CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00996177EuroTransUpdated Jan 29, 2014

A Study to Compare Patient-controlled Pain Medications Delivered Either Through the Skin or Intravenously

A Phase 4 interventional study of IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem and IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) in Pain, Analgesia, Patient-Controlled and Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Janssen-Cilag International NV. Completed at 45 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-29.

Sponsored by Janssen-Cilag International NV · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
657
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a patient-controlled system to deliver fentanyl compared with a patient-controlled intravenous system to deliver morphine in the management of postoperative pain.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention) study to evaluate the clinical use, safety and ease of care of two patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) systems to deliver pain medication either through the skin or intravenously. The fentanyl hydrochloride PCA system, which delivers the medication through the skin, and morphine intravenous (IV)- PCA, which requires injection into a vein, are used for management of moderate to severe acute pain in postoperative patients who have undergone elective major abdominal or orthopedic surgery. These patients, who are expected to require postoperative pain relief with strong opioids for at least 24 hours, will control the delivery of medication for up to 3 days. Assessment of effectiveness include: patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent); Pain Intensity, measured on a visual numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst possible pain; Ease-of-Care questionnaires including Patient Ease-of-Care questionnaire, Nurse Ease-of-Care questionnaire, and Physical Therapist Ease-of-Care questionnaire; and, total number of doses delivered by patients in the fentanyl transdermal PCA or morphine IV PCA treatment groups. Safety evaluations include vital signs (pulse, blood pressure) and oxygen saturation, respiratory function, and the incidence of adverse events. The study hypothesis is that fentanyl transdermal PCA is not inferior to morphine IV PCA treatment in patient's global assessment of method of pain control during the first 24 hours after surgery. Transdermal PCA: 40 micrograms fentanyl per on-demand dose, each delivered over 10 minutes for a maximum of 6 doses/hr for 24 hours (maximum of 80 doses, 3.2milligrams). Morphine IV PCA: morphine doses with a maximum of 20 milligrams per 2 hours for 24 hours (maximum 12 doses, 240 milligrams).

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
  • Pain, Postoperative

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Patient-controlled analgesia
  • Postoperative pain
  • Transdermal fentanyl
  • Surgical pain
  • Opioid analgesics
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 657 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen-Cilag International NV is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who meet the criteria of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) pre-operative physical status I, II, or III
  • Patients expected to have moderate or severe pain after a major abdominal or orthopedic procedure
  • Patients expected to remain hospitalized for at least 24 hours postoperatively

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl, morphine, or to skin adhesives
  • Known or suspected to be dependent on strong opioids or to have abused any drug substance or alcohol
  • Severe respiratory symptoms
  • Chronic pain disorder
  • Pregnant or nursing women, or those lacking adequate contraception
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
657 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IONSYS

    IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem

    Drug: IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem

  • Active comparator
    Patient-Controlled Analgesia

    IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

    Drug: IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

Interventions

  • DrugIONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem

    40 µg fentanyl on-demand (240µg/hr) or a maximum of 80 doses (3.2 mg) per day

  • DrugIV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

    20mg/2hr (240 mg during 24 hours)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent) 24 hours after start of study treatment

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization (24 hours after either the first transdermal iontorphoretic system was applied or 24 hours after the intravenous access for the morphine solution was applied).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of pain control by patient and doctor

    Time frame: At 24, 48, and 72 hours after randomization

  2. Pain Intensity, vital signs, and oxygen level in the blood

    Time frame: Hourly through 8 hours and then every 4 hours after randomization

  3. Incidence of adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout study

07

Study locations

45 sites
  • Wien, Austria
  • Brussel, Belgium
  • Gent, Belgium
  • Leuven, Belgium
  • Aalborg, Denmark
  • Kÿbenhavn Nv N/A, Denmark
  • Kÿbenhavn Ÿ, Denmark
  • Odense C, Denmark
  • Ÿrhus C, Denmark
  • Boulogne Billancourt Cedex, France
  • Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
  • Lille Cedex, France
  • Montpellier Cedex 5, France
  • Nice, France
  • Paris, France
  • Rennes Cedex 2, France
  • Suresnes, France
  • Aachen, Germany
  • Bochum, Germany
  • Bonn, Germany
  • Frankfurt / Main, Germany
  • Halle, Germany
  • Hamburg N/A, Germany
  • Jena, Germany
  • Kiel, Germany
  • Kÿln, Germany
  • Mainz, Germany
  • Marburg, Germany
  • Ulm, Germany
  • Cork, Ireland
  • Madrid, Spain
  • Göteborg, Sweden
  • Huddinge N/A, Sweden
  • Linköpng N/A, Sweden
  • Stockholm, Sweden
  • Örebro, Sweden
  • Genève, Switzerland
  • Luzern, Switzerland
  • St Gallen, Switzerland
  • Zuerich, Switzerland
  • Zurich, Switzerland
  • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom
  • N/a N/a, United Kingdom
  • Salford, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, Hoppenbrouwers M, Richarz U, Bonnet F. Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102. Erratum In: Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):146. PubMed 17519263 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00996177
Lead sponsor
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Collaborators
Alza Corporation, DE, USA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2009
Start date
Jun 2004
Primary completion
Apr 2005
Completion
Apr 2005
Last update
Jan 29, 2014

Study contacts

Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen-Cilag International NV

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion