A Phase 4 interventional study of LectraJet and TIV by jet injection in Healthy Adults, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-03.
Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Phase 4, Interventional, and Device feasibility
This research study involves testing of a device that can give injections (shots) without the use of a needle.
The device is called LectraJet M3 and has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (or FDA), the government agency that oversees the approval of new medical devices. The approval is called a 510(k) and allows for the marketing and use of the device in the United States (US). Devices under a 510(k) do not need to have clinical trials performed. The researchers are performing this study in order to collect clinical data in a controlled environment. Non significant risk (NSR) devices such as the LectraJet may be studied in clinical trials with or without a 510(k). Currently there are several other disposable-syringe jet injectors that are also FDA approved for sale and use in the United States, including: 1) Biojector® 2000 , 2) Medi-Jector Vision, and 3) Injex™. These devices have been used to deliver millions of injections in a variety of healthcare settings. The LectraJet® is jet injector that is most suited for mass immunization campaigns due to the ability to power the device with a foot pedal as well as electricity and the speed with which immunizations can be delivered. It is designed so that vaccine delivery characteristics are the same as that of the licensed disposable-syringe jet injectors.
Giving vaccines without needles (needle-free vaccine delivery) may be better than giving them using a needle for many reasons. One method for giving shots without needles is a technique called jet injection. This is what the researchers are testing in this study. A jet injector pushes the vaccine fluid out of a small hole at a high enough speed to allow the vaccine to go under the subject's skin without needing a needle. Years ago, people got shots using jet injectors, but these older devices reused the same "nozzle" or hole through which the fluid was forced. Newer jet injectors, including the one the researchers are testing in this study, use disposable cartridges to hold the vaccine. So, the only thing that touches the subject's skin is their own cartridge, which gets thrown away after injection.
In this study, the volunteers are getting the licensed seasonal flu vaccine to see if the jet injector works as well as giving the vaccine by needle and syringe. The seasonal flu vaccine that the researchers are using is called trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). It is licensed in the US to protect people 6 months of age and older against influenza. Influenza is a virus that is also commonly known as the "flu". The flu is a serious illness that kills over 35,000 people per year in the US alone. The flu virus constantly changes and that is why people who are at risk for developing complications from the flu, such as children, the elderly, and people with underlying health conditions need to be vaccinated every year. Volunteers will receive the 2009-2010 annual seasonal flu vaccine called TIV either by needle and syringe or by jet injection. The researchers will compare the side effects and see how well the vaccine generates an immune response when given by the two methods.
2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 163 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.
Browse Influenza, Human studies →University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 687 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.
Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 63 (70%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Thirty volunteers will receive 1 intramuscular (IM) dose of licensed trivalent inactivated 2009-10 seasonal influenza vaccine by the standard needle and syringe method
Device: TIV by jet injection · Biological: Seasonal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine
Thirty volunteers will receive 1 intramuscular (IM) dose of licensed trivalent inactivated 2009-10 seasonal influenza vaccine by the experimental method of jet injection
Device: LectraJet · Biological: Seasonal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine
LectraJet is a new jet injector studied for the first time in humans. It is in the category known as disposable-syringe jet injectors that have the advantage of eliminating the risk of disease transmission between subjects. A new syringe and nozzle is used for each patient so that no splash back of blood can occur onto the jet apparatus itself.
Administration of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) by jet injection
Licensed trivalent influenza vaccine provided by either jet injection or traditional needle and syringe.
Adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE) information (solicited in the clinic and via memory aids, concomitant medications, and periodic targeted physical assessment)
Time frame: 90 Days
Proportion of volunteers in each administration group achieving a greater than four-fold rise in hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer from pre-vaccination to 28 days post-vaccination against each of the vaccine-associated strains
Time frame: Day 28
Proportion of volunteers in each administration group achieving a HI titer >40 on day 28 post-vaccination against each of the vaccine-associated strains
Time frame: Day 28
Geometric mean titer (GMT) of HI titers against each of the vaccine-associated strains in each group 28 days after receipt of the vaccine
Time frame: Day 28
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Maryland, Baltimore