CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00977665Updated Feb 26, 2015Results posted

Clinical Trial to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rasagiline Mesylate 1 mg in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy of the Parkinsonian Subtype (MSA-P)

A Phase 2 interventional study of rasagiline mesylate and placebo in Multiple System Atrophy, sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.. Completed at 47 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 30 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-26.

Sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
174
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To test the clinical effect of rasagiline on subjects with MSA of the parkinsonian subtype.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Multiple System Atrophy

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple System Atrophy; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 174 is above the median of 41 across 130 interventional studies indexed under Multiple System Atrophy.

Browse Multiple System Atrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 205 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 49 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (96%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects over 30 years old with a diagnosis of Possible or Probable MSA of the parkinsonian subtype (MSA-P) according to The Gilman Criteria (2008).
  • Subjects who are less than 3 years from the time of documented MSA diagnosis.
  • Subjects with an anticipated survival of at least 3 years in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Subjects who are willing and able to give informed consent. Subjects who are not able to write may give verbal consent in the presence of at least one witness, and the witness should sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects receiving treatment with midodrine or other sympathomimetics within 4 weeks prior to baseline visit.
  • Subjects with severe orthostatic symptoms as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) question 9.
  • Subjects who meet any of the following criteria which tend to suggest advanced disease:

    1. Speech impairment as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 1
    2. Swallowing impairment as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 2
    3. Impairment in ambulation as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 7
    4. Falling more frequently than once per week as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 8
  • Subjects taking disallowed medications according to the locally approved Azilect® label.
  • Subjects taking monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors within 3 months prior to baseline visit.
  • Subjects with hypertension whose blood pressure, in the investigator's opinion, is not well controlled.
  • Subjects who, based on the investigator's judgment, have a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that may preclude safe and complete study participation. Subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
  • Subjects who have taken any investigational products within 60 days prior to baseline.
  • Women of child-bearing potential who do not practice an acceptable method of birth control [acceptable methods of birth control in this study are: surgical sterilization, intrauterine devices, oral contraceptive, contraceptive patch, long-acting injectable contraceptive, partner's vasectomy, a double-protection method (condom or diaphragm with spermicide)].
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
174 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rasagiline mesylate

    rasagiline tablet, 1 mg/day for up to 48 weeks.

    Drug: rasagiline mesylate

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    placebo tablet for up to 48 weeks.

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugrasagiline mesylate

    rasagiline 1 mg tablet/day for 48 weeks

    Also known as: Azilect, TVP-1012

  • Drugplacebo

    placebo tablet for 48 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS Part I and II)

    This outcome represents the sum of 2 UMSARS sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement. In the case that 6 items or more (out of 26) were missing at a certain visit, the UMSARS score for that visit was assigned a missing value.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 48/Termination Visit

    Outcome measures the investigator's clinical impression of the participants' improvement at Week 48 as compared to Week 12. CGI scale range from 1-7, with 1=very much improved, 4= no change, and 7=very much worse. In order to maintain the overall (hypotheses about primary and key secondary endpoints) type I error at the 0.05 level an hierarchy will be employed as follows: If the primary endpoint will be found to be significant at a significance level of 0.05 then the first key secondary endpoint will be tested, if this endpoint will be found to be significant in a significance level of 0.05 then the second key secondary endpoint will be tested and so on. The 'key' secondary endpoints are outcomes 2-6.

    Time frame: Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score

    The UMSARS is composed of 2 sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement. In the case that 6 items or more (out of 26) were missing at a certain visit, the UMSARS score for that visit was assigned a missing value.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of >=3 on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Question #7 Regarding Ambulation

    UMSARS' Question #7 concerns the participant's ability to walk, rated on a scale of 0=normal to 4=cannot walk at all even with assistance. This endpoint counts participants rated a 3 or worse. Rating 3 = Severely impaired; assistance and/or walking aid needed occasionally.

    Time frame: up to week 48

  4. Mean Score of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale Select (COMPASS_Select Change) at Week 48/Termination Visit

    COMPASS_Select change is comprised of 5 of the 11 domains in the COMPASS scale: Orthostatic Intolerance, Bladder Disorder, Sweating, Vasomotor, and Sleep Disorder COMPASS_Select change has a range of -150 to 150, with -150 indicating symptoms are much better and 150 indicating symptoms are much worse.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) Scale

    The Multiple System Atrophy Quality of Life questionnaire (MSA-QoL) is a self-reported questionnaire focusing on MSA-specific symptoms and has a scale ranging from 0 - 160, with 0= 'no problem' and 160= "extreme problem".

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 48

  6. Rate of Progression in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score From Baseline to Weeks 12-48

    The UMSARS is composed of 2 sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. The rate of progression of atrophy is represented by the slope of change from baseline scores for visits between Weeks 12 and 48.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Weeks 12-48

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in UMSARS Subscores for Parts I, II and IV

    UMSARS Part I is an historical review and scores symptoms of neurological and autonomic dysfunction with 12 items rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (extreme dysfunction). The full scale for Part 1 is therefore 0 (normal) to 48 (extreme dysfunction). Part II is a motor examination and has 14 items also rated on a scale of 0 to 4 for a full scale of 0 (normal) to 56 (extreme dysfunction). Part IV is a global disability scale with rates the extent of disease from 1 (normal) to 5 (severe disease).

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 or termination visit

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total UMSARS Score for Symptomatic Effect

    This outcome represents the sum of 2 UMSARS sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 12

  9. Estimates for Time to Change in Anti-Parkinsonian or Anti-Orthostatis Hypotension Medications

    Change in anti-parkinsonian or anti-orthostatic hypotension medication is defined by at least one of the following events: 1. An addition of a new anti-parkinsonian or anti-orthostatic hypotension medication during study. 2. Dose modification of anti-parkinsonian or anti-orthostatic hypotension concomitant medications reflecting disease progression. The event of interest, determined on a by patient basis, therefore, is the earliest event of the two events defined above. Otherwise, patient is right censored according to his/her study termination date. Since less than 25% of participants had an event, median estimatation for time to change in medications is not possible.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline) to Week 48 or termination visit

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) Scale

    MoCA is a cognitive screening test which helps health professionals identify mild cognitive impairment. The total scale is 0 (significant cognitive impairment) to 30 (no impairment detected). Scores \>=26 are considered normal. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in cognition.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 or termination visit

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of >=3 on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Question #1 (Speech Impairment), Question #2 (Swallowing Impairment) and Question #8 (Falling)

    UMSARS' questions are rated on a scale of 0=normal to 4=extreme impairment. This endpoint reports the percentage of participants rated a 3 or worse. Rating 3 = Severely impaired speech (Question #1), swallowing (Question #2) or falling more frequently than once per week (Question #8).

    Time frame: up to week 48

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Beck Depression Inventory Scale (BDI-II)

    The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of depression. Participants are asked to pick the answer for each question that best describes the way they have been feeling in the past two weeks, including the day participants complete the questionnaire. Each question is rated on a scale of 0-3, with 0 meaning the participant does not feel the emotion described in the question, and 3 meaning the participant has extremely strong feelings. Total scale is 0 (no evidence of depression) to 63 (extreme depression). Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in level of depression.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 or termination visit

  13. Total Number of Falls During the Study

    Participants recorded each time they fell during the study in a diary.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to week 48

07

Results

Posted Feb 26, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Started8490
Completed6375
Not completed2115
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject13
Withdrew: Physician decision21
Withdrew: Sponsor requested withdrawal01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Death32
Withdrew: Adverse event147
Withdrew: Treatment failure01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS Part I and II)

This outcome represents the sum of 2 UMSARS sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement. In the case that 6 items or more (out of 26) were missing at a certain visit, the UMSARS score for that visit was assigned a missing value.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS Part I and II)
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS Part I and II)7.2 ± 1.1867.8 ± 1.091
Statistical analysis
  • Rasagiline Mesylate vs Placebo · repeated measures model · p = 0.6984 (A priori threshold for statistical significance is 0.05.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.603 · 95% CI -3.677 to 2.470Fixed effects: categorical week in trial by treatment interaction, center, and baseline UMSARS score.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 48/Termination Visit

Outcome measures the investigator's clinical impression of the participants' improvement at Week 48 as compared to Week 12. CGI scale range from 1-7, with 1=very much improved, 4= no change, and 7=very much worse. In order to maintain the overall (hypotheses about primary and key secondary endpoints) type I error at the 0.05 level an hierarchy will be employed as follows: If the primary endpoint will be found to be significant at a significance level of 0.05 then the first key secondary endpoint will be tested, if this endpoint will be found to be significant in a significance level of 0.05 then the second key secondary endpoint will be tested and so on. The 'key' secondary endpoints are outcomes 2-6.

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 48/Termination Visit
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 48/Termination Visit4.9 ± 0.1524.8 ± 0.139
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score

The UMSARS is composed of 2 sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement. In the case that 6 items or more (out of 26) were missing at a certain visit, the UMSARS score for that visit was assigned a missing value.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score3.8 ± 0.8113.0 ± 0.760
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of >=3 on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Question #7 Regarding Ambulation

UMSARS' Question #7 concerns the participant's ability to walk, rated on a scale of 0=normal to 4=cannot walk at all even with assistance. This endpoint counts participants rated a 3 or worse. Rating 3 = Severely impaired; assistance and/or walking aid needed occasionally.

Time frame:
up to week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of >=3 on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Question #7 Regarding Ambulation
percentage of participantsRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of >=3 on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Question #7 Regarding Ambulation46.452.2
SecondaryMean Score of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale Select (COMPASS_Select Change) at Week 48/Termination Visit

COMPASS_Select change is comprised of 5 of the 11 domains in the COMPASS scale: Orthostatic Intolerance, Bladder Disorder, Sweating, Vasomotor, and Sleep Disorder COMPASS_Select change has a range of -150 to 150, with -150 indicating symptoms are much better and 150 indicating symptoms are much worse.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Score of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale Select (COMPASS_Select Change) at Week 48/Termination Visit
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Mean Score of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale Select (COMPASS_Select Change) at Week 48/Termination Visit34.1 ± 4.34242.7 ± 4.025
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) Scale

The Multiple System Atrophy Quality of Life questionnaire (MSA-QoL) is a self-reported questionnaire focusing on MSA-specific symptoms and has a scale ranging from 0 - 160, with 0= 'no problem' and 160= "extreme problem".

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) Scale
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 48/Termination Visit in the Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) Scale4.6 ± 2.8779.3 ± 2.720
SecondaryRate of Progression in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score From Baseline to Weeks 12-48

The UMSARS is composed of 2 sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. The rate of progression of atrophy is represented by the slope of change from baseline scores for visits between Weeks 12 and 48.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Weeks 12-48
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale/week
Rate of Progression in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score From Baseline to Weeks 12-48
units on a scale/weekRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Rate of Progression in Total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Score From Baseline to Weeks 12-480.1496 ± 0.028430.1788 ± 0.02591
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in UMSARS Subscores for Parts I, II and IV

UMSARS Part I is an historical review and scores symptoms of neurological and autonomic dysfunction with 12 items rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (extreme dysfunction). The full scale for Part 1 is therefore 0 (normal) to 48 (extreme dysfunction). Part II is a motor examination and has 14 items also rated on a scale of 0 to 4 for a full scale of 0 (normal) to 56 (extreme dysfunction). Part IV is a global disability scale with rates the extent of disease from 1 (normal) to 5 (severe disease).

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 or termination visit
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in UMSARS Subscores for Parts I, II and IV
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
UMSARS Part I3.8233 ± 0.63394.3785 ± 0.5808
UMSARS Part II3.6478 ± 0.70173.5068 ± 0.6445
UMSARS Part IV0.7100 ± 0.10400.6763 ± 0.09523
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Total UMSARS Score for Symptomatic Effect

This outcome represents the sum of 2 UMSARS sub-scales: Part I: Historical Review that includes 12 items and Part II: Motor Examination that includes 14 items. All items range from 0 to 4. Each subscale score is the sum of its items and the total UMSARS score is the sum of all 26 items. Hence the total UMSARS score can range from 0 to 104, with 0 meaning no impairment and 104 indicating severe impairment. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total UMSARS Score for Symptomatic Effect
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total UMSARS Score for Symptomatic Effect1.875 ± 0.6931.574 ± 0.678
SecondaryEstimates for Time to Change in Anti-Parkinsonian or Anti-Orthostatis Hypotension Medications

Change in anti-parkinsonian or anti-orthostatic hypotension medication is defined by at least one of the following events: 1. An addition of a new anti-parkinsonian or anti-orthostatic hypotension medication during study. 2. Dose modification of anti-parkinsonian or anti-orthostatic hypotension concomitant medications reflecting disease progression. The event of interest, determined on a by patient basis, therefore, is the earliest event of the two events defined above. Otherwise, patient is right censored according to his/her study termination date. Since less than 25% of participants had an event, median estimatation for time to change in medications is not possible.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline) to Week 48 or termination visit
Reported as:
Median · days
Estimates for Time to Change in Anti-Parkinsonian or Anti-Orthostatis Hypotension Medications
daysRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Estimates for Time to Change in Anti-Parkinsonian or Anti-Orthostatis Hypotension Medications246 (162 to NA)294 (226 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Rasagiline Mesylate vs Placebo · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.189 · 95% CI 0.646 to 2.186
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) Scale

MoCA is a cognitive screening test which helps health professionals identify mild cognitive impairment. The total scale is 0 (significant cognitive impairment) to 30 (no impairment detected). Scores \>=26 are considered normal. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in cognition.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 or termination visit
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) Scale
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) Scale-1.1572 ± 0.4590-0.5786 ± 0.4186
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of >=3 on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Question #1 (Speech Impairment), Question #2 (Swallowing Impairment) and Question #8 (Falling)

UMSARS' questions are rated on a scale of 0=normal to 4=extreme impairment. This endpoint reports the percentage of participants rated a 3 or worse. Rating 3 = Severely impaired speech (Question #1), swallowing (Question #2) or falling more frequently than once per week (Question #8).

Time frame:
up to week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of >=3 on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) Question #1 (Speech Impairment), Question #2 (Swallowing Impairment) and Question #8 (Falling)
percentage of participantsRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Q1. Speech Impairment35.730.0
Q2. Swallowing Impairment3.66.7
Q8. Falling19.015.6
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Beck Depression Inventory Scale (BDI-II)

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of depression. Participants are asked to pick the answer for each question that best describes the way they have been feeling in the past two weeks, including the day participants complete the questionnaire. Each question is rated on a scale of 0-3, with 0 meaning the participant does not feel the emotion described in the question, and 3 meaning the participant has extremely strong feelings. Total scale is 0 (no evidence of depression) to 63 (extreme depression). Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in level of depression.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 or termination visit
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Beck Depression Inventory Scale (BDI-II)
units on a scaleRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 48 or Termination in the Beck Depression Inventory Scale (BDI-II)0.4894 ± 0.99880.7145 ± 0.9241
SecondaryTotal Number of Falls During the Study

Participants recorded each time they fell during the study in a diary.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to week 48
Reported as:
Median · falls
Total Number of Falls During the Study
fallsRasagiline MesylatePlacebo
Total Number of Falls During the Study4.00 (1.00 to 14.00)5.00 (1.00 to 10.00)

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 to Week 48. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—23/90 (25.6%)45/90 (50%)
Rasagiline Mesylate—29/84 (34.5%)41/84 (48.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 74
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboRasagiline Mesylate
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations1/904/84
RESPIRATORY FAILURERespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/903/84
ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSIONVascular disorders0/903/84
FALLInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/902/84
FEMUR FRACTUREInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/902/84
HEAD INJURYInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/902/84
SYNCOPENervous system disorders2/902/84
DYSPNOEARespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/902/84
CARDIOVASCULAR INSUFFICIENCYCardiac disorders0/901/84
SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIACardiac disorders0/901/84
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboRasagiline Mesylate
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations12/906/84
DIZZINESSNervous system disorders10/9010/84
OEDEMA PERIPHERALGeneral disorders6/909/84
FALLInjury, poisoning and procedural complications9/905/84
HEADACHENervous system disorders7/903/84
ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSIONVascular disorders3/906/84
NASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestations6/904/84
CONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disorders5/905/84
SOMNOLENCENervous system disorders5/902/84
DEPRESSIONPsychiatric disorders5/901/84

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Mean64.9 ± 8.565.1 ± 8.665.0 ± 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Female353974
Male4951100
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Asian/Oriental022
Black of African Heritage202
Black or African American022
Caucasian8185166
Unknown112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Portugal235
United States161632
France9817
Hungary111021
Canada101020
Spain437
Austria347
Israel91221
Germany71219
Netherlands325
Italy8816
United Kingdom224
Weight
Weight(kg)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Mean76.9 ± 15.976.8 ± 15.576.9 ± 15.6
Height
Height(cm)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Mean168.0 ± 10.2169.0 ± 8.9168.5 ± 9.6
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m^2)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Mean27.2 ± 4.426.8 ± 4.427.0 ± 4.4
Multiple System Atrophy of the Parkinsonian Subtype (MSA-P)
Multiple System Atrophy of the Parkinsonian Subtype (MSA-P)(participants)Rasagiline MesylatePlaceboTotal
Possible MSA-P385593
Probable MSA-P463581
08

Study locations

47 sites
  • Teva Investigational Site 1004
    Irvine, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1014
    La Jolla, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1006
    Sunnyvale, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1010
    Washington, District of Columbia, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1061
    Boca Raton, Florida, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1012
    Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1009
    Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1003
    Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1007
    Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1011
    St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1008
    Rochester, New York, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1001
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1002
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1013
    Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1005
    Houston, Texas, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 3305
    Graz, Austria
  • Teva Investigational Site 3304
    Innsbruck, Austria
  • Teva Investigational Site 1109
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • Teva Investigational Site 1111
    Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada
  • Teva Investigational Site 1108
    Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  • Teva Investigational Site 1110
    Québec, Quebec, Canada
  • Teva Investigational Site 3503
    Lille Cedex, France
  • Teva Investigational Site 3502
    Pessac, France
  • Teva Investigational Site 3206
    Dresden, Germany
  • Teva Investigational Site 3203
    Kiel, Germany
  • Teva Investigational Site 3201
    Marburg, Germany
  • Teva Investigational Site 3205
    Muenchen, Germany
  • Teva Investigational Site 3204
    Tuebingen, Germany
  • Teva Investigational Site 3202
    Ulm, Germany
  • Teva Investigational Site 5101
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Teva Investigational Site 5102
    Debrecen, Hungary
  • Teva Investigational Site 5103
    Miskolc, Hungary
  • Teva Investigational Site 8002
    Ramat -Gan, IL, Israel
  • Teva Investigational Site 8004
    Haifa, Israel
  • Teva Investigational Site 8003
    Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Teva Investigational Site 3006
    Bologna, Italy
  • Teva Investigational Site 3004
    Roma, Italy
  • Teva Investigational Site 3005
    Venezia - Lido, Italy
  • Teva Investigational Site 3801
    Amersfoort, Netherlands
  • Teva Investigational Site 3802
    Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
  • Teva Investigational Site 3603
    Lisbon, Portugal
  • Teva Investigational Site 3101
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Teva Investigational Site 3102
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Teva Investigational Site 3103
    Sevilla, Spain
  • Teva Investigational Site 3403
    Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
  • Teva Investigational Site 3401
    London, United Kingdom
  • Teva Investigational Site 3402
    Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Poewe W, Seppi K, Fitzer-Attas CJ, Wenning GK, Gilman S, Low PA, Giladi N, Barone P, Sampaio C, Eyal E, Rascol O; Rasagiline-for-MSA investigators. Efficacy of rasagiline in patients with the parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70288-1. Epub 2014 Dec 8. PubMed 25498732 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00977665
Lead sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Collaborators
H. Lundbeck A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2009
Start date
Dec 2009
Primary completion
Oct 2011
Completion
Oct 2011
Results posted
Feb 26, 2015
Last update
Feb 26, 2015

Study contacts

Werner Poewe, Prof
principal investigator · Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion