2.496.1 ± 2.42
Change at Endpoint: Tingling (n=173, 176)-2.1 ± 3.01-2.4 ± 3.09
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9686 · Ls mean difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4476 · Ls mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.3
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5630 · Ls mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.3
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9937 · Ls mean difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8718 · Ls mean difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8241 · Ls mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.4
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3164 · Ls mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.2
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8996 · Ls mean difference: -0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9676 · Ls mean difference: -0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9091 · Ls mean difference: -0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
SecondaryNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors, and 2 temporal items. Results reported for categorical change in temporal items assessed on 5-point scale for duration of spontaneous pain (1=continuously, 2=8-12 hours \[hrs\], 3=4-7 hrs, 4=1-3 hrs, 5=less than 1 hr), numbers of pain attacks (1=more than 20, 2=11-20 attacks, 3=6-10 attacks, 4=1-5 attacks, 5=no attack). Change data categorized as worsened (negative change), unchanged (no change), and improved (positive change). Endpoint=last observation as per imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Worsened (n=173,172)3133
Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Unchanged(n=173,172)5650
Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Improved (n=173,172)8689
Number of Pain Attacks, Worsened (n=173, 176)4025
Number of Pain Attacks, Unchanged (n=173, 176)4954
Number of Pain Attacks, Improved (n=173, 176)8497
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7300
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0559
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (subscales: burning \[superficial\] spontaneous pain, pressing \[deep\] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia \[P/D\]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. The relevant subscales and total score were transformed to 0-1, higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: Burning Pain (n=183, 192)0.61 ± 0.2330.62 ± 0.252
Change at Endpoint: Burning Pain (n=173, 176)-0.24 ± 0.291-0.26 ± 0.306
Baseline: Pressing Pain (n=182, 192)0.55 ± 0.2270.54 ± 0.248
Change at Endpoint: Pressing Pain (n=173, 176)-0.22 ± 0.280-0.21 ± 0.279
Baseline: Paroxysmal Pain (n=183, 192)0.56 ± 0.2270.56 ± 0.236
Change at Endpoint: Paroxysmal Pain (n=173, 176)-0.22 ± 0.272-0.23 ± 0.279
Baseline: Evoked Pain (n=183, 192)0.57 ± 0.2020.55 ± 0.206
Change at Endpoint: Evoked Pain (n=173, 176)-0.22 ± 0.243-0.21 ± 0.253
Baseline: P/D (n=183, 192)0.62 ± 0.2110.63 ± 0.199
Change at Endpoint: P/D (n=173, 176)-0.23 ± 0.282-0.25 ± 0.277
Baseline: Total Score (n=182, 192)0.58 ± 0.1730.57 ± 0.175
Change at Endpoint: Total Score (n=173,176)-0.22 ± 0.231-0.23 ± 0.236
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9686 · Ls mean difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.05
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4711 · Ls mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.06 to 0.03
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9215 · Ls mean difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6042 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.03
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9394 · Ls mean difference: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.04
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7801 · Ls mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.03
SecondaryTotal Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)

Total sleep time is the number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening and MIS is the number of minutes spent awake after sleep onset to final awakening. TST and MIS were determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · minutes
Total Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)
minutesPregabalinPlacebo
Endpoint: TST396.84 ± 5.04400.29 ± 5.29
Endpoint: MIS41.48 ± 1.4545.14 ± 1.50
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6012 · Ls mean difference: -3.44
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0534 · Ls mean difference: -3.66
SecondarySleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)

SFI is a measure to quantify sleep restlessness. SFI calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. SFI determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of immobile bouts
Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)
percentage of immobile boutsPregabalinPlacebo
Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)18.57 ± 0.4719.60 ± 0.49
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0966 · Ls mean difference: -1.03
SecondarySleep Efficiency

Sleep efficiency is the time spent asleep divided by total time between sleep onset and sleep end, multiplied by 100. Sleep efficiency was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent time between sleep onset and end
Sleep Efficiency
Percent time between sleep onset and endPregabalinPlacebo
Sleep Efficiency85.80 ± 0.3984.84 ± 0.41
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0611 · Ls mean difference: 0.97
SecondaryTotal Activity Counts

Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the "day" (non sleep period). A total activity count was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · activity counts per day
Total Activity Counts
activity counts per dayPregabalinPlacebo
Total Activity Counts297350 ± 5280.2305787 ± 5480.9
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2195 · Ls mean difference: -8436
SecondaryPercentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level

Percentage of time above sedentary level is number of epochs (60 seconds) with greater than (\>) 200 activity counts per minute divided by total number of epochs during the "day" (non sleep period) multiplied by 100. This was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of day time
Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level
percentage of day timePregabalinPlacebo
Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level52.43 ± 0.5152.28 ± 0.53
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8241 · Ls mean difference: 0.15
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: Sleep Disturbance (n=183, 192)35.27 ± 22.12739.32 ± 22.800
Change at Endpoint: Sleep Disturbance (n=173, 175)-6.58 ± 22.856-8.64 ± 25.317
Baseline: Snoring (n=181, 192)25.30 ± 31.45626.04 ± 34.077
Change at Endpoint: Snoring (n=171, 175)0.94 ± 35.301-3.77 ± 33.862
Baseline: SOB (n= 183, 192)22.08 ± 27.21625.83 ± 28.567
Change at Endpoint: SOB (n=173, 175)-3.01 ± 28.938-7.09 ± 30.552
Baseline: Quantity (n= 183, 192)7.50 ± 1.9697.96 ± 3.976
Change at Endpoint: Quantity (n=173, 175)0.27 ± 1.8140.36 ± 2.082
Baseline: Adequacy (n= 183, 192)57.81 ± 25.77654.22 ± 24.801
Change at Endpoint: Adequacy (n=173, 175)5.26 ± 30.3194.63 ± 30.091
Baseline: Somnolence (n= 183, 192)26.05 ± 21.07829.10 ± 20.773
Change at Endpoint: Somnolence (n=173, 175)-0.77 ± 22.946-4.23 ± 24.136
Baseline: Sleep Problems Index (n= 183, 192)32.97 ± 16.72636.91 ± 16.862
Change at Endpoint:Sleep Problems Index(n=173,175)-4.25 ± 17.382-6.70 ± 18.358
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8528 · Ls mean difference: -0.38 · 95% CI -4.42 to 3.66
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3650 · Ls mean difference: 2.88 · 95% CI -3.37 to 9.14
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7237 · Ls mean difference: 0.89 · 95% CI -4.07 to 5.86
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2783 · Ls mean difference: -0.18 · 95% CI -0.50 to 0.15
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2475 · Ls mean difference: 3.02 · 95% CI -2.11 to 8.16
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5492 · Ls mean difference: 1.16 · 95% CI -2.64 to 4.96
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9113 · Ls mean difference: 0.18 · 95% CI -3.00 to 3.36
SecondaryMedical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep

MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Baseline (n=183, 192)8077
Endpoint (n=173, 176)8080
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7399
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: HADS-A (n=183, 192)5.99 ± 4.0656.32 ± 4.216
Change at Endpoint: HADS-A (n=173, 176)-1.03 ± 4.550-1.50 ± 4.593
Baseline: HADS-D (n=183, 192)4.92 ± 3.4785.42 ± 3.885
Change at Endpoint: HADS-D (n=173, 176)0.07 ± 4.238-1.02 ± 4.038
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8258 · Ls mean difference: 0.08 · 95% CI -0.67 to 0.84
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0840 · Ls mean difference: 0.65 · 95% CI -0.09 to 1.38
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical \[R-P\], role-emotional \[R-E\]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame:
Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: Ph Fn (n=183, 192)55.25 ± 24.91356.30 ± 24.444
Change at Endpoint: Ph Fn (n=173, 176)8.29 ± 26.4386.85 ± 27.839
Baseline: R-P (n=183, 192)55.43 ± 25.80658.37 ± 25.078
Change at Endpoint: R-P (n=173, 176)9.03 ± 27.0127.05 ± 29.122
Baseline: BP (n=183, 192)48.11 ± 20.14948.47 ± 21.855
Change at Endpoint: BP (n=172, 176)13.13 ± 24.84612.86 ± 28.888
Baseline: GH (n=183, 192)58.83 ± 20.58359.47 ± 19.808
Change at Endpoint: GH (n=173, 176)8.25 ± 20.9857.37 ± 21.300
Baseline: Ph C (n=183, 192)39.66 ± 8.63240.06 ± 8.110
Change at Endpoint: Ph C (n=171, 176)4.44 ± 8.5304.17 ± 9.528
Baseline: Vit (n=183, 192)61.01 ± 16.33859.80 ± 18.443
Change at Endpoint: Vit (n=172, 176)2.86 ± 19.1964.87 ± 21.014
Baseline: So Fn (n=183, 192)68.37 ± 22.49866.34 ± 22.825
Change at Endpoint: So Fn (n=173, 176)2.60 ± 26.8666.18 ± 23.299
Baseline: R-E (n=183, 192)63.80 ± 26.33367.93 ± 25.214
Change at Endpoint: R-E (n=173, 176)6.74 ± 29.5361.85 ± 29.307
Baseline: MnH (n=183, 192)69.07 ± 16.90268.59 ± 19.133
Change at Endpoint: MnH (n=172, 176)3.11 ± 20.6984.12 ± 19.776
Baseline: Mn C (n=183, 192)47.12 ± 10.03747.18 ± 10.473
Change at Endpoint: Mn C (n=171, 176)1.18 ± 11.3941.21 ± 10.519
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6114 · Ls mean difference: 1.22 · 95% CI -3.49 to 5.92
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8209 · Ls mean difference: 0.57 · 95% CI -4.39 to 5.53
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9737 · Ls mean difference: 0.08 · 95% CI -4.52 to 4.67
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6966 · Ls mean difference: 0.76 · 95% CI -3.05 to 4.57
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8569 · Ls mean difference: 0.15 · 95% CI -1.44 to 1.73
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4734 · Ls mean difference: -1.33 · 95% CI -4.96 to 2.31
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3625 · Ls mean difference: -1.97 · 95% CI -6.22 to 2.28
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2736 · Ls mean difference: 2.79 · 95% CI -2.21 to 7.79
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8199 · Ls mean difference: -0.41 · 95% CI -3.98 to 3.15
  • Pregabalin vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9361 · Ls mean difference: 0.08 · 95% CI -1.82 to 1.98
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which specific health problem (SHP) affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded "Yes/No" to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16, 17
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: Employed (n=183, 192)5757
Week 16: Employed (n=169, 170)5751
Week 17: Employed (n=167, 171)5847
Baseline: Unemployed (n=183, 192)126135
Week 16: Unemployed (n=169, 170)112119
Week 17: Unemployed (n=167, 171)109124
SecondaryAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days. A participant who had responded 'no' to question 1 regarding employment status reported hours of work and as this was a self-reported questionnaire the source data were included.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16, 17
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
hoursPregabalinPlacebo
Baseline, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=57, 58)5.58 ± 10.6014.86 ± 11.488
Week 16, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=57, 54)2.05 ± 5.0442.41 ± 6.603
Week 17, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=58, 48)3.03 ± 5.3641.27 ± 2.703
Baseline, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=57, 58)12.77 ± 21.2537.31 ± 15.144
Week 16, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=57, 54)7.53 ± 15.1216.74 ± 14.070
Week 17, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=58, 48)7.72 ± 17.8872.94 ± 6.635
Baseline: Hours Worked (n=57, 58)32.54 ± 17.36728.76 ± 18.780
Week 16: Hours Worked (n=57, 54)37.44 ± 19.44132.72 ± 19.835
Week 17: Hours Worked (n=58, 48)34.83 ± 20.67038.15 ± 21.399
SecondaryProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16, 17
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
units on a scalePregabalinPlacebo
Baseline: Productivity Affected (n=55, 57)5.00 ± 2.4805.93 ± 2.513
Week 16: Productivity Affected (n=60, 54)3.60 ± 2.4023.15 ± 2.771
Week 17: Productivity Affected (n=58, 48)3.40 ± 2.6153.00 ± 2.806
Baseline: Daily Activity Affected (n=183, 192)6.03 ± 2.0786.12 ± 2.190
Week 16: Daily Activity Affected (n=169, 170)3.75 ± 2.5473.66 ± 2.769
Week 17: Daily Activity Affected (n=167, 171)3.82 ± 2.5683.64 ± 2.754
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
AEs126117
SAEs77
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Findings

Laboratory tests included hematology, chemistry, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) count, HIV plasma viral load, B12, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL), toxic screens for drugs and alcohol, reflex thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), urinalysis. Number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time was reported.

Time frame:
Screening up to Week 17
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Findings
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Findings165170
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Positive Serum and Urine Pregnancy

Serum pregnancy test (regardless of childbearing potential) and urine pregnancy test for all female participants were performed.

Time frame:
Screening for serum pregnancy test, Week 1 for urine pregnancy test

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings

A physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, chest, pulses, pulmonary, cardiovascular, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, abdominal, and extremities.

Time frame:
Screening, Week 8, 17
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Screening: General (n=183, 192)1613
Week 8: General (n=146, 154)127
Week 17: General (n=170, 174)116
Screening: Skin (n=183, 192)3037
Week 8: Skin (n=146, 154)2020
Week 17: Skin (n=170, 174)2132
Screening: Chest (n=183, 192)64
Week 8: Chest (n=146, 154)23
Week 17: Chest (n=170, 174)42
Screening: Pulses (n=183, 191)31
Week 8: Pulses (n=146, 153)21
Week 17: Pulses (n=170, 174)12
Screening: Lungs (n=183, 192)26
Week 8: Lungs (n=146, 154)23
Week 17: Lungs (n=170, 174)35
Screening: Heart (n=183, 192)34
Week 8: Heart (n=146, 154)43
Week 17: Heart (n=170, 174)43
Screening: Abdomen (n=183, 192)116
Week 8: Abdomen (n=146, 154)92
Week 17: Abdomen (n=170, 174)86
Screening: Extremities (n=183, 192)5046
Week 8: Extremities (n=146, 154)2826
Week 17: Extremities (n=170, 174)2923
Screening: Head (n=183, 192)25
Week 8: Head (n=146, 154)02
Week 17: Head (n=170, 174)22
Screening: Ears (n=181, 191)13
Week 8: Ears (n=145, 154)00
Week 17: Ears (n=170, 174)13
Screening: Eyes (n=183, 192)127
Week 8: Eyes (n=146, 154)85
Week 17: Eyes (n=170, 174)96
Screening: Nose (n=183, 192)03
Week 8: Nose (n=146, 154)34
Week 17: Nose (n=170, 174)31
Screening: Throat (n=183, 192)33
Week 8: Throat (n=146, 154)46
Week 17: Throat (n=170, 174)52
Other pre-specifiedBody Weight
Time frame:
Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17
Reported as:
Mean · kilogram
Body Weight
kilogramPregabalinPlacebo
Screening (n=183, 192)70.8 ± 17.772.0 ± 17.3
Week 1 (n=183, 192)71.2 ± 17.7672.5 ± 17.84
Week 4 (n=158, 169)72.6 ± 19.0271.8 ± 16.88
Week 8 (n=146, 154)73.1 ± 19.3572.1 ± 17.17
Week 12 (n=127, 137)74.0 ± 19.0172.7 ± 17.20
Week 16 (n=170, 176)73.6 ± 18.0672.5 ± 17.00
Week 17 (n=167, 171)73.6 ± 18.1372.6 ± 16.95
Other pre-specifiedSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle of heart. Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles of heart.

Time frame:
Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17
Reported as:
Mean · millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
millimeter of mercury (mmHg)PregabalinPlacebo
Screening: SBP (n=183, 192)121.2 ± 16.18122.1 ± 15.02
Week 1: SBP (n=183, 192)119.9 ± 14.58120.4 ± 14.79
Week 4: SBP (n=159, 169)117.9 ± 16.42119.8 ± 15.07
Week 8: SBP (n=147, 154)118.6 ± 14.24120.7 ± 15.18
Week 12: SBP (n=127, 137)120.2 ± 15.33121.7 ± 14.30
Week 16: SBP (n=171, 176)119.3 ± 15.71122.9 ± 13.67
Week 17: SBP (n=167, 171)120.1 ± 15.89121.6 ± 14.35
Screening: DBP (n=183, 192)78.7 ± 11.0878.4 ± 10.84
Week 1: DBP (n=183, 192)76.9 ± 10.4877.5 ± 10.40
Week 4: DBP (n=159, 169)76.0 ± 12.0176.5 ± 10.43
Week 8: DBP (n=147, 154)76.0 ± 11.2577.6 ± 11.27
Week 12: DBP (n=127, 137)77.5 ± 10.6278.0 ± 10.07
Week 16: DBP (n=171, 176)76.4 ± 11.0778.1 ± 9.52
Week 17: DBP (n=167, 171)76.4 ± 11.2878.5 ± 11.48
Other pre-specifiedSitting Heart Rate
Time frame:
Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute (bpm)
Sitting Heart Rate
beats per minute (bpm)PregabalinPlacebo
Screening (n=183, 192)75.2 ± 12.4474.6 ± 11.10
Week 1 (n=183, 192)76.0 ± 11.4674.9 ± 9.27
Week 4 (n=159, 169)77.5 ± 10.7577.2 ± 10.63
Week 8 (n=147, 154)77.4 ± 10.5277.1 ± 10.32
Week 12 (n=127, 137)78.0 ± 11.0977.5 ± 11.09
Week 16 (n=171, 176)76.2 ± 11.0376.5 ± 11.17
Week 17 (n=167, 171)76.0 ± 10.9176.2 ± 10.35
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination Findings

A neurological examination consisted of examination of the mental state, cranial nerve function, motor function (reflexes of patellar, achilles, biceps, babinski and coordination) and sensory function (sharp sensation of dorsal surface of right and left great toe, light touch of lower extremities \[LE\], right and left first metatarsal joint position sense, and vibration sensation \[vibration is felt for \< 6 seconds = markedly diminished, 6 to 10 seconds = mild loss, \> 10 seconds = normal\]).

Time frame:
Screening
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Neurological Examination Findings
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Cranial Nerve Function: Missing10
Cranial Nerve Function: Normal178192
Cranial Nerve Function: Abnormal40
Cranial Nerve Function: Not Done00
Coordination, Gait: Missing11
Coordination, Gait: Normal169181
Coordination, Gait: Not Evaluable22
Coordination, Gait: Mild Ataxia77
Coordination, Gait: Moderate Ataxia31
Coordination, Gait: Severe Ataxia10
Coordination, Romberg Test: Missing10
Coordination, Romberg Test: Normal174188
Coordination, Romberg Test: Abnormal62
Coordination, Romberg Test: Not Done22
Reflexes, Left Patellar: Missing10
Reflexes, Left Patellar: None/Absent713
Reflexes, Left Patellar: Normal124130
Reflexes, Left Patellar: Not Done00
Reflexes, Left Patellar: Hypoactive (Diminished)4341
Reflexes, Left Patellar: Hyperactive (More Brisk)88
Reflexes, Left Patellar: Clonus (Very Intense)00
Reflexes, Right Patellar: Missing10
Reflexes, Right Patellar: None/Absent813
Reflexes, Right Patellar: Normal124129
Reflexes, Right Patellar: Not Done10
Reflexes, Right Patellar: Hypoactive (Diminished)4241
Reflexes, Right Patellar: Hyperactive (More Brisk)79
Reflexes, Right Patellar: Clonus (Very Intense)00
Reflexes, Left Achilles: Missing10
Reflexes, Left Achilles: None/Absent92100
Reflexes, Left Achilles: Normal1413
Reflexes, Left Achilles: Not Done00
Reflexes, Left Achilles: Hypoactive (Diminished)7378
Reflexes, Left Achilles: Hyperactive (More Brisk)31
Reflexes, Left Achilles: Clonus (Very Intense)00
Reflexes, Right Achilles: Missing10
Reflexes, Right Achilles: None/Absent90100
Reflexes, Right Achilles: Normal149
Reflexes, Right Achilles: Not Done00
Reflexes, Right Achilles: Hypoactive (Diminished)7582
Reflexes, Right Achilles: Hyperactive (More Brisk)31
Reflexes, Right Achilles: Clonus (Very Intense)00
Reflexes, Right Biceps: Missing10
Reflexes, Right Biceps: None/Absent12
Reflexes, Right Biceps: Normal166178
Reflexes, Right Biceps: Not Done32
Reflexes, Right Biceps: Hypoactive (Diminished)87
Reflexes, Right Biceps: Hyperactive (More Brisk)43
Reflexes, Right Biceps: Clonus (Very Intense)00
Reflexes, Left Biceps: Missing10
Reflexes, Left Biceps: None/Absent12
Reflexes, Left Biceps: Normal169180
Reflexes, Left Biceps: Not Done21
Reflexes, Left Biceps: Hypoactive (Diminished)76
Reflexes, Left Biceps: Hyperactive (More Brisk)33
Reflexes, Left Biceps: Clonus (Very Intense)00
Mental State: Missing30
Mental State: Normal179192
Mental State: Abnormal10
Mental State: Not Done00
Sensory Function, Right Great Toe: Missing10
Sensory Function, Right Great Toe: Absent6357
Sensory Function, Right Great Toe: Diminished99114
Sensory Function, Right Great Toe: Normal57
Sensory Function, Right Great Toe: Increased1514
Sensory Function, Left Great Toe: Missing10
Sensory Function, Left Great Toe: Absent6158
Sensory Function, Left Great Toe: Diminished102112
Sensory Function, Left Great Toe: Normal58
Sensory Function, Left Great Toe: Increased1414
Sensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Missing23
Sensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Not Done76
Sensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Unable to Detect3948
Sensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Hyposensitivity99102
Sensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Normal Sensation2825
Sensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Hypersensitivity88
Sensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Missing10
Sensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Normal129143
Sensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Abnormal5247
Sensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Not Done12
Sensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Missing10
Sensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Normal129143
Sensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Abnormal5146
Sensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Not Done23
Vibration Sensation: Missing22
Vibration Sensation: Not Done11
Vibration Sensation: Absent2724
Vibration Sensation: Markedly Diminished4252
Vibration Sensation: Mild Loss8679
Vibration Sensation: Normal2534
Reflexes, Right Babinski: Missing10
Reflexes, Right Babinski: Not Evaluable36
Reflexes, Right Babinski: Absent173180
Reflexes, Right Babinski: Present66
Reflexes, Left Babinski: Missing10
Reflexes, Left Babinski: Not Evaluable36
Reflexes, Left Babinski: Absent173180
Reflexes, Left Babinski: Present66
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants Who Met Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Criteria

MINI: short structured clinical interview to make diagnoses of psychiatric disorders according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) or International Classifications of Disease-10 (ICD-10). In the MINI Modules, participants were asked a series of Yes/No questions.

Time frame:
Screening

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories

S-STS:8-item clinician/participant administered prospective rating scale to assess TE suicidal(Su) ideation(ID),behavior(BHV).Items 1a,2-6,7a,8 scored on 5-point Likert scale 0(not at all) to 4(extremely). Items 1,1b,7 require yes/no response. S-STS total score range 0-30. Lower score=reduced Su tendency. Responses on S-STS were mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA) as 1:Completed Su; 2: Su attempt; 3: Preparatory acts; 4: Su ID; 5: Self-injurious (SI) BHV, intent unknown; 6: Not enough information; 7: SI BHV, no Su intent; 8: Other, no deliberate self harm.

Time frame:
Screening, Post-Baseline (Week 4 up to Week 17)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Screening: Su Attempt (n=183, 192)58
Screening: Preparatory Acts (n=183, 192)58
Screening: Su ID (n=183, 192)2837
Screening: SI BHV, no Su intent (n=183, 192)44
Post-Baseline: Completed Suicide (n=178, 185)00
Post-Baseline: Su Attempt (n=178, 185)01
Post-Baseline: Preparatory Acts (n=178, 185)02
Post-Baseline: Su ID (n=178, 185)511
Post-Baseline: SI BHV, no Su intent (n=178, 185)00
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)

PHQ-8: 8-item self-administered validated subset of PHQ-9, which comprises first 8 items of measure. Participant rated "Over past 2 weeks, how often bothered by any of following problems?": little interest in doing things(1); feeling down(2); trouble falling or staying asleep/sleeping too much(3); feeling tired(4); poor appetite/overeating(5); feeling bad about self(6); trouble concentrating(7); moving or speaking slowly or being so fidgety/moving around more than usual (8). Each item scored on scale of 0(not at all)-3(nearly every day). Total score range: 0-24, higher score=greater severity.

Time frame:
Screening
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)
participantsPregabalinPlacebo
Little Interest: Not at All (n=183, 192)7789
Little Interest: Several Days (n=183, 192)6372
Little Interest: > 1/2 Days (n=183,192)2320
Little Interest: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)2011
Feeling Down: Not at All (n=183, 192)105109
Feeling Down: Several Days (n=183, 192)6159
Feeling Down: > 1/2 Days the Days (n=183, 192)1312
Feeling Down: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)412
Trouble With Sleep: Not at All (n=182, 192)6368
Trouble With Sleep: Several Days (n=182, 192)6986
Trouble With Sleep: > 1/2 Days (n=182, 192)2622
Trouble With Sleep: Nearly Every Day (n=182, 192)2416
Feeling Tired: Not at All (n=183, 192)5756
Feeling Tired: Several Days (n=183, 192)87100
Feeling Tired: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)2729
Feeling Tired: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)127
Poor Appetite/Overeat: Not at All (n=183, 192)99116
Poor Appetite/Overeat: Several Days (n=183, 192)5356
Poor Appetite/Overeat: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)2115
Poor Appetite/Overeat: Nearly Everyday (n=183,192)105
Feeling Bad About Self: Not at All (n=183, 192)124138
Feeling Bad About Self: Several Days (n=183, 192)4143
Feeling Bad About Self: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)126
Feeling Bad About Self: Nearly Everyday(n=183,192)65
Trouble Concentrating: Not at All (n=183, 192)131140
Trouble Concentrating: Several Days (n=183, 192)3533
Trouble Concentrating: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)1113
Trouble Concentrating: Nearly Everyday (n=183,192)66
Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety: Not at All (n=183,192)144143
Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety:Several Days(n=183,192)2333
Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety: >1/2 Days (n=183, 192)1010
Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety:Nearly Everyday(n=183,192)66
SecondaryDiagnostic Neuropathy Assessment
Time frame:
Screening

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pregabalin—7/183 (3.8%)64/183 (35%)
Placebo—7/192 (3.6%)47/192 (24.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventPregabalinPlacebo
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/1831/192
Perineal abscessInfections and infestations1/1830/192
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/1831/192
Demyelinating polyneuropathyNervous system disorders1/1830/192
Loss of consciousnessNervous system disorders1/1830/192
Peripheral sensorimotor neuropathyNervous system disorders1/1830/192
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/1830/192
Renal failure acuteRenal and urinary disorders1/1830/192
Gallbladder disorderHepatobiliary disorders0/1831/192
Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1831/192
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPregabalinPlacebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders25/18310/192
HeadacheNervous system disorders25/18326/192
InfluenzaInfections and infestations17/18312/192
SomnolenceNervous system disorders13/1834/192

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PregabalinPlaceboTotal
Mean41.2 ± 9.042.3 ± 8.441.7 ± 8.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PregabalinPlaceboTotal
Female121116237
Male6276138
08

Study locations

63 sites
  • Southwest Center for HIV/AIDS
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • SW Center for HIV/AIDS
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Arizona Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85023, United States
  • AIDS Research Alliance of America
    Los Angeles, California 90015, United States
  • Anthony Mills, MD, Inc.
    Los Angeles, California 90069, United States
  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA c/o NNAB
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Providence Clinical Research
    North Hollywood, California 91606, United States
  • Desert Medical Group, Inc. dba Desert Oasis Healthcare Medical Group
    Palm Springs, California 92262, United States
  • University of California San Diego
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Stanford University Medical Center
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Neuroscience Consultants, LLC.
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • South Florida Medical Research
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Wohlfeiler, Piperato & Associates, LLC
    Miami Beach, Florida 33139, United States
  • The Kinder Medical Group
    Miami, Florida 33133, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Midtown Neurology, PC
    Atlanta, Georgia 30312, United States
  • Neurology Specialists of Decatur Research Center
    Decatur, Georgia 30033, United States
  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • University of Toledo Medical Center
    Toledo, Ohio 43614, United States
  • University of Toledo
    Toledo, Ohio 43614, United States
  • University of Texas Physicians
    Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States
  • Amelia Court HIV Research Clinic
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Asistencia Cientifica de Alta Complejidad
    Bogota, Cundinamarca 0000, Colombia
  • Centro Instituto de Investigaciones Fundación Universitaria Sanitas
    Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia
  • Riesgo de Fractura S.A
    Bogotá, Cundinamarca 0000, Colombia
  • Instituto Colombiano para el Avance de la Medicina- Santander S.A.S. - ICAMEDIC Santander S.A.S
    Bucaramanga, Santander 0000, Colombia
  • Instituto Dominicano de Estudios Virológicos - IDEV
    Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
  • Mahavir Hospital and Research Centre
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 004, India
  • Surakshaka Multispeciality Hospital
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 072, India
  • Infectious Disease Clinic
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380 009, India
  • Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400026, India
  • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre
    Pune, Maharashtra 411 004, India
  • YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education
    Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 113, India
  • Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo
    Lima, L 01, Peru
  • Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen
    Lima, L 13, Peru
  • Katedra Chorob Zakaznych i Hepatologii UMK w Toruniu CM w Bydgoszczy
    Bydgoszcz, 85-030, Poland
  • Oddzial Diagnostyki i Terapii AIDS
    Chorzow, 41-500, Poland
  • Ponce School of Medicine-CAIMED Center
    Ponce, 00716, Puerto Rico
  • Ponce School of Medicine - Practice Group
    Ponce, 00732-7004, Puerto Rico
  • Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium
    Rio Piedras, 00935, Puerto Rico
  • Border Diabetic Centre
    East London, Eastern Cape 5200, South Africa
  • MediSynergy
    Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape 6065, South Africa
  • Worthwhile Clinical Trials
    Benoni, Gauteng 1500, South Africa
  • Toga Laboratory
    Johannesburg, Gauteng 1610, South Africa
  • Drs Essack and Mitha
    Johannesburg, Gauteng 2113, South Africa
  • University of Witwatersrand-Clinical HIV Research Unit (CHRU)
    Johannesburg, Gauteng 2193, South Africa
  • Pretoria West Hospital
    Pretoria West, Gauteng 0117, South Africa
  • Synexus SA Stanza Bopape Clinical Research Centre
    Pretoria, Gauteng 0122, South Africa
  • Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, The Palliative Care Centre
    Soweto, Gauteng 1808, South Africa
  • Dr J. Reddy's Surgery
    Stanger, KwaZulu Natal 4450, South Africa
  • University of Cape Town
    Cape Town, Western Cape 7925, South Africa
  • Synapta Clinical Research Centre
    Durban, 4001, South Africa
  • Innovir Institute
    Gauteng, 2047, South Africa
  • Mzansi Ethical Research Centre
    Middelburg, 1050, South Africa
  • Be Part Yoluntu Centre
    Paarl, 7626, South Africa
  • Paarl Research Center
    Paarl, 7646, South Africa
  • Clinical Research Unit, University of Pretoria
    Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
  • Department of Neurology
    Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa
  • South East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii
    Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
  • Neurology unit, Department of Medicine,
    Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Simpson DM, Rice AS, Emir B, Landen J, Semel D, Chew ML, Sporn J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and open-label extension study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with human immunodeficiency virus neuropathy. Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 4. PubMed 24907403 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01049217
Lead sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2010
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
May 2012
Completion
May 2012
Results posted
Jul 17, 2013
Last update
Jan 28, 2021

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion