ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00978406Updated Mar 3, 2020

National Cancer Institute Food Study

An observational study in Validation Study, Diet Surveys and Nutritional Assessment, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-03.

Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
83
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Information about Americans food choices and opinions helps researchers and law makers to develop policies and programs to promote health. For this reason, it is important to be able to collect good quality information about how people think about food. This project will compare different ways of collecting information about food from adults.

Read the detailed description

Objectives:

-To compare different ways of collecting information about food choices and opinions from adults.

Eligibility:

  • Individuals between the ages of 20 and 70, recruited from a database of volunteers who wish to participate in research studies.
  • Volunteers must have high-speed Internet access.
  • Individuals who have previously been involved in a research study will be excluded.

Design:

-Participants will come to a research study center for three consecutive meals (approximately 45 minutes per meal). On the following day, participants will return to the study center for an interview about their food choices and opinions (approximately 45 minutes).

02

Conditions studied

  • Validation Study
  • Diet Surveys
  • Nutritional Assessment
  • Epidemiology
  • Methodologic Study

Keywords

  • Dietary Assessment Methods
  • Measurement of Diet
  • 24-Hour Diet Recall
  • Validation
  • Feeding Study
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,554 studies on the registry; 334 are open to participants now.

Of its 407 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 370 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy volunteers living in Maryland@@@

Eligibility criteria

  • Eligibility Criteria
  • Individuals between the ages of 20 and 70, recruited from a database of volunteers who wish to participate in research studies.
  • Volunteers must have high-speed Internet access.
  • Individuals who have previously been involved in a research study will be excluded.
  • Subjects will be accrued from a variety of racial and ethnic groups and of varying educational achievement, though these characteristics will not be used to assess eligibility.
  • All subjects will provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy volunteers

    Healthy volunteers

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement of truth and reported dietary intake

    Measured exact intake of foods will be compared to reported intake by the participant. Two different reporting systems will be compared with truth.

    Time frame: 2 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Westat, Inc.
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirkpatrick SI, Potischman N, Dodd KW, Douglass D, Zimmerman TP, Kahle LL, Thompson FE, George SM, Subar AF. The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls. J Nutr. 2016 Dec;146(12):2567-2573. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.237271. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PubMed 27807039 ↗
  • Kirkpatrick SI, Subar AF, Douglass D, Zimmerman TP, Thompson FE, Kahle LL, George SM, Dodd KW, Potischman N. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):233-40. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.083238. Epub 2014 Apr 30. PubMed 24787491 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2009 to primary completion in Jul 2013, 47 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2009
First posted
Sep 16, 2009
StartActual
Aug 26, 2009
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2013
CompletionActual
Feb 26, 2020
Last update
Mar 3, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00978406
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2009
Start date
Aug 26, 2009
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2013
Completion
Feb 26, 2020
Last update
Mar 3, 2020

Study contacts

Nancy A. Potischman, Ph.D.
principal investigator · National Cancer Institute (NCI)
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion