ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00988871PICCUpdated Oct 2, 2009

Comparison of Central Venous Pressures (CVPs) Measured From Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC) and CICC in Liver Transplantation Recipients

An observational study in Patients Cannulated With Both PICC and CICC. and The Rapidly Fluctuating Hemodynamics During LT., sponsored by National Cancer Center, Korea. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-10-02.

Sponsored by National Cancer Center, Korea · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
35
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring from the peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) has not often been used because of the higher inherent resistance of the PICC due to its longer length and narrower lumen. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of the CVP measured from PICCs as a predictor of the CVP measured from CICCs in the setting of rapidly fluctuating hemodynamic conditions during liver transplantation.

Read the detailed description

According to the protocol of LT in our hospital, a PICC is concomitantly inserted with the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and 9-Fr advanced venous access (AVA) catheter for the LT recipient at anesthetic induction. PAC and AVA catheter are usually removed on the second postoperative day, and instead the PICC is used for the postoperative infusion of prostaglandin E1 which is very irritable to small peripheral vein. So we fortunately had chance to measure the CVPs from both CICC and PICC simultaneously in the same patients.

Methods: We measured the CVPs from the CICC and the PICC simultaneously during each main surgical period of adult liver transplantation (preanhepatic, anhepatic, reperfusion, and neo-hepatic period). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using simple linear regression analysis to observe whether changes in the PICCP were paralleled by simultaneous changes in the CICCP. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the degree of agreement between the two devices. Analysis of variance was performed to study whether there were changes in the CVP agreement profiles in regard to the different time periods of LT. Differences were regarded as being statistically significant when p values were less than 0.05.

(This observational study has been completed already.)

02

Conditions studied

  • Patients Cannulated With Both PICC and CICC.
  • The Rapidly Fluctuating Hemodynamics During LT.

Keywords

  • PICC (peripherally inserted central venous catheter)
  • CICC (centrally inserted central venous catheter
  • CVP (central venous pressure)
  • LT (liver transplantation)
  • agreement
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Center, Korea is the lead sponsor of 203 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients who had been scheduled for elective liver transplant surgery, and placed with both PICC and CICC.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients who had been scheduled for elective liver transplant surgery
  • Patients who had been placed with both PICC and CICC at anesthetic induction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to insert PICC
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Liver transplantation (LT) recipients

    LT recipients who had both PICC and CICC at the same time according to the LT protocol of our hospital

    Device: PICC, CICC

Interventions

  • DevicePICC, CICC

    PICC insertion, CICC (advanced venous access with pulmonary artery catheter) insertion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PICCP: CVP measured from peripherally inserted antecubital central catheters in liver transplantation recipients

    Time frame: every 10 minutes during the liver transplantation

  2. CICCP: CVP from IJV central catheters in liver transplantation recipients

    Time frame: every 10 minutes during the liver transplantation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Cancer Center
    323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 410-769, South Korea
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Black IH, Blosser SA, Murray WB. Central venous pressure measurements: peripherally inserted catheters versus centrally inserted catheters. Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;28(12):3833-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200012000-00014. PubMed 11153622 ↗
  • McLemore EC, Tessier DJ, Rady MY, Larson JS, Mueller JT, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, Patel BM. Intraoperative peripherally inserted central venous catheter central venous pressure monitoring in abdominal aortic aneurysm reconstruction. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep;20(5):577-81. doi: 10.1007/s10016-006-9108-x. Epub 2006 Jul 27. PubMed 16871437 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00988871
First posted
Oct 2, 2009
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jun 2009
Last update
Oct 2, 2009

Study contacts

So-Hee Park, PhD
study director · Department of cancer registration and biostatistics branch, Research institute and hospital, National cancer center, Republic of Korea
Soon-Ae Lee, MD.PhD.
study director · Department of Anesthesiology and pain medicine, Research institute and hospital, National cancer center, Republic of Korea

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion