CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01023191Updated Jul 22, 2019

Open Versus Percutaneous Insertion of CAPD Catheters

An interventional study of Percutaneous Insertion catheter and Open insertion Catheter in Renal Failure, sponsored by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Withdrawn at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-22.

Sponsored by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Did not pass set-up phase
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Healthy kidneys clean your blood by removing excess fluid, minerals, and wastes. When your kidneys fail, harmful wastes build up in your body and your body may retain excess fluid. When this happens, you need treatment to replace the work of your failed kidneys. This may be with a dialysis machine using haemodialysis or with fluid in the abdomen or peritoneal dialysis.

In peritoneal dialysis, a tube called a catheter is put in the abdomen wall and used to fill your abdomen with a cleansing liquid called dialysis solution. The walls of your abdominal cavity are lined with a membrane called the peritoneum, which allows waste products and extra fluid to pass from your blood into the dialysis solution. These wastes and fluid are removed from the body when the dialysis fluid is drained and replaced with a fresh solution.

The tubes or catheters used to exchange the fluid are currently positioned using a general anaesthetic (with the patient awake) and an operation with a cut under the belly button. Newer techniques using local anaesthetic (with the patient awake and the area numbed) and requiring only a small cut in the skin have been used. No one has ever directly compared the two techniques.

The investigators aim is to perform a direct comparison between the two techniques to look at the complications and time required for surgery and length of hospital stay required. The investigators will also look at the patients satisfaction and pain scores with each technique to help gather evidence as to which is likely to be the best technique to use from now on.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dialysis
  • Peritoneal
  • Catheter
  • Surgery
03

In context

Renal Insufficiency

1,995 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency; 173 are open to participants now.

Browse Renal Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Potential participating patients will be identified by referral to the vascular surgery department for insertion of CAPD catheter for peritoneal access.

Specific inclusion criteria necessary for invitation to study participation;

  • Patients referred to vascular consultants for CAPD catheter insertion

General inclusion criteria:

  • Ability to give informed written consent

Specific exclusion criteria:

  • Previous abdominal surgery via midline incision
  • Unfit for general anaesthetic
  • Aged under 18 at time of referral

General exclusion criteria:

  • Inability to give informed written consent
  • Inability to attend follow up appointments

Withdrawal criteria:

  • Patient request
  • Patient non compliance with study protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Percutaneous insertion

    To undergo insertion of catheter using percutaneous technique under local anaesthetic

    Procedure: Percutaneous Insertion catheter

  • Active comparator
    Open insertion

    To undergo insertion of catheter using open technique under general anaesthetic

    Procedure: Open insertion Catheter

Interventions

  • ProcedurePercutaneous Insertion catheter

    Insertion of CAPD catheter using percutaneous seldinger technique under local anaesthetic +/- sedation as required

  • ProcedureOpen insertion Catheter

    Present technique of open insertion under general anaesthetic. Incision to lower abdomen and direct visualisation of catheter tip placement into pelvis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Catheter survival

    Time to catheter removal for any reason.recorded as percentage inn situ at 6, 12,18,etc months post procedure.

    Time frame: Ongoing (recorded at 6 month intervals)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peri operative complications (bleeding, bowel injury)

    All complications occuring at time of procedure and in 24 hours immediately post procedure.

    Time frame: 24 hrs post procedure

  2. Mechanical Complication (drainage failure, displacement, fluid leak)

    All mechanical complications recorded during follow up period. Note of timing of complications will be made in results. Early = within 30 days, late = beyond 30 days

    Time frame: ongoing (reported at 30 days and monthly thereafter)

  3. Infective complications (exit site, tunnel, peritonitis)

    All infective complications recorded during follow up period. Note of timing of complications will be made in results. Early = within 30 days, late = beyond 30 days

    Time frame: ongoing (reported at 30 days and monthly thereafter)

  4. Operative time

    Time to complete procedure from start to finish.

    Time frame: Average of 2 hours post procedure

  5. Technical Success of placement

    Assessment of whether a working and useable catheter is in situ at the end of the procedure.

    Time frame: Average of 2 hours post procedure

  6. Length of admission

    Length of admission post procedure according to strict discharge criteria.

    Time frame: Average of 48 hours post procedure

  7. Patient reported pain post procedure

    Analgesia and daily pain scoring diaries will be issued to patients post procedure. These will record patient reported pain at 24 hour intervals to 5 days as well as analgesia taken during the same period.

    Time frame: 24 hour intervals to 5 days post procedure

  8. Quality of life assessment by questionnaire

    Time frame: Within 24 hours prior to procedure, and again at both 5 days and 3 months post procedure

  9. Estimated cost of care episode

    Overall estimated cost of admission, procedure, ongoing care of catheter and management of complications arising from catheter or procedure will be calculated.

    Time frame: 3 months post procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hull Royal Infirmary
    Hull, East Yorkshire HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01023191
Lead sponsor
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Collaborators
University of Hull
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2009
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2019

Study contacts

Ian C Chetter, MB ChB
principal investigator · University of Hull

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion