CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01027065CONVERTUpdated Oct 18, 2012

Dose Escalation of Interleukin-1 (IL-7) Added on Antiviral Treatment and Vaccination in HBeAg-negative Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Infected Patients

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of CYT107+GenHevac+entecavir or tenofovir and CYT107+ entecavir or tenofovir in Chronic Hepatitis B, sponsored by Cytheris SA. Status unknown at 8 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-18.

Sponsored by Cytheris SA · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2012), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to evaluate the safety of biological active dose of a new experimental drug, IL-7, in combination with anti viral therapy and vaccine in patients with Hepatitis B chronic infection.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase I/IIa inter-patient dose-escalation study assessing weekly doses of Interleukin-7 (CYT107) in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B infected adult patients. The dose escalation is aimed at establishing the safety of a biologically active doses of CYT107 added to the current antiviral therapy with entecavir or tenofovir and vaccination or not. At each dose level, study patients will receive one subcutaneous administration of CYT107 per week for a total of 4.

Groups of 8 patients will be entered at each dose level of CYT107. Three dose levels are planned.

At each dose level, patients are randomized between 2 arms of treatment: tritherapy (CYT107, vaccine and antiviral treatment) or bitherapy (CYT107 and vaccine). Each treatment group is composed of 4 patients, 3 receiving experimental treatments, 1 just the current antiviral treatment (control patient).

According to the treatment arm, eligible patients initially receive a vaccine if in treatment group of tritherapy, thereafter, CYT107 is added for a cycle of four weekly injections (if not a control patient) at a defined dose level. If in treatment group of tritherapy, patients will receive 2 additional doses of vaccine.

The treatment phase for the tritherapy group is from first vaccine D0 to last vaccine W12 and includes CYT107 administration from W4 to W7.

The treatment phase for the bitehrapy group is from W4 to W7 corresponding to CYT104 injections.

The patients are then followed on a regular basis until reaching 52 weeks after the D0.

Participants will have 1 overnight hospitalization and 12 clinic visit on a period of 55 weeks.

During the visits the following may be done:

  • medical history, physical examination, blood tests
  • electrocardiograms (ECG)
  • chest X-Ray
  • liver/spleen imaging
  • urine tests
02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

  • interleukin-7
  • immune-based therapies
  • hepatitis B
  • HBe negative
  • HBV vaccination
  • entecavir
  • tenofovir
  • chronic hepatitis
  • immune specific responses to HBV
  • phase 1/2a
  • viral disease
  • liver disease
03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 100 across 1,886 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

Cytheris SA is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic HBV-infected patients
  • HBeAg-negative patients
  • Age > 18 years
  • Patients with active chronic hepatitis at the start of the antiviral treatment
  • Patient with a HBV DNA undetectable (\<70 copies/ml) stable for at least 3 months under entecavir or tenofovir treatment.
  • Ongoing treatment by entecavir or tenofovir at screening Note: previous treatment with pegylated IFN monotherapy, before the start of entecavir or tenofovir, is acceptable

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection by HCV
  • Infection by HIV-1 and /or HIV-2
  • Apart from HBV infection, presence of active infection requiring a specific treatment or a hospitalization
  • Previous treatment by lamivudine and/or nucleosides analogues
  • Inactive carrier
  • Cirrhosis
  • Other liver disease (notably from alcoholic, metabolic or immunological origin)
  • History of clinical autoimmune disease or active auto-immune disease
  • Type I diabetes mellitus
  • Severe asthma, presently on chronic medications
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tritherapy: CYT107+ vaccine+ antiviral

    Drug: CYT107+GenHevac+entecavir or tenofovir

  • Experimental
    Bitherapy: CYT107 + antiviral

    Drug: CYT107+ entecavir or tenofovir

Interventions

  • DrugCYT107+GenHevac+entecavir or tenofovir

    4 patients per arm for each dose level. 3 patients receiving experimental treatment (CYT107 and vaccine) in addition to current antiviral treatment and 1 control patient only the current antiviral treatment

  • DrugCYT107+ entecavir or tenofovir

    4 patients per arm for each dose level. 3 patients receiving experimental treatment (CYT107) in addition to current antiviral treatment and 1 control patient only the current antiviral treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the short and long-term safety and biological activity of CYT107 in patients with a HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who have, at screening a HBV DNA undetectable stable for at least 3 months with antiviral treatment.

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. To characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CYT107 in humans chronically infected with HBV.

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. To assess the effects of the tri-therapy (CYT107 + HBV vaccine + antiviral treatment) versus bi-therapy (CYT107 + antiviral treatment) versus control (antiviral treatment) on the markers of the HBV infection (antiviral activity)at W16 weeks and W52

    Time frame: Week 12 and Week 52

  3. To quantify the effects of the tri-therapy (CYT107 + HBV vaccine + antiviral treatment) versus bi-therapy (CYT107 + antiviral treatment) versus control (antiviral treatment) on the immune system at W16 weeks

    Time frame: Week 16

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Hopital Henri Mendor-Service d'HepatoGastroEnterologie
    Creteil, France
  • Hopital Michallon
    Grenoble, France
  • Hopital de l'Hotel Dieu
    Lyon, France
  • Hopital Saint Joseph
    Marseille, France
  • CHU l'Archet
    Nice, France
  • Hopital Tenon
    Paris, France
  • Hopital Civil
    Strasbourg, France
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi
    Bologna, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01027065
Lead sponsor
Cytheris SA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2009
Start date
Dec 2009
Primary completion
Nov 2012 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2013 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 18, 2012

Study contacts

Christophe Hezode
study chair · Hopital Henri Mondor-Créteil-France
Pietro Andreone
principal investigator · S. Orsola Malpighi- Bologna-Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion