CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00995579Updated Oct 15, 2009

Assessment of Energy Expenditure by Indirect Calorimetry for a Daily 10,000 Steps Goal

An observational study in Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-10-15.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to measure the actual energy expenditure (EE) using indirect calorimetry for the 10,000 steps goal, and compared to the estimated EE using predictive equation.

Read the detailed description

Physical inactivity is considered a major risk factor for a number of adverse health outcomes such as obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and all-cause mortality. Certain guidelines specifically recommend taking 10,000 steps per day for a goal. Some of pedometers have a function of energy expenditure estimation in addition to counting steps. However, the EE derived from pedometers is the indirect estimation calculated from metabolic calculations instead of direct measurement.The purpose of this study was to measure the actual energy expenditure (EE) using indirect calorimetry for the 10,000 steps goal, and compared to the estimated EE using predictive equation.

Twenty healthy college volunteers were recruited. First, height and weight were measured from each subject. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight to height in meters squared. We used BioScan 920 to get all subjects' body composition data including fat mass and fat-free mass. Followed by measurements of basic characteristics, all subjects wore the pedometer and walked 10,000 steps on the treadmill. The walking speeds ranged from 3.0 to 4.0 miles per hour (mph) according to different gender. The speed of 4.0 mph was set for male and 3.0 mph was set for female. If the subject could'nt follow the pre-set speed, he/she could walk with self-comfortable speed but the speed should be in the range of 3.0 to 4.0 mph defined as moderate intensity of ACSM's recommendation. Subjects rested on the chair with back support for 3 minutes and then completed the 10,000 steps goal. After recovery for 3 minutes, the data collection was finished. The stopping criteria of the test were as follows: dizziness, nausea, dyspnea, or leg fatigue which leads subjects unable to continue. Expired gas was collected using the Cosmed K4b2 portable indirect calorimetry system, and EE was monitored breath-by-breath according to the following formula:

EE (Kcal/min)= 3.781×VO2+1.237×VCO2

where VO2 represents the standardized oxygen consumption per minute, and VCO2 is the carbon dioxide production per minute. Estimated EE was calculated by the predictive equation published by ACSM:

VO2 (ml/kg/min)= 0.1×S (m/min)+1.8×S×G (%)+3.5

where S represents the walking speed, and G is the walking grade.

The total walking duration and distance for taking 10,000 steps were also recorded. Pulmonary function tests were performed on the other day to get each subject's functional vital capacity (FVC). We used this parameter to estimate subject's predicted maximal minute ventilation (predicted max VE) according to the equation provided in the guidelines of American Thoracic Society (ATS) for cardiopulmonary exercise testing:

VE (L/min)= 26.3×VC-34

where VC represents vital capacity. The ratio of averaged VE during walking and predicted maximal VE was calculated to determine the level of exercise intensity for taking 10,000 steps.

02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity
  • Energy Expenditure

Keywords

  • Physical Activity
  • Energy Expenditure
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Healthy college volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-30 y/o

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable systemic disease, respiratory diseases, cardiac diseases or other clinical diagnosis which would affect outcome measure
  • Subjects who answered yes to any of the PAR-Q questions or who were not physically able to complete the test
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy college volunteers
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. energy expenditure

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Body composition: fat mass and fat-free mass

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Pulmonary function: FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University
    Taipei, Taiwan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00995579
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
First posted
Oct 15, 2009
Start date
Nov 2008
Primary completion
Feb 2009
Completion
Feb 2009
Last update
Oct 15, 2009

Study contacts

Liying Wang, Ph.D.
principal investigator · chool and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion