CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01001234Updated May 7, 2024Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Rizatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine in Children and Adolescents (MK-0462-082 AM7)

A Phase 3 interventional study of rizatriptan and placebo in Migraine, Acute, sponsored by Organon and Co. Completed. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-07.

Sponsored by Organon and Co · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,382
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This Clinical Trial evaluates the Safety and Efficacy of Rizatriptan for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Children and Adolescents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Migraine, Acute

Browse trials for

03

In context

Migraine Disorders

1,528 studies on the registry are indexed under Migraine Disorders; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,382 is above the median of 80 across 1,175 interventional studies indexed under Migraine Disorders.

Browse Migraine Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Organon and Co is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 21 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient weighs at least 20 kg (44 pounds)
  • Patient has had a history of migraine with or without aura > 6 months with >= 1 to \<= 8 moderate or severe migraine attacks per month in the 2 months prior to screening Visit 1
  • Patient has a history of migraine defined by International Headache Society (IHS) migraine definitions
  • Patient is willing to stay awake for at least 2 hours after administration of the first dose of study medication
  • Patient has not experienced satisfactory relief from migraine pain with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) treatment
  • The parent or guardian and patient agree to the patient's participation in the study as indicated by parental/guardian signature on the consent form and

patient assent

  • For patients taking migraine prophylactic medication, treatment regimen is stable and has been taken for at least 3 months prior to Visit 1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is pregnant or breast-feeding, or is a female expecting to conceive within the projected duration of study participation
  • Patient has a history of mild migraine attacks or migraines that resolve in less than 2 hours
  • Patient has basilar or hemiplegic migraine headaches
  • Patient has >15 headache-days per month OR has taken medication for acute

headache on more than 10 days per month in any of the 3 months prior to screening

  • Patient has uncontrolled high blood pressure, uncontrolled diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), any

cancer, or any other significant disease

  • Patient has a history or clinical evidence of cardiovascular problems or stroke
  • Patient has either demonstrated hypersensitivity to or experienced a serious

adverse event in response to rizatriptan

  • Patient did not experience satisfactory relief from migraine pain to prior treatment with 2 or more adequate courses of 5-hydroxytryptamine 1 (5HT1) agonists
  • Patient has a recent history (within the past year) or current evidence of drug or alcohol abuse or is a "recreational user" of illicit drugs
  • Patient is currently taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors, methysergide, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) or propranolol, and is unable to tolerate withdrawal of these medications for the intervals required
  • Patient is currently participating or has participated in a study with an

investigational compound or device within 30 days of screening

  • Patient is legally or mentally incapacitated.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,382 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: rizatriptan

    Drug: rizatriptan

  • Placebo comparator
    Stage 1: placebo

    Drug: placebo

  • Experimental
    Stage 2: rizatriptan

    Drug: rizatriptan

  • Placebo comparator
    Stage 2: placebo

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugrizatriptan

    For participants randomized to rizatriptan in Stage 1: a single 5 or 10 mg rizatriptan orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) was to be taken within 30 minutes of onset of qualifying migraine (defined as a migraine of moderate or severe intensity). Rizatriptan dose administered was based on participant weight at Screening: those \<40 kg received 5 mg tablet, those ≥40 kg received 10 mg tablet.

    Also known as: Maxalt, MK-0462

  • Drugplacebo

    For participants randomized to placebo in Stage 1: a single placebo ODT was to be taken within 30 minutes of onset of qualifying migraine.

  • Drugrizatriptan

    For participants randomized to rizatriptan in Stage 2 (must have taken placebo in Stage 1 and was Non-Responder \[moderate or severe pain 15 minutes after dose\] to be randomized at Stage 2): a single 5 or 10 mg rizatriptan ODT was to be taken approximately 15 minutes post Stage 1 dose, to treat same qualifying migraine treated in Stage 1. Rizatriptan dose administered was based on participant weight at Screening: those \<40 kg received 5 mg tablet, those ≥40 kg received 10 mg tablet.

    Also known as: Maxalt, MK-0462

  • Drugplacebo

    For participants randomized to placebo in Stage 2 (must have taken placebo in Stage 1 and was Non-Responder to be randomized at Stage 2) or allocated to placebo in Stage 2 (took rizatriptan in Stage 1 and was Non-Responder): a single placebo ODT was to be taken approximately 15 minutes post Stage 1 dose, to treat same qualifying migraine treated in Stage 1.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Freedom at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 12 and 17 Years of Age

    Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain freedom was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 1 (no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

    Time frame: 2 hours post Stage 2 dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Relief at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 12 and 17 Years of Age

    Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain relief was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 2 or 1 (mild or no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

    Time frame: 2 hours post Stage 2 dose

  2. Pain Freedom at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 6 and 17 Years of Age

    Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain freedom was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 1 (no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

    Time frame: 2 hours post Stage 2 dose

  3. Pain Relief at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 6 and 17 Years of Age

    Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain relief was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 2 or 1 (mild or no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

    Time frame: 2 hours post Stage 2 dose

07

Results

Posted May 8, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo/NARizatriptan/NAPlacebo/RizatriptanPlacebo/PlaceboRizatriptan/Placebo
Started4923140941040
Particpants treated124840040540
Participants not treated36823950
Completed87537738540
Not completed4052632250
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20300
Withdrew: Protocol violation34319180
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00120
Withdrew: Physician decision10000
Withdrew: Not treated: adverse event10000
Withdrew: Not treated: withdrawal by subject232200
Withdrew: Not treated: protocol violation30000
Withdrew: Not treated: lost to follow-up534750
Withdrew: Not treated: pregnancy30000
Withdrew: Not treated: physician decision374000
Withdrew: Not treated: lack of qualifying event24813000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Freedom at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 12 and 17 Years of Age

Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain freedom was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 1 (no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

Time frame:
2 hours post Stage 2 dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Pain Freedom at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 12 and 17 Years of Age
participantsRizatriptanPlacebo
2-hour pain freedom87 (25.3 to 36.4)63 (17.4 to 27.3)
No 2-hour pain freedom197223
Statistical analysis
  • Rizatriptan vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.025 (The statistical significance level for the primary endpoint was α=0.0477, and had been adjusted to account for the interim sample size adjustment.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.55 · 95% CI 1.06 to 2.26Testing of primary endpoint and secondary endpoints was conducted sequentially in a pre-specified order, thus strongly controlling Type I error.
SecondaryPain Relief at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 12 and 17 Years of Age

Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain relief was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 2 or 1 (mild or no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

Time frame:
2 hours post Stage 2 dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Pain Relief at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 12 and 17 Years of Age
participantsRizatriptanPlacebo
2-hour pain relief167 (52.8 to 64.6)147 (45.4 to 57.3)
No 2-hour pain relief117139
Statistical analysis
  • Rizatriptan vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.080 (Secondary endpoints were to be formally tested only if the test of the primary endpoint was statistically significant at the α=0.0477 level. The secondary endpoints were then tested sequentially in a pre-specified order, each at the α=0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.35 · 95% CI 0.96 to 1.90This first secondary hypothesis was not statistically significant, therefore the other two were not formally tested for statistical significance.
SecondaryPain Freedom at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 6 and 17 Years of Age

Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain freedom was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 1 (no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

Time frame:
2 hours post Stage 2 dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Pain Freedom at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 6 and 17 Years of Age
participantsRizatriptanPlacebo
2-hour pain freedom126 (28.3 to 37.9)94 (20.0 to 28.8)
No 2-hour pain freedom256294
Statistical analysis
  • Rizatriptan vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.010 (This second secondary hypothesis was not formally tested since the first secondary was not statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.52 · 95% CI 1.10 to 2.10
SecondaryPain Relief at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 6 and 17 Years of Age

Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-Face Pain Scale ranging from 1=no pain to 5=very bad pain. Pain relief was defined as a reduction in severity from a rating of 3, 4 or 5 (moderate or severe pain) at the Stage 2 baseline (15 minutes post Stage 1 dose) to a rating of 2 or 1 (mild or no pain) at 2 hours post Stage 2 dose. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the preceding Stage 2 pain intensity values. Missing Stage 2 baseline values were imputed by carrying forward the Stage 1 baseline value, if available.

Time frame:
2 hours post Stage 2 dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Pain Relief at 2 Hours Post Dose in Participants Between 6 and 17 Years of Age
participantsRizatriptanPlacebo
2-hour pain relief220 (52.5 to 62.6)204 (47.5 to 57.6)
No 2-hour pain relief162184
Statistical analysis
  • Rizatriptan vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.178 (This third secondary hypothesis was not formally tested since the first secondary was not statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.91 to 1.63

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 14 days post dose. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Rizatriptan—0/462 (0%)0/462 (0%)
Placebo—2/515 (0.4%)0/515 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRizatriptanPlacebo
Enterobacter bacteremiaInfections and infestations0/4621/515
MigraineNervous system disorders0/4621/515

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo/NARizatriptan/NAPlacebo/RizatriptanPlacebo/PlaceboRizatriptan/PlaceboTotal
Mean12.7 ± 2.913.4 ± 2.113.0 ± 2.913.1 ± 2.913.1 ± 3.413.0 ± 2.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo/NARizatriptan/NAPlacebo/RizatriptanPlacebo/PlaceboRizatriptan/PlaceboTotal
Female61422723820550
Male63417316720427
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ho TW, Pearlman E, Lewis D, Hamalainen M, Connor K, Michelson D, Zhang Y, Assaid C, Mozley LH, Strickler N, Bachman R, Mahoney E, Lines C, Hewitt DJ; Rizatriptan Protocol 082 Pediatric Migraine Study Group. Efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan in pediatric migraineurs: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using a novel adaptive enrichment design. Cephalalgia. 2012 Jul;32(10):750-65. doi: 10.1177/0333102412451358. Epub 2012 Jun 18. PubMed 22711898 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01001234
Lead sponsor
Organon and Co
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2009
Start date
Nov 30, 2009
Primary completion
Apr 21, 2011
Completion
Apr 21, 2011
Results posted
May 8, 2012
Last update
May 7, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion