ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01009554Updated Jul 3, 2015Results posted

Oral Tissue Tolerance of a Mouthrinse

An interventional study of Potassium Oxylate Mouthwash and Sodium Fluoride Dentifrice in Dental Health, sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-03.

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide (formerly part of Johnson & Johnson) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is 8 weeks long. People participating in this study will be asked to brush their teeth two times a day. Some people will get a mouthwash. People with a mouthwash will rinse two times a day after brushing their teeth. The mouth, teeth, tongue and gums will be looked at by a dentist. The dentist will look at the mouth to make sure the mouthwash does not irritate the mouth. The dentist will also look at the color of the teeth and amount of stain on the front teeth.

Read the detailed description

This is an 8-week, randomized, observer-blind, controlled, parallel group clinical study design to assess the oral tissue tolerance of a potassium oxalate containing mouthrinse. Subjects will have their oral soft/hard tissues assessed and will be evaluated for stain levels and tooth color shades at Screening/Baseline (Visit 1), Week 4 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3) and Week 8 (Visit 4). Subjects will be instructed to brush their teeth two times daily in their usual manner using the provided sodium fluoride toothpaste. Subjects assigned to the mouthrinse group will be instructed to rinse twice daily after brushing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Health

Keywords

  • Mouthwashes
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide left Johnson & Johnson.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females at least 18 years of age and in good general and oral health.
  • Volunteers must read, sign, and receive a signed copy of the Informed Consent Form after the nature of the study has been fully explained.
  • Willingness to use the assigned products according to instructions, availability for appointments and likelihood of completing the study.
  • Willingness to refrain from using any breath freshener products or unassigned oral care products (i.e., oral care strips, candy-type mints, sprays, chewing gums, throat lozenges, cough drops, mouthwashes or teeth whitening products) throughout the duration of the study.
  • Willingness to refrain from using any whitening products and smokeless tobacco products within one week prior to and for the duration of the study, in order to reduce alternate sources of potential irritation.
  • A minimum of 16 natural teeth, including at least 10 of the 12 anterior teeth (#6-11, #22-27, however, #7-10 must be present), with scorable facial and lingual surfaces. Teeth that are grossly carious, fully crowned or extensively restored on facial and/or lingual surfaces, orthodontically banded, abutments, or third molars will not be included in the tooth count.
  • Classic Vita® Shade minimum value of A2 or darker on at least 2 of the 4 maxillary anterior teeth (#7-10).
  • Absence of abnormal or severely fissured tongue, geographic tongue, tongue piercing or any obvious tongue abnormalities that may interfere with the assessment of oral irritation.
  • Adequate oral hygiene (i.e., brush teeth daily and exhibit no signs of oral neglect).
  • Absence of neglected dental health (i.e. gross calculus deposits or rampant caries based on visual examination), significant oral soft tissue pathology, systemically-related gingival enlargement, tissue damage due to ill-fitting appliances or restoration, or extreme crowding or overlapping of teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude use of normal oral hygiene procedures (i.e., toothbrushing, etc.).
  • History of significant adverse effects following use of oral hygiene products such as toothpastes and mouthrinses.
  • History or current evidence of significant oral soft tissue pathology, excluding gingivitis, based on the dentist's visual examination and at the discretion of the investigator.
  • Prior participation in any oral hygiene or product clinical study within the previous 30 days.
  • Therapy with any medications, currently or within the last 30 days, which might interfere with the outcome of the study by affecting tooth color or stain formation (i.e., certain antimicrobial mouthrinses and antibiotics, such as chlorhexidine).
  • Restorations on 10% or more of the facial surfaces of the maxillary anterior incisor teeth.
  • Dental fluorosis, hypoplasia, restorations, tetracycline stains, or other enamel surface irregularities that may interfere with evaluation of the selected teeth.
  • Visual evidence of Moderate/advanced periodontitis (ADA Type III, IV). Orthodontic bands, appliances, bridges, numerous crowns, removable orthodontic appliances or partial dentures.
  • Self-reported pregnancy or lactation (this criterion is due to oral tissue changes related to pregnancy and nursing which can affect interpretation of study results).
  • Regular use of whitening products within 1 week prior to Screening/Baseline. Other severe, acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with trial participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of trial result and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for the entry into this trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Potassium Oxylate

    1.5% potassium oxalate sensitive mouthwash

    Device: Potassium Oxylate Mouthwash

  • Active comparator
    Sodium Fluoride

    Sodium Fluoride Dentifrice

    Drug: Sodium Fluoride Dentifrice

Interventions

  • DevicePotassium Oxylate Mouthwash

    Rinse with 10 mL for 60 seconds, twice daily after brushing in usual manner with a sodium fluoride dentifrice

    Also known as: Formula 11794-050

  • Brush in usual manner, twice daily, with a sodium fluoride dentifrice

    Also known as: Regular Cavity Protection toothpaste

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Oral Tissue Tolerance

    Oral tissue tolerance was assessed by oral tissue adverse events for which the relationship to treatment was considered as possible, probable, or very likely. If the relationship to treatment was missing, the adverse event was categorized as a treatment-related adverse event.

    Time frame: through 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  7. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

    The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  9. Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  10. Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  11. Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  12. Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  13. Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  14. Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  15. Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  16. Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  17. Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  18. Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  19. Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  20. Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  21. Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  22. Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  23. Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  24. Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  25. Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  26. Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  27. Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  28. Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  29. Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  30. Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  31. Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  32. Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  33. Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  34. Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  35. Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  36. Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  37. Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  38. Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  39. Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  40. Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  41. Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  42. Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  43. Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  44. Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  45. Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  46. Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  47. Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  48. Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  49. Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  50. Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  51. Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

    The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  52. Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

    The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  53. Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

    The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  54. Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  55. Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  56. Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

    The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  57. Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

    The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  58. Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

    The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  59. Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

    The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  60. Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

    The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  61. Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

    The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  62. Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

    The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 3, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Started4848
Completed4641
Not completed27
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject13
Withdrew: Noncompliant with study product03

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.909 ± 0.06121.035 ± 0.0650
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.168 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.126 · 95% CI -0.054 to 0.306Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter values (L, a, and b) and age (in years) as covariates.
PrimaryOral Tissue Tolerance

Oral tissue tolerance was assessed by oral tissue adverse events for which the relationship to treatment was considered as possible, probable, or very likely. If the relationship to treatment was missing, the adverse event was categorized as a treatment-related adverse event.

Time frame:
through 8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Oral Tissue Tolerance
percentage of participantsCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Participants with ≥ one treatment-related AE2.10.0
Sensitivity of teeth2.10.0
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.875 ± 0.04640.882 ± 0.0475
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.928 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.006 · 95% CI -0.127 to 0.139Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter values (L, a, and b) and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.805 ± 0.04961.040 ± 0.0507
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.235 · 95% CI 0.092 to 0.378Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter values (L, a, and b) and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.013 ± 0.08570.054 ± 0.0876
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.741 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.041 · 95% CI -0.205 to 0.286Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter value L and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.071 ± 0.0959-0.090 ± 0.0981
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.249 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.161 · 95% CI -0.437 to 0.115Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter value L and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.158 ± 0.0949-0.043 ± 0.1006
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.154 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.201 · 95% CI -0.479 to 0.077Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter value L and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.077 ± 0.0518-0.117 ± 0.0529
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.011 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.195 · 95% CI -0.343 to -0.047Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter value b and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.123 ± 0.0487-0.212 ± 0.0498
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.334 · 95% CI -0.474 to -0.195Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter value b and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryChange in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.107 ± 0.0639-0.107 ± 0.0677
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.025 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.214 · 95% CI -0.401 to -0.027Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline tooth color parameter value b and age (in years) as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.329 ± 0.04640.386 ± 0.0505
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.319 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.056 · 95% CI -0.055 to 0.168Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.349 ± 0.05650.621 ± 0.0605
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.272 · 95% CI 0.139 to 0.405Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.394 ± 0.07030.791 ± 0.0785
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.398 · 95% CI 0.231 to 0.565Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.154 ± 0.02240.184 ± 0.0243
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.270 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.030 · 95% CI -0.024 to 0.084Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.164 ± 0.02740.302 ± 0.0293
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.137 · 95% CI 0.073 to 0.202Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.181 ± 0.03340.375 ± 0.0372
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.193 · 95% CI 0.114 to 0.273Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.162 ± 0.02250.196 ± 0.0245
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.217 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.034 · 95% CI -0.020 to 0.088Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.166 ± 0.02700.303 ± 0.0290
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.137 · 95% CI 0.073 to 0.200Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.188 ± 0.03400.383 ± 0.0379
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.195 · 95% CI 0.114 to 0.276Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area over all tooth sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.408 ± 0.05900.463 ± 0.0643
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.444 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.055 · 95% CI -0.087 to 0.197Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area score for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.427 ± 0.07120.776 ± 0.0762
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.349 · 95% CI 0.182 to 0.517Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.451 ± 0.08890.994 ± 0.0991
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.542 · 95% CI 0.331 to 0.754Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.192 ± 0.02840.224 ± 0.0309
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.361 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.032 · 95% CI -0.037 to 0.100Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.205 ± 0.03500.379 ± 0.0374
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.174 · 95% CI 0.092 to 0.256Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.210 ± 0.04220.475 ± 0.0470
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.264 · 95% CI 0.164 to 0.364Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.202 ± 0.02840.236 ± 0.0309
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.331 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.034 · 95% CI -0.035 to 0.102Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.206 ± 0.03480.383 ± 0.0373
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.177 · 95% CI 0.095 to 0.259Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.218 ± 0.04330.483 ± 0.0483
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.265 · 95% CI 0.162 to 0.368Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for interproximal (mesial and distal) sites and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.383 ± 0.05960.521 ± 0.0652
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.060 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.138 · 95% CI -0.006 to 0.282Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.395 ± 0.07320.732 ± 0.0786
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.338 · 95% CI 0.165 to 0.510Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.526 ± 0.09140.920 ± 0.1023
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.394 · 95% CI 0.176 to 0.612Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.180 ± 0.02920.252 ± 0.0318
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.045 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.072 · 95% CI 0.002 to 0.143Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.180 ± 0.03500.358 ± 0.0375
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.178 · 95% CI 0.095 to 0.260Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.241 ± 0.04340.438 ± 0.0485
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.197 · 95% CI 0.094 to 0.300Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.186 ± 0.02920.263 ± 0.0319
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.034 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.077 · 95% CI 0.006 to 0.147Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.184 ± 0.03350.352 ± 0.0359
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.168 · 95% CI 0.089 to 0.247Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.250 ± 0.04300.444 ± 0.0481
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.193 · 95% CI 0.091 to 0.296Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the gingival region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.132 ± 0.02580.112 ± 0.0281
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.524 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.020 · 95% CI -0.082 to 0.042Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.160 ± 0.03370.215 ± 0.0361
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.172 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.055 · 95% CI -0.024 to 0.133Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.143 ± 0.03710.258 ± 0.0412
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.010 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.116 · 95% CI 0.028 to 0.203Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.058 ± 0.01210.045 ± 0.0132
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.348 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.014 · 95% CI -0.043 to 0.015Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.075 ± 0.01600.100 ± 0.0171
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.185 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.025 · 95% CI -0.012 to 0.062Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.063 ± 0.01660.112 ± 0.0184
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.014 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.049 · 95% CI 0.010 to 0.088Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.064 ± 0.01330.056 ± 0.0145
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.623 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.008 · 95% CI -0.040 to 0.024Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.076 ± 0.01580.100 ± 0.0169
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.192 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.024 · 95% CI -0.013 to 0.061Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.067 ± 0.01800.124 ± 0.0200
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.009 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.057 · 95% CI 0.014 to 0.099Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the body region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.063 ± 0.03140.058 ± 0.0342
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.893 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.005 · 95% CI -0.081 to 0.071Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.118 ± 0.03990.140 ± 0.0427
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.655 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.021 · 95% CI -0.073 to 0.116Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.097 ± 0.05760.319 ± 0.0642
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.222 · 95% CI 0.084 to 0.359Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.027 ± 0.01530.025 ± 0.0167
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.914 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: -0.002 · 95% CI -0.039 to 0.035Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.054 ± 0.01920.065 ± 0.0206
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.646 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.011 · 95% CI -0.035 to 0.056Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.042 ± 0.02570.144 ± 0.0286
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.102 · 95% CI 0.040 to 0.163Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.032 ± 0.01470.033 ± 0.0160
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.930 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.002 · 95% CI -0.034 to 0.037Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.059 ± 0.01880.075 ± 0.0201
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.486 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.016 · 95% CI -0.029 to 0.060Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.047 ± 0.02810.160 ± 0.0313
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.112 · 95% CI 0.045 to 0.180Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the facial region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.596 ± 0.08310.716 ± 0.0910
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.237 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.120 · 95% CI -0.080 to 0.320Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.586 ± 0.09491.106 ± 0.1020
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.521 · 95% CI 0.298 to 0.743Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.677 ± 0.11461.244 ± 0.1283
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.567 · 95% CI 0.295 to 0.839Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain score for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.282 ± 0.04060.344 ± 0.0444
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.210 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.062 · 95% CI -0.036 to 0.160Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.279 ± 0.04670.541 ± 0.0501
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.262 · 95% CI 0.153 to 0.372Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.314 ± 0.05490.596 ± 0.0614
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.281 · 95% CI 0.151 to 0.411Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain intensity for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.293 ± 0.04090.359 ± 0.0448
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = 0.187 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.066 · 95% CI -0.033 to 0.165Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.277 ± 0.04600.533 ± 0.0495
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.256 · 95% CI 0.148 to 0.364Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.
SecondaryMean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks
units on a scaleCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.325 ± 0.05600.598 ± 0.0628
Statistical analysis
  • Crest® Regular Toothpaste vs 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (The significance threshold level was 0.05 (two-sided).) · Least squares mean difference: 0.273 · 95% CI 0.140 to 0.406Terms included treatment as a factor and baseline mean stain area for the lingual region and smoking status as covariates.

Adverse events

Collected over Week 8, +30 days for serious adverse events.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Crest® Regular Toothpaste—0/48 (0%)3/48 (6.3%)
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)—0/48 (0%)2/48 (4.2%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/482/48

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Crest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Total
Mean47.6 ± 9.9649.8 ± 8.0848.7 ± 9.08
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Crest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Total
Female404080
Male8816
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Crest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Total
USA484896
08

Study locations

1 site
  • TKL Reearch, Inc.
    Paramus, New Jersey 07652, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2009, a primary completion of Dec 2009 and a completion of Dec 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2015, 5 years 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2009
First posted
Nov 6, 2009
Start
Oct 2009
Primary completionActual
Dec 2009
CompletionActual
Dec 2009
Results first posted
Jul 3, 2015
Last update
Jul 3, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01009554
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2009
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Results posted
Jul 3, 2015
Last update
Jul 3, 2015

Study contacts

Michael Lynch, DMD, PhD
study director · Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion