CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01004003Updated Oct 26, 2017Results posted

Phase I/II Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of BIBF 1120 and Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sorafenib and BIBF 1120 in Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 28 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-26.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aim is to determine maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of BIBF 1120 in HCC (hepatocellular cancer) and compare efficacy of BIBF 1120 to Sorafenib in HCC patients

02

Conditions studied

  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to curative surgery or loco-regional therapy (RFA, percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), TACE)
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 2 or less
  • Child-Pugh score A (score 5-6)
  • At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.0 (this criterion is limited to phase II only)
  • In case a measurable lesion was previously treated by loco-regional therapy (RFA, PEI, TACE or RT) , this lesion must have to be documented as progression according to RECIST 1.0 by CT or MRI (this criterion is limited to phase II only).
  • Time interval from last local therapy (e.g. radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, radiotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization) more than 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment
  • Written informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation/ Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Prior systemic therapy for HCC
  • Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  • Bilirubin greater than 1.5 times ULN
  • AST or ALT greater than 2 times ULN
  • Uncontrolled or refractory ascites to adequate medical therapy
  • Hepatic encephalopathy more than grade 1 according to Child-Pugh criteria
  • Prothrombin time international normalized ratio greater than 2.3, or prothrombin time more than 6 seconds prolonged than control
  • Absolute neutrophil count less than 1000 /µL
  • Platelet count less than 60000 /µL
  • Hemoglobin less than 9 g/dL
  • Serum creatinine greater than 1.5 times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
  • Proteinuria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 2 or greater
  • Variceal bleeding within last 6 months prior to start of study treatment
  • History of major thrombotic (except portal vein thrombosis) or clinically relevant major bleeding event in the past 6 months
  • Known inherited predisposition to bleeding or thrombosis
  • Significant cardiovascular diseases (i.e. hypertension not controlled by medical therapy, blood pressure > 150/90 mmHg), unstable angina, history of myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, congestive heart failure > class II according to New York Heart Association (NYHA), serious cardiac arrhythmia, pericardial effusion)
  • Therapeutic anticoagulation (except low dose heparin and/or heparin flush as needed for maintenance of an indwelling intravenous device) or antiplatelet therapy (except for chronic low-dose therapy with acetylsalicylic acid =\< 325mg per day)
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment
  • Treatment with other investigational drugs or participation in another clinical trial within the past four weeks before start of therapy or concomitantly with this trial (except for present trial drug)
  • Known serious illness or concomitant non-oncological disease such as neurologic, psychiatric, infectious disease or active ulcers (gastro-intestinal tract, skin) or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration and in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the study
  • Patients who are sexually active and unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g. such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices or vasectomized partner for participating females, condoms for participating males) during the trial and for at least twelve months after end of active therapy
  • Current alcohol abuse or drug abuse that would limit pt ability to comply with protocol
  • Symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastasis
  • Life expectancy less than 12 weeks
  • Patient unable to take oral medication
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BIBF 1120

    Phase I dose escalation and phase II using dose determined in phase I ( 200 mg BID)

    Drug: BIBF 1120

  • Active comparator
    Sorafenib

    Drug: Sorafenib

Interventions

  • DrugSorafenib
  • DrugBIBF 1120

    Dose escalated in phase I until MTD or adjusted by investigator, dose in phase II part based on phase I data

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I

    The MTD was defined as the highest dose studied for which the incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) was 0/3 or less than 2/6 patients during the first treatment course.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Time to Progression (TTP) in Phase II

    TTP according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.0 criteria based on central independent review. TTP RECIST 1.0 was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression according to RECIST 1.0.

    Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I

    Number of patients with dose limiting toxicity are presented

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Objective Tumour Response by RECIST

    Objective RECIST 1.0 tumour response was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) and was derived from the patient's best objective RECIST 1.0 response based on central independent review. 95% Confidence Interval presented below are computed by Clopper and Pearson method.

    Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS by RECIST 1.0 was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to date of progression or death, whichever occurred earlier, based on central independent review.

    Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

  4. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to the date of death.

    Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

07

Results

Posted Aug 7, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
Started63434486231
Completed000000021
Not completed63434486030
Withdrew: Progressive disease21102113922
Withdrew: Adverse event4233227216
Withdrew: Refused to continue taking trial med.000000002
Withdrew: Other000001000

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I

The MTD was defined as the highest dose studied for which the incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) was 0/3 or less than 2/6 patients during the first treatment course.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Number · mg bid
Maximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I
mg bidGroup 1Group 2
Maximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I200200
PrimaryTime to Progression (TTP) in Phase II

TTP according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.0 criteria based on central independent review. TTP RECIST 1.0 was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression according to RECIST 1.0.

Time frame:
From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Progression (TTP) in Phase II
monthsPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
Time to Progression (TTP) in Phase II5.45 (2.69 to 9.20)4.63 (2.79 to 20.40)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase II, 200 mg Nintedanib Bid vs Phase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.437 · 95% CI 0.805 to 2.565Hazard ratio (HR) from Cox proportional hazards model stratified by macroscopic vacular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both present vs both absent. HR below 1 favors Nintedanib.
SecondaryIncidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I

Number of patients with dose limiting toxicity are presented

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I
participantsPhase I Group I, 100 mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 150 mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 50 mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 100 mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 150 mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 200 mg Nintedanib Bid
Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0000000
SecondaryObjective Tumour Response by RECIST

Objective RECIST 1.0 tumour response was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) and was derived from the patient's best objective RECIST 1.0 response based on central independent review. 95% Confidence Interval presented below are computed by Clopper and Pearson method.

Time frame:
From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Tumour Response by RECIST
percentage of participantsPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
Objective Tumour Response by RECIST1.6 (0.0 to 8.7)6.5 (0.8 to 21.4)
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS by RECIST 1.0 was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to date of progression or death, whichever occurred earlier, based on central independent review.

Time frame:
From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
monthsPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
Progression Free Survival (PFS)5.32 (2.69 to 9.20)3.94 (2.33 to 7.36)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase II, 200 mg Nintedanib Bid vs Phase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.351 · 95% CI 0.779 to 2.343Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model stratified by macroscopic vacular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both present vs both absent. HR below 1 favors Nintedanib.
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to the date of death.

Time frame:
From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
Overall Survival11.86 (6.60 to 25.46)11.40 (6.51 to 17.25)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase II, 200 mg Nintedanib Bid vs Phase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.877 · 95% CI 0.522 to 1.473Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model stratified by macroscopic vacular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both present vs both absent. HR below 1 favors Nintedanib.

Adverse events

Collected over From first administration of the trial drug and until 28 days after the last administration of nintedanib or sorafenib, up to 1289 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib Bid—3/6 (50%)6/6 (100%)
Phase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib Bid—1/3 (33.3%)3/3 (100%)
Phase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib Bid—4/4 (100%)4/4 (100%)
Phase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib Bid—3/3 (100%)3/3 (100%)
Phase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib Bid—2/4 (50%)4/4 (100%)
Phase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib Bid—3/4 (75%)4/4 (100%)
Phase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib Bid—4/8 (50%)7/8 (87.5%)
Phase II, 200 mg Nintedanib Bid—34/62 (54.8%)61/62 (98.4%)
Phase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid—14/31 (45.2%)31/31 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 77
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/60/30/42/31/41/40/81/620/31
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders1/60/30/42/30/40/41/81/620/31
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/60/30/40/31/42/40/81/620/31
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/60/30/41/31/42/41/81/620/31
Malignant neoplasm progressionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/60/30/41/30/42/40/82/623/31
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/61/30/40/30/40/40/81/620/31
Rectal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/60/30/41/30/40/40/80/620/31
Varices oesophagealGastrointestinal disorders0/60/30/41/30/40/41/81/621/31
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/60/30/41/30/40/40/80/621/31
Bile duct obstructionHepatobiliary disorders0/61/30/40/30/40/40/80/621/31
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 161
Most frequent other events
EventPhase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/62/33/43/32/43/45/843/6221/31
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/63/33/42/31/43/47/829/629/31
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/63/33/42/32/41/45/823/629/31
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders1/60/33/40/31/40/41/81/621/31
FatigueGeneral disorders3/60/33/42/31/42/45/832/6210/31
Influenza like illnessGeneral disorders1/61/33/41/30/41/40/81/620/31
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/60/33/40/32/42/45/823/6213/31
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders1/62/30/40/31/40/41/81/621/31
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/62/30/40/30/40/42/811/625/31
Blood alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations0/62/30/40/31/40/40/86/622/31

Baseline characteristics

Treated set which included all patients who received at least one single dose of trial medication.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Phase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib BidTotal
Mean69.7 ± 6.865.0 ± 7.866.5 ± 4.072.3 ± 11.756.3 ± 6.459.3 ± 13.957.0 ± 11.065.4 ± 10.063.1 ± 11.864.2 ± 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib BidTotal
Female110001214524
Male52434364826101
08

Study locations

28 sites
  • 1199.37.43001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Wien, Austria
  • 1199.37.43002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Wien, Austria
  • 1199.37.33001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Paris, France
  • 1199.37.33002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Paris, France
  • 1199.37.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Berlin, Germany
  • 1199.37.49009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Erlangen, Germany
  • 1199.37.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Freiburg, Germany
  • 1199.37.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hannover, Germany
  • 1199.37.49010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • 1199.37.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Jena, Germany
  • 1199.37.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Magdeburg, Germany
  • 1199.37.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    München, Germany
  • 1199.37.49006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Tübingen, Germany
  • 1199.37.36001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Debrecen, Hungary
  • 1199.37.31002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Leiden, Netherlands
  • 1199.37.31001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 1199.37.48002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Olsztyn, Poland
  • 1199.37.48003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Warsaw, Poland
  • 1199.37.48001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Warszawa, Poland
  • 1199.37.40002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bucharest, Romania
  • 1199.37.40003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • 1199.37.44001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 1199.37.44005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • 1199.37.44008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 1199.37.44002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    London, United Kingdom
  • 1199.37.44003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    London, United Kingdom
  • 1199.37.44006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 1199.37.44004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nottingham, United Kingdom
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01004003
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 29, 2009
Start date
Oct 22, 2009
Primary completion
Jul 14, 2014
Completion
Oct 12, 2016
Results posted
Aug 7, 2015
Last update
Oct 26, 2017

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion